Quelle CasesDep.v Sprache: Coq

(* Check forward dependencies *)

Check
  (fun (P : nat -> Prop) Q (A : P 0 -> Q) (B : forall n : nat, P (S n) -> Q)
     x =>
   match x return Q with
   | exist _ O H => A H
   | exist _ (S n) H => B n H
   end).

(* Check dependencies in anonymous arguments (from FTA/listn.v) *)

Inductive listn (A : Set) : nat -> Set :=
  | niln : listn A 0
  | consn : forall (a : A) (n : nat), listn A n -> listn A (S n).

Section Folding.
Variable B C : Set.
Variable g : B -> C -> C.
Variable c : C.

Fixpoint foldrn (n : nat) (bs : listn B n) {struct bs} : C :=
  match bs with
  | niln _ => c
  | consn _ b _ tl => g b (foldrn _ tl)
  end.
End Folding.

(** Testing post-processing of nested dependencies *)

Check fun x:{x|x=0}*nat+nat => match x with
      | inl ((exist _ 0 eq_refl),0) => None
      | _ => Some 0
      end.

Check fun x:{_:{x|x=0}|True}+nat => match x with
      | inl (exist _ (exist _ 0 eq_refl) I) => None
      | _ => Some 0
      end.

Check fun x:{_:{x|x=0}|True}+nat => match x with
      | inl (exist _ (exist _ 0 eq_refl) I) => None
      | _ => Some 0
      end.

Check fun x:{_:{x|x=0}|True}+nat => match x return option nat with
      | inl (exist _ (exist _ 0 eq_refl) I) => None
      | _ => Some 0
      end.

  (* the next two examples were failing from r14703 (Nov 22 2011) to r14732 *)
  (* due to a bug in dependencies postprocessing (revealed by CoLoR) *)

Check fun x:{x:nat*nat|fst x = 0 & True} => match x return option nat with
      | exist2 _ _ (x,y) eq_refl I => None
      end.

Check fun x:{_:{x:nat*nat|fst x = 0 & True}|True}+nat => match x return option nat with
      | inl (exist _ (exist2 _ _ (x,y) eq_refl I) I) => None
      | _ => Some 0
      end.

(* -------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(*   Example to test patterns matching on dependent families            *)
(* This exemple extracted from the development done by Nacira Chabane   *)
(* (equipe Paris 6)                                                     *)
(* -------------------------------------------------------------------- *)

Require Import Prelude.

Section Orderings.
   Variable U : Type.

   Definition Relation := U -> U -> Prop.

   Variable R : Relation.

   Definition Reflexive : Prop := forall x : U, R x x.

   Definition Transitive : Prop := forall x y z : U, R x y -> R y z -> R x z.

   Definition Symmetric : Prop := forall x y : U, R x y -> R y x.

   Definition Antisymmetric : Prop := forall x y : U, R x y -> R y x -> x = y.

   Definition contains (R R' : Relation) : Prop :=
     forall x y : U, R' x y -> R x y.
  Definition same_relation (R R' : Relation) : Prop :=
    contains R R' /\ contains R' R.
Inductive Equivalence : Prop :=
    Build_Equivalence : Reflexive -> Transitive -> Symmetric -> Equivalence.

   Inductive PER : Prop :=
       Build_PER : Symmetric -> Transitive -> PER.

End Orderings.

(***** Setoid  *******)

Inductive Setoid : Type :=
    Build_Setoid :
      forall (S : Type) (R : Relation S), Equivalence _ R -> Setoid.

Definition elem (A : Setoid) := let (S, R, e) := A in S.

Definition equal (A : Setoid) :=
  let (S, R, e) as s return (Relation (elem s)) := A in R.

Axiom prf_equiv : forall A : Setoid, Equivalence (elem A) (equal A).
Axiom prf_refl : forall A : Setoid, Reflexive (elem A) (equal A).
Axiom prf_sym : forall A : Setoid, Symmetric (elem A) (equal A).
Axiom prf_trans : forall A : Setoid, Transitive (elem A) (equal A).

Section Maps.
Variable A B : Setoid.

Definition Map_law (f : elem A -> elem B) :=
  forall x y : elem A, equal _ x y -> equal _ (f x) (f y).

Inductive Map : Type :=
    Build_Map : forall (f : elem A -> elem B) (p : Map_law f), Map.

Definition explicit_ap (m : Map) :=
  match m return (elem A -> elem B) with
  | Build_Map f p => f
  end.

Axiom pres : forall m : Map, Map_law (explicit_ap m).

