theory Homology_Groups imports Simplices "HOL-Algebra.Exact_Sequence"
begin
subsection\<open>Homology Groups\<close>
text\<open>Now actually connect to group theory and set up homology groups. Note that we define homomogy
groups for all \emph{integers} @{term p}, since this seems to avoid some special-case reasoning,
though they are trivial for @{term"p < 0"}.\<close>
definition chain_group :: "nat \ 'a topology \ 'a chain monoid" where"chain_group p X \ free_Abelian_group (singular_simplex_set p X)"
lemma carrier_chain_group [simp]: "carrier(chain_group p X) = singular_chain_set p X" by (auto simp: chain_group_def singular_chain_def free_Abelian_group_def)
lemma one_chain_group [simp]: "one(chain_group p X) = 0" by (auto simp: chain_group_def free_Abelian_group_def)
lemma mult_chain_group [simp]: "monoid.mult(chain_group p X) = (+)" by (auto simp: chain_group_def free_Abelian_group_def)
lemma m_inv_chain_group [simp]: "Poly_Mapping.keys a \ singular_simplex_set p X \ inv\<^bsub>chain_group p X\<^esub> a = -a" unfolding chain_group_def by simp
lemma group_chain_group [simp]: "Group.group (chain_group p X)" by (simp add: chain_group_def)
lemma abelian_chain_group: "comm_group(chain_group p X)" by (simp add: free_Abelian_group_def group.group_comm_groupI [OF group_chain_group])
lemma subgroup_singular_relcycle: "subgroup (singular_relcycle_set p X S) (chain_group p X)" proof show"x \\<^bsub>chain_group p X\<^esub> y \ singular_relcycle_set p X S" if"x \ singular_relcycle_set p X S" and "y \ singular_relcycle_set p X S" for x y using that by (simp add: singular_relcycle_add) next show"inv\<^bsub>chain_group p X\<^esub> x \ singular_relcycle_set p X S" if"x \ singular_relcycle_set p X S" for x using that by clarsimp (metis m_inv_chain_group singular_chain_def singular_relcycle singular_relcycle_minus) qed (auto simp: singular_relcycle)
definition relcycle_group :: "nat \ 'a topology \ 'a set \ ('a chain) monoid" where"relcycle_group p X S \
subgroup_generated (chain_group p X) (Collect(singular_relcycle p X S))"
lemma carrier_relcycle_group [simp]: "carrier (relcycle_group p X S) = singular_relcycle_set p X S" proof - have"carrier (chain_group p X) \ singular_relcycle_set p X S = singular_relcycle_set p X S" using subgroup.subset subgroup_singular_relcycle by blast moreoverhave"generate (chain_group p X) (singular_relcycle_set p X S) \ singular_relcycle_set p X S" by (simp add: group.generate_subgroup_incl group_chain_group subgroup_singular_relcycle) ultimatelyshow ?thesis by (auto simp: relcycle_group_def subgroup_generated_def generate.incl) qed
lemma one_relcycle_group [simp]: "one(relcycle_group p X S) = 0" by (simp add: relcycle_group_def)
lemma mult_relcycle_group [simp]: "(\\<^bsub>relcycle_group p X S\<^esub>) = (+)" by (simp add: relcycle_group_def)
lemma abelian_relcycle_group [simp]: "comm_group(relcycle_group p X S)" unfolding relcycle_group_def by (intro group.abelian_subgroup_generated group_chain_group) (auto simp: abelian_chain_group singular_relcycle)
lemma group_relcycle_group [simp]: "group(relcycle_group p X S)" by (simp add: comm_group.axioms(2))
lemma relcycle_group_restrict [simp]: "relcycle_group p X (topspace X \ S) = relcycle_group p X S" by (metis relcycle_group_def singular_relcycle_restrict)
definition relative_homology_group :: "int \ 'a topology \ 'a set \ ('a chain) set monoid" where "relative_homology_group p X S \ if p < 0 then singleton_group undefined else
(relcycle_group (nat p) X S) Mod (singular_relboundary_set (nat p) X S)"
abbreviation homology_group where"homology_group p X \ relative_homology_group p X {}"
lemma relative_homology_group_restrict [simp]: "relative_homology_group p X (topspace X \ S) = relative_homology_group p X S" by (simp add: relative_homology_group_def)
lemma nontrivial_relative_homology_group: fixes p::nat shows"relative_homology_group p X S
= relcycle_group p X S Mod singular_relboundary_set p X S" by (simp add: relative_homology_group_def)
lemma singular_relboundary_ss: "singular_relboundary p X S x \ Poly_Mapping.keys x \ singular_simplex_set p X" using singular_chain_def singular_relboundary_imp_chain by blast
lemma trivial_relative_homology_group [simp]: "p < 0 \ trivial_group(relative_homology_group p X S)" by (simp add: relative_homology_group_def)
lemma subgroup_singular_relboundary: "subgroup (singular_relboundary_set p X S) (chain_group p X)" unfolding chain_group_def proof unfold_locales show"singular_relboundary_set p X S \<subseteq> carrier (free_Abelian_group (singular_simplex_set p X))" using singular_chain_def singular_relboundary_imp_chain by fastforce next fix x assume"x \ singular_relboundary_set p X S" thenshow"inv\<^bsub>free_Abelian_group (singular_simplex_set p X)\<^esub> x \<in> singular_relboundary_set p X S" by (simp add: singular_relboundary_ss singular_relboundary_minus) qed (auto simp: free_Abelian_group_def singular_relboundary_add)
lemma subgroup_singular_relboundary_relcycle: "subgroup (singular_relboundary_set p X S) (relcycle_group p X S)" unfolding relcycle_group_def by (simp add: Collect_mono group.subgroup_of_subgroup_generated singular_relboundary_imp_relcycle subgroup_singular_relboundary)
lemma normal_subgroup_singular_relboundary_relcycle: "(singular_relboundary_set p X S) \ (relcycle_group p X S)" by (simp add: comm_group.normal_iff_subgroup subgroup_singular_relboundary_relcycle)
lemma group_relative_homology_group [simp]: "group (relative_homology_group p X S)" by (simp add: relative_homology_group_def normal.factorgroup_is_group
normal_subgroup_singular_relboundary_relcycle)
lemma right_coset_singular_relboundary: "r_coset (relcycle_group p X S) (singular_relboundary_set p X S)
= (\<lambda>a. {b. homologous_rel p X S a b})" using singular_relboundary_minus by (force simp: r_coset_def homologous_rel_def relcycle_group_def subgroup_generated_def)
lemma carrier_relative_homology_group: "carrier(relative_homology_group (int p) X S)
= (homologous_rel_set p X S) ` singular_relcycle_set p X S" by (auto simp: set_eq_iff image_iff relative_homology_group_def FactGroup_def RCOSETS_def right_coset_singular_relboundary)
lemma carrier_relative_homology_group_0: "carrier(relative_homology_group 0 X S)
= (homologous_rel_set 0 X S) ` singular_relcycle_set 0 X S" using carrier_relative_homology_group [of 0 X S] by simp
lemma one_relative_homology_group [simp]: "one(relative_homology_group (int p) X S) = singular_relboundary_set p X S" by (simp add: relative_homology_group_def FactGroup_def)
lemma mult_relative_homology_group: "(\\<^bsub>relative_homology_group (int p) X S\<^esub>) = (\R S. (\r\R. \s\S. {r + s}))" unfolding relcycle_group_def subgroup_generated_def chain_group_def free_Abelian_group_def set_mult_def relative_homology_group_def FactGroup_def by force
lemma inv_relative_homology_group: assumes"R \ carrier (relative_homology_group (int p) X S)" shows"m_inv(relative_homology_group (int p) X S) R = uminus ` R" proof (rule group.inv_equality [OF group_relative_homology_group _ assms]) obtain c where c: "R = homologous_rel_set p X S c""singular_relcycle p X S c" using assms by (auto simp: carrier_relative_homology_group) have"singular_relboundary p X S (b - a)" if"a \ R" and "b \ R" for a b using c that by clarify (metis homologous_rel_def homologous_rel_eq) moreover have"x \ (\x\R. \y\R. {y - x})" if"singular_relboundary p X S x"for x using c by simp (metis diff_eq_eq homologous_rel_def homologous_rel_refl homologous_rel_sym that) ultimately have"(\x\R. \xa\R. {xa - x}) = singular_relboundary_set p X S" by auto thenshow"uminus ` R \\<^bsub>relative_homology_group (int p) X S\<^esub> R = \<one>\<^bsub>relative_homology_group (int p) X S\<^esub>" by (auto simp: carrier_relative_homology_group mult_relative_homology_group) have"singular_relcycle p X S (-c)" using c by (simp add: singular_relcycle_minus) moreoverhave"homologous_rel p X S c x \ homologous_rel p X S (-c) (- x)" for x by (metis homologous_rel_def homologous_rel_sym minus_diff_eq minus_diff_minus) moreoverhave"homologous_rel p X S (-c) x \ x \ uminus ` homologous_rel_set p X S c" for x by (clarsimp simp: image_iff) (metis add.inverse_inverse diff_0 homologous_rel_diff homologous_rel_refl) ultimatelyshow"uminus ` R \ carrier (relative_homology_group (int p) X S)" using c by (auto simp: carrier_relative_homology_group) qed
lemma homologous_rel_eq_relboundary: "homologous_rel p X S c = singular_relboundary p X S \<longleftrightarrow> singular_relboundary p X S c" (is "?lhs = ?rhs") proof assume ?lhs thenshow ?rhs unfolding homologous_rel_def by (metis diff_zero singular_relboundary_0) next assume R: ?rhs show ?lhs unfolding homologous_rel_def using singular_relboundary_diff R by fastforce qed
lemma homologous_rel_set_eq_relboundary: "homologous_rel_set p X S c = singular_relboundary_set p X S \ singular_relboundary p X S c" by (auto simp flip: homologous_rel_eq_relboundary)
text\<open>Lift the boundary and induced maps to homology groups. We totalize both
quite aggressively to the appropriate group identity in all "undefined"
situations, which makes several of the properties cleaner and simpler.\<close>
lemma homomorphism_chain_boundary: "chain_boundary p \ hom (relcycle_group p X S) (relcycle_group(p - Suc 0) (subtopology X S) {})"
(is"?h \ hom ?G ?H") proof (rule homI) show"\x. x \ carrier ?G \ ?h x \ carrier ?H" by (auto simp: singular_relcycle_def mod_subset_def chain_boundary_boundary) qed (simp add: relcycle_group_def subgroup_generated_def chain_boundary_add)
lemma hom_boundary1: "\d. \p X S.
