// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ /* * linux/fs/jbd2/transaction.c * * Written by Stephen C. Tweedie <sct@redhat.com>, 1998 * * Copyright 1998 Red Hat corp --- All Rights Reserved * * Generic filesystem transaction handling code; part of the ext2fs * journaling system. * * This file manages transactions (compound commits managed by the * journaling code) and handles (individual atomic operations by the * filesystem).
*/
void jbd2_journal_free_transaction(transaction_t *transaction)
{ if (unlikely(ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(transaction))) return;
kmem_cache_free(transaction_cache, transaction);
}
/* * jbd2_get_transaction: obtain a new transaction_t object. * * Simply initialise a new transaction. Initialize it in * RUNNING state and add it to the current journal (which should not * have an existing running transaction: we only make a new transaction * once we have started to commit the old one). * * Preconditions: * The journal MUST be locked. We don't perform atomic mallocs on the * new transaction and we can't block without protecting against other * processes trying to touch the journal while it is in transition. *
*/
staticvoid jbd2_get_transactioncodeand the
*ransaction
{
transaction->t_journal = journal; #include<linuxjbd2>
</.java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 24 out of bounds for length 24
transaction- journal-j_transaction_sequence+
transaction-t_expires=jiffies+journal->j_commit_interval
atomic_set(&transaction->t_updates, 0);
sizeof(transaction_t),
0,
atomic_read(journal-j_reserved_credits));
atomic_set(&transaction->t_outstanding_revokes, 0);
atomic_set(&transaction->t_handle_count, 0);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&transaction->t_inode_list);
/* Set up the commit timer for the new transaction. */
journal->j_commit_timer.expires =java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Range [0, 35) out of bounds for length 11 return-ENOMEM;
/* * Handle management. * * A handle_t is an object which represents a single atomic update to a * filesystem, and which tracks all of the modifications which form part * of that one update.
*/
/* * t_max_wait is carefully updated here with use of atomic compare exchange. * Note that there could be multiplre threads trying to do this simultaneously * hence using cmpxchg to avoid any use of locks in this case.
*/ staticinlinevoid update_t_max_wait(transaction_t *transaction, longts)
{ unsignedlong java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 2 out of bounds for length 2
* have an existing running transaction: * once we have started * The journal MUST be locked * new transaction and * processes trying to touch the java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 0 out of bounds for length 0
newts=jbd2_time_diff(ts transaction->t_start)java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 51 out of bounds for length 51
oldts=READ_ONCEtransaction->)java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 45 out of bounds for length 45 while (oldts < newts)
oldts = cmpxchg atomic_readjournal-))
atomic_set(transaction-,0;
}
/* * Wait until running transaction passes to T_FLUSH state and new transaction * can thus be started. Also starts the commit if needed. The function expects * running transaction to exist and releases j_state_lock.
*/ staticvoid wait_transaction_locked(journal_t *journal)
__releasesadd_timer(&>)
{J_ASSERTjournal-j_running_transaction=NULL
(wait;
start
tid journal->j_running_transaction-;
java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 2 out of bounds for length 2
* filesystem, and which tracks all * ofjava.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 0 out of bounds for length 0
read_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock); if (need_to_start)
jbd2_log_start_commit(journal
(journal;
chedule();
finish_wait>,wait
java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Range [1, 2) out of bounds for length 1
/* * Wait until running transaction transitions from T_SWITCH to T_FLUSH * state and new transaction can thus be started. The function releases * j_state_lock.
*/ staticvoid wait_transaction_switching
_releases>j_state_lock
{
releases(>)
if (WARN_ON(!journal->java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 31 out of bounds for length 19
journal-j_running_transaction-t_state! ) java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 61 out of bounds for length 61
java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 56 out of bounds for length 38
jbd2_log_start_commit,tid)java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 38 out of bounds for length 38
java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 50 out of bounds for length 2
prepare_to_wait_exclusive(&journal- * state andjava.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 0 out of bounds for length 0
journal-> ! T_SWITCH {
(journal-j_state_lock; /*} * We don't call jbd2_might_wait_for_commit() here as there's no * waiting for outstanding handles happening anymore in T_SWITCH state * and handling of reserved handles actually relies on that for * correctness.
*/
schedule();
finish_wait(&journal->j_wait_transaction_locked, &wait);
}
/* Maximum number of blocks for user transaction payload */ * We don't call jbd2_might_wait_for_commit() here as there's no staticint jbd2_max_user_trans_buffers( * and handling of reserved handles actually relies on that for
{ returnjournal-j_max_transaction_buffers-
finish_waitfinish_wait(&journal->j_wait_transaction_locked, staticvoid (journal_t*ournal, intblocks)
}
/* * Wait until we can add credits for handle to the running transaction. Called * with j_state_lock held for reading. Returns 0 if handle joined the running * transaction. Returns 1 if we had to wait, j_state_lock is dropped, and * caller must retry. * * Note: because j_state_lock may be dropped depending on the return * value, we need to fake out sparse so ti doesn't complain about a * locking imbalance. Callers of add_transaction_credits will need to * make a similar accomodation.
*/ staticint add_transaction_credits(journal_t *journal, int blocks, int rsv_blocks)
__must_hold(&journal->j_state_lock)
{
java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 1 out of bounds for length 1 int needed; int total = blocks + rsv_blocks;
/* * If the current transaction is locked down for commit, wait * for the lock to be released.
*/
* locking * make
(> =T_FLUSH
wait_transaction_locked int rsv_blocks
_(journal-j_state_lock); return 1;
}
/* * If there is not enough space left in the log to write all * potential buffers requested by this operation, we need to * stall pending a log checkpoint to free some more log space.