Definition ext (f g : Map) :=
  forall x : elem A, equal _ (explicit_ap f x) (explicit_ap g x).

Axiom Equiv_map_eq : Equivalence Map ext.

Definition Map_setoid := Build_Setoid Map ext Equiv_map_eq.

End Maps.

Notation ap := (explicit_ap _ _).

(* <Warning> : Grammar is replaced by Notation *)

Definition ap2 (A B C : Setoid) (f : elem (Map_setoid A (Map_setoid B C)))
  (a : elem A) := ap (ap f a).

(*****    posint     ******)

Inductive posint : Type :=
  | Z : posint
  | Suc : posint -> posint.

Axiom
  f_equal : forall (A B : Type) (f : A -> B) (x y : A), x = y -> f x = f y.
Axiom eq_Suc : forall n m : posint, n = m -> Suc n = Suc m.

(* The predecessor function *)

Definition pred (n : posint) : posint :=
  match n return posint with
  | Z => (* Z *)  Z
      (* Suc u *)
  | Suc u => u
  end.

Axiom pred_Sucn : forall m : posint, m = pred (Suc m).
Axiom eq_add_Suc : forall n m : posint, Suc n = Suc m -> n = m.
Axiom not_eq_Suc : forall n m : posint, n <> m -> Suc n <> Suc m.

Definition IsSuc (n : posint) : Prop :=
  match n return Prop with
  | Z => (* Z *)  False
      (* Suc p *)
  | Suc p => True
  end.
Definition IsZero (n : posint) : Prop :=
  match n with
  | Z => True
  | Suc _ => False
  end.

Axiom Z_Suc : forall n : posint, Z <> Suc n.
Axiom Suc_Z : forall n : posint, Suc n <> Z.
Axiom n_Sucn : forall n : posint, n <> Suc n.
Axiom Sucn_n : forall n : posint, Suc n <> n.
Axiom eqT_symt : forall a b : posint, a <> b -> b <> a.

(*******  Dsetoid *****)

Definition Decidable (A : Type) (R : Relation A) :=
  forall x y : A, R x y \/ ~ R x y.

Record DSetoid : Type :=
  {Set_of : Setoid; prf_decid : Decidable (elem Set_of) (equal Set_of)}.

(* example de Dsetoide d'entiers *)

Axiom eqT_equiv : Equivalence posint (eq (A:=posint)).
Axiom Eq_posint_deci : Decidable posint (eq (A:=posint)).

(* Dsetoide des posint*)

Definition Set_of_posint := Build_Setoid posint (eq (A:=posint)) eqT_equiv.

Definition Dposint := Build_DSetoid Set_of_posint Eq_posint_deci.

(**************************************)

(* Definition des signatures *)
(* une signature est un ensemble d'operateurs muni
de l'arite de chaque operateur *)

Module Sig.

Record Signature : Type :=
  {Sigma : DSetoid; Arity : Map (Set_of Sigma) (Set_of Dposint)}.

Parameter S : Signature.

Parameter Var : DSetoid.

Inductive TERM : Type :=
  | var : elem (Set_of Var) -> TERM
  | oper :
      forall op : elem (Set_of (Sigma S)), LTERM (ap (Arity S) op) -> TERM
with LTERM : posint -> Type :=
  | nil : LTERM Z
  | cons : TERM -> forall n : posint, LTERM n -> LTERM (Suc n).

(* -------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(*                  Examples                                            *)
(* -------------------------------------------------------------------- *)

Parameter t1 t2 : TERM.

Type
  match t1, t2 with
  | var v1, var v2 => True
  | oper op1 l1, oper op2 l2 => False
  | _, _ => False
  end.

Parameter n2 : posint.
Parameter l1 l2 : LTERM n2.

Type
  match l1, l2 with
  | nil, nil => True
  | cons v m y, nil => False
  | _, _ => False
  end.

Type
  match l1, l2 with
  | nil, nil => True
  | cons u n x, cons v m y => False
  | _, _ => False
  end.

Module Type Version1.

Definition equalT (t1 t2 : TERM) : Prop :=
  match t1, t2 with
  | var v1, var v2 => True
  | oper op1 l1, oper op2 l2 => False
  | _, _ => False
  end.

Definition EqListT (n1 : posint) (l1 : LTERM n1) (n2 : posint)
  (l2 : LTERM n2) : Prop :=
  match l1, l2 with
  | nil, nil => True
  | cons t1 n1' l1', cons t2 n2' l2' => False
  | _, _ => False
  end.

