text\<open>Spy has access to his own key for spoof messages, but RCA is secure\<close> specification (bad)
Spy_in_bad [iff]: "Spy \ bad"
RCA_not_bad [iff]: "RCA \ bad" by (rule exI [of _ "{Spy}"], simp)
subsection\<open>Agents' Knowledge\<close>
consts(*Initial states of agents -- parameter of the construction*)
initState :: "agent \ msg set"
(* Message reception does not extend spy's knowledge because of
reception invariant enforced by Reception rule in protocol definition*) primrec knows :: "[agent, event list] \ msg set" where
knows_Nil: "knows A [] = initState A"
| knows_Cons: "knows A (ev # evs) =
(if A = Spy then
(case ev of
Says A' B X \ insert X (knows Spy evs)
| Gets A' X \ knows Spy evs
| Notes A' X \ if A' \ bad then insert X (knows Spy evs) else knows Spy evs)
else
(case ev of
Says A' B X \ if A'=A then insert X (knows A evs) else knows A evs
| Gets A' X \ if A'=A then insert X (knows A evs) else knows A evs
| Notes A' X \ if A'=A then insert X (knows A evs) else knows A evs))"
subsection\<open>Used Messages\<close>
primrec used :: "event list \ msg set" where (*Set of items that might be visible to somebody: complement of the set of fresh items.
As above, message reception does extend used items *)
used_Nil: "used [] = (UN B. parts (initState B))"
| used_Cons: "used (ev # evs) =
(case ev of
Says A B X \<Rightarrow> parts {X} \<union> (used evs)
| Gets A X \<Rightarrow> used evs
| Notes A X \<Rightarrow> parts {X} \<union> (used evs))"
(* Inserted by default but later removed. This declaration lets the file
be re-loaded. Addsimps [knows_Cons, used_Nil, *)
(** Simplifying parts (insert X (knows Spy evs))
= parts {X} \<union> parts (knows Spy evs) -- since general case loops*)
lemmas parts_insert_knows_A = parts_insert [of _ "knows A evs"] for A evs
lemma knows_Spy_Says [simp]: "knows Spy (Says A B X # evs) = insert X (knows Spy evs)" by auto
text\<open>Letting the Spy see "bad" agents' notes avoids redundant case-splits
on whether \<^term>\<open>A=Spy\<close> and whether \<^term>\<open>A\<in>bad\<close>\<close> lemma knows_Spy_Notes [simp]: "knows Spy (Notes A X # evs) =
(if A\<in>bad then insert X (knows Spy evs) else knows Spy evs)" apply auto done
lemma knows_Spy_Gets [simp]: "knows Spy (Gets A X # evs) = knows Spy evs" by auto
lemma initState_subset_knows: "initState A \ knows A evs" apply (induct_tac "evs") apply (auto split: event.split) done
lemma knows_Spy_subset_knows_Spy_Says: "knows Spy evs \ knows Spy (Says A B X # evs)" by auto
lemma knows_Spy_subset_knows_Spy_Notes: "knows Spy evs \ knows Spy (Notes A X # evs)" by auto
lemma knows_Spy_subset_knows_Spy_Gets: "knows Spy evs \ knows Spy (Gets A X # evs)" by auto
(*Spy sees what is sent on the traffic*) lemma Says_imp_knows_Spy [rule_format]: "Says A B X \ set evs \ X \ knows Spy evs" apply (induct_tac "evs") apply (auto split: event.split) done
(*Use with addSEs to derive contradictions from old Says events containing
items known to be fresh*) lemmas knows_Spy_partsEs =
Says_imp_knows_Spy [THEN parts.Inj, elim_format]
parts.Body [elim_format]
subsection\<open>The Function \<^term>\<open>used\<close>\<close>
lemma used_Says [simp]: "used (Says A B X # evs) = parts{X} \ used evs" by auto
lemma used_Notes [simp]: "used (Notes A X # evs) = parts{X} \ used evs" by auto
lemma used_Gets [simp]: "used (Gets A X # evs) = used evs" by auto
lemma Notes_imp_parts_subset_used [rule_format]: "Notes A X \ set evs \ parts {X} \ used evs" apply (induct_tac "evs") apply (rename_tac [2] a evs') apply (induct_tac [2] "a", auto) done
text\<open>NOTE REMOVAL--laws above are cleaner, as they don't involve "case"\<close> declare knows_Cons [simp del]
used_Nil [simp del] used_Cons [simp del]
text\<open>For proving theorems of the form \<^term>\<open>X \<notin> analz (knows Spy evs) \<longrightarrow> P\<close>
New events added byinductionto"evs" are discarded. Provided
this information isn't needed, the proof will be much shorter, since
it will omit complicated reasoning about \<^term>\<open>analz\<close>.\<close>
lemmas analz_mono_contra =
knows_Spy_subset_knows_Spy_Says [THEN analz_mono, THEN contra_subsetD]
knows_Spy_subset_knows_Spy_Notes [THEN analz_mono, THEN contra_subsetD]
knows_Spy_subset_knows_Spy_Gets [THEN analz_mono, THEN contra_subsetD]
lemmas analz_impI = impI [where P = "Y \ analz (knows Spy evs)"] for Y evs
ML \<open> fun analz_mono_contra_tac ctxt =
resolve_tac ctxt @{thms analz_impI} THEN'
REPEAT1 o (dresolve_tac ctxt @{thms analz_mono_contra}) THEN' mp_tac ctxt \<close>
method_setup analz_mono_contra = \<open>
Scan.succeed (fn ctxt => SIMPLE_METHOD (REPEAT_FIRST (analz_mono_contra_tac ctxt)))\<close> "for proving theorems of the form X \ analz (knows Spy evs) \ P"
end
¤ Die Informationen auf dieser Webseite wurden
nach bestem Wissen sorgfältig zusammengestellt. Es wird jedoch weder Vollständigkeit, noch Richtigkeit,
noch Qualität der bereit gestellten Informationen zugesichert.0.1Bemerkung:
(vorverarbeitet)
¤
Die Informationen auf dieser Webseite wurden
nach bestem Wissen sorgfältig zusammengestellt. Es wird jedoch weder Vollständigkeit, noch Richtigkeit,
noch Qualität der bereit gestellten Informationen zugesichert.
Bemerkung:
Die farbliche Syntaxdarstellung ist noch experimentell.