section\<open>Theory of Events for Security Protocols that use smartcards\<close>
theory EventSC imports "../Message" "HOL-Library.Simps_Case_Conv" begin
consts(*Initial states of agents -- parameter of the construction*)
initState :: "agent => msg set"
datatype card = Card agent
text\<open>Four new events express the traffic between an agent and his card\<close> datatype
event = Says agent agent msg
| Notes agent msg
| Gets agent msg
| Inputs agent card msg (*Agent sends to card and\<dots>*)
| C_Gets card msg (*\<dots> card receives it*)
| Outpts card agent msg (*Card sends to agent and\<dots>*)
| A_Gets agent msg (*agent receives it*)
consts
bad :: "agent set"(*compromised agents*)
stolen :: "card set"(* stolen smart cards *)
cloned :: "card set"(* cloned smart cards*)
secureM :: "bool"(*assumption of secure means between agents and their cards*)
abbreviation
insecureM :: bool where(*certain protocols make no assumption of secure means*) "insecureM == \secureM"
text\<open>Spy has access to his own key for spoof messages, but Server is secure\<close> specification (bad)
Spy_in_bad [iff]: "Spy \ bad"
Server_not_bad [iff]: "Server \ bad" apply (rule exI [of _ "{Spy}"], simp) done
specification (stolen) (*The server's card is secure by assumption\<dots>*)
Card_Server_not_stolen [iff]: "Card Server \ stolen"
Card_Spy_not_stolen [iff]: "Card Spy \ stolen" apply blast done
specification (cloned) (*\<dots> the spy's card is secure because she already can use it freely*)
Card_Server_not_cloned [iff]: "Card Server \ cloned"
Card_Spy_not_cloned [iff]: "Card Spy \ cloned" apply blast done
primrec(*This definition is extended over the new events, subject to the
assumption of secure means*)
knows :: "agent => event list => msg set"(*agents' knowledge*) where
knows_Nil: "knows A [] = initState A" |
knows_Cons: "knows A (ev # evs) =
(case ev of
Says A' B X => if (A=A' | A=Spy) then insert X (knows A evs) else knows A evs
| Notes A' X => if (A=A' | (A=Spy & A'\<in>bad)) then insert X (knows A evs)
else knows A evs
| Gets A' X => if (A=A' & A \ Spy) then insert X (knows A evs)
else knows A evs
| Inputs A' C X => if secureM then if A=A' then insert X (knows A evs) else knows A evs
else if (A=A' | A=Spy) then insert X (knows A evs) else knows A evs
| C_Gets C X => knows A evs
| Outpts C A' X => if secureM then if A=A' then insert X (knows A evs) else knows A evs
else if A=Spy then insert X (knows A evs) else knows A evs
| A_Gets A' X => if (A=A' & A \ Spy) then insert X (knows A evs)
else knows A evs)"
primrec (*The set of items that might be visible to someone is easily extended
over the new events*)
used :: "event list => msg set"where
used_Nil: "used [] = (UN B. parts (initState B))" |
used_Cons: "used (ev # evs) =
(case ev of
Says A B X => parts {X} \<union> (used evs)
| Notes A X => parts {X} \<union> (used evs)
| Gets A X => used evs
| Inputs A C X => parts{X} \<union> (used evs)
| C_Gets C X => used evs
| Outpts C A X => parts{X} \<union> (used evs)
| A_Gets A X => used evs)" \<comment> \<open>\<^term>\<open>Gets\<close> always follows \<^term>\<open>Says\<close> in real protocols.
Likewise, \<^term>\<open>C_Gets\<close> will always have to follow \<^term>\<open>Inputs\<close> and\<^term>\<open>A_Gets\<close> will always have to follow \<^term>\<open>Outpts\<close>\<close>
lemma Notes_imp_used [rule_format]: "Notes A X \ set evs \ X \ used evs" apply (induct_tac evs) apply (auto split: event.split) done
lemma Says_imp_used [rule_format]: "Says A B X \ set evs \ X \ used evs" apply (induct_tac evs) apply (auto split: event.split) done
lemma MPair_used [rule_format]: "MPair X Y \ used evs \ X \ used evs & Y \ used evs" apply (induct_tac evs) apply (auto split: event.split) done
(*Simplifying parts(insert X (knows Spy evs)) = parts{X} \<union> parts(knows Spy evs).