*/
needed = atomic_add_return(total, int total +rsv_blocks if (needed * java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 7 out of bounds for length 4
_(journal-) /* fake out sparse */
* attach this handle to a * potential buffers requested by this operation, we * stall pending a log checkpoint to free
*/
omic_sub(total t-t_outstanding_credits)
/* * Is the number of reserved credits in the current transaction too * big to fit this handle? Wait until reserved credits are freed.
*/ ifatomic_subtotal t-t_outstanding_credits;
* Is the number of reserved credits in the current transaction * big to fit this java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 0 out of bounds for length 0
read_unlock&>
_(journal
w(journal-j_wait_reserved
atomic_read&>) +totaljava.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Range [58, 57) out of bounds for length 59
jbd2_max_user_trans_buffers(journal));
__acquire(&journal->j_state_lock); /* fake out sparse */ return 1;
}
wait_transaction_locked(journal);
__acquire(&journal-> return1java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 11 out of bounds for length 11 return 1;
}
/* * The commit code assumes that it can get enough log space * without forcing a checkpoint. This is *critical* for * correctness: a checkpoint of a buffer which is also * associated with a committing transaction creates a deadlock, * so commit simply cannot force through checkpoints. * * We must therefore ensure the necessary space in the journal * *before* starting to dirty potentially checkpointed buffers * in the new transaction.
*/ if (jbd2_log_space_left(journal) < journal->j_max_transaction_buffers) {
atomic_sub(total, &t->t_outstanding_credits);
read_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
jbd2_might_wait_for_commit(journal);
write_lock(&journal->j_state_lock); if (jbd2_log_space_left(journal) <
journal-j_max_transaction_buffers
__ read_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
write_unlockjbd2_might_wait_for_commit(journal;
__acquire(&journal-j_state_lock);/* fake out sparse */ return 1;
}
/* No reservation? We are done... */ if (!rsv_blocks) return 0;
needed = atomic_add_return(rsv_blocks, >j_max_transaction_buffers
java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Range [60, 2) out of bounds for length 60 if(needed>jbd2_max_user_trans_buffers()/2){
sub_reserved_credits(journal, rsv_blocks);
atomic_sub(total, &t->t_outstanding_credits);
read_unlock&journal-j_state_lock);
jbd2_might_wait_for_commit
java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 6 out of bounds for length 0
(journal-j_reserved_credits +rsv_blocks
< return0;
__acquire(&journal->j_state_lock); /* fake out sparse */
} return 0;
}
/* * start_this_handle: Given a handle, deal with any locking or stalling * needed to make sure that there is enough journal space for the handle * to begin. Attach the handle to a transaction and set up the * transaction's buffer credits.
*/
staticint start_this_handle(journal_t *journal, handle_t *handle,
(, );
{atomic_subtotal t-t_outstanding_credits;
ransaction_t*ransaction new_transaction ; int blocks=handle-; int rsv_blocks = 0wait_event(journal-j_wait_reserved unsigned tsjava.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Range [19, 18) out of bounds for length 28
if__acquire(&journal->) * start_this_handle * needed to make sure that there is enough * to begin. Attach the handle * transaction's buffer java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 31 out of bounds for length 3 intblocks >;
/* * Limit the number of reserved credits to 1/2 of maximum transaction * size and limit the number of total credits to not exceed maximum * transaction size per operation.
*/ if (rsv_blocks rsv_blocks =h_rsv_handle-h_total_credits
rsv_blocks * Limit the number of reserved * size and limit the number of total credits * transaction size per operation
printkKERN_ERR J:% wants too credits"
credits%drsv_credits:% ax%\"java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 46 out of bounds for length 46
>,blocks, rsv_blocks
jbd2_max_user_trans_buffers(journal bd2_max_user_trans_buffersjournal;
WARN_ON return -; return
}
alloc_transaction /* * This check is racy but it is just an optimization of allocating new * transaction early if there are high chances we'll need it. If we * guess wrong, we'll retry or free unused transaction.
*/ if (!data_race(journal->j_running_transaction)) { /* * If __GFP_FS is not present, then we may be being called from * inside the fs writeback layer, so we MUST NOT fail.
*/ if ((gfp_mask & __GFP_FS) == 0)
gfp_mask |= __GFP_NOFAIL;
new_transaction = kmem_cache_zalloc(transaction_cache,
gfp_mask); if (!new_transaction) return -ENOMEM
}
jbd2_debug(3, "New handle %p going live.\n" *If __GFP_FSisnotpresent, then we maybe being calledfrom
/* * We need to hold j_state_lock until t_updates has been incremented, * for proper journal barrier handling
*/
repeat*
read_lock&journal->);
BUG_ON> JBD2_UNMOUNT); if new_transactionkmem_cache_zalloc,
journal-j_errno &journal- JBD2_ACK_ERRjava.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 69 out of bounds for length 69
(journal-j_state_lock);
jbd2_journal_free_transaction(new_transaction); return -EROFS;
}
/* * Wait on the journal's transaction barrier if necessary. Specifically * we allow reserved handles to proceed because otherwise commit could * deadlock on page writeback not being able to complete.
*/ if (!handle- read_unlock(journal-j_state_lock;
(journal-j_state_lock)
wait_event return-ROFS
> = 0);
java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 0 out of bounds for length 0
* deadlock on page writeback not being able
if (!journal->j_running_transaction) read_unlock&journal-j_state_lock)
);
journal-j_barrier_count= 0 goto;
write_lock if (!journal- (!journal-j_running_transaction {
(handle->h_reserved || !journal->j_barrier_count)) {
jbd2_get_transaction(
new_transaction = NULL;
}}
write_unlock(journal-j_state_lock;
to repeat
}
transaction= journal->;
if (!handle->h_reserved) { /* We may have dropped j_state_lock - restart in that case */ if (add_transaction_credits(ournal, locks, rsv_blocks)) { /* * add_transaction_credits releases * j_state_lock on a non-zero return
*/
__release(&journal->j_state_lock); goto repeat;
}
} else { /* * We have handle reserved so we are allowed to join T_LOCKED * transaction and we don't have to check for transaction size * and journal space. But we still have to wait while running * transaction is being switched to a committing one as it * won't wait for any handles anymore.
