lemma less_option_None_is_Some: "None < x \ \z. x = Some z" by (cases x) (simp_all add: less_option_def)
lemma less_option_None_Some [simp]: "None < Some x" by (simp add: less_option_def)
lemma less_option_None_Some_code [code]: "None < Some x \ True" by simp
lemma less_option_Some [simp, code]: "Some x < Some y \ x < y" by (simp add: less_option_def)
instance by standard
(auto simp add: less_eq_option_def less_option_def less_le_not_le
elim: order_trans split: option.splits)
end
instance option :: (order) order by standard (auto simp add: less_eq_option_def less_option_def split: option.splits)
instance option :: (linorder) linorder by standard (auto simp add: less_eq_option_def less_option_def split: option.splits)
instantiation option :: (order) order_bot begin
definition bot_option where"\ = None"
instance by standard (simp add: bot_option_def)
end
instantiation option :: (order_top) order_top begin
definition top_option where"\ = Some \"
instance by standard (simp add: top_option_def less_eq_option_def split: option.split)
end
instance option :: (wellorder) wellorder proof fix P :: "'a option \ bool" fix z :: "'a option" assume H: "\x. (\y. y < x \ P y) \ P x" have"P None"by (rule H) simp thenhave P_Some [case_names Some]: "P z"if"\x. z = Some x \ (P \ Some) x" for z using\<open>P None\<close> that by (cases z) simp_all show"P z" proof (cases z rule: P_Some) case (Some w) show"(P \ Some) w" proof (induct rule: less_induct) case (less x) have"P (Some x)" proof (rule H) fix y :: "'a option" assume"y < Some x" show"P y" proof (cases y rule: P_Some) case (Some v) with\<open>y < Some x\<close> have "v < x" by simp with less show"(P \ Some) v" . qed qed thenshow ?caseby simp qed qed qed
instantiation option :: (inf) inf begin
definition inf_option where "x \ y = (case x of None \ None | Some x \ (case y of None \ None | Some y \ Some (x \ y)))"
lemma inf_None_1 [simp, code]: "None \ y = None" by (simp add: inf_option_def)
lemma sup_Some [simp, code]: "Some x \ Some y = Some (x \ y)" by (simp add: sup_option_def)
instance ..
end
instance option :: (semilattice_inf) semilattice_inf proof fix x y z :: "'a option" show"x \ y \ x" by (cases x, simp_all, cases y, simp_all) show"x \ y \ y" by (cases x, simp_all, cases y, simp_all) show"x \ y \ x \ z \ x \ y \ z" by (cases x, simp_all, cases y, simp_all, cases z, simp_all) qed
instance option :: (semilattice_sup) semilattice_sup proof fix x y z :: "'a option" show"x \ x \ y" by (cases x, simp_all, cases y, simp_all) show"y \ x \ y" by (cases x, simp_all, cases y, simp_all) fix x y z :: "'a option" show"y \ x \ z \ x \ y \ z \ x" by (cases y, simp_all, cases z, simp_all, cases x, simp_all) qed
instance option :: (distrib_lattice) distrib_lattice proof fix x y z :: "'a option" show"x \ y \ z = (x \ y) \ (x \ z)" by (cases x, simp_all, cases y, simp_all, cases z, simp_all add: sup_inf_distrib1 inf_commute) qed
instantiation option :: (complete_lattice) complete_lattice begin
