Quelle Tauto.v Sprache: Coq

(************************************************************************)
(*         *      The Rocq Prover / The Rocq Development Team           *)
(*  v      *         Copyright INRIA, CNRS and contributors             *)
(* <O___,, * (see version control and CREDITS file for authors & dates) *)
(*   \VV/  **************************************************************)
(*    //   *    This file is distributed under the terms of the         *)
(*         *     GNU Lesser General Public License Version 2.1          *)
(*         *     (see LICENSE file for the text of the license)         *)
(************************************************************************)

(**** Tactics Tauto and Intuition ****)

(**** Tauto:
  Tactic for automating proof in Intuionnistic Propositional Calculus, based on
  the contraction-free LJT* of Dickhoff ****)

(**** Intuition:
  Simplifications of goals, based on LJT* calcul ****)

(**** Examples of intuitionistic tautologies ****)
Parameter A B C D E F : Prop.
Parameter even : nat -> Prop.
Parameter P : nat -> Prop.

Lemma Ex_Wallen : (A -> B /\ C) -> (A -> B) \/ (A -> C).
Proof.
   tauto.
Qed.

Lemma Ex_Klenne : ~ ~ (A \/ ~ A).
Proof.
   tauto.
Qed.

Lemma Ex_Klenne' : forall n : nat, ~ ~ (even n \/ ~ even n).
Proof.
   tauto.
Qed.

Lemma Ex_Klenne'' :
~ ~ ((forall n : nat, even n) \/ ~ (forall m : nat, even m)).
Proof.
   tauto.
Qed.

Lemma tauto : (forall x : nat, P x) -> forall y : nat, P y.
Proof.
   tauto.
Qed.

Lemma tauto1 : A -> A.
Proof.
   tauto.
Qed.

Lemma tauto2 : (A -> B -> C) -> (A -> B) -> A -> C.
Proof.
   tauto.
Qed.

Lemma a : forall (x0 : A \/ B) (x1 : B /\ C), A -> B.
Proof.
   tauto.
Qed.

Lemma a2 : (A -> B /\ C) -> (A -> B) \/ (A -> C).
Proof.
   tauto.
Qed.

Lemma a4 : ~ A -> ~ A.
Proof.
   tauto.
Qed.

Lemma e2 : ~ ~ (A \/ ~ A).
Proof.
   tauto.
Qed.

Lemma e4 : ~ ~ (A \/ B -> A \/ B).
Proof.
   tauto.
Qed.

Lemma y0 :
forall (x0 : A) (x1 : ~ A) (x2 : A -> B) (x3 : A \/ B) (x4 : A /\ B),
A -> False.
Proof.
   tauto.
Qed.

Lemma y1 : forall x0 : (A /\ B) /\ C, B.
Proof.
   tauto.
Qed.

Lemma y2 : forall (x0 : A) (x1 : B), C \/ B.
Proof.
   tauto.
Qed.

Lemma y3 : forall x0 : A /\ B, B /\ A.
Proof.
   tauto.
Qed.

Lemma y5 : forall x0 : A \/ B, B \/ A.
Proof.
   tauto.
Qed.

Lemma y6 : forall (x0 : A -> B) (x1 : A), B.
Proof.
   tauto.
Qed.

Lemma y7 : forall (x0 : A /\ B -> C) (x1 : B) (x2 : A), C.
Proof.
   tauto.
Qed.

Lemma y8 : forall (x0 : A \/ B -> C) (x1 : A), C.
Proof.
   tauto.
Qed.

Lemma y9 : forall (x0 : A \/ B -> C) (x1 : B), C.
Proof.
   tauto.
Qed.

Lemma y10 : forall (x0 : (A -> B) -> C) (x1 : B), C.
Proof.
   tauto.
Qed.

(* This example took much time with the old version of Tauto *)
Lemma critical_example0 : (~ ~ B -> B) -> (A -> B) -> ~ ~ A -> B.
Proof.
   tauto.
Qed.

(* Same remark as previously *)
Lemma critical_example1 : (~ ~ B -> B) -> (~ B -> ~ A) -> ~ ~ A -> B.
Proof.
   tauto.
Qed.