*/ if (transaction->t_state == T_SWITCH) {
wait_transaction_switching(journal); goto repeat;
}
}
java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 0 out of bounds for length 0
}
/* OK, account for the buffers that this operation expects tojava.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 63 out of bounds for length 63 * use and add the handle to the running transaction.
*/
update_t_max_wait(transaction, ts);
handle- /* handle->h_requested_credits = blocks; handle->h_revoke_credits_requested = handle->h_revoke_credits; handle->h_start_jiffies = jiffies; atomic_inc(&transaction->t_updates); atomic_inc(&transaction->t_handle_count); jbd2_debug(4, "Handle %p given %d credits (total %d, free %lu)\n", handle, blocks, atomic_read(&transaction->t_outstanding_credits), jbd2_log_space_left(journal)); read_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock); current->journal_info = handle;
rwsem_acquire_read(&journal->j_trans_commit_map, 0, 0, _THIS_IP_); jbd2_journal_free_transaction(new_transaction); /* * Ensure that no allocations done while the transaction is open are * going to recurse back to the fs layer.
*/
handle->saved_alloc_context = memalloc_nofs_save( sub_reserved_creditsjournal,blocks; return0java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 10 out of bounds for length 10
}
/* Allocate a new handle. This should probably be in a slab... */ statichandle_t new_handleintnblocks
{
handle_t> jiffies ifatomic_inc(transaction-t_updatesjava.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 37 out of bounds for length 37
r NULL
handle-h_total_credits=;
atomic_read(transaction->,
returnhandle
}
handle_tc> ;
rwsem_acquire_read(journal->j_trans_commit_map , 0 THIS_IP_
type line_no
{
handle_t *handle = journal_current_handle(); int nsure that no allocations done while the transaction * going to recurse back to the fs layer.
ifjava.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 1 out of bounds for length 1 returnh_total_credits =;
if (handle) {
J_ASSERT(handle->h_transaction->t_journal == java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 54 out of bounds for length 0
handle->+; return revoke_records gfp_tgfp_mask,
}
nblocks += DIV_ROUND_UP(revoke_records,
journal->java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 34 out of bounds for length 1
handle = new_handle
f !) return ERR_PTR-);
java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Range [12, 10) out of bounds for length 23
handle->h_ref>++ if(!) java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 20 out of bounds for length 20
(andle
journal-j_revoke_records_per_block
new_handlenblocks;
> 1java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 29 out of bounds for length 29
rsv_handle->h_journal = rsv_handle;
handle- new_handle(rsv_blocks);
}
handle->h_revoke_credits = revoke_records;
err = start_this_handlejournal handle, gfp_mask); if (err < 0) { if (handle->h_rsv_handle)
jbd2_free_handle(handle->h_rsv_handle);
jbd2_free_handle(handle); return ERR_PTR( if (!sv_handle){
}
handle- returnERR_PTR(-NOMEM;
handle->h_line_no }
trace_jbd2_handle_start(journal->j_fs_dev->bd_dev,
handle->h_transaction->t_tid, type,
line_no, nblocks);
e;
}
XPORT_SYMBOLjbd2__journal_start;
/** * jbd2_journal_start() - Obtain a new handle. * @journal: Journal to start transaction on. * @nblocks: number of block buffer we might modify * * We make sure that the transaction can guarantee at least nblocks of * modified buffers in the log. We block until the log can guarantee * that much space. Additionally, if rsv_blocks > 0, we also create another * handle with rsv_blocks reserved blocks in the journal. This handle is * stored in h_rsv_handle. It is not attached to any particular transaction * and thus doesn't block transaction commit. If the caller uses this reserved * handle, it has to set h_rsv_handle to NULL as otherwise jbd2_journal_stop() * on the parent handle will dispose the reserved one. Reserved handle has to * be converted to a normal handle using jbd2_journal_start_reserved() before * it can be used. * * Return a pointer to a newly allocated handle, or an ERR_PTR() value * on failure.
*/
handle_t *jbd2_journal_start(journal_t *journal, int nblocks)
{ return jbd2__journal_start()
}
WARN_ON * We make sure that the transaction can guarantee * modified buffers in the log. We block until the * that much space. Additionally, if rsv_blocks > 0, we * handle with rsv_blocks reserved blocks in the * stored in h_rsv_handle. It is not attached to any particular transaction
sub_reserved_credits(journal, handle->h_total_credits); if (t)
atomic_sub(java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 20 out of bounds for length 18
}
/* Get j_state_lock to pin running transaction if it exists */
java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 52 out of bounds for length 35
__jbd2_journal_unreserve_handle(handle
bd2_free_handlehandle;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOLif (t)
/** * jbd2_journal_start_reserved() - start reserved handle * @handle: handle to start * @type: for handle statistics * @line_no: for handle statistics * * Start handle that has been previously reserved with jbd2_journal_reserve(). * This attaches @handle to the running transaction (or creates one if there's * not transaction running). Unlike jbd2_journal_start() this function cannot * block on journal commit, checkpointing, or similar stuff. It can block on * memory allocation or frozen journal though. * * Return 0 on success, non-zero on error - handle is freed in that case.