This version won't loop with the simplifier.*) lemmas parts_insert_knows_A = parts_insert [of _ "knows A evs"] for A evs
lemma knows_Spy_Says [simp]: "knows Spy (Says A B X # evs) = insert X (knows Spy evs)" by simp
text\<open>Letting the Spy see "bad" agents' notes avoids redundant case-splits
on whether \<^term>\<open>A=Spy\<close> and whether \<^term>\<open>A\<in>bad\<close>\<close> lemma knows_Spy_Notes [simp]: "knows Spy (Notes A X # evs) =
(if A\<in>bad then insert X (knows Spy evs) else knows Spy evs)" by simp
lemma knows_Spy_Gets [simp]: "knows Spy (Gets A X # evs) = knows Spy evs" by simp
lemma knows_Spy_Inputs_secureM [simp]: "secureM \ knows Spy (Inputs A C X # evs) =
(if A=Spy then insert X (knows Spy evs) else knows Spy evs)" by simp
lemma knows_Spy_Inputs_insecureM [simp]: "insecureM \ knows Spy (Inputs A C X # evs) = insert X (knows Spy evs)" by simp
lemma knows_Spy_C_Gets [simp]: "knows Spy (C_Gets C X # evs) = knows Spy evs" by simp
lemma knows_Spy_Outpts_secureM [simp]: "secureM \ knows Spy (Outpts C A X # evs) =
(if A=Spy then insert X (knows Spy evs) else knows Spy evs)" by simp
lemma knows_Spy_Outpts_insecureM [simp]: "insecureM \ knows Spy (Outpts C A X # evs) = insert X (knows Spy evs)" by simp
lemma knows_Spy_A_Gets [simp]: "knows Spy (A_Gets A X # evs) = knows Spy evs" by simp
lemma knows_Spy_subset_knows_Spy_Says: "knows Spy evs \ knows Spy (Says A B X # evs)" by (simp add: subset_insertI)
lemma knows_Spy_subset_knows_Spy_Notes: "knows Spy evs \ knows Spy (Notes A X # evs)" by force
lemma knows_Spy_subset_knows_Spy_Gets: "knows Spy evs \ knows Spy (Gets A X # evs)" by (simp add: subset_insertI)
lemma knows_Spy_subset_knows_Spy_Inputs: "knows Spy evs \ knows Spy (Inputs A C X # evs)" by auto
lemma knows_Spy_equals_knows_Spy_Gets: "knows Spy evs = knows Spy (C_Gets C X # evs)" by (simp add: subset_insertI)
lemma knows_Spy_subset_knows_Spy_Outpts: "knows Spy evs \ knows Spy (Outpts C A X # evs)" by auto
lemma knows_Spy_subset_knows_Spy_A_Gets: "knows Spy evs \ knows Spy (A_Gets A X # evs)" by (simp add: subset_insertI)
text\<open>Spy sees what is sent on the traffic\<close> lemma Says_imp_knows_Spy [rule_format]: "Says A B X \ set evs \ X \ knows Spy evs" apply (induct_tac "evs") apply (simp_all (no_asm_simp) split: event.split) done
lemma Notes_imp_knows_Spy [rule_format]: "Notes A X \ set evs \ A\ bad \ X \ knows Spy evs" apply (induct_tac "evs") apply (simp_all (no_asm_simp) split: event.split) done
(*Nothing can be stated on a Gets event*)
lemma Inputs_imp_knows_Spy_secureM [rule_format (no_asm)]: "Inputs Spy C X \ set evs \ secureM \ X \ knows Spy evs" apply (induct_tac "evs") apply (simp_all (no_asm_simp) split: event.split) done
lemma Inputs_imp_knows_Spy_insecureM [rule_format (no_asm)]: "Inputs A C X \ set evs \ insecureM \ X \ knows Spy evs" apply (induct_tac "evs") apply (simp_all (no_asm_simp) split: event.split) done
(*Nothing can be stated on a C_Gets event*)
lemma Outpts_imp_knows_Spy_secureM [rule_format (no_asm)]: "Outpts C Spy X \ set evs \ secureM \ X \ knows Spy evs" apply (induct_tac "evs") apply (simp_all (no_asm_simp) split: event.split) done
lemma Outpts_imp_knows_Spy_insecureM [rule_format (no_asm)]: "Outpts C A X \ set evs \ insecureM \ X \ knows Spy evs" apply (induct_tac "evs") apply (simp_all (no_asm_simp) split: event.split) done
