(* Title: HOL/MicroJava/BV/JVM.thy Author: Tobias Nipkow, Gerwin Klein Copyright 2000 TUM
*)
section \<open>Kildall for the JVM \label{sec:JVM}\<close>
theory JVM imports Typing_Framework_JVM begin
definition kiljvm :: "jvm_prog \ nat \ nat \ ty \ exception_table \
instr list \<Rightarrow> JVMType.state list \<Rightarrow> JVMType.state list" where "kiljvm G maxs maxr rT et bs ==
kildall (JVMType.le G maxs maxr) (JVMType.sup G maxs maxr) (exec G maxs rT et bs)"
definition wt_kil :: "jvm_prog \ cname \ ty list \ ty \ nat \ nat \
exception_table \<Rightarrow> instr list \<Rightarrow> bool" where "wt_kil G C pTs rT mxs mxl et ins ==
check_bounded ins et \<and> 0 < size ins \<and>
(let first = Some ([],(OK (Class C))#((map OK pTs))@(replicate mxl Err));
start = OK first#(replicate (size ins - 1) (OK None));
result = kiljvm G mxs (1+size pTs+mxl) rT et ins start in\<forall>n < size ins. result!n \<noteq> Err)"
definition wt_jvm_prog_kildall :: "jvm_prog \ bool" where "wt_jvm_prog_kildall G ==
wf_prog (\<lambda>G C (sig,rT,(maxs,maxl,b,et)). wt_kil G C (snd sig) rT maxs maxl et b) G"
lemma subset_replicate: "set (replicate n x) \ {x}" by (induct n) auto
lemma in_set_replicate: "x \ set (replicate n y) \ x = y" proof - assume"x \ set (replicate n y)" alsohave"set (replicate n y) \ {y}" by (rule subset_replicate) finallyhave"x \ {y}" . thus ?thesis by simp qed
shows"\phi. wt_method G C pTs rT maxs mxl bs et phi" proof - let ?start = "OK (Some ([],(OK (Class C))#((map OK pTs))@(replicate mxl Err)))
#(replicate (size bs - 1) (OK None))"
from wtk obtain maxr r where
bounded: "check_bounded bs et"and
result: "r = kiljvm G maxs maxr rT et bs ?start"and
success: "\n < size bs. r!n \ Err" and
instrs: "0 < size bs"and
maxr: "maxr = Suc (length pTs + mxl)" by (unfold wt_kil_def) simp
from bounded have"bounded (exec G maxs rT et bs) (size bs)" by (unfold exec_def) (intro bounded_lift check_bounded_is_bounded) with wf have bcv: "is_bcv (JVMType.le G maxs maxr) Err (exec G maxs rT et bs)
(size bs) (states G maxs maxr) (kiljvm G maxs maxr rT et bs)" by (rule is_bcv_kiljvm)
from C pTs instrs maxr have"?start \ list (length bs) (states G maxs maxr)" apply (unfold JVM_states_unfold) apply (rule listI) apply (auto intro: list_appendI dest!: in_set_replicate) apply force done
with bcv success result have "\ts\list (length bs) (states G maxs maxr).
?start <=[JVMType.le G maxs maxr] ts \<and>
wt_step (JVMType.le G maxs maxr) Err (exec G maxs rT et bs) ts" by (unfold is_bcv_def) auto thenobtain phi' where
phi': "phi'\<in> list (length bs) (states G maxs maxr)" and
s: "?start <=[JVMType.le G maxs maxr] phi'"and
w: "wt_step (JVMType.le G maxs maxr) Err (exec G maxs rT et bs) phi'" by blast hence wt_err_step: "wt_err_step (sup_state_opt G) (exec G maxs rT et bs) phi'" by (simp add: wt_err_step_def exec_def JVM_le_Err_conv)
from s have le: "JVMType.le G maxs maxr (?start ! 0) (phi'!0)" by (drule_tac p=0 in le_listD) (simp add: lesub_def)+
from phi' have l: "size phi' = size bs" by simp with instrs w have"phi' ! 0 \ Err" by (unfold wt_step_def) simp with instrs l have phi0: "OK (map ok_val phi' ! 0) = phi' ! 0" by auto
from phi' have "check_types G maxs maxr phi'" by(simp add: check_types_def) alsofrom w have"phi' = map OK (map ok_val phi')" by (auto simp add: wt_step_def intro!: nth_equalityI) finally have check_types: "check_types G maxs maxr (map OK (map ok_val phi'))" .
