lemma fTrue_ne_fFalse: "fFalse \ fTrue" unfolding fFalse_def fTrue_def by simp
lemma fNot_table: "fNot fFalse = fTrue" "fNot fTrue = fFalse" unfolding fFalse_def fTrue_def fNot_def by auto
lemma fconj_table: "fconj fFalse P = fFalse" "fconj P fFalse = fFalse" "fconj fTrue fTrue = fTrue" unfolding fFalse_def fTrue_def fconj_def by auto
lemma fdisj_table: "fdisj fTrue P = fTrue" "fdisj P fTrue = fTrue" "fdisj fFalse fFalse = fFalse" unfolding fFalse_def fTrue_def fdisj_def by auto
lemma fimplies_table: "fimplies P fTrue = fTrue" "fimplies fFalse P = fTrue" "fimplies fTrue fFalse = fFalse" unfolding fFalse_def fTrue_def fimplies_def by auto
lemma fAll_table: "Ex (fComp P) \ fAll P = fTrue" "All P \ fAll P = fFalse" unfolding fFalse_def fTrue_def fComp_def fAll_def by auto
lemma fEx_table: "All (fComp P) \ fEx P = fTrue" "Ex P \ fEx P = fFalse" unfolding fFalse_def fTrue_def fComp_def fEx_def by auto
lemma fequal_table: "fequal x x = fTrue" "x = y \ fequal x y = fFalse" unfolding fFalse_def fTrue_def fequal_def by auto
lemma fNot_law: "fNot P \ P" unfolding fNot_def by auto
lemma fComp_law: "fComp P x \ \ P x" unfolding fComp_def ..
lemma fconj_laws: "fconj P P \ P" "fconj P Q \ fconj Q P" "fNot (fconj P Q) \ fdisj (fNot P) (fNot Q)" unfolding fNot_def fconj_def fdisj_def by auto
lemma fdisj_laws: "fdisj P P \ P" "fdisj P Q \ fdisj Q P" "fNot (fdisj P Q) \ fconj (fNot P) (fNot Q)" unfolding fNot_def fconj_def fdisj_def by auto
lemma fimplies_laws: "fimplies P Q \ fdisj (\ P) Q" "fNot (fimplies P Q) \ fconj P (fNot Q)" unfolding fNot_def fconj_def fdisj_def fimplies_def by auto
lemma fAll_law: "fNot (fAll R) \ fEx (fComp R)" unfolding fNot_def fComp_def fAll_def fEx_def by auto
lemma fEx_law: "fNot (fEx R) \ fAll (fComp R)" unfolding fNot_def fComp_def fAll_def fEx_def by auto
lemma fequal_laws: "fequal x y = fequal y x" "fequal x y = fFalse \ fequal y z = fFalse \ fequal x z = fTrue" "fequal x y = fFalse \ fequal (f x) (f y) = fTrue" unfolding fFalse_def fTrue_def fequal_def by auto
text\<open>
We use the @{const HOL.Ex} constant on the right-hand side of @{thm [source] fChoice_iff_Ex} because
we want touse the TPTP-native version if fChoice is introduced in a logic that supports FOOL. In logics that don't support it, it gets replaced by fEx during processing.
Notice that we cannot use @{term"\x. P x"}, as existentials are not skolimized by the metis proof
method but @{term"Ex P"} is eta-expanded if FOOL is supported.\<close>
subsection \<open>Basic connection between ATPs and HOL\<close>
Die Informationen auf dieser Webseite wurden
nach bestem Wissen sorgfältig zusammengestellt. Es wird jedoch weder Vollständigkeit, noch Richtigkeit,
noch Qualität der bereit gestellten Informationen zugesichert.
Bemerkung:
Die farbliche Syntaxdarstellung ist noch experimentell.