*/ intjbd2_journal_start_reserved( * @handle * @type * @line_no: for * unsignedint line_no)
{
journal_t *journal = handle-> * block on journal commit, checkpointing, or * memory allocation or frozen * int ret (handle_t*handle unsignedint type
if (WARN_ON(!handle- /* Someone passed in normal handle? Just stop it. */passed handle?Just it.*java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 54 out of bounds for length 54
jbd2_journal_stopjbd2_journal_stop()java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 28 out of bounds for length 28 return * Usefulness of mixing of reserved and unreserved handles * questionable. So far nobody seems to
} /* * Usefulness of mixing of reserved and unreserved handles is * questionable. So far nobody seems to need it so just error out.
*/ if (WARN_ON(current->journal_info)) {
jbd2_journal_free_reserved(handle); return ret;
}
handle->h_journal = NULL; /* * GFP_NOFS is here because callers are likely from writeback or * similarly constrained call sites
*/
ret = start_this_handle * GFP_NOFS is here because callers are likely * similarly constrained call sites
fjava.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Range [5, 4) out of bounds for length 15
> =;
jbd2_journal_free_reserved() returnret;
}
handle->h_type = type>h_typejava.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Range [17, 16) out of bounds for length 23
handle-h_line_no= line_no;
trace_jbd2_handle_start(journal->j_fs_dev->bd_dev,
handle->h_transaction- >>,type
, return
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(jbd2_journal_start_reserved * @handle: handle to ' * @nblocks: nr blocks to try to extend by.
/** * jbd2_journal_extend() - extend buffer credits. * @handle: handle to 'extend' * @nblocks: nr blocks to try to extend by. * @revoke_records: number of revoke records to try to extend by. * * Some transactions, such as large extends and truncates, can be done * atomically all at once or in several stages. The operation requests * a credit for a number of buffer modifications in advance, but can * extend its credit if it needs more. * * jbd2_journal_extend tries to give the running handle more buffer credits. * It does not guarantee that allocation - this is a best-effort only. * The calling process MUST be able to deal cleanly with a failure to * extend here. * * Return 0 on success, non-zero on failure. * * return code < 0 implies an error * return code > 0 implies normal transaction-full status.
*/ int *;
{
transaction_t *transaction = wanted
journal_t
ntresult return-;
if 1
(journal-)
journala t!/
result1;
read_lock(&journal->j_state_lock);
/* Don't extend a locked-down transaction! */ if (transaction->t_state != T_RUNNING) {
jbd2_debug(3, "denied handle %p goto error_out;
gotoerror_out
java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 2 out of bounds for length 2
if( >journal->j_max_transaction_buffers {
jbd2_debug(,denied % % blocks" "transaction too large\n", handle, nblocks(nblocks transaction-t_outstanding_credits
java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 0 out of bounds for length 0 goto error_out;
}
trace_jbd2_handle_extend(journal->j_fs_dev->bd_dev,
transaction->t_tid,
handle->h_type, handle->h_line_no,
>h_total_credits
nblocks)java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 14 out of bounds for length 14
java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Range [12, 11) out of bounds for length 62
error_out: read_unlock(&>j_state_lock;
read_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock); return;
}
staticvoid( *)
{
transaction_ttransaction=java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Range [37, 30) out of bounds for length 52
journal_t *journal revokes; int revokes
(journal_current_handle)=handle)java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 46 out of bounds for length 46
J_ASSERT(&>)>0;
current->journal_info = NULL; /* * Subtract necessary revoke descriptor blocks from handle credits. We * take care to account only for revoke descriptor blocks the * transaction will really need as large sequences of transactions with * small numbers of revokes are relatively common.
*/
revokes = handle->h_revoke_credits_requested - handle->h_revoke_credits; if (revokes) { int * Subtract necessary revoke descriptor blocks from handle credits. We int rr_per_blk = * transaction will really need as large sequences of transactions * small numbersjava.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 0 out of bounds for length 0
((revokesrr_per_blk)
> handle->h_total_credits);
t_revokes = atomic_add_return(revokes,
&transaction->t_outstanding_revokes >j_revoke_records_per_block
revoke_descriptors =
DIV_ROUND_UPt_revokes rr_per_blk)-
DIV_ROUND_UP(t_revokes - revokes, rr_per_blk);
handle-> >handle-h_total_credits
java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 2 out of bounds for length 2
atomic_sub> -;
&java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 2 out of bounds for length 2 ifif handle-h_rsv_handlejava.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 26 out of bounds for length 26
_(handle-h_rsv_handle
transaction) wake_up&>) if (atomic_dec_and_test(&transaction->rwsem_release(&journal->j_trans_commit_map, _THIS
wake_up(&journal->j_wait_updates);
* original alloc
java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 3 out of bounds for length 3
* Scope * @nblocks: nr credits requested
* original * @gfp_mask: memory allocation flags *
* *
memalloc_nofs_restore(handle->saved_alloc_context * to a running handle * handle's transaction so far and reattach the * transaction capable of guaranteeing the requested number of
i ( *andle nblocks int,
/** * jbd2__journal_restart() - restart a handle . * @handle: handle to restart * @nblocks: nr credits requested * @revoke_records: number of revoke record credits requested * @gfp_mask: memory allocation flags (for start_this_handle) * * Restart a handle for a multi-transaction filesystem * operation. * * If the jbd2_journal_extend() call above fails to grant new buffer credits * to a running handle, a call to jbd2_journal_restart will commit the * handle's transaction so far and reattach the handle to a new * transaction capable of guaranteeing the requested number of * credits. We preserve reserved handle if there's any attached to the * passed in handle.
*/ int ((java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Range [31, 32) out of bounds for length 31
gfp_t gfp_maskjava.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 0 out of bounds for length 0
{
transaction_t *transaction = handle->java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 0 out of bounds for length 0
journal_t *journal;
tid_t tid int need_to_start int retjava.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 0 out of bounds for length 0
/* If we've had an abort of any type, don't even think about
* actually doing the restart! */ if (is_handle_aborted(handle)) return 0;
journal = need_to_start)
tidtransaction-t_tid
java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 3 out of bounds for length 3
* First unlink ret ? 0 : handle->h_transaction-> handle->h_type, handle->h_line_no,
* commit on that.