d p X S \<in> hom (relative_homology_group (int p) X S)
(homology_group (int (p - Suc 0)) (subtopology X S)) \<and> (\<forall>c. singular_relcycle p X S c \<longrightarrow> d p X S (homologous_rel_set p X S c)
= homologous_rel_set (p - Suc 0) (subtopology X S) {} (chain_boundary p c))"
(is"\d. \p X S. ?\ (d p X S) p X S") proof ((subst choice_iff [symmetric])+, clarify) fix p X and S :: "'a set"
define \<theta> where "\<theta> \<equiv> r_coset (relcycle_group(p - Suc 0) (subtopology X S) {})
(singular_relboundary_set (p - Suc 0) (subtopology X S) {}) \<circ> chain_boundary p"
define H where"H \ relative_homology_group (int (p - Suc 0)) (subtopology X S) {}"
define J where"J \ relcycle_group (p - Suc 0) (subtopology X S) {}"
have\<theta>: "\<theta> \<in> hom (relcycle_group p X S) H" unfolding\<theta>_def proof (rule hom_compose) show"chain_boundary p \ hom (relcycle_group p X S) J" by (simp add: J_def homomorphism_chain_boundary) show"(#>\<^bsub>relcycle_group (p - Suc 0) (subtopology X S) {}\<^esub>)
(singular_relboundary_set (p - Suc 0) (subtopology X S) {}) \<in> hom J H" by (simp add: H_def J_def nontrivial_relative_homology_group
normal.r_coset_hom_Mod normal_subgroup_singular_relboundary_relcycle) qed have *: "singular_relboundary (p - Suc 0) (subtopology X S) {} (chain_boundary p c)" if"singular_relboundary p X S c"for c proof (cases "p=0") case True thenshow ?thesis by (metis chain_boundary_def singular_relboundary_0) next case False with that have"\d. singular_chain p (subtopology X S) d \ chain_boundary p d = chain_boundary p c" by (metis add.left_neutral chain_boundary_add chain_boundary_boundary_alt singular_relboundary) with that False show ?thesis by (auto simp: singular_boundary) qed have\<theta>_eq: "\<theta> x = \<theta> y" if x: "x \ singular_relcycle_set p X S" and y: "y \ singular_relcycle_set p X S" and eq: "singular_relboundary_set p X S #>\<^bsub>relcycle_group p X S\<^esub> x
= singular_relboundary_set p X S #>\<^bsub>relcycle_group p X S\<^esub> y" for x y proof - have"singular_relboundary p X S (x-y)" by (metis eq homologous_rel_def homologous_rel_eq mem_Collect_eq right_coset_singular_relboundary) with * have"(singular_relboundary (p - Suc 0) (subtopology X S) {}) (chain_boundary p (x-y))" by blast thenshow ?thesis unfolding\<theta>_def comp_def by (metis chain_boundary_diff homologous_rel_def homologous_rel_eq right_coset_singular_relboundary) qed obtain d where"d \ hom ((relcycle_group p X S) Mod (singular_relboundary_set p X S)) H" and d: "\u. u \ singular_relcycle_set p X S \ d (homologous_rel_set p X S u) = \ u" by (metis FactGroup_universal [OF \<theta> normal_subgroup_singular_relboundary_relcycle \<theta>_eq] right_coset_singular_relboundary carrier_relcycle_group) thenhave"d \ hom (relative_homology_group p X S) H" by (simp add: nontrivial_relative_homology_group) thenshow"\d. ?\ d p X S" by (force simp: H_def right_coset_singular_relboundary d \<theta>_def) qed
lemma hom_boundary2: "\d. (\p X S.
(d p X S) \<in> hom (relative_homology_group p X S)
(homology_group (p-1) (subtopology X S))) \<and> (\<forall>p X S c. singular_relcycle p X S c \<and> Suc 0 \<le> p \<longrightarrow> d p X S (homologous_rel_set p X S c)
= homologous_rel_set (p - Suc 0) (subtopology X S) {} (chain_boundary p c))"
(is"\d. ?\ d") proof - have *: "\f. \(\p. if p \ 0 then \q r t. undefined else f(nat p)) \ \f. \ f" for \ by blast show ?thesis apply (rule * [OF ex_forward [OF hom_boundary1]]) apply (simp add: not_le relative_homology_group_def nat_diff_distrib' int_eq_iff nat_diff_distrib flip: nat_1) by (simp add: hom_def singleton_group_def) qed
lemma hom_boundary3: "\d. ((\p X S c. c \ carrier(relative_homology_group p X S) \<longrightarrow> d p X S c = one(homology_group (p-1) (subtopology X S))) \<and>
(\<forall>p X S.
d p X S \<in> hom (relative_homology_group p X S)
(homology_group (p-1) (subtopology X S))) \<and>
(\<forall>p X S c.