definition Inf_option :: "'a option set \ 'a option" where "\A = (if None \ A then None else Some (\Option.these A))"
lemma None_in_Inf [simp]: "None \ A \ \A = None" by (simp add: Inf_option_def)
definition Sup_option :: "'a option set \ 'a option" where "\A = (if A = {} \ A = {None} then None else Some (\Option.these A))"
lemma empty_Sup [simp]: "\{} = None" by (simp add: Sup_option_def)
lemma singleton_None_Sup [simp]: "\{None} = None" by (simp add: Sup_option_def)
instance proof fix x :: "'a option"and A assume"x \ A" thenshow"\A \ x" by (cases x) (auto simp add: Inf_option_def in_these_eq intro: Inf_lower) next fix z :: "'a option"and A assume *: "\x. x \ A \ z \ x" show"z \ \A" proof (cases z) case None thenshow ?thesis by simp next case (Some y) show ?thesis by (auto simp add: Inf_option_def in_these_eq Some intro!: Inf_greatest dest!: *) qed next fix x :: "'a option"and A assume"x \ A" thenshow"x \ \A" by (cases x) (auto simp add: Sup_option_def in_these_eq intro: Sup_upper) next fix z :: "'a option"and A assume *: "\x. x \ A \ x \ z" show"\A \ z " proof (cases z) case None with * have"\x. x \ A \ x = None" by (auto dest: less_eq_option_None_is_None) thenhave"A = {} \ A = {None}" by blast thenshow ?thesis by (simp add: Sup_option_def) next case (Some y) from * have"\w. Some w \ A \ Some w \ z" . with Some have"\w. w \ Option.these A \ w \ y" by (simp add: in_these_eq) thenhave"\Option.these A \ y" by (rule Sup_least) with Some show ?thesis by (simp add: Sup_option_def) qed next show"\{} = (\::'a option)" by (auto simp: bot_option_def) show"\{} = (\::'a option)" by (auto simp: top_option_def Inf_option_def) qed
lemma Some_Sup: "A \ {} \ Some (\A) = \(Some ` A)" by (auto simp add: Sup_option_def)
lemma Some_INF: "Some (\x\A. f x) = (\x\A. Some (f x))" by (simp add: Some_Inf image_comp)
lemma Some_SUP: "A \ {} \ Some (\x\A. f x) = (\x\A. Some (f x))" by (simp add: Some_Sup image_comp)
lemma option_Inf_Sup: "\(Sup ` A) \ \(Inf ` {f ` A |f. \Y\A. f Y \ Y})" for A :: "('a::complete_distrib_lattice option) set set" proof (cases "{} \ A") case True thenshow ?thesis by (rule INF_lower2, simp_all) next case False from this have X: "{} \ A" by simp thenshow ?thesis proof (cases "{None} \ A") case True thenshow ?thesis by (rule INF_lower2, simp_all) next case False
{fix y assume A: "y \ A" have"Sup (y - {None}) = Sup y" by (metis (no_types, lifting) Sup_option_def insert_Diff_single these_insert_None these_not_empty_eq) from A and this have"(\z. y - {None} = z - {None} \ z \ A) \ \y = \(y - {None})" by auto
} from this have A: "Sup ` A = (Sup ` {y - {None} | y. y\A})" by (auto simp add: image_def)
have [simp]: "\y. y \ A \ \ya. {ya. \x. x \ y \ (\y. x = Some y) \ ya = the x}
= {y. \<exists>x\<in>ya - {None}. y = the x} \<and> ya \<in> A" by (rule exI, auto)
have [simp]: "\y. y \ A \
(\<exists>ya. y - {None} = ya - {None} \<and> ya \<in> A) \<and> \<Squnion>{ya. \<exists>x\<in>y - {None}. ya = the x}