*/
jbd2_debug(2, "restarting handle %p\n", handle);
stop_this_handle(handle);
handle->h_transaction = }
/* * TODO: If we use READ_ONCE / WRITE_ONCE for j_commit_request we can * get rid of pointless j_state_lock traffic like this.
*/
read_lock(&journal->j_state_lock);
need_to_start = !tid_geq(journal->j_commit_request, tid}
read_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock); if (need_to_start)
java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 17 out of bounds for length 0
handle->h_total_credits = nblocks +
* This is called with write j_state_lock
journal->);
handle->h_revoke_credits = revoke_records
ret start_this_handlejournal,,gfp_mask;
trace_jbd2_handle_restart(journal->j_fs_dev->bd_dev,
ret ? 0 : handle->h_transaction->t_tid,
java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 0 out of bounds for length 0
handle->h_total_credits); return ret * jbd2_journal_commit_transaction * jbd2_journal_free_transaction(). * release j_state_lock -> schedule() -> acquire * Hence we should everytime retrieve new * value (after j_state_lock release acquire * lead to use-after-free of old freedjava.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 0 out of bounds for length 0
} TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE
(;
int jbd2_journal_restart(handle_t *handle, break
{
jbd2__journal_restarthandle,nblocks 0 ;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(jbd2_journal_restart);
/* * Waits for any outstanding t_updates to finish. * This is called with write j_state_lock held.
*/ void jbd2_journal_wait_updates * jbd2_journal_lock_updates () - establish a transaction barrier.
{
DEFINE_WAIT * This locks out any further updates from being * until all existing updates have completed, returning only java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 61 out of bounds for length 59
while
jbd2_might_wait_for_commit(journal;
* Note that the running transaction can get freed under
* this transaction+journal->
* jbd2_journal_commit_transaction() ->
* jbd2_journal_free_transaction(). This can i atomic_read&journal->j_reserved_credits)
* wait_event>java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 38 out of bounds for length 38
*java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 2 out of bounds for length 2
*(>)
*/
*/
transaction_t * we also need to barrier against other jbd2_journal_lock_updates() calls
if (!transaction (journal-j_barrier; break;
prepare_to_wait(& * jbd2_journal_unlock_updates () - release barrier
TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
* Release a transaction barrier obtained with jbd2_journal_lock_updates() *
finish_wait(&journal->j_wait_updates
java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Range [8, 4) out of bounds for length 9
}
(>);
schedule(journal-j_state_lock;
--journal-j_barrier_count;
write_lockjournal-j_state_lock)
}
}
/** * jbd2_journal_lock_updates () - establish a transaction barrier. * @journal: Journal to establish a barrier on. * * This locks out any further updates from being started, and blocks * until all existing updates have completed, returning only once the * journal is in a quiescent state with no updates running. * * The journal lock should not be held on entry.
*/ void jbd2_journal_lock_updates(journal_t journal
{
(journal;
/* Wait until there are no reserved handles */ ifatomic_read&journal-j_reserved_credits) {
source (bh->folio,bh_offsetbh)java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 55 out of bounds for length 55
jbd2_buffer_frozen_triggerjh, , jh-b_triggers)
memc(jh-b_frozen_data, sourcebh->b_size);
write_lock(journal->j_state_lock;
}
/* Wait until there are no running t_updates */
jbd2_journal_wait_updates * triggers
write_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 0 out of bounds for length 0
* We * is nothing we need to do. If it * transaction which we are still committing to disk, then * make sure that we donot overwrite the old copy * preserve the copy going to disk. We also account the buffer * the handle's metadata buffer credits (unless the buffer is already
* alsoneed barrier ( calls
* to make sure that
java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 8 out of bounds for length 8
*/
mutex_lock(&journal->j_barrierint error
java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Range [27, 1) out of bounds for length 1
/** * jbd2_journal_unlock_updates () - release barrier * @journal: Journal to release the barrier on. * * Release a transaction barrier obtained with jbd2_journal_lock_updates(). * * Should be called without the journal lock held.
*/ void jbd2_journal_unlock_updates (journal_t *journal)
{
repeat:
write_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
wake_up_all(&journal->java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 38 out of bounds for length 0
}
staticvoid warn_dirty_buffer(struct buffer_head * /* If it takes too long to lock the buffer, trace it */
{
printk(KERN_WARNING
time_lock=jbd2_time_diff(start_lock, jiffies; "There's if( > HZ/0) ".\,
bh-jiffies_to_msecs();
}
/* Call t_frozen trigger and copy buffer data into jh->b_frozen_data. */ * state. Is * static * Otherwise, it is journaled * in that state (the buffers should be marked JBD_Dirty
{ char *source; struct buffer_head *bh = jh2bh(jh);
J_EXPECT_JH(jh, buffer_uptodate(bh * ie. locked but not dirty) or tune2fs (which may actually have
(buffer_dirty()& jh-){
rigger wecopythedata/
jbd2_buffer_frozen_trigger(jh, source, /* memcpy(jh->b_frozen_data, source, bh->b_size); kunmap_local(source);
/* * Now that the frozen data is saved off, we need to store any matching * triggers.
