(* Title: JinjaThreads/BV/BVSpec.thy
Author: Cornelia Pusch, Gerwin Klein, Andreas Lochbihler
Based on the theory Jinja/BV/BVSpec
*)
section ‹The Bytecode Verifier \label{sec:BVSpec}›
theory BVSpec
imports
Effect
begin
text ‹
This theory contains a specification of the BV. The specification
describes correct typings of method bodies; it corresponds
to type \emph{checking}.
›
― ‹The method type only contains declared classes:›
definition check_types :: "'m prog → nat → nat → tyi' err list → bool"
where
"check_types P mxs mxl τs ≡ set τs ⊆ states P mxs mxl"
― ‹An instruction is welltyped if it is applicable and its effect›
― ‹is compatible with the type at all successor instructions:›
definition wt_instr :: "['m prog,ty,nat,pc,ex_table,'addr instr,pc,tym] → bool"
(‹_,_,_,_,_ ⊨ _,_ :: _› [60,0,0,0,0,0,0,61] 60)
where
"P,T,mxs,mpc,xt ⊨ i,pc :: τs ≡
app i P mxs T pc mpc xt (τs!pc) ∧
(∀(pc',τ') ∈ set (eff i P pc xt (τs!pc)). P ⊨ τ' ≤' τs!pc')"
― ‹The type at @{text "pc=0"} conforms to the method calling convention:›
definition wt_start :: "['m prog,cname,ty list,nat,tym] → bool"
where
"wt_start P C Ts mxl0 τs ≡
P ⊨ Some ([],OK (Class C)#map OK Ts@replicate mxl0 Err) ≤' τs!0"
― ‹A method is welltyped if the body is not empty,›
― ‹if the method type covers all instructions and mentions›
― ‹declared classes only, if the method calling convention is respected, and›
― ‹if all instructions are welltyped.›
definition wt_method :: "['m prog,cname,ty list,ty,nat,nat,'addr instr list, ex_table,tym] → bool"
where
"wt_method P C Ts Tr mxs mxl0 is xt τs ≡
0 < size is ∧ size τs = size is ∧
check_types P mxs (1+size Ts+mxl0) (map OK τs) ∧
wt_start P C Ts mxl0 τs ∧
(∀pc < size is. P,Tr,mxs,size is,xt ⊨ is!pc,pc :: τs)"
― ‹A program is welltyped if it is wellformed and all methods are welltyped›
definition wf_jvm_prog_phi :: "tyP → 'addr jvm_prog → bool" (‹wf'_jvm'_prog›)
where
"wf_jvm_prog<Phi> ≡
wf_prog (λP C (M,Ts,Tr,(mxs,mxl0,is,xt)).
wt_method P C Ts Tr mxs mxl0 is xt (Φ C M))"
definition wf_jvm_prog :: "'addr jvm_prog → bool"
where
"wf_jvm_prog P ≡ ∃Φ. wf_jvm_prog<Phi> P"
lemma wt_jvm_progD:
"wf_jvm_prog<Phi> P ==> ∃wt. wf_prog wt P"
(*<*) by (unfold wf_jvm_prog_phi_def, blast) (*>*)
lemma wt_jvm_prog_impl_wt_instr:
"[ wf_jvm_prog<Phi> P;
P ⊨ C sees M:Ts → T = ⌊(mxs,mxl0,ins,xt)⌋ in C; pc < size ins ]
==> P,T,mxs,size ins,xt ⊨ ins!pc,pc :: Φ C M"
(*<*)
apply (unfold wf_jvm_prog_phi_def)
apply (drule (1) sees_wf_mdecl)
apply (simp add: wf_mdecl_def wt_method_def)
done
(*>*)
lemma wt_jvm_prog_impl_wt_start:
"[ wf_jvm_prog<Phi> P;
P ⊨ C sees M:Ts → T = ⌊(mxs,mxl0,ins,xt)⌋ in C ] ==>
0 < size ins ∧ wt_start P C Ts mxl0 (Φ C M)"
(*<*)
apply (unfold wf_jvm_prog_phi_def)
apply (drule (1) sees_wf_mdecl)
apply (simp add: wf_mdecl_def wt_method_def)
done
(*>*)
end
¤ Dauer der Verarbeitung: 0.3 Sekunden
¤
*© Formatika GbR, Deutschland
|
|