End Version1.

(* ------------------------------------------------------------------*)
(*          Initial example (without patterns)                       *)
(*-------------------------------------------------------------------*)

Module Version2.

Fixpoint equalT (t1 : TERM) : TERM -> Prop :=
  match t1 return (TERM -> Prop) with
  | var v1 =>
      (*var*)
      fun t2 : TERM =>
      match t2 return Prop with
      | var v2 =>
          (*var*) equal _ v1 v2
          (*oper*)
      | oper op2 _ => False
      end
      (*oper*)
  | oper op1 l1 =>
      fun t2 : TERM =>
      match t2 return Prop with
      | var v2 =>
          (*var*) False
          (*oper*)
      | oper op2 l2 =>
          equal _ op1 op2 /\
          EqListT (ap (Arity S) op1) l1 (ap (Arity S) op2) l2
      end
  end

with EqListT (n1 : posint) (l1 : LTERM n1) {struct l1} :
forall n2 : posint, LTERM n2 -> Prop :=
  match l1 in (LTERM _) return (forall n2 : posint, LTERM n2 -> Prop) with
  | nil =>
      (*nil*)
      fun (n2 : posint) (l2 : LTERM n2) =>
      match l2 in (LTERM _) return Prop with
      | nil =>
          (*nil*) True
          (*cons*)
      | cons t2 n2' l2' => False
      end
      (*cons*)
  | cons t1 n1' l1' =>
      fun (n2 : posint) (l2 : LTERM n2) =>
      match l2 in (LTERM _) return Prop with
      | nil =>
          (*nil*)  False
          (*cons*)
      | cons t2 n2' l2' => equalT t1 t2 /\ EqListT n1' l1' n2' l2'
      end
  end.

End Version2.

(* ---------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(*                Version with simple patterns                      *)
(* ---------------------------------------------------------------- *)

Module Version3.

Fixpoint equalT (t1 : TERM) : TERM -> Prop :=
  match t1 with
  | var v1 =>
      fun t2 : TERM =>
      match t2 with
      | var v2 => equal _ v1 v2
      | oper op2 _ => False
      end
  | oper op1 l1 =>
      fun t2 : TERM =>
      match t2 with
      | var _ => False
      | oper op2 l2 =>
          equal _ op1 op2 /\
          EqListT (ap (Arity S) op1) l1 (ap (Arity S) op2) l2
      end
  end

with EqListT (n1 : posint) (l1 : LTERM n1) {struct l1} :
forall n2 : posint, LTERM n2 -> Prop :=
  match l1 return (forall n2 : posint, LTERM n2 -> Prop) with
  | nil =>
      fun (n2 : posint) (l2 : LTERM n2) =>
      match l2 with
      | nil => True
      | _ => False
      end
  | cons t1 n1' l1' =>
      fun (n2 : posint) (l2 : LTERM n2) =>
      match l2 with
      | nil => False
      | cons t2 n2' l2' => equalT t1 t2 /\ EqListT n1' l1' n2' l2'
      end
  end.

End Version3.

Module Version4.

Fixpoint equalT (t1 : TERM) : TERM -> Prop :=
  match t1 with
  | var v1 =>
      fun t2 : TERM =>
      match t2 with
      | var v2 => equal _ v1 v2
      | oper op2 _ => False
      end
  | oper op1 l1 =>
      fun t2 : TERM =>
      match t2 with
      | var _ => False
      | oper op2 l2 =>
          equal _ op1 op2 /\
          EqListT (ap (Arity S) op1) l1 (ap (Arity S) op2) l2
      end
  end

with EqListT (n1 : posint) (l1 : LTERM n1) (n2 : posint)
(l2 : LTERM n2) {struct l1} : Prop :=
  match l1 with
  | nil => match l2 with
           | nil => True
           | _ => False
           end
  | cons t1 n1' l1' =>
      match l2 with
      | nil => False
      | cons t2 n2' l2' => equalT t1 t2 /\ EqListT n1' l1' n2' l2'
      end
  end.

End Version4.

(* ---------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(*                  Version with multiple patterns                  *)
(* ---------------------------------------------------------------- *)

Module Version5.