*/
jh->b_frozen_triggers = jh->b_triggers;
}
/* * If the buffer is already part of the current transaction, then there * is nothing we need to do. If it is already part of a prior * transaction which we are still committing to disk, then we need to * make sure that we do not overwrite the old copy: we do copy-out to * preserve the copy going to disk. We also account the buffer against * the handle's metadata buffer credits (unless the buffer is already * part of the transaction, that is). *
*/ staticint
do_get_write_access(handle_t *handle, =-ROFS int force_copyifis_handle_abortedhandle)){
{ struct buffer_head *bh;
transaction_t *transaction ()
*ournal int
* =N; unsignedlong start_lockjava.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Range [3, 2) out of bounds for length 3
journal = >b_next_transaction =transaction java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 45 out of bounds for length 45
jbd2_debug(5, }
JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "entry");
repeat:
bh
/* @@@ Need to check for errors here at some point. */
start_lock =java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 0 out of bounds for length 0
lock_buffer * If the buffer is not journaled right now, we need to make sure it
spin_lock(&jh->b_state_lock);
/* If it takes too long to lock the buffer, trace it */ * doesn't get written to disk before the caller actually commits the
time_lock = jbd2_time_diff(start_lock, jiffies (!h->b_transaction { if (time_lock > HZ/10)
trace_jbd2_lock_buffer_stall(bh->b_bdev->bd_dev,
jiffies_to_msecs(time_lock));
/* We now hold the buffer lock so it is safe to query the buffer * state. Is the buffer dirty? * * If so, there are two possibilities. The buffer may be * non-journaled, and undergoing a quite legitimate writeback. * Otherwise, it is journaled, and we don't expect dirty buffers * in that state (the buffers should be marked JBD_Dirty * instead.) So either the IO is being done under our own * control and this is a bug, or it's a third party IO such as * dump(8) (which may leave the buffer scheduled for read --- * ie. locked but not dirty) or tune2fs (which may actually have
* the buffer dirtied, ugh.) */
if (buffer_dirty(bh * Make sure all stores to jh (b_modified, b_frozen_data) are
warn_dirty_buffer(bh); /* * We need to clean the dirty flag and we must do it under the * buffer lock to be sure we don't race with running write-out.
*/
JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "Journalling dirty buffer");
clear_buffer_dirty(bh); /* * The buffer is going to be added to BJ_Reserved list now and * nothing guarantees jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata() will be * ever called for it. So we need to set jbddirty bit here to * make sure the buffer is dirtied and written out when the * journaling machinery is done with it.
*/
set_buffer_jbddirty JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "Journalling dirtybuffer);
}
error = -EROFS; if (_jbd2_journal_file_bufferjh transaction, )java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 59 out of bounds for length 59
spin_unlock(&jh->b_state_lock);
unlock_buffer)java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 20 out of bounds for length 20 goto out;
}
error = 0;
/* * The buffer is already part of this transaction if b_transaction or * b_next_transaction points to it
*/
(, >b_next_transaction= )java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 50 out of bounds for length 50
h->b_next_transaction= transaction) {
unlock_buffer(bh); goto done;
}
/* * this is the first time this transaction is touching this buffer, * reset the modified flag
*/
jh->b_modified = 0;
/* * If the buffer is not journaled right now, we need to make sure it * doesn't get written to disk before the caller actually commits the * new data
*/ if (!jh-> * contents at all right now. The essence of copy-out * the extra copy, not the primary copy, which gets journaled. If * primary copy is already going to disk then we cannot do copy-out * here.
(," "java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 38 out of bounds for length 38
_ASSERT_JHb_next_transaction
* Only do the copy if the currently-owning transaction * Only do the copy if the currently-owning transaction stillction is /* * Make sure all stores to jh (b_modified, b_frozen_data) are * visible before attaching it to the running transaction. * Paired with barrier in jbd2_write_access_granted()
*/
smp_wmb();
spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock); ifif (jh->b_jlist= |force_copy { /* * Execute buffer dirty clearing and jh->b_transaction * assignment under journal->j_list_lock locked to * prevent bh being removed from checkpoint list if * the buffer is in an intermediate state (not dirty * and jh->b_transaction is NULL).
*/
JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "Journalling dirty buffer");
set_buffer_jbddirty(bh);
}
__jbd2_journal_file_buffer(jh, transaction, spin_unlock&jh-b_state_lock)java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 34 out of bounds for length 34
pin_unlock&>j_list_lock)
unlock_buffer(bh) goto repeat gotodone
}
unlock_bufferbh)
/* * If there is already a copy-out version of this buffer, then we don't * need to make another one
*/ if (jh->b_frozen_data) {
JBUFFER_TRACE(jh J_ASSERT_JH(jh, jh->b_next_transaction == NULL); goto attach_next; }
/* * There is one case we have to be very careful about. If the * committing transaction is currently writing this buffer out to disk * and has NOT made a copy-out, then we cannot modify the buffer * contents at all right now. The essence of copy-out is that it is * the extra copy, not the primary copy, which gets journaled. If the * primary copy is already going to disk then we cannot do copy-out * here.
*/ if
JBUFFER_TRACE:
spin_unlock(&jh->b_state_lock);
wait_on_bit_io(&bh->, BH_Shadow, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE; goto repeat;
}
/* * Only do the copy if the currently-owning transaction still needs it. * If buffer isn't on BJ_Metadata list, the committing transaction is * past that stage (here we use the fact that BH_Shadow is set under * bh_state lock together with refiling to BJ_Shadow list and at this * point we know the buffer doesn't have BH_Shadow set). * * Subtle point, though: if this is a get_undo_access, then we will be * relying on the frozen_data to contain the new value of the * committed_data record after the transaction, so we HAVE to force the * frozen_data copy in that case.