(*Nothing can be stated on an A_Gets event*)
text\<open>Elimination rules: derive contradictions from old Says events containing
items known to be fresh\<close> lemmas knows_Spy_partsEs =
Says_imp_knows_Spy [THEN parts.Inj, elim_format]
parts.Body [elim_format]
subsection\<open>Knowledge of Agents\<close>
lemma knows_Inputs: "knows A (Inputs A C X # evs) = insert X (knows A evs)" by simp
lemma knows_C_Gets: "knows A (C_Gets C X # evs) = knows A evs" by simp
lemma knows_Outpts_secureM: "secureM \ knows A (Outpts C A X # evs) = insert X (knows A evs)" by simp
lemma knows_Outpts_insecureM: "insecureM \ knows Spy (Outpts C A X # evs) = insert X (knows Spy evs)" by simp (*somewhat equivalent to knows_Spy_Outpts_insecureM*)
lemma knows_subset_knows_Says: "knows A evs \ knows A (Says A' B X # evs)" by (simp add: subset_insertI)
lemma knows_subset_knows_Notes: "knows A evs \ knows A (Notes A' X # evs)" by (simp add: subset_insertI)
lemma knows_subset_knows_Gets: "knows A evs \ knows A (Gets A' X # evs)" by (simp add: subset_insertI)
lemma knows_subset_knows_Inputs: "knows A evs \ knows A (Inputs A' C X # evs)" by (simp add: subset_insertI)
lemma knows_subset_knows_C_Gets: "knows A evs \ knows A (C_Gets C X # evs)" by (simp add: subset_insertI)
lemma knows_subset_knows_Outpts: "knows A evs \ knows A (Outpts C A' X # evs)" by (simp add: subset_insertI)
lemma knows_subset_knows_A_Gets: "knows A evs \ knows A (A_Gets A' X # evs)" by (simp add: subset_insertI)
text\<open>Agents know what they say\<close> lemma Says_imp_knows [rule_format]: "Says A B X \ set evs \ X \ knows A evs" apply (induct_tac "evs") apply (simp_all (no_asm_simp) split: event.split) apply blast done
text\<open>Agents know what they note\<close> lemma Notes_imp_knows [rule_format]: "Notes A X \ set evs \ X \ knows A evs" apply (induct_tac "evs") apply (simp_all (no_asm_simp) split: event.split) apply blast done
text\<open>Agents know what they receive\<close> lemma Gets_imp_knows_agents [rule_format]: "A \ Spy \ Gets A X \ set evs \ X \ knows A evs" apply (induct_tac "evs") apply (simp_all (no_asm_simp) split: event.split) done
(*Agents know what they input to their smart card*) lemma Inputs_imp_knows_agents [rule_format (no_asm)]: "Inputs A (Card A) X \ set evs \ X \ knows A evs" apply (induct_tac "evs") apply (simp_all (no_asm_simp) split: event.split) apply blast done
(*Nothing to prove about C_Gets*)
(*Agents know what they obtain as output of their smart card,
if the means is secure...*) lemma Outpts_imp_knows_agents_secureM [rule_format (no_asm)]: "secureM \ Outpts (Card A) A X \ set evs \ X \ knows A evs" apply (induct_tac "evs") apply (simp_all (no_asm_simp) split: event.split) done
(*otherwise only the spy knows the outputs*) lemma Outpts_imp_knows_agents_insecureM [rule_format (no_asm)]: "insecureM \ Outpts (Card A) A X \ set evs \ X \ knows Spy evs" apply (induct_tac "evs") apply (simp_all (no_asm_simp) split: event.split) done
Die Informationen auf dieser Webseite wurden
nach bestem Wissen sorgfältig zusammengestellt. Es wird jedoch weder Vollständigkeit, noch Richtigkeit,
noch Qualität der bereit gestellten Informationen zugesichert.
Bemerkung:
Die farbliche Syntaxdarstellung ist noch experimentell.