= \<Squnion>{ya. \<exists>x. x \<in> y \<and> (\<exists>y. x = Some y) \<and> ya = the x}" apply (safe, blast) by (rule arg_cong [of _ _ Sup], auto)
{fix y assume [simp]: "y \ A" have"\x. (\y. x = {ya. \x\y - {None}. ya = the x} \ y \ A) \ \{ya. \x. x \ y \ (\y. x = Some y) \ ya = the x} = \x" and"\x. (\y. x = y - {None} \ y \ A) \ \{ya. \x\y - {None}. ya = the x} = \{y. \xa. xa \ x \ (\y. xa = Some y) \ y = the xa}" apply (rule exI [of _ "{ya. \x. x \ y \ (\y. x = Some y) \ ya = the x}"], simp) by (rule exI [of _ "y - {None}"], simp)
} from this have C: "(\x. (\Option.these x)) ` {y - {None} |y. y \ A} = (Sup ` {the ` (y - {None}) |y. y \ A})" by (simp add: image_def Option.these_def, safe, simp_all)
have D: "\ f . \Y\A. f Y \ Y \ False" by (drule spec [of _ "\ Y . SOME x . x \ Y"], simp add: X some_in_eq)
define F where"F = (\ Y . SOME x::'a option . x \ (Y - {None}))"
have G: "\ Y . Y \ A \ \ x . x \ Y - {None}" by (metis False X all_not_in_conv insert_Diff_single these_insert_None these_not_empty_eq)
have F: "\ Y . Y \ A \ F Y \ (Y - {None})" by (metis F_def G empty_iff some_in_eq)
have"Some \ \ Inf (F ` A)" by (metis (no_types, lifting) Diff_iff F Inf_option_def bot.extremum image_iff
less_eq_option_Some singletonI)
from this have"Inf (F ` A) \ None" by (cases "\x\A. F x", simp_all)
from this have"Inf (F ` A) \ None \ Inf (F ` A) \ Inf ` {f ` A |f. \Y\A. f Y \ Y}" using F by auto
from this have"\ x . x \ None \ x \ Inf ` {f ` A |f. \Y\A. f Y \ Y}" by blast
from this have E:" Inf ` {f ` A |f. \Y\A. f Y \ Y} = {None} \ False" by blast
have [simp]: "((\x\{f ` A |f. \Y\A. f Y \ Y}. \x) = None) = False" by (metis (no_types, lifting) E Sup_option_def \<open>\<exists>x. x \<noteq> None \<and> x \<in> Inf ` {f ` A |f. \<forall>Y\<in>A. f Y \<in> Y}\<close>
ex_in_conv option.simps(3))
have B: "Option.these ((\x. Some (\Option.these x)) ` {y - {None} |y. y \ A})
= ((\<lambda>x. (\<Squnion> Option.these x)) ` {y - {None} |y. y \<in> A})" by (metis image_image these_image_Some_eq)
{ fix f assume A: "\ Y . (\y. Y = the ` (y - {None}) \ y \ A) \ f Y \ Y"
have"\xa. xa \ A \ f {y. \a\xa - {None}. y = the a} = f (the ` (xa - {None}))" by (simp add: image_def) from this have [simp]: "\xa. xa \ A \ \x\A. f {y. \a\xa - {None}. y = the a} = f (the ` (x - {None}))" by blast have"\xa. xa \ A \ f (the ` (xa - {None})) = f {y. \a \ xa - {None}. y = the a} \ xa \ A" by (simp add: image_def) from this have [simp]: "\xa. xa \ A \ \x. f (the ` (xa - {None})) = f {y. \a\x - {None}. y = the a} \ x \ A" by blast
{ fix Y have"Y \ A \ Some (f (the ` (Y - {None}))) \ Y" using A [of "the ` (Y - {None})"] apply (simp add: image_def) using option.collapse by fastforce
} from this have [simp]: "\ Y . Y \ A \ Some (f (the ` (Y - {None}))) \ Y" by blast have [simp]: "(\x\A. Some (f {y. \x\x - {None}. y = the x})) = \{Some (f {y. \a\x - {None}. y = the a}) |x. x \ A}" by (simp add: Setcompr_eq_image)