singular_relcycle p X S c \<and> 1 \<le> p \<longrightarrow> d p X S (homologous_rel_set p X S c)
= homologous_rel_set (p - Suc 0) (subtopology X S) {} (chain_boundary p c)) \<and>
(\<forall>p X S. d p X S = d p X (topspace X \<inter> S))) \<and>
(\<forall>p X S c. d p X S c \<in> carrier(homology_group (p-1) (subtopology X S))) \<and>
(\<forall>p. p \<le> 0 \<longrightarrow> d p = (\<lambda>q r t. undefined))"
(is"\x. ?P x \ ?Q x \ ?R x") proof - have"\x. ?Q x \ ?R x" by (erule all_forward) (force simp: relative_homology_group_def) moreoverhave"\x. ?P x \ ?Q x" proof - obtain d:: "[int, 'a topology, 'a set, ('a chain) set] \ ('a chain) set" where 1: "\p X S. d p X S \ hom (relative_homology_group p X S)
(homology_group (p-1) (subtopology X S))" and 2: "\n X S c. singular_relcycle n X S c \ Suc 0 \ n \<Longrightarrow> d n X S (homologous_rel_set n X S c)
= homologous_rel_set (n - Suc 0) (subtopology X S) {} (chain_boundary n c)" using hom_boundary2 by blast have 4: "c \ carrier (relative_homology_group p X S) \
d p X (topspace X \<inter> S) c \<in> carrier (relative_homology_group (p-1) (subtopology X S) {})" for p X S c using hom_carrier [OF 1 [of p X "topspace X \ S"]] by (simp add: image_subset_iff subtopology_restrict) show ?thesis apply (rule_tac x="\p X S c. if c \<in> carrier(relative_homology_group p X S) then d p X (topspace X \<inter> S) c
else one(homology_group (p-1) (subtopology X S))" in exI) apply (simp add: Int_left_absorb subtopology_restrict carrier_relative_homology_group
group.is_monoid group.restrict_hom_iff 4 cong: if_cong) by (metis "1""2" homologous_rel_restrict relative_homology_group_restrict singular_relcycle_def subtopology_restrict) qed ultimatelyshow ?thesis by auto qed
consts hom_boundary :: "[int,'a topology,'a set,'a chain set] \ 'a chain set" specification (hom_boundary)
hom_boundary: "((\p X S c. c \ carrier(relative_homology_group p X S) \<longrightarrow> hom_boundary p X S c = one(homology_group (p-1) (subtopology X (S::'a set)))) \<and>
(\<forall>p X S.
hom_boundary p X S \<in> hom (relative_homology_group p X S)
(homology_group (p-1) (subtopology X (S::'a set)))) \
(\<forall>p X S c.
singular_relcycle p X S c \<and> 1 \<le> p \<longrightarrow> hom_boundary p X S (homologous_rel_set p X S c)
= homologous_rel_set (p - Suc 0) (subtopology X (S::'a set)) {} (chain_boundary p c)) \
(\<forall>p X S. hom_boundary p X S = hom_boundary p X (topspace X \<inter> (S::'a set)))) \<and>
(\<forall>p X S c. hom_boundary p X S c \<in> carrier(homology_group (p-1) (subtopology X (S::'a set)))) \<and>
(\<forall>p. p \<le> 0 \<longrightarrow> hom_boundary p = (\<lambda>q r. \<lambda>t::'a chain set. undefined))" by (fact hom_boundary3)
lemma hom_boundary_default: "c \ carrier(relative_homology_group p X S) \<Longrightarrow> hom_boundary p X S c = one(homology_group (p-1) (subtopology X S))" and hom_boundary_hom: "hom_boundary p X S \ hom (relative_homology_group p X S) (homology_group (p-1) (subtopology X S))" and hom_boundary_restrict [simp]: "hom_boundary p X (topspace X \ S) = hom_boundary p X S" and hom_boundary_carrier: "hom_boundary p X S c \ carrier(homology_group (p-1) (subtopology X S))" and hom_boundary_trivial: "p \ 0 \ hom_boundary p = (\q r t. undefined)" by (metis hom_boundary)+
lemma hom_boundary_chain_boundary: "\singular_relcycle p X S c; 1 \ p\ \<Longrightarrow> hom_boundary (int p) X S (homologous_rel_set p X S c) =
homologous_rel_set (p - Suc 0) (subtopology X S) {} (chain_boundary p c)" by (metis hom_boundary)+
lemma hom_chain_map: "\continuous_map X Y f; f \ S \ T\ \<Longrightarrow> (chain_map p f) \<in> hom (relcycle_group p X S) (relcycle_group p Y T)" by (simp add: chain_map_add hom_def singular_relcycle_chain_map)
lemma hom_induced1: "\hom_relmap.
(\<forall>p X S Y T f.
continuous_map X Y f \<and> f \<in> (topspace X \<inter> S) \<rightarrow> T \<longrightarrow> (hom_relmap p X S Y T f) \<in> hom (relative_homology_group (int p) X S)
(relative_homology_group (int p) Y T)) \<and>
(\<forall>p X S Y T f c.
continuous_map X Y f \<and> f \<in> (topspace X \<inter> S) \<rightarrow> T \<and>
singular_relcycle p X S c \<longrightarrow> hom_relmap p X S Y T f (homologous_rel_set p X S c) =
homologous_rel_set p Y T (chain_map p f c))" proof - have"\y. (y \ hom (relative_homology_group (int p) X S) (relative_homology_group (int p) Y T)) \
(\<forall>c. singular_relcycle p X S c \<longrightarrow>
y (homologous_rel_set p X S c) = homologous_rel_set p Y T (chain_map p f c))" if contf: "continuous_map X Y f"and fim: "f \ (topspace X \ S) \ T" for p X S Y T and f :: "'a \ 'b" proof - let ?f = "(#>\<^bsub>relcycle_group p Y T\<^esub>) (singular_relboundary_set p Y T) \ chain_map p f" let ?F = "\x. singular_relboundary_set p X S #>\<^bsub>relcycle_group p X S\<^esub> x" have"chain_map p f \ hom (relcycle_group p X S) (relcycle_group p Y T)" by (metis contf fim hom_chain_map relcycle_group_restrict) thenhave 1: "?f \ hom (relcycle_group p X S) (relative_homology_group (int p) Y T)" by (simp add: hom_compose normal.r_coset_hom_Mod normal_subgroup_singular_relboundary_relcycle relative_homology_group_def) have 2: "singular_relboundary_set p X S \ relcycle_group p X S" using normal_subgroup_singular_relboundary_relcycle by blast have 3: "?f x = ?f y" if"singular_relcycle p X S x""singular_relcycle p X S y""?F x = ?F y"for x y proof - have"homologous_rel p X S x y" by (metis (no_types) homologous_rel_set_eq right_coset_singular_relboundary that(3)) thenhave"singular_relboundary p Y T (chain_map p f (x - y))" using singular_relboundary_chain_map [OF _ contf fim] by (simp add: homologous_rel_def) thenhave"singular_relboundary p Y T (chain_map p f x - chain_map p f y)" by (simp add: chain_map_diff) with that show ?thesis by (metis comp_apply homologous_rel_def homologous_rel_set_eq right_coset_singular_relboundary) qed obtain g where"g \ hom (relcycle_group p X S Mod singular_relboundary_set p X S)
(relative_homology_group (int p) Y T)" "\x. x \ singular_relcycle_set p X S \ g (?F x) = ?f x" using FactGroup_universal [OF 1 2 3, unfolded carrier_relcycle_group] by blast thenshow ?thesis by (force simp: right_coset_singular_relboundary nontrivial_relative_homology_group) qed thenshow ?thesis apply (simp flip: all_conj_distrib) apply ((subst choice_iff [symmetric])+) apply metis done qed
lemma hom_induced2: "\hom_relmap.
(\<forall>p X S Y T f.
continuous_map X Y f \<and>
f \<in> (topspace X \<inter> S) \<rightarrow> T \<longrightarrow> (hom_relmap p X S Y T f) \<in> hom (relative_homology_group p X S)
(relative_homology_group p Y T)) \<and>
(\<forall>p X S Y T f c.
continuous_map X Y f \<and>
f \<in> (topspace X \<inter> S) \<rightarrow> T \<and>
singular_relcycle p X S c \<longrightarrow> hom_relmap p X S Y T f (homologous_rel_set p X S c) =
homologous_rel_set p Y T (chain_map p f c)) \<and>
(\<forall>p. p < 0 \<longrightarrow> hom_relmap p = (\<lambda>X S Y T f c. undefined))"
(is"\d. ?\ d") proof - have *: "\f. \(\p. if p < 0 then \X S Y T f c. undefined else f(nat p)) \ \f. \ f" for \ by blast show ?thesis apply (rule * [OF ex_forward [OF hom_induced1]]) apply (simp add: not_le relative_homology_group_def nat_diff_distrib' int_eq_iff nat_diff_distrib flip: nat_1) done qed
lemma hom_induced3: "\hom_relmap.
((\<forall>p X S Y T f c.