(* This example took very much time (about 3mn on a PIII 450MHz in bytecode)
   with the old Tauto. Now, it's immediate (less than 1s). *)
Lemma critical_example2 : (~ A <-> B) -> (~ B <-> A) -> (~ ~ A <-> A).
Proof.
   tauto.
Qed.

(* This example was a bug *)
Lemma old_bug0 :
(~ A <-> B) -> (~ (C \/ E) <-> D /\ F) -> (~ (C \/ A \/ E) <-> D /\ B /\ F).
Proof.
   tauto.
Qed.

(* Another bug *)
Lemma old_bug1 : ((A -> B -> False) -> False) -> (B -> False) -> False.
Proof.
   tauto.
Qed.

(* A bug again *)
Lemma old_bug2 :
((((C -> False) -> A) -> ((B -> False) -> A) -> False) -> False) ->
(((C -> B -> False) -> False) -> False) -> ~ A -> A.
Proof.
   tauto.
Qed.

(* A bug from CNF form *)
Lemma old_bug3 :
((~ A \/ B) /\ (~ B \/ B) /\ (~ A \/ ~ B) /\ (~ B \/ ~ B) -> False) ->
~ ((A -> B) -> B) -> False.
Proof.
   tauto.
Qed.

(* sometimes, the behaviour of Tauto depends on the order of the hyps *)
Lemma old_bug3bis :
~ ((A -> B) -> B) ->
((~ B \/ ~ B) /\ (~ B \/ ~ A) /\ (B \/ ~ B) /\ (B \/ ~ A) -> False) -> False.
Proof.
   tauto.
Qed.

(* A bug found by Freek Wiedijk <freek@cs.kun.nl> *)
Lemma new_bug :
((A <-> B) -> (B <-> C)) ->
((B <-> C) -> (C <-> A)) -> ((C <-> A) -> (A <-> B)) -> (A <-> B).
Proof.
   tauto.
Qed.

(*  A private club has the following rules :
*
*  . rule 1 : Every non-scottish member wears red socks
*  . rule 2 : Every member wears a kilt or doesn't wear red socks
*  . rule 3 : The married members don't go out on sunday
*  . rule 4 : A member goes out on sunday if and only if he is scottish
*  . rule 5 : Every member who wears a kilt is scottish and married
*  . rule 6 : Every scottish member wears a kilt
*
*  Actually, no one can be accepted !
*)

Section club.

Variable Scottish RedSocks WearKilt Married GoOutSunday : Prop.

Hypothesis rule1 : ~ Scottish -> RedSocks.
Hypothesis rule2 : WearKilt \/ ~ RedSocks.
Hypothesis rule3 : Married -> ~ GoOutSunday.
Hypothesis rule4 : GoOutSunday <-> Scottish.
Hypothesis rule5 : WearKilt -> Scottish /\ Married.
Hypothesis rule6 : Scottish -> WearKilt.

Lemma NoMember : False.
tauto.
Qed.

End club.

(**** Use of Intuition ****)
Lemma intu0 :
(forall x : nat, P x) /\ B -> (forall y : nat, P y) /\ P 0 \/ B /\ P 0.
Proof.
   intuition.
Qed.

Lemma intu1 :
(forall A : Prop, A \/ ~ A) -> forall x y : nat, x = y \/ x <> y.
Proof.
   intuition.
Qed.

quality99%

¤ Dauer der Verarbeitung: 0.10 Sekunden ¤

Wurzel

Suchen

Beweissystem der NASA

Beweissystem Isabelle

NIST Cobol Testsuite

Cephes Mathematical Library

Wiener Entwicklungsmethode

Haftungshinweis

Die Informationen auf dieser Webseite wurden nach bestem Wissen sorgfältig zusammengestellt. Es wird jedoch weder Vollständigkeit, noch Richtigkeit, noch Qualität der bereit gestellten Informationen zugesichert.

Bemerkung:

Die farbliche Syntaxdarstellung ist noch experimentell.