text‹ This theory contains a specification of the BV. The specification describes correct typings of method bodies; it corresponds to type \emph{checking}. ›
definition 🍋‹The program counter will always be inside the method:›
check_bounded :: "instr list ==> exception_table ==> bool"where "check_bounded ins et ⟷ (∀pc < length ins. ∀pc' ∈ set (succs (ins!pc) pc). pc' < length ins) ∧ (∀e ∈ set et. fst (snd (snd e)) < length ins)"
definition 🍋‹The method type only contains declared classes:›
check_types :: "jvm_prog ==> nat ==> nat ==> JVMType.state list ==> bool"where "check_types G mxs mxr phi ⟷ set phi ⊆ states G mxs mxr"
definition 🍋‹An instruction is welltyped if it is applicable and its effect› 🍋‹is compatible with the type at all successor instructions:›
wt_instr :: "[instr,jvm_prog,ty,method_type,nat,p_count, exception_table,p_count] ==> bool"where "wt_instr i G rT phi mxs max_pc et pc ⟷ app i G mxs rT pc et (phi!pc) ∧ (∀(pc',s') ∈ set (eff i G pc et (phi!pc)). pc' < max_pc ∧ G ⊨ s' <=' phi!pc')"
definition 🍋‹The type at ‹pc=0›conforms to the method calling convention:›
wt_start :: "[jvm_prog,cname,ty list,nat,method_type] ==> bool"where "wt_start G C pTs mxl phi ⟷ G ⊨ Some ([],(OK (Class C))#((map OK pTs))@(replicate mxl Err)) <=' phi!0"
definition 🍋‹A method is welltyped if the body is not empty, if execution does not› 🍋‹leave the body, if the method type covers all instructions and mentions› 🍋‹declared classes only, if the method calling convention is respected, and› 🍋‹if all instructions are welltyped.›
wt_method :: "[jvm_prog,cname,ty list,ty,nat,nat,instr list, exception_table,method_type] ==> bool"where "wt_method G C pTs rT mxs mxl ins et phi ⟷ (let max_pc = length ins in 0 < max_pc ∧ length phi = length ins ∧ check_bounded ins et ∧ check_types G mxs (1+length pTs+mxl) (map OK phi) ∧ wt_start G C pTs mxl phi ∧ (∀pc. pc⟶ wt_instr (ins!pc) G rT phi mxs max_pc et pc))"
definition 🍋‹A program is welltyped if it is wellformed and all methods are welltyped›
wt_jvm_prog :: "[jvm_prog,prog_type] ==> bool"where "wt_jvm_prog G phi ⟷ wf_prog (λG C (sig,rT,(maxs,maxl,b,et)). wt_method G C (snd sig) rT maxs maxl b et (phi C sig)) G"
lemma wt_jvm_progD: "wt_jvm_prog G phi ==> (∃wt. wf_prog wt G)" by (unfold wt_jvm_prog_def, blast)
lemma wt_jvm_prog_impl_wt_instr: "[ wt_jvm_prog G phi; is_class G C; method (G,C) sig = Some (C,rT,maxs,maxl,ins,et); pc < length ins ] ==> wt_instr (ins!pc) G rT (phi C sig) maxs (length ins) et pc" by (unfold wt_jvm_prog_def, drule method_wf_mdecl,
simp, simp, simp add: wf_mdecl_def wt_method_def)
text‹ We could leave out the check 🍋‹pc' 🚫›in the definition of 🍋‹wt_instr›in the context of 🍋‹wt_method›. › lemma wt_instr_def2: "[ wt_jvm_prog G Phi; is_class G C; method (G,C) sig = Some (C,rT,maxs,maxl,ins,et); pc < length ins; i = ins!pc; phi = Phi C sig; max_pc = length ins ] ==> wt_instr i G rT phi maxs max_pc et pc = (app i G maxs rT pc et (phi!pc) ∧ (∀(pc',s') ∈ set (eff i G pc et (phi!pc)). G ⊨ s' <=' phi!pc'))" apply (simp add: wt_instr_def) apply (unfold wt_jvm_prog_def) apply (drule method_wf_mdecl) apply (simp, simp, simp add: wf_mdecl_def wt_method_def) apply (auto dest: check_boundedD) done
lemma wt_jvm_prog_impl_wt_start: "[ wt_jvm_prog G phi; is_class G C; method (G,C) sig = Some (C,rT,maxs,maxl,ins,et) ]==> 0 < (length ins) ∧ wt_start G C (snd sig) maxl (phi C sig)" by (unfold wt_jvm_prog_def, drule method_wf_mdecl,
simp, simp, simp add: wf_mdecl_def wt_method_def)
end
Messung V0.5 in Prozent
¤ Dauer der Verarbeitung: 0.11 Sekunden
(vorverarbeitet am 2026-04-29)
¤
Die Informationen auf dieser Webseite wurden
nach bestem Wissen sorgfältig zusammengestellt. Es wird jedoch weder Vollständigkeit, noch Richtigkeit,
noch Qualität der bereit gestellten Informationen zugesichert.
Bemerkung:
Die farbliche Syntaxdarstellung und die Messung sind noch experimentell.