~(continuous_map X Y f \<and> f \<in> (topspace X \<inter> S) \<rightarrow> T \<and>
c \<in> carrier(relative_homology_group p X S)) \<longrightarrow> hom_relmap p X S Y T f c = one(relative_homology_group p Y T)) \<and>
(\<forall>p X S Y T f.
hom_relmap p X S Y T f \<in> hom (relative_homology_group p X S) (relative_homology_group p Y T)) \<and>
(\<forall>p X S Y T f c.
continuous_map X Y f \<and> f \<in> (topspace X \<inter> S) \<rightarrow> T \<and> singular_relcycle p X S c \<longrightarrow> hom_relmap p X S Y T f (homologous_rel_set p X S c) =
homologous_rel_set p Y T (chain_map p f c)) \<and>
(\<forall>p X S Y T.
hom_relmap p X S Y T =
hom_relmap p X (topspace X \<inter> S) Y (topspace Y \<inter> T))) \<and>
(\<forall>p X S Y f T c.
hom_relmap p X S Y T f c \<in> carrier(relative_homology_group p Y T)) \<and>
(\<forall>p. p < 0 \<longrightarrow> hom_relmap p = (\<lambda>X S Y T f c. undefined))"
(is"\x. ?P x \ ?Q x \ ?R x") proof - have"\x. ?Q x \ ?R x" by (erule all_forward) (fastforce simp: relative_homology_group_def) moreoverhave"\x. ?P x \ ?Q x" proof - obtain hom_relmap:: "[int,'a topology,'a set,'b topology,'b set,'a \ 'b,('a chain) set] \ ('b chain) set" where 1: "\p X S Y T f. \continuous_map X Y f; f \ (topspace X \ S) \ T\ \
hom_relmap p X S Y T f \<in> hom (relative_homology_group p X S) (relative_homology_group p Y T)" and 2: "\p X S Y T f c. \<lbrakk>continuous_map X Y f; f \<in> (topspace X \<inter> S) \<rightarrow> T; singular_relcycle p X S c\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
hom_relmap (int p) X S Y T f (homologous_rel_set p X S c) =
homologous_rel_set p Y T (chain_map p f c)" and 3: "(\p. p < 0 \ hom_relmap p = (\X S Y T f c. undefined))" using hom_induced2 [where ?'a='a and ?'b='b] by (fastforce simp: Pi_iff) have 4: "\continuous_map X Y f; f \ (topspace X \ S) \ T; c \ carrier (relative_homology_group p X S)\ \
hom_relmap p X (topspace X \<inter> S) Y (topspace Y \<inter> T) f c \<in> carrier (relative_homology_group p Y T)" for p X S Y f T c using hom_carrier [OF 1 [of X Y f "topspace X \ S" "topspace Y \ T" p]]
continuous_map_image_subset_topspace by fastforce have inhom: "(\c. if continuous_map X Y f \ f \ (topspace X \ S) \ T \
c \<in> carrier (relative_homology_group p X S) then hom_relmap p X (topspace X \<inter> S) Y (topspace Y \<inter> T) f c
else \<one>\<^bsub>relative_homology_group p Y T\<^esub>) \<in> hom (relative_homology_group p X S) (relative_homology_group p Y T)" (is "?h \<in> hom ?GX ?GY") for p X S Y T f proof (rule homI) show"\x. x \ carrier ?GX \ ?h x \ carrier ?GY" by (auto simp: 4 group.is_monoid) show"?h (x \\<^bsub>?GX\<^esub> y) = ?h x \\<^bsub>?GY\<^esub>?h y" if "x \ carrier ?GX" "y \ carrier ?GX" for x y proof (cases "p < 0") case True with that show ?thesis by (simp add: relative_homology_group_def singleton_group_def 3) next case False show ?thesis proof (cases "continuous_map X Y f") case True thenhave"f \ (topspace X \ S) \ topspace Y" using continuous_map_image_subset_topspace by blast thenshow ?thesis using True False that using 1 [of X Y f "topspace X \ S" "topspace Y \ T" p] by (simp add: 4 Pi_iff continuous_map_funspace hom_mult not_less group.is_monoid monoid.m_closed Int_left_absorb) qed (simp add: group.is_monoid) qed qed have hrel: "\continuous_map X Y f; f \ (topspace X \ S) \ T; singular_relcycle p X S c\ \<Longrightarrow> hom_relmap (int p) X (topspace X \<inter> S) Y (topspace Y \<inter> T)
f (homologous_rel_set p X S c) = homologous_rel_set p Y T (chain_map p f c)" for p X S Y T f c using 2 [of X Y f "topspace X \ S" "topspace Y \ T" p c]
continuous_map_image_subset_topspace by fastforce show ?thesis apply (rule_tac x="\p X S Y T f c. if continuous_map X Y f \<and> f \<in> (topspace X \<inter> S) \<rightarrow> T \<and>
c \<in> carrier(relative_homology_group p X S) then hom_relmap p X (topspace X \<inter> S) Y (topspace Y \<inter> T) f c
else one(relative_homology_group p Y T)" in exI) apply (simp add: Int_left_absorb subtopology_restrict carrier_relative_homology_group
group.is_monoid group.restrict_hom_iff 4 inhom hrel split: if_splits) apply (intro ext strip) apply (auto simp: continuous_map_def) done qed ultimatelyshow ?thesis by auto qed
consts hom_induced:: "[int,'a topology,'a set,'b topology,'b set,'a \ 'b,('a chain) set] \ ('b chain) set" specification (hom_induced)
hom_induced: "((\p X S Y T f c.
~(continuous_map X Y f \<and>
f \<in> (topspace X \<inter> S) \<rightarrow> T \<and>
c \<in> carrier(relative_homology_group p X S)) \<longrightarrow> hom_induced p X (S::'a set) Y (T::'b set) f c =
one(relative_homology_group p Y T)) \<and>
(\<forall>p X S Y T f.
(hom_induced p X (S::'a set) Y (T::'b set) f) \<in> hom (relative_homology_group p X S)
(relative_homology_group p Y T)) \<and>
(\<forall>p X S Y T f c.
continuous_map X Y f \<and>
f \<in> (topspace X \<inter> S) \<rightarrow> T \<and>
singular_relcycle p X S c \<longrightarrow> hom_induced p X (S::'a set) Y (T::'b set) f (homologous_rel_set p X S c) =
homologous_rel_set p Y T (chain_map p f c)) \<and>
(\<forall>p X S Y T.
hom_induced p X (S::'a set) Y (T::'b set) =
hom_induced p X (topspace X \<inter> S) Y (topspace Y \<inter> T))) \<and>
(\<forall>p X S Y f T c.
