(* ********************************************************************** *) (* It is easy to see that WO7 is equivalent to (**) *) (* ********************************************************************** *)
(* ********************************************************************** *) (* It is also easy to show that LEMMA implies WO1. *) (* ********************************************************************** *)
(* ********************************************************************** *) (* The Rubins' proof of the other implication is contained within the *) (* following sentence \<in> *) (* "... each infinite ordinal is well ordered by < but not by >." *) (* This statement can be proved by the following two theorems. *) (* But moreover we need to show similar property for any well ordered *) (* infinite set. It is not very difficult thanks to Isabelle order types *) (* We show that if a set is well ordered by some relation and by its *) (* converse, then apropriate order type is well ordered by the converse *) (* of it's membership relation, which in connection with the previous *) (* gives the conclusion. *) (* ********************************************************************** *)
Die Informationen auf dieser Webseite wurden
nach bestem Wissen sorgfältig zusammengestellt. Es wird jedoch weder Vollständigkeit, noch Richtigkeit,
noch Qualität der bereit gestellten Informationen zugesichert.
Bemerkung:
Die farbliche Syntaxdarstellung ist noch experimentell.