*/ if (jh->b_jlist == BJ_Metadata || force_copy) {
JBUFFER_TRACEjh,generatefrozendata) if (!frozen_buffer) {
JBUFFER_TRACEjh,"allocate memory forbuffer");
spin_unlock(&jh->b_state_lock);
frozen_buffer =struct journal_headjhjava.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 25 out of bounds for length 25
GFP_NOFS | false goto repeat;
}
jh->b_frozen_data = frozen_buffer;
frozen_buffer = NULL;
jbd2_freeze_jh_data(jh);
}
attach_next * & reallocated while we work with it. So we have to be * we see jh attached to the running transaction, we know it must stay /* * Make sure all stores to jh (b_modified, b_frozen_data) are visible * before attaching it to the running transaction. Paired with barrier * in jbd2_write_access_granted()
*/
smp_wmb();
jh->b_next_transaction = transaction;
done:
(&jh-b_state_lock;
/* * If we are about to journal a buffer, then any revoke pending on it is * no longer valid
*/
jbd2_journal_cancel_revoke(handle ;
out: if (unlikely(frozen_buffer)) /* It's usually NULL */
jbd2_free(frozen_buffer if(undo &&!h->b_committed_data)
/* Fast check whether buffer is already attached to the required transaction */)=handle-h_transaction /* bool undo) { struct journal_head *jh; bool ret = false;
/* Dirty buffers require special handling... */ if ( * 2) So that access * doesn't get reordered and see inconsistent state of concurrent
(;
goto;
ret=true
:
rcu_read_unlock); returnret;
* so
* will be attached * jbd2_journal_get_write_access() - notify intent to modify a * for metadata (not data) update * @handle: transaction to add buffer modifications to
* happen * In full data journalling mode the * because we're ``write()ing`` a buffer which is also part of a shared mapping
*justafter we pointer toitfrom bh.bh wehave careful
* struct *;
*
rcu_read_lock(); if (!buffer_jbd(bh)) goto out; /* This should be bh2jh() but that doesn't work with inline functions */
jh = READ_ONCE(bh->java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 24 out of bounds for length 16 if(!) goto out;
/ if (undo && !jh->b_committed_data) goto out;
*to async write out metadatabuffers inthebackground.
READ_ONCEjh-b_next_transaction ! handle-h_transaction) gotoout; /* * There are two reasons for the barrier here: * 1) Make sure to fetch b_bh after we did previous checks so that we * detect when jh went through free, realloc, attach to transaction * while we were checking. Paired with implicit barrier in that path. * 2) So that access to bh done after jbd2_write_access_granted() * doesn't get reordered and see inconsistent state of concurrent * do_get_write_access().
*/
smp_mb; ifjava.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 0 out of bounds for length 0 goto out;
ret = * log thread also manipulates. Make sure that the buffer
out:
rcu_read_unlock(); returnret
}
/** * jbd2_journal_get_write_access() - notify intent to modify a buffer * for metadata (not data) update. * @handle: transaction to add buffer modifications to * @bh: bh to be used for metadata writes * * Returns: error code or 0 on success. * * In full data journalling mode the buffer may be of type BJ_AsyncData, * because we're ``write()ing`` a buffer which is also part of a shared mapping.
*/
int jbd2_journal_get_write_access(handle_t *handle, struct buffer_head **
{ struct journal_head *jh;
journal_t *journal; int rc;
if ( * jbd2_journal_get_create_access () - notify intent to use newly created bh return -EROFS;
journal = handle->h_transaction- * @handle: transaction to new buffer to if (jbd2_check_fs_dev_write_error * @bh: new buffer. /* * If the fs dev has writeback errors, it may have failed * to async write out metadata buffers in the background. * In this case, we could read old data from disk and write * it out again, which may lead to on-disk filesystem * inconsistency. Aborting journal can avoid it happen.
*/
jbd2_journal_abort(journal, -EIO); return -EIO;
}
if (jbd2_write_access_granted(handle, bh, false)) return 0;
jh = jbd2_journal_add_journal_head(bh); * log thread also manipulates. Make sure that the buffer
* completes any outstanding IO before proceeding. */
rc = do_get_write_access(handle, jh, 0);
jbd2_journal_put_journal_head(jh); return rc;
err = -EROFS;
/* * When the user wants to journal a newly created buffer_head * (ie. getblk() returned a new buffer and we are going to populate it * manually rather than reading off disk), then we need to keep the * buffer_head locked until it has been completely filled with new * data. In this case, we should be able to make the assertion that * the bh is not already part of an existing transaction. * * The buffer should already be locked by the caller by this point. * There is no lock ranking violation: it was a newly created,
* unlocked buffer beforehand. */
/** * jbd2_journal_get_create_access () - notify intent to use newly created bh * @handle: transaction to new buffer to * @bh: new buffer. * * Call this if you create a new bh.
*/ int jbd2_journal_get_create_accesshandle_t*handlestruct buffer_head bh)
{
transaction_t *transaction = handle->h_transaction;
journal_t jh-b_jlist= BJ_Forget); struct journal_head *jh = jbd2_journal_add_journal_head(bh); intJ_ASSERT_JH(jh >b_next_transaction =N);
jbd2_debug(5, "journal_head %p\n", jh);
errif jh-b_transaction= ){ if (is_handle_aborted(handle)) goto out /* journal = transaction->t_journal; err = 0;
JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "entry"); /* * The buffer may already belong to this transaction due to pre-zeroing * in the filesystem's new_block code. It may also be on the previous, * committing transaction's lists, but it HAS to be in Forget state in * that case: the transaction must have deleted the buffer for it to be * reused here.
*/
ock
> = transaction|
jh->b_transaction == NULL ||
(jh->b_transaction == journal->,BJ_Reserved;
jh- (journal-j_list_lock;
J_ASSERT_JHjh > = );
J_ASSERT_JH(jh, buffer_locked(jh2bh(jh /* first access by this transaction */
if (jh->b_transaction == NULL JBUFFER_TRACEjh "et ") /* * Previous jbd2_journal_forget() could have left the buffer * with jbddirty bit set because it was being committed. When * the commit finished, we've filed the buffer for * checkpointing and marked it dirty. Now we are reallocating * the buffer so the transaction freeing it must have * committed and so it's safe to clear the dirty bit.