hom_induced p X (S::'a set) Y (T::'b set) f c \<in>
carrier(relative_homology_group p Y T)) \<and>
(\<forall>p. p < 0 \<longrightarrow> hom_induced p = (\<lambda>X S Y T. \<lambda>f::'a\<Rightarrow>'b. \<lambda>c. undefined))" by (fact hom_induced3)
lemma hom_induced_default: "~(continuous_map X Y f \ f \ (topspace X \ S) \ T \ c \ carrier(relative_homology_group p X S)) \<Longrightarrow> hom_induced p X S Y T f c = one(relative_homology_group p Y T)" and hom_induced_hom: "hom_induced p X S Y T f \ hom (relative_homology_group p X S) (relative_homology_group p Y T)" and hom_induced_restrict [simp]: "hom_induced p X (topspace X \ S) Y (topspace Y \ T) = hom_induced p X S Y T" and hom_induced_carrier: "hom_induced p X S Y T f c \ carrier(relative_homology_group p Y T)" and hom_induced_trivial: "p < 0 \ hom_induced p = (\X S Y T f c. undefined)" by (metis hom_induced)+
lemma hom_induced_chain_map_gen: "\continuous_map X Y f; f \ (topspace X \ S) \ T; singular_relcycle p X S c\ \<Longrightarrow> hom_induced p X S Y T f (homologous_rel_set p X S c) = homologous_rel_set p Y T (chain_map p f c)" by (metis hom_induced)
lemma hom_induced_chain_map: "\continuous_map X Y f; f \ S \ T; singular_relcycle p X S c\ \<Longrightarrow> hom_induced p X S Y T f (homologous_rel_set p X S c)
= homologous_rel_set p Y T (chain_map p f c)" by (simp add: Pi_iff hom_induced_chain_map_gen)
lemma hom_induced_eq: assumes"\x. x \ topspace X \ f x = g x" shows"hom_induced p X S Y T f = hom_induced p X S Y T g" proof -
consider "p < 0" | n where"p = int n" by (metis int_nat_eq not_less) thenshow ?thesis proof cases case 1 thenshow ?thesis by (simp add: hom_induced_trivial) next case 2 have"hom_induced n X S Y T f C = hom_induced n X S Y T g C"for C proof - have"continuous_map X Y f \ f \ (topspace X \ S) \ T \ C \ carrier (relative_homology_group n X S) \<longleftrightarrow> continuous_map X Y g \<and> g \<in> (topspace X \<inter> S) \<rightarrow> T \<and> C \<in> carrier (relative_homology_group n X S)"
(is"?P = ?Q") using assms Pi_iff continuous_map_eq [of X Y] by (smt (verit, ccfv_SIG) Int_iff) then consider "\ ?P \ \ ?Q" | "?P \ ?Q" by blast thenshow ?thesis proof cases case 1 thenshow ?thesis by (simp add: hom_induced_default) next case 2 have"homologous_rel_set n Y T (chain_map n f c) = homologous_rel_set n Y T (chain_map n g c)" if"continuous_map X Y f""f \ (topspace X \ S) \ T" "continuous_map X Y g""g \ (topspace X \ S) \ T" "C = homologous_rel_set n X S c""singular_relcycle n X S c" for c proof - have"chain_map n f c = chain_map n g c" using assms chain_map_eq singular_relcycle that by metis thenshow ?thesis by simp qed with 2 show ?thesis by (force simp: relative_homology_group_def carrier_FactGroup
right_coset_singular_relboundary hom_induced_chain_map_gen) qed qed with 2 show ?thesis by auto qed qed
subsection\<open>Towards the Eilenberg-Steenrod axioms\<close>
text\<open>First prove we get functors into abelian groups with the boundary map
being a natural transformation between them, and prove Eilenberg-Steenrod axioms (we also prove additivity a bit later on if one counts that). \<close> (*1. Exact sequence from the inclusions and boundary map H_{p+1} X --(j')\<longlongrightarrow> H_{p+1}X (A) --(d')\<longlongrightarrow> H_p A --(i')\<longlongrightarrow> H_p X 2. Dimension axiom: H_p X is trivial for one-point X and p =/= 0 3. Homotopy invariance of the induced map 4. Excision: inclusion (X - U,A - U) --(i')\<longlongrightarrow> X (A) induces an isomorphism
when cl U \<subseteq> int A*)
lemma abelian_relative_homology_group [simp]: "comm_group(relative_homology_group p X S)" by (simp add: comm_group.abelian_FactGroup relative_homology_group_def subgroup_singular_relboundary_relcycle)
lemma abelian_homology_group: "comm_group(homology_group p X)" by simp
lemma hom_induced_id_gen: assumes contf: "continuous_map X X f"and feq: "\x. x \ topspace X \ f x = x" and c: "c \ carrier (relative_homology_group p X S)" shows"hom_induced p X S X S f c = c" proof -
consider "p < 0" | n where"p = int n" by (metis int_nat_eq not_less) thenshow ?thesis proof cases case 1 with c show ?thesis by (simp add: hom_induced_trivial relative_homology_group_def) next case 2 have cm: "chain_map n f d = d"if"singular_relcycle n X S d"for d using that assms by (auto simp: chain_map_id_gen singular_relcycle) have"f ` (topspace X \ S) \ S" using feq by auto with 2 c show ?thesis by (auto simp: nontrivial_relative_homology_group carrier_FactGroup
cm right_coset_singular_relboundary hom_induced_chain_map_gen assms) qed qed
lemma hom_induced_id: "c \ carrier (relative_homology_group p X S) \ hom_induced p X S X S id c = c" by (rule hom_induced_id_gen) auto
lemma hom_induced_compose: assumes"continuous_map X Y f""f \ S \ T" "continuous_map Y Z g" "g \ T \ U" shows"hom_induced p X S Z U (g \ f) = hom_induced p Y T Z U g \ hom_induced p X S Y T f" proof -
consider (neg) "p < 0" | (int) n where"p = int n" by (metis int_nat_eq not_less) thenshow ?thesis proof cases case int have gf: "continuous_map X Z (g \ f)" using assms continuous_map_compose by fastforce have gfim: "(g \ f) \ S \ U" unfolding o_def using assms by blast have sr: "\a. singular_relcycle n X S a \ singular_relcycle n Y T (chain_map n f a)" by (simp add: assms singular_relcycle_chain_map) show ?thesis proof fix c show"hom_induced p X S Z U (g \ f) c = (hom_induced p Y T Z U g \ hom_induced p X S Y T f) c" proof (cases "c \ carrier(relative_homology_group p X S)") case True with gfim show ?thesis unfolding int by (auto simp: carrier_relative_homology_group gf gfim assms
sr chain_map_compose hom_induced_chain_map) next case False thenshow ?thesis by (simp add: hom_induced_default hom_one [OF hom_induced_hom]) qed qed qed (force simp: hom_induced_trivial) qed
lemma hom_induced_compose': assumes"continuous_map X Y f""f \ S \ T" "continuous_map Y Z g" "g \ T \ U" shows"hom_induced p Y T Z U g (hom_induced p X S Y T f x) = hom_induced p X S Z U (g \ f) x" using hom_induced_compose [OF assms] by simp
lemma naturality_hom_induced: assumes"continuous_map X Y f""f \ S \ T" shows"hom_boundary q Y T \ hom_induced q X S Y T f
= hom_induced (q - 1) (subtopology X S) {} (subtopology Y T) {} f \<circ> hom_boundary q X S" proof (cases "q \ 0") case False thenobtain p where p1: "p \ Suc 0" and q: "q = int p" using zero_le_imp_eq_int by force show ?thesis proof fix c show"(hom_boundary q Y T \ hom_induced q X S Y T f) c =
(hom_induced (q - 1) (subtopology X S) {} (subtopology Y T) {} f \<circ> hom_boundary q X S) c" proof (cases "c \ carrier(relative_homology_group p X S)") case True thenobtain a where ceq: "c = homologous_rel_set p X S a"and a: "singular_relcycle p X S a" by (force simp: carrier_relative_homology_group) thenhave sr: "singular_relcycle p Y T (chain_map p f a)" using assms singular_relcycle_chain_map by fastforce thenhave sb: "singular_relcycle (p - Suc 0) (subtopology X S) {} (chain_boundary p a)" by (metis One_nat_def a chain_boundary_boundary singular_chain_0 singular_relcycle) have p1_eq: "int p - 1 = int (p - Suc 0)" using p1 by auto have cbm: "(chain_boundary p (chain_map p f a))
= (chain_map (p - Suc 0) f (chain_boundary p a))" using a chain_boundary_chain_map singular_relcycle by metis have contf: "continuous_map (subtopology X S) (subtopology Y T) f" using assms by (auto simp: continuous_map_in_subtopology continuous_map_from_subtopology) show ?thesis unfolding q using assms p1 a by (simp add: cbm ceq contf hom_boundary_chain_boundary hom_induced_chain_map p1_eq sb sr
