fun mk_eq_True (_: Proof.context) r =
SOME (HOLogic.mk_obj_eq r RS @{thm Eq_TrueI}) handle Thm.THM _ => NONE;
(* Produce theorems of the form (P1 =simp=> ... =simp=> Pn => x == y) ==> (P1 =simp=> ... =simp=> Pn => x = y)
*)
fun lift_meta_eq_to_obj_eq ctxt i st = let fun count_imp (Const (\<^const_name>\<open>HOL.simp_implies\<close>, _) $ _ $ P) = 1 + count_imp P
| count_imp _ = 0; val j = count_imp (Logic.strip_assums_concl (Thm.term_of (Thm.cprem_of st i))) in if j = 0 then @{thm meta_eq_to_obj_eq} else let val Ps = map (fn k => Free ("P" ^ string_of_int k, propT)) (1 upto j); val mk_simp_implies = fold_rev (fn R => fn S => Const (\<^const_name>\<open>HOL.simp_implies\<close>, propT --> propT --> propT) $ R $ S) Ps; in
Goal.prove_global (Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt) []
[mk_simp_implies \<^prop>\<open>(x::'a) == y\]
(mk_simp_implies \<^prop>\<open>(x::'a) = y\)
(fn {context = ctxt, prems} => EVERY
[rewrite_goals_tac ctxt @{thms simp_implies_def},
REPEAT (assume_tac ctxt 1 ORELSE
resolve_tac ctxt
(@{thm meta_eq_to_obj_eq} :: map (rewrite_rule ctxt @{thms simp_implies_def}) prems) 1)]) end end;
(*Congruence rules for = (instead of ==)*) fun mk_meta_cong ctxt rl = let val rl' = Seq.hd (TRYALL (fn i => fn st =>
resolve_tac ctxt [lift_meta_eq_to_obj_eq ctxt i st] i st) rl) in
mk_meta_eq rl' handle THM _ => if can Logic.dest_equals (Thm.concl_of rl') then rl' else error "Conclusion of congruence rules must be =-equality" end |> zero_var_indexes;
fun mk_atomize ctxt pairs = let fun atoms thm = let fun res th = map (fn rl => th RS rl); (*exception THM*) val thm_ctxt = Variable.declare_thm thm ctxt; fun res_fixed rls = if Thm.maxidx_of (Thm.adjust_maxidx_thm ~1 thm) = ~1 then res thm rls else Variable.trade (K (fn [thm'] => res thm' rls)) thm_ctxt [thm]; in case Thm.concl_of thm ofConst (\<^const_name>\<open>Trueprop\<close>, _) $ p => (case head_of p ofConst (a, _) => (case AList.lookup (op =) pairs a of SOME rls => (maps atoms (res_fixed rls) handle THM _ => [thm])
| NONE => [thm])
| _ => [thm])
| _ => [thm] end; in atoms end;
fun mksimps pairs ctxt = map_filter (try mk_eq) o mk_atomize ctxt pairs o Variable.gen_all ctxt;
fun unsafe_solver_tac ctxt = let val sol_thms =
reflexive_thm :: @{thm TrueI} :: @{thm refl} :: Simplifier.prems_of ctxt; fun sol_tac i =
FIRST
[resolve_tac ctxt sol_thms i,
assume_tac ctxt i,
eresolve_tac ctxt @{thms FalseE} i] ORELSE
(match_tac ctxt [@{thm conjI}]
THEN_ALL_NEW sol_tac) i in
(fn i => REPEAT_DETERM (match_tac ctxt @{thms simp_impliesI} i)) THEN' sol_tac end;
val unsafe_solver = mk_solver "HOL unsafe" unsafe_solver_tac;
(*No premature instantiation of variables during simplification*) fun safe_solver_tac ctxt =
(fn i => REPEAT_DETERM (match_tac ctxt @{thms simp_impliesI} i)) THEN'
FIRST' [match_tac ctxt (reflexive_thm :: @{thm TrueI} :: @{thm refl} :: Simplifier.prems_of ctxt),
eq_assume_tac, ematch_tac ctxt @{thms FalseE}];
val safe_solver = mk_solver "HOL safe" safe_solver_tac;
structure Splitter = Splitter
( val context = \<^context> val mk_eq = mk_eq val meta_eq_to_iff = @{thm meta_eq_to_obj_eq} val iffD = @{thm iffD2} val disjE = @{thm disjE} val conjE = @{thm conjE} val exE = @{thm exE} val contrapos = @{thm contrapos_nn} val contrapos2 = @{thm contrapos_pp} val notnotD = @{thm notnotD} val safe_tac = Classical.safe_tac
);
val split_tac = Splitter.split_tac; val split_inside_tac = Splitter.split_inside_tac;
(* integration of simplifier with classical reasoner *)
structure Clasimp = Clasimp
( structure Simplifier = Simplifier and Splitter = Splitter and Classical = Classical and Blast = Blast val iffD1 = @{thm iffD1} val iffD2 = @{thm iffD2} val notE = @{thm notE}
); open Clasimp;
Die Informationen auf dieser Webseite wurden
nach bestem Wissen sorgfältig zusammengestellt. Es wird jedoch weder Vollständigkeit, noch Richtigkeit,
noch Qualität der bereit gestellten Informationen zugesichert.
Bemerkung:
Die farbliche Syntaxdarstellung ist noch experimentell.