have [simp]: "\x. (\f. x = {y. \x\A. y = f x} \ (\Y\A. f Y \ Y)) \ \{Some (f {y. \a\x - {None}. y = the a}) |x. x \ A} = \x" apply (rule exI [of _ "{Some (f {y. \a\x - {None}. y = the a}) | x . x\ A}"], safe) by (rule exI [of _ "(\ Y . Some (f (the ` (Y - {None})))) "], safe, simp_all)
{ fix xb have"xb \ A \ (\x\{{ya. \x\y - {None}. ya = the x} |y. y \ A}. f x) \ f {y. \x\xb - {None}. y = the x}" apply (rule INF_lower2 [of "{y. \x\xb - {None}. y = the x}"]) by blast+
} from this have [simp]: "(\x\{the ` (y - {None}) |y. y \ A}. f x) \ the (\Y\A. Some (f (the ` (Y - {None}))))" apply (simp add: Inf_option_def image_def Option.these_def) by (rule Inf_greatest, clarsimp) have [simp]: "the (\Y\A. Some (f (the ` (Y - {None})))) \ Option.these (Inf ` {f ` A |f. \Y\A. f Y \ Y})" apply (auto simp add: Option.these_def) apply (rule imageI) apply auto using\<open>\<And>Y. Y \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> Some (f (the ` (Y - {None}))) \<in> Y\<close> apply blast apply (auto simp add: Some_INF [symmetric]) done have"(\x\{the ` (y - {None}) |y. y \ A}. f x) \ \Option.these (Inf ` {f ` A |f. \Y\A. f Y \ Y})" by (rule Sup_upper2 [of "the (Inf ((\ Y . Some (f (the ` (Y - {None})) )) ` A))"], simp_all)
} from this have X: "\ f . \Y. (\y. Y = the ` (y - {None}) \ y \ A) \ f Y \ Y \
(\<Sqinter>x\<in>{the ` (y - {None}) |y. y \<in> A}. f x) \<le> \<Squnion>Option.these (Inf ` {f ` A |f. \<forall>Y\<in>A. f Y \<in> Y})" by blast
have [simp]: "\ x . x\{y - {None} |y. y \ A} \ x \ {} \ x \ {None}" using F by fastforce
have"(Inf (Sup `A)) = (Inf (Sup ` {y - {None} | y. y\A}))" by (subst A, simp)
alsohave"... = (\x\{y - {None} |y. y \ A}. if x = {} \ x = {None} then None else Some (\Option.these x))" by (simp add: Sup_option_def)
alsohave"... = (\x\{y - {None} |y. y \ A}. Some (\Option.these x))" using G by fastforce
alsohave"... = Some (\Option.these ((\x. Some (\Option.these x)) ` {y - {None} |y. y \ A}))" by (simp add: Inf_option_def, safe)
alsohave"... = Some (\ ((\x. (\Option.these x)) ` {y - {None} |y. y \ A}))" by (simp add: B)
alsohave"... = Some (Inf (Sup ` {the ` (y - {None}) |y. y \ A}))" by (unfold C, simp) thm Inf_Sup alsohave"... = Some (\x\{f ` {the ` (y - {None}) |y. y \ A} |f. \Y. (\y. Y = the ` (y - {None}) \ y \ A) \ f Y \ Y}. \x) " by (simp add: Inf_Sup)
alsohave"... \ \ (Inf ` {f ` A |f. \Y\A. f Y \ Y})" proof (cases "\ (Inf ` {f ` A |f. \Y\A. f Y \ Y})") case None thenshow ?thesis by (simp add: less_eq_option_def) next case (Some a) thenshow ?thesis apply simp apply (rule Sup_least, safe) apply (simp add: Sup_option_def) apply (cases "(\f. \Y\A. f Y \ Y) \ Inf ` {f ` A |f. \Y\A. f Y \ Y} = {None}", simp_all) by (drule X, simp) qed finallyshow ?thesis by simp qed qed
instance option :: (complete_distrib_lattice) complete_distrib_lattice by (standard, simp add: option_Inf_Sup)
Die Informationen auf dieser Webseite wurden
nach bestem Wissen sorgfältig zusammengestellt. Es wird jedoch weder Vollständigkeit, noch Richtigkeit,
noch Qualität der bereit gestellten Informationen zugesichert.
Bemerkung:
Die farbliche Syntaxdarstellung ist noch experimentell.