del: of_nat_diff) next case False with assms show ?thesis unfolding q o_def using assms apply (simp add: hom_induced_default hom_boundary_default) by (metis group_relative_homology_group hom_boundary hom_induced hom_one one_relative_homology_group) qed qed qed (force simp: hom_induced_trivial hom_boundary_trivial)
lemma homology_exactness_axiom_1: "exact_seq ([homology_group (p-1) (subtopology X S), relative_homology_group p X S, homology_group p X],
[hom_boundary p X S,hom_induced p X {} X S id])" proof -
consider (neg) "p < 0" | (int) n where"p = int n" by (metis int_nat_eq not_less) thenhave"(hom_induced p X {} X S id) ` carrier (homology_group p X)
= kernel (relative_homology_group p X S) (homology_group (p-1) (subtopology X S))
(hom_boundary p X S)" proof cases case neg thenshow ?thesis unfolding kernel_def singleton_group_def relative_homology_group_def by (auto simp: hom_induced_trivial hom_boundary_trivial) next case int have"hom_induced (int m) X {} X S id ` carrier (relative_homology_group (int m) X {})
= carrier (relative_homology_group (int m) X S) \<inter>
{c. hom_boundary (int m) X S c = \<one>\<^bsub>relative_homology_group (int m - 1) (subtopology X S) {}\<^esub>}" for m proof (cases m) case 0 have"hom_induced 0 X {} X S id ` carrier (relative_homology_group 0 X {})
= carrier (relative_homology_group 0 X S)" (is "?lhs = ?rhs") proof show"?lhs \ ?rhs" using hom_induced_hom [of 0 X "{}" X S id] by (simp add: hom_induced_hom hom_carrier) show"?rhs \ ?lhs" apply (clarsimp simp add: image_iff carrier_relative_homology_group [of 0, simplified] singular_relcycle) apply (force simp: chain_map_id_gen chain_boundary_def singular_relcycle
hom_induced_chain_map [of concl: 0, simplified]) done qed with 0 show ?thesis by (simp add: hom_boundary_trivial relative_homology_group_def [of "-1"] singleton_group_def) next case (Suc n) have"(hom_induced (int (Suc n)) X {} X S id \
homologous_rel_set (Suc n) X {}) ` singular_relcycle_set (Suc n) X {}
= homologous_rel_set (Suc n) X S `
(singular_relcycle_set (Suc n) X S \<inter>
{c. hom_boundary (int (Suc n)) X S (homologous_rel_set (Suc n) X S c)
= singular_relboundary_set n (subtopology X S) {}})"
(is"?lhs = ?rhs") proof - have 1: "(\x. x \ A \ x \ B \ x \ C) \ f ` (A \ B) = f ` (A \ C)" for f A B C by blast have 2: "\\x. x \ A \ \y. y \ B \ f x = f y; \x. x \ B \ \y. y \ A \ f x = f y\ \<Longrightarrow> f ` A = f ` B" for f A B by blast have"?lhs = homologous_rel_set (Suc n) X S ` singular_relcycle_set (Suc n) X {}" using hom_induced_chain_map chain_map_ident [of _ X] singular_relcycle by (smt (verit, best) comp_apply continuous_map_id empty_iff funcsetI
image_cong mem_Collect_eq) alsohave"\ = homologous_rel_set (Suc n) X S `
(singular_relcycle_set (Suc n) X S \<inter>
{c. singular_relboundary n (subtopology X S) {} (chain_boundary (Suc n) c)})" proof (rule 2) fix c assume"c \ singular_relcycle_set (Suc n) X {}" thenshow"\y. y \ singular_relcycle_set (Suc n) X S \
{c. singular_relboundary n (subtopology X S) {} (chain_boundary (Suc n) c)} \<and>
homologous_rel_set (Suc n) X S c = homologous_rel_set (Suc n) X S y" using singular_cycle singular_relcycle by (metis Int_Collect mem_Collect_eq singular_chain_0
singular_relboundary_0) next fix c assume c: "c \ singular_relcycle_set (Suc n) X S \
{c. singular_relboundary n (subtopology X S) {} (chain_boundary (Suc n) c)}" thenobtain d where d: "singular_chain (Suc n) (subtopology X S) d" "chain_boundary (Suc n) d = chain_boundary (Suc n) c" by (auto simp: singular_boundary) with c have"c - d \ singular_relcycle_set (Suc n) X {}" by (auto simp: singular_cycle chain_boundary_diff singular_chain_subtopology singular_relcycle singular_chain_diff) moreoverhave"homologous_rel_set (Suc n) X S c = homologous_rel_set (Suc n) X S (c - d)" proof (simp add: homologous_rel_set_eq) show"homologous_rel (Suc n) X S c (c - d)" using d by (simp add: homologous_rel_def singular_chain_imp_relboundary) qed ultimatelyshow"\y. y \ singular_relcycle_set (Suc n) X {} \
homologous_rel_set (Suc n) X S c = homologous_rel_set (Suc n) X S y" by blast qed alsohave"\ = ?rhs" by (rule 1) (simp add: hom_boundary_chain_boundary homologous_rel_set_eq_relboundary del: of_nat_Suc) finallyshow"?lhs = ?rhs" . qed with Suc show ?thesis unfolding carrier_relative_homology_group image_comp id_def by auto qed thenshow ?thesis by (auto simp: kernel_def int) qed thenshow ?thesis using hom_boundary_hom hom_induced_hom by (force simp: group_hom_def group_hom_axioms_def) qed
lemma homology_exactness_axiom_2: "exact_seq ([homology_group (p-1) X, homology_group (p-1) (subtopology X S), relative_homology_group p X S],
[hom_induced (p-1) (subtopology X S) {} X {} id, hom_boundary p X S])" proof -
consider (neg) "p \ 0" | (int) n where "p = int (Suc n)" by (metis linear not0_implies_Suc of_nat_0 zero_le_imp_eq_int) thenhave"kernel (relative_homology_group (p-1) (subtopology X S) {})
(relative_homology_group (p-1) X {})
(hom_induced (p-1) (subtopology X S) {} X {} id)
= hom_boundary p X S ` carrier (relative_homology_group p X S)" proof cases case neg obtain x where"x \ carrier (relative_homology_group p X S)" using group_relative_homology_group group.is_monoid by blast with neg show ?thesis unfolding kernel_def singleton_group_def relative_homology_group_def by (force simp: hom_induced_trivial hom_boundary_trivial) next case int have"hom_boundary (int (Suc n)) X S ` carrier (relative_homology_group (int (Suc n)) X S)
= carrier (relative_homology_group n (subtopology X S) {}) \<inter>
{c. hom_induced n (subtopology X S) {} X {} id c = \<one>\<^bsub>relative_homology_group n X {}\<^esub>}"
(is"?lhs = ?rhs") proof - have 1: "(\x. x \ A \ x \ B \ x \ C) \ f ` (A \ B) = f ` (A \ C)" for f A B C by blast have 2: "(\x. x \ A \ x \ B \ x \ f -` C) \ f ` (A \ B) = f ` A \ C" for f A B C by blast have"?lhs = homologous_rel_set n (subtopology X S) {}
` (chain_boundary (Suc n) ` singular_relcycle_set (Suc n) X S)" unfolding carrier_relative_homology_group image_comp by (rule image_cong [OF refl]) (simp add: o_def hom_boundary_chain_boundary del: of_nat_Suc) alsohave"\ = homologous_rel_set n (subtopology X S) {} `
(singular_relcycle_set n (subtopology X S) {} \<inter> singular_relboundary_set n X {})" by (force simp: singular_relcycle singular_boundary chain_boundary_boundary_alt) alsohave"\ = ?rhs" unfolding carrier_relative_homology_group vimage_def by (intro 2) (auto simp: hom_induced_chain_map chain_map_ident homologous_rel_set_eq_relboundary singular_relcycle) finallyshow ?thesis . qed thenshow ?thesis by (auto simp: kernel_def int) qed thenshow ?thesis using hom_boundary_hom hom_induced_hom by (force simp: group_hom_def group_hom_axioms_def) qed
lemma homology_exactness_axiom_3: "exact_seq ([relative_homology_group p X S, homology_group p X, homology_group p (subtopology X S)],
[hom_induced p X {} X S id, hom_induced p (subtopology X S) {} X {} id])" proof (cases "p < 0") case True thenshow ?thesis unfolding relative_homology_group_def by (simp add: group_hom.kernel_to_trivial_group group_hom_axioms_def group_hom_def hom_induced_trivial) next case False thenobtain n where peq: "p = int n" by (metis int_ops(1) linorder_neqE_linordered_idom pos_int_cases) have"hom_induced n (subtopology X S) {} X {} id `
(homologous_rel_set n (subtopology X S) {} `
singular_relcycle_set n (subtopology X S) {})
= {c \<in> homologous_rel_set n X {} ` singular_relcycle_set n X {}.