from l bounded have"bounded (\pc. eff (bs!pc) G pc et) (length phi')" by (simp add: exec_def check_bounded_is_bounded) hence bounded': "bounded (exec G maxs rT et bs) (length bs)" by (auto intro: bounded_lift simp add: exec_def l) with wt_err_step have"wt_app_eff (sup_state_opt G) (\pc. app (bs!pc) G maxs rT pc et)
(\<lambda>pc. eff (bs!pc) G pc et) (map ok_val phi')" by (auto intro: wt_err_imp_wt_app_eff simp add: l exec_def) with instrs l le bounded bounded' check_types maxr have"wt_method G C pTs rT maxs mxl bs et (map ok_val phi')" apply (unfold wt_method_def wt_app_eff_def) apply simp apply (rule conjI) apply (unfold wt_start_def) apply (rule JVM_le_convert [THEN iffD1]) apply (simp (no_asm) add: phi0) apply clarify apply (erule allE, erule impE, assumption) apply (elim conjE) apply (clarsimp simp add: lesub_def wt_instr_def) apply (simp add: exec_def) apply (drule bounded_err_stepD, assumption+) apply blast done
assumes wtm: "wt_method G C pTs rT maxs mxl bs et phi"
shows"wt_kil G C pTs rT maxs mxl et bs" proof - let ?mxr = "1+size pTs+mxl"
from wtm obtain
instrs: "0 < length bs"and
len: "length phi = length bs"and
bounded: "check_bounded bs et"and
ck_types: "check_types G maxs ?mxr (map OK phi)"and
wt_start: "wt_start G C pTs mxl phi"and
wt_ins: "\pc. pc < length bs \
wt_instr (bs ! pc) G rT phi maxs (length bs) et pc" by (unfold wt_method_def) simp
from ck_types len have istype_phi: "map OK phi \ list (length bs) (states G maxs (1+size pTs+mxl))" by (auto simp add: check_types_def intro!: listI)
let ?eff = "\pc. eff (bs!pc) G pc et" let ?app = "\pc. app (bs!pc) G maxs rT pc et"
from bounded have bounded_exec: "bounded (exec G maxs rT et bs) (size bs)" by (unfold exec_def) (intro bounded_lift check_bounded_is_bounded)
from wt_ins have"wt_app_eff (sup_state_opt G) ?app ?eff phi" apply (unfold wt_app_eff_def wt_instr_def lesub_def) apply (simp (no_asm) only: len) apply blast done with bounded_exec have"wt_err_step (sup_state_opt G) (err_step (size phi) ?app ?eff) (map OK phi)" by - (erule wt_app_eff_imp_wt_err,simp add: exec_def len) hence wt_err: "wt_err_step (sup_state_opt G) (exec G maxs rT et bs) (map OK phi)" by (unfold exec_def) (simp add: len)
from wf bounded_exec have is_bcv: "is_bcv (JVMType.le G maxs ?mxr) Err (exec G maxs rT et bs)
(size bs) (states G maxs ?mxr) (kiljvm G maxs ?mxr rT et bs)" by (rule is_bcv_kiljvm)
let ?start = "OK (Some ([],(OK (Class C))#((map OK pTs))@(replicate mxl Err)))
#(replicate (size bs - 1) (OK None))"
from C pTs instrs have start: "?start \ list (length bs) (states G maxs ?mxr)" apply (unfold JVM_states_unfold) apply (rule listI) apply (auto intro!: list_appendI dest!: in_set_replicate) apply force done
let ?phi = "map OK phi" have less_phi: "?start <=[JVMType.le G maxs ?mxr] ?phi" proof - from len instrs have"length ?start = length (map OK phi)"by simp moreover
{ fix n from wt_start have"G \ ok_val (?start!0) <=' phi!0" by (simp add: wt_start_def) moreover from instrs len have"0 < length phi"by simp ultimately have"JVMType.le G maxs ?mxr (?start!0) (?phi!0)" by (simp add: JVM_le_Err_conv Err.le_def lesub_def) moreover
{ fix n' have"JVMType.le G maxs ?mxr (OK None) (?phi!n)" by (auto simp add: JVM_le_Err_conv Err.le_def lesub_def
split: err.splits) hence"\ n = Suc n'; n < length ?start \ \<Longrightarrow> JVMType.le G maxs ?mxr (?start!n) (?phi!n)" by simp
} ultimately have"n < length ?start \ (?start!n) <=_(JVMType.le G maxs ?mxr) (?phi!n)" by (unfold lesub_def) (cases n, blast+)
} ultimatelyshow ?thesis by (rule le_listI) qed
from wt_err have"wt_step (JVMType.le G maxs ?mxr) Err (exec G maxs rT et bs) ?phi" by (simp add: wt_err_step_def JVM_le_Err_conv) with start istype_phi less_phi is_bcv have"\p. p < length bs \ kiljvm G maxs ?mxr rT et bs ?start ! p \ Err" by (unfold is_bcv_def) auto with bounded instrs show"wt_kil G C pTs rT maxs mxl et bs"by (unfold wt_kil_def) simp qed
theorem jvm_kildall_sound_complete: "wt_jvm_prog_kildall G = (\Phi. wt_jvm_prog G Phi)" proof let ?Phi = "\C sig. let (C,rT,(maxs,maxl,ins,et)) = the (method (G,C) sig) in
SOME phi. wt_method G C (snd sig) rT maxs maxl ins et phi"
assume"wt_jvm_prog_kildall G" hence"wt_jvm_prog G ?Phi" apply (unfold wt_jvm_prog_def wt_jvm_prog_kildall_def) apply (erule jvm_prog_lift) apply (auto dest!: wt_kil_correct intro: someI) done thus"\Phi. wt_jvm_prog G Phi" by fast next assume"\Phi. wt_jvm_prog G Phi" thus"wt_jvm_prog_kildall G" apply (clarify) apply (unfold wt_jvm_prog_def wt_jvm_prog_kildall_def) apply (erule jvm_prog_lift) apply (auto intro: wt_kil_complete) done qed
end
¤ Dauer der Verarbeitung: 0.2 Sekunden
(vorverarbeitet)
¤
Die Informationen auf dieser Webseite wurden
nach bestem Wissen sorgfältig zusammengestellt. Es wird jedoch weder Vollständigkeit, noch Richtigkeit,
noch Qualität der bereit gestellten Informationen zugesichert.
Bemerkung:
Die farbliche Syntaxdarstellung ist noch experimentell.