/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ /* * Latched RB-trees * * Copyright (C) 2015 Intel Corp., Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> * * Since RB-trees have non-atomic modifications they're not immediately suited * for RCU/lockless queries. Even though we made RB-tree lookups non-fatal for * lockless lookups; we cannot guarantee they return a correct result. * * The simplest solution is a seqlock + RB-tree, this will allow lockless * lookups; but has the constraint (inherent to the seqlock) that read sides * cannot nest in write sides. * * If we need to allow unconditional lookups (say as required for NMI context * usage) we need a more complex setup; this data structure provides this by * employing the latch technique -- see @write_seqcount_latch_begin -- to * implement a latched RB-tree which does allow for unconditional lookups by * virtue of always having (at least) one stable copy of the tree. * * However, while we have the guarantee that there is at all times one stable * copy, this does not guarantee an iteration will not observe modifications. * What might have been a stable copy at the start of the iteration, need not * remain so for the duration of the iteration. * * Therefore, this does require a lockless RB-tree iteration to be non-fatal; * see the comment in lib/rbtree.c. Note however that we only require the first * condition -- not seeing partial stores -- because the latch thing isolates * us from loops. If we were to interrupt a modification the lookup would be * pointed at the stable tree and complete while the modification was halted.
*/
/** * latch_tree_ops - operators to define the tree order * @less: used for insertion; provides the (partial) order between two elements. * @comp: used for lookups; provides the order between the search key and an element. * * The operators are related like: * * comp(a->key,b) < 0 := less(a,b) * comp(a->key,b) > 0 := less(b,a) * comp(a->key,b) == 0 := !less(a,b) && !less(b,a) * * If these operators define a partial order on the elements we make no * guarantee on which of the elements matching the key is found. See * latch_tree_find().
*/ struct latch_tree_ops { bool (*less)(struct latch_tree_node *a, struct latch_tree_node *b); int (*comp)(void *key, struct latch_tree_node *b);
};
/** * latch_tree_insert() - insert @node into the trees @root * @node: nodes to insert * @root: trees to insert @node into * @ops: operators defining the node order * * It inserts @node into @root in an ordered fashion such that we can always * observe one complete tree. See the comment for write_seqcount_latch_begin(). * * The inserts use rcu_assign_pointer() to publish the element such that the * tree structure is stored before we can observe the new @node. * * All modifications (latch_tree_insert, latch_tree_remove) are assumed to be * serialized.
*/ static __always_inline void
latch_tree_insert(struct latch_tree_node *node, struct latch_tree_root *root, conststruct latch_tree_ops *ops)
{
write_seqcount_latch_begin(&root->seq);
__lt_insert(node, root, 0, ops->less);
write_seqcount_latch(&root->seq);
__lt_insert(node, root, 1, ops->less);
write_seqcount_latch_end(&root->seq);
}
/** * latch_tree_erase() - removes @node from the trees @root * @node: nodes to remote * @root: trees to remove @node from * @ops: operators defining the node order * * Removes @node from the trees @root in an ordered fashion such that we can * always observe one complete tree. See the comment for * write_seqcount_latch_begin(). * * It is assumed that @node will observe one RCU quiescent state before being * reused of freed. * * All modifications (latch_tree_insert, latch_tree_remove) are assumed to be * serialized.
*/ static __always_inline void
latch_tree_erase(struct latch_tree_node *node, struct latch_tree_root *root, conststruct latch_tree_ops *ops)
{
write_seqcount_latch_begin(&root->seq);
__lt_erase(node, root, 0);
write_seqcount_latch(&root->seq);
__lt_erase(node, root, 1);
write_seqcount_latch_end(&root->seq);
}
/** * latch_tree_find() - find the node matching @key in the trees @root * @key: search key * @root: trees to search for @key * @ops: operators defining the node order * * Does a lockless lookup in the trees @root for the node matching @key. * * It is assumed that this is called while holding the appropriate RCU read * side lock. * * If the operators define a partial order on the elements (there are multiple * elements which have the same key value) it is undefined which of these * elements will be found. Nor is it possible to iterate the tree to find * further elements with the same key value. * * Returns: a pointer to the node matching @key or NULL.
*/ static __always_inline struct latch_tree_node *
latch_tree_find(void *key, struct latch_tree_root *root, conststruct latch_tree_ops *ops)
{ struct latch_tree_node *node; unsignedint seq;
do {
seq = read_seqcount_latch(&root->seq);
node = __lt_find(key, root, seq & 1, ops->comp);
} while (read_seqcount_latch_retry(&root->seq, seq));
Die Informationen auf dieser Webseite wurden
nach bestem Wissen sorgfältig zusammengestellt. Es wird jedoch weder Vollständigkeit, noch Richtigkeit,
noch Qualität der bereit gestellten Informationen zugesichert.
Bemerkung:
Die farbliche Syntaxdarstellung und die Messung sind noch experimentell.