hom_induced n X {} X S id c = singular_relboundary_set n X S}"
(is"?lhs = ?rhs") proof - have 2: "\\x. x \ A \ \y. y \ B \ f x = f y; \x. x \ B \ \y. y \ A \ f x = f y\ \<Longrightarrow> f ` A = f ` B" for f A B by blast have"\f. singular_chain n (subtopology X S) f \
singular_chain (n - Suc 0) trivial_topology (chain_boundary n f) \<Longrightarrow>
hom_induced (int n) (subtopology X S) {} X {} id (homologous_rel_set n (subtopology X S) {} f) =
homologous_rel_set n X {} f" by (auto simp: chain_map_ident hom_induced_chain_map singular_relcycle) thenhave"?lhs = homologous_rel_set n X {} ` (singular_relcycle_set n (subtopology X S) {})" by (simp add: singular_relcycle image_comp) alsohave"\ = homologous_rel_set n X {} ` (singular_relcycle_set n X {} \ singular_relboundary_set n X S)" proof (rule 2) fix c assume"c \ singular_relcycle_set n (subtopology X S) {}" thenshow"\y. y \ singular_relcycle_set n X {} \ singular_relboundary_set n X S \
homologous_rel_set n X {} c = homologous_rel_set n X {} y" using singular_chain_imp_relboundary singular_relboundary_imp_chain by (fastforce simp: singular_cycle) next fix c assume"c \ singular_relcycle_set n X {} \ singular_relboundary_set n X S" thenobtain d e where c: "singular_relcycle n X {} c""singular_relboundary n X S c" and d: "singular_chain n (subtopology X S) d" and e: "singular_chain (Suc n) X e""chain_boundary (Suc n) e = c + d" using singular_relboundary_alt by blast thenhave"chain_boundary n (c + d) = 0" using chain_boundary_boundary_alt by fastforce thenhave"chain_boundary n c + chain_boundary n d = 0" by (metis chain_boundary_add) with c have"singular_relcycle n (subtopology X S) {} (- d)" by (metis (no_types) d eq_add_iff singular_cycle singular_relcycle_minus) moreoverhave"homologous_rel n X {} c (- d)" using c by (metis diff_minus_eq_add e homologous_rel_def singular_boundary) ultimately show"\y. y \ singular_relcycle_set n (subtopology X S) {} \
homologous_rel_set n X {} c = homologous_rel_set n X {} y" by (force simp: homologous_rel_set_eq) qed alsohave"\ = homologous_rel_set n X {} `
(singular_relcycle_set n X {} \<inter> homologous_rel_set n X {} -` {x. hom_induced n X {} X S id x = singular_relboundary_set n X S})" by (rule 2) (auto simp: hom_induced_chain_map homologous_rel_set_eq_relboundary chain_map_ident [of _ X] singular_cycle cong: conj_cong) alsohave"\ = ?rhs" by blast finallyshow ?thesis . qed thenhave"kernel (relative_homology_group p X {}) (relative_homology_group p X S) (hom_induced p X {} X S id)
= hom_induced p (subtopology X S) {} X {} id ` carrier (relative_homology_group p (subtopology X S) {})" by (simp add: kernel_def carrier_relative_homology_group peq) thenshow ?thesis by (simp add: not_less group_hom_def group_hom_axioms_def hom_induced_hom) qed
lemma homology_dimension_axiom: assumes X: "topspace X = {a}"and"p \ 0" shows"trivial_group(homology_group p X)" proof (cases "p < 0") case True thenshow ?thesis by simp next case False thenobtain n where peq: "p = int n""n > 0" by (metis assms(2) neq0_conv nonneg_int_cases not_less of_nat_0) have"homologous_rel_set n X {} ` singular_relcycle_set n X {} = {singular_relcycle_set n X {}}"
(is"?lhs = ?rhs") proof show"?lhs \ ?rhs" using peq assms by (auto simp: image_subset_iff homologous_rel_set_eq_relboundary simp flip: singular_boundary_set_eq_cycle_singleton) have"singular_relboundary n X {} 0" by simp with peq assms show"?rhs \ ?lhs" by (auto simp: image_iff simp flip: homologous_rel_eq_relboundary singular_boundary_set_eq_cycle_singleton) qed with peq assms show ?thesis unfolding trivial_group_def by (simp add: carrier_relative_homology_group singular_boundary_set_eq_cycle_singleton [OF X]) qed
proposition homology_homotopy_axiom: assumes"homotopic_with (\h. h \ S \ T) X Y f g" shows"hom_induced p X S Y T f = hom_induced p X S Y T g" proof (cases "p < 0") case True thenshow ?thesis by (simp add: hom_induced_trivial) next case False thenobtain n where peq: "p = int n" by (metis int_nat_eq not_le) have cont: "continuous_map X Y f""continuous_map X Y g" using assms homotopic_with_imp_continuous_maps by blast+ have im: "f \ (topspace X \ S) \ T" "g \ (topspace X \ S) \ T" using homotopic_with_imp_property assms by blast+ show ?thesis proof fix c show"hom_induced p X S Y T f c = hom_induced p X S Y T g c" proof (cases "c \ carrier(relative_homology_group p X S)") case True thenobtain a where a: "c = homologous_rel_set n X S a""singular_relcycle n X S a" unfolding carrier_relative_homology_group peq by auto with assms homotopic_imp_homologous_rel_chain_maps show ?thesis by (force simp add: peq hom_induced_chain_map_gen cont im homologous_rel_set_eq) qed (simp add: hom_induced_default) qed qed
proposition homology_excision_axiom: assumes"X closure_of U \ X interior_of T" "T \ S" shows "hom_induced p (subtopology X (S - U)) (T - U) (subtopology X S) T id \<in> iso (relative_homology_group p (subtopology X (S - U)) (T - U))
(relative_homology_group p (subtopology X S) T)" proof (cases "p < 0") case True thenshow ?thesis unfolding iso_def bij_betw_def relative_homology_group_def by (simp add: hom_induced_trivial) next case False thenobtain n where peq: "p = int n" by (metis int_nat_eq not_le) have cont: "continuous_map (subtopology X (S - U)) (subtopology X S) id" by (meson Diff_subset continuous_map_from_subtopology_mono continuous_map_id) have TU: "topspace X \ (S - U) \ (T - U) \ T" by auto show ?thesis proof (simp add: iso_def peq carrier_relative_homology_group bij_betw_def hom_induced_hom, intro conjI) show"inj_on (hom_induced n (subtopology X (S - U)) (T - U) (subtopology X S) T id)
(homologous_rel_set n (subtopology X (S - U)) (T - U) `
singular_relcycle_set n (subtopology X (S - U)) (T - U))" unfolding inj_on_def proof (clarsimp simp add: homologous_rel_set_eq) fix c d assume c: "singular_relcycle n (subtopology X (S - U)) (T - U) c" and d: "singular_relcycle n (subtopology X (S - U)) (T - U) d" and hh: "hom_induced n (subtopology X (S - U)) (T - U) (subtopology X S) T id
(homologous_rel_set n (subtopology X (S - U)) (T - U) c)
= hom_induced n (subtopology X (S - U)) (T - U) (subtopology X S) T id
(homologous_rel_set n (subtopology X (S - U)) (T - U) d)" thenobtain scc: "singular_chain n (subtopology X (S - U)) c" and scd: "singular_chain n (subtopology X (S - U)) d" using singular_relcycle by metis have"singular_relboundary n (subtopology X (S - U)) (T - U) c" if srb: "singular_relboundary n (subtopology X S) T c" and src: "singular_relcycle n (subtopology X (S - U)) (T - U) c"for c proof - have [simp]: "(S - U) \ (T - U) = T - U" "S \ T = T" using\<open>T \<subseteq> S\<close> by blast+ have c: "singular_chain n (subtopology X (S - U)) c" "singular_chain (n - Suc 0) (subtopology X (T - U)) (chain_boundary n c)" using that by (auto simp: singular_relcycle_def mod_subset_def subtopology_subtopology) obtain d e where d: "singular_chain (Suc n) (subtopology X S) d" and e: "singular_chain n (subtopology X T) e" and dce: "chain_boundary (Suc n) d = c + e" using srb by (auto simp: singular_relboundary_alt subtopology_subtopology) obtain m f g where f: "singular_chain (Suc n) (subtopology X (S - U)) f" and g: "singular_chain (Suc n) (subtopology X T) g" and dfg: "(singular_subdivision (Suc n) ^^ m) d = f + g" using excised_chain_exists [OF assms d] . obtain h where