Fixpoint equalT (t1 t2 : TERM) {struct t1} : Prop :=
  match t1, t2 with
  | var v1, var v2 => equal _ v1 v2
  | oper op1 l1, oper op2 l2 =>
      equal _ op1 op2 /\ EqListT (ap (Arity S) op1) l1 (ap (Arity S) op2) l2
  | _, _ => False
  end

with EqListT (n1 : posint) (l1 : LTERM n1) (n2 : posint)
(l2 : LTERM n2) {struct l1} : Prop :=
  match l1, l2 with
  | nil, nil => True
  | cons t1 n1' l1', cons t2 n2' l2' =>
      equalT t1 t2 /\ EqListT n1' l1' n2' l2'
  | _, _ => False
  end.

End Version5.

(* ------------------------------------------------------------------ *)

End Sig.

(* Exemple soumis par Bruno *)

Definition bProp (b : bool) : Prop := if b then True else False.

Definition f0 (F : False) (ty : bool) : bProp ty :=
  match ty as _, ty return (bProp ty) with
  | true, true => I
  | _, false => F
  | _, true => I
  end.

(* Simplification of bug/wish #1671 *)

Inductive I : unit -> Type :=
| C : forall a, I a -> I tt.

(*
Definition F (l:I tt) : l = l :=
match l return l = l with
| C tt (C _ l')  => refl_equal (C tt (C _ l'))
end.

one would expect that the compilation of F (this involves
some kind of pattern-unification) would produce:
*)

Definition F (l:I tt) : l = l :=
match l return l = l with
| C tt l' => match l' return C _ l' = C _ l' with C _ l''  => refl_equal (C tt (C _ l'')) end
end.

Inductive J : nat -> Type :=
| D : forall a, J (S a) -> J a.

(*
Definition G (l:J O) : l = l :=
match l return l = l with
| D O (D 1 l')  => refl_equal (D O (D 1 l'))
| D _ _  => refl_equal _
end.

one would expect that the compilation of G (this involves inversion)
would produce:
*)

Definition G (l:J O) : l = l :=
match l return l = l with
| D 0 l'' =>
    match l'' as _l'' in J n return
      match n return forall l:J n, Prop with
      | O => fun _ => l = l
      | S p => fun l'' => D p l'' = D p l''
      end _l'' with
    | D 1 l'  => refl_equal (D O (D 1 l'))
    | _ => refl_equal _
    end
| _ => refl_equal _
end.

Fixpoint app {A} {n m} (v : listn A n) (w : listn A m) : listn A (n + m) :=
  match v with
    | niln _ => w
    | consn _ a n' v' => consn _ a _ (app v' w)
  end.

(* Testing regression of bug 2106 *)

Set Implicit Arguments.

Inductive nt := E.
Definition root := E.
Inductive ctor : list nt -> nt -> Type :=
Plus : ctor (cons E (cons E nil)) E.

Inductive term : nt -> Type :=
| Term : forall s n, ctor s n -> spine s -> term n
with spine : list nt -> Type :=
| EmptySpine : spine nil
| ConsSpine : forall n s, term n -> spine s -> spine (n :: s).

Inductive step : nt -> nt -> Type :=
  | Step : forall l n r n' (c:ctor (l++n::r) n'), spine l -> spine r -> step n
n'.

Definition test (s:step E E) :=
  match s with
    | @Step nil _ (cons E nil) _ Plus l l' => true
    | _ => false
  end.

(* Testing regression of bug 2454 ("get" used not be type-checkable when
   defined with its type constraint) *)

Inductive K : nat -> Type := KC : forall (p q:nat), K p.

Definition get : K O -> nat := fun x => match x with KC p q => q end.

(* Checking correct order of substitution of realargs *)
(* (was broken from revision 14664 to 14669) *)
(* Example extracted from contrib CoLoR *)

Inductive EQ : nat -> nat -> Prop := R x y : EQ x y.

Check fun e t (d1 d2:EQ e t) =>
      match d1 in EQ e1 t1, d2 in EQ e2 t2 return
        (e1,t1) = (e2,t2) -> (e1,t1) = (e,t) -> 0=0
      with
      | R _ _, R _ _ => fun _ _ => eq_refl
      end.

quality99%

¤ Dauer der Verarbeitung: 0.12 Sekunden ¤

Wurzel

Suchen

Beweissystem der NASA

Beweissystem Isabelle

NIST Cobol Testsuite

Cephes Mathematical Library

Wiener Entwicklungsmethode

Haftungshinweis

Die Informationen auf dieser Webseite wurden nach bestem Wissen sorgfältig zusammengestellt. Es wird jedoch weder Vollständigkeit, noch Richtigkeit, noch Qualität der bereit gestellten Informationen zugesichert.

Bemerkung:

Die farbliche Syntaxdarstellung ist noch experimentell.