h0: "\p. h p 0 = (0 :: 'a chain)" and hdiff: "\p c1 c2. h p (c1-c2) = h p c1 - h p c2" and hSuc: "\p X c. singular_chain p X c \ singular_chain (Suc p) X (h p c)" and hchain: "\p X c. singular_chain p X c \<Longrightarrow> chain_boundary (Suc p) (h p c) + h (p - Suc 0) (chain_boundary p c)
= (singular_subdivision p ^^ m) c - c" using chain_homotopic_iterated_singular_subdivision by blast have hadd: "\p c1 c2. h p (c1 + c2) = h p c1 + h p c2" by (metis add_diff_cancel diff_add_cancel hdiff)
define c1 where"c1 \ f - h n c"
define c2 where"c2 \ chain_boundary (Suc n) (h n e) - (chain_boundary (Suc n) g - e)" show ?thesis unfolding singular_relboundary_alt proof (intro exI conjI) show c1: "singular_chain (Suc n) (subtopology X (S - U)) c1" by (simp add: \<open>singular_chain n (subtopology X (S - U)) c\<close> c1_def f hSuc singular_chain_diff) have"chain_boundary (Suc n) (chain_boundary (Suc (Suc n)) (h (Suc n) d) + h n (c+e))
= chain_boundary (Suc n) (f + g - d)" using hchain [OF d] by (simp add: dce dfg) thenhave"chain_boundary (Suc n) (h n (c + e))
= chain_boundary (Suc n) f + chain_boundary (Suc n) g - (c + e)" using chain_boundary_boundary_alt [of "Suc n""subtopology X S"] by (simp add: chain_boundary_add chain_boundary_diff d hSuc dce) thenhave"chain_boundary (Suc n) (h n c) + chain_boundary (Suc n) (h n e)
= chain_boundary (Suc n) f + chain_boundary (Suc n) g - (c + e)" by (simp add: chain_boundary_add hadd) thenhave *: "chain_boundary (Suc n) (f - h n c) = c + (chain_boundary (Suc n) (h n e) - (chain_boundary (Suc n) g - e))" by (simp add: algebra_simps chain_boundary_diff) thenshow"chain_boundary (Suc n) c1 = c + c2" unfolding c1_def c2_def by (simp add: algebra_simps chain_boundary_diff) obtain"singular_chain n (subtopology X (S - U)) c2""singular_chain n (subtopology X T) c2" using singular_chain_diff c c1 * unfolding c1_def c2_def by (metis add_diff_cancel_left' e g hSuc singular_chain_boundary_alt) thenshow"singular_chain n (subtopology (subtopology X (S - U)) (T - U)) c2" by (fastforce simp add: singular_chain_subtopology) qed qed thenhave"singular_relboundary n (subtopology X S) T (c - d) \
singular_relboundary n (subtopology X (S - U)) (T - U) (c - d)" using c d singular_relcycle_diff by metis with hh show"homologous_rel n (subtopology X (S - U)) (T - U) c d" apply (simp add: hom_induced_chain_map cont c d chain_map_ident [OF scc] chain_map_ident [OF scd]) using homologous_rel_set_eq homologous_rel_def by metis qed next have h: "homologous_rel_set n (subtopology X S) T a \<in> (\<lambda>x. homologous_rel_set n (subtopology X S) T (chain_map n id x)) `
singular_relcycle_set n (subtopology X (S - U)) (T - U)" if a: "singular_relcycle n (subtopology X S) T a"for a proof - obtain c' where c': "singular_relcycle n (subtopology X (S - U)) (T - U) c'" "homologous_rel n (subtopology X S) T a c'" using a by (blast intro: excised_relcycle_exists [OF assms]) thenhave scc': "singular_chain n (subtopology X S) c'" using homologous_rel_singular_chain that by (force simp: singular_relcycle) thenshow ?thesis using scc' chain_map_ident [of _ "subtopology X S"] c' homologous_rel_set_eq by fastforce qed have"(\x. homologous_rel_set n (subtopology X S) T (chain_map n id x)) `
singular_relcycle_set n (subtopology X (S - U)) (T - U) =
homologous_rel_set n (subtopology X S) T `
singular_relcycle_set n (subtopology X S) T" by (force simp: cont h singular_relcycle_chain_map) then show"hom_induced n (subtopology X (S - U)) (T - U) (subtopology X S) T id `
homologous_rel_set n (subtopology X (S - U)) (T - U) `
singular_relcycle_set n (subtopology X (S - U)) (T - U)
= homologous_rel_set n (subtopology X S) T ` singular_relcycle_set n (subtopology X S) T" by (simp add: image_comp o_def hom_induced_chain_map_gen cont TU
cong: image_cong_simp) qed qed
subsection\<open>Additivity axiom\<close>
text\<open>Not in the original Eilenberg-Steenrod list but usually included nowadays,
following Milnor's "On Axiomatic Homology Theory".\
lemma iso_chain_group_sum: assumes disj: "pairwise disjnt \" and UU: "\\ = topspace X" and subs: "\C T. \compactin X C; path_connectedin X C; T \ \; ~ disjnt C T\ \ C \T" shows"(\f. sum' f \) \ iso (sum_group \ (\S. chain_group p (subtopology X S))) (chain_group p X)" proof - have pw: "pairwise (\i j. disjnt (singular_simplex_set p (subtopology X i))
(singular_simplex_set p (subtopology X j))) \<U>" proof fix S T assume"S \ \" "T \ \" "S \ T" thenshow"disjnt (singular_simplex_set p (subtopology X S))
(singular_simplex_set p (subtopology X T))" using nonempty_standard_simplex [of p] disj by (fastforce simp: pairwise_def disjnt_def singular_simplex_subtopology image_subset_iff) qed have"\S\\. singular_simplex p (subtopology X S) f" if f: "singular_simplex p X f"for f proof - obtain x where x: "x \ topspace X" "x \ f ` standard_simplex p" using f nonempty_standard_simplex [of p] continuous_map_image_subset_topspace unfolding singular_simplex_def by fastforce thenobtain S where"S \ \" "x \ S" using UU by auto have"f ` standard_simplex p \ S" proof (rule subs) have cont: "continuous_map (subtopology (powertop_real UNIV)
(standard_simplex p)) X f" using f singular_simplex_def by auto show"compactin X (f ` standard_simplex p)" by (simp add: compactin_subtopology compactin_standard_simplex image_compactin [OF _ cont]) show"path_connectedin X (f ` standard_simplex p)" by (simp add: path_connectedin_subtopology path_connectedin_standard_simplex path_connectedin_continuous_map_image [OF cont]) have"standard_simplex p \ {}" by (simp add: nonempty_standard_simplex) then show"\ disjnt (f ` standard_simplex p) S" using x \<open>x \<in> S\<close> by (auto simp: disjnt_def) qed (auto simp: \<open>S \<in> \<U>\<close>) thenshow ?thesis by (meson \<open>S \<in> \<U>\<close> singular_simplex_subtopology that) qed thenhave"(\i\\. singular_simplex_set p (subtopology X i)) = singular_simplex_set p X" by (auto simp: singular_simplex_subtopology) thenshow ?thesis using iso_free_Abelian_group_sum [OF pw] by (simp add: chain_group_def) qed
lemma relcycle_group_0_eq_chain_group: "relcycle_group 0 X {} = chain_group 0 X" proof (rule monoid.equality) show"carrier (relcycle_group 0 X {}) = carrier (chain_group 0 X)" by (simp add: Collect_mono chain_boundary_def singular_cycle subset_antisym) qed (simp_all add: relcycle_group_def chain_group_def)
proposition iso_cycle_group_sum: assumes disj: "pairwise disjnt \" and UU: "\\ = topspace X" and subs: "\C T. \compactin X C; path_connectedin X C; T \ \; \ disjnt C T\ \ C \T" shows"(\f. sum' f \) \ iso (sum_group \ (\T. relcycle_group p (subtopology X T) {}))
(relcycle_group p X {})"
--> --------------------
--> maximum size reached
--> --------------------
¤ Dauer der Verarbeitung: 0.20 Sekunden
(vorverarbeitet)
¤
Die Informationen auf dieser Webseite wurden
nach bestem Wissen sorgfältig zusammengestellt. Es wird jedoch weder Vollständigkeit, noch Richtigkeit,
noch Qualität der bereit gestellten Informationen zugesichert.
Bemerkung:
Die farbliche Syntaxdarstellung ist noch experimentell.