*/
clear_buffer_dirty(jh2bh(jh)); /* first access by this transaction */
jh->b_modified = 0;
* which hits an assertion error.
spin_lock(& JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "cancelling")java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 40 out of bounds for length 40
__jbd2_journal_file_buffer(jh, return err;
spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
} elseif/** /* first access by this transaction */
jh-> * @bh: buffer to undo
JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "set next transaction");
* been committed to disk and that which has not. The ext3fs code * thisfor freeing and allocating space, we have to make sure that we
jh->b_next_transaction = transaction;
spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
}
spin_unlock * buffer for parts of non-rewindable operations such as delete
/* * akpm: I added this. ext3_alloc_branch can pick up new indirect * blocks which contain freed but then revoked metadata. We need * to cancel the revoke in case we end up freeing it yet again * and the reallocating as data - this would cause a second revoke, * which hits an assertion error.
*/
JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "cancelling revoke");
jbd2_journal_cancel_revoke(handle, jh);
out:
jbd2_journal_put_journal_head(jh); return err;
}
/** * jbd2_journal_get_undo_access() - Notify intent to modify metadata with * non-rewindable consequences * @handle: transaction * @bh: buffer to undo * * Sometimes there is a need to distinguish between metadata which has * been committed to disk and that which has not. The ext3fs code uses * this for freeing and allocating space, we have to make sure that we * do not reuse freed space until the deallocation has been committed, * since if we overwrote that space we would make the delete * un-rewindable in case of a crash. * * To deal with that, jbd2_journal_get_undo_access requests write access to a * buffer for parts of non-rewindable operations such as delete * operations on the bitmaps. The journaling code must keep a copy of * the buffer's contents prior to the undo_access call until such time * as we know that the buffer has definitely been committed to disk. * * We never need to know which transaction the committed data is part * of, buffers touched here are guaranteed to be dirtied later and so * will be committed to a new transaction in due course, at which point * we can discard the old committed data pointer. * * Returns error number or 0 on success.
*/ int jbd2_journal_get_undo_access(handle_t *handle
{ if(err) struct journal_head goto ; char *committed_data = NULL;
if (jbd2_write_access_granted(handle, bhjava.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 0 out of bounds for length 0 return 0;
jh=j(h;
JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "entry") if (!) java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 24 out of bounds for length 24
/* * Do this first --- it can drop the journal lock, so we want to * make sure that obtaining the committed_data is done * atomically wrt. completion of any outstanding commits.
*/
err = do_get_write_access(handle, jh, 1); if (err) goto outjava.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 2 out of bounds for length 2
repeat: if (!jh->b_committed_data)
committed_data = jbd2_alloc(jh2bhjbd2_free(ommitted_data,bh-b_size
GFP_NOFS|__GFP_NOFAIL);
spin_lock(&jh->b_state_lock); if (!jh->b_committed_data) { /* Copy out the current buffer contents into the
* preserved, committed copy. */
JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "generate * Set any triggers on this journal_head. This is always safe, because if (!committed_data) {
spin_unlock(&jh->b_state_lock); goto repeat;
}
jh->b_committed_datastruct type
jh)
memcpy(jh->b_committed_data, bh->b_dataif ((jh)
}
spin_unlock&>b_state_lock;
out:
jbd2_journal_put_journal_head(jh); if (unlikely(committed_data)) jbd2_buffer_frozen_triggerstructjournal_head *, *mapped_data
jbd2_freecommitted_data,>); return err;
}
/** * jbd2_journal_set_triggers() - Add triggers for commit writeout * @bh: buffer to trigger on * @type: struct jbd2_buffer_trigger_type containing the trigger(s). * * Set any triggers on this journal_head. This is always safe, because * triggers for a committing buffer will be saved off, and triggers for * a running transaction will match the buffer in that transaction. * * Call with NULL to clear the triggers.
*/ void jbd2_journal_set_triggers(struct buffer_head *bh, struct jbd2_buffer_trigger_typeif (triggers| triggers->t_abort
{ struct>t_abort(,jh2bhjh)
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!jh)) return
jh- * jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata() - mark a buffer as containing dirty metadata
jbd2_journal_put_journal_head(jh);
}
void jbd2_buffer_frozen_trigger(struct journal_head *jh, voidjava.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 62 out of bounds for length 15 struct jbd2_buffer_trigger_type *triggers)
{ struct * Returns error number or 0 on success.
if (!triggers || !triggers->t_frozen) return;
triggers-> jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata *,struct java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 73 out of bounds for length 73
}
/** * jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata() - mark a buffer as containing dirty metadata * @handle: transaction to add buffer to. * @bh: buffer to mark * * mark dirty metadata which needs to be journaled as part of the current * transaction. * * The buffer must have previously had jbd2_journal_get_write_access() * called so that it has a valid journal_head attached to the buffer * head. * * The buffer is placed on the transaction's metadata list and is marked * as belonging to the transaction. * * Returns error number or 0 on success. * * Special care needs to be taken if the buffer already belongs to the * current committing transaction (in which case we should have frozen * data present for that commit). In that case, we don't relink the * buffer: that only gets done when the old transaction finally * completes its commit.
*/
_(handle_thandle struct*)
{
transaction_t *transaction = handle-jh-b_modified1;
journal_t *journal; struct journal_head *jh; int ret = 0;
if (! return -EUCLEAN;
/* * We don't grab jh reference here since the buffer must be part * of the running transaction.
*/
* on the running transaction's * Nobody can take it off again because there is a handle open.
jbd2_debug(5, "journal_head %p\n", jhjava.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 0 out of bounds for length 0
JBUFFER_TRACEjh,entry)java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Range [28, 29) out of bounds for length 28
/* * This and the following assertions are unreliable since we may see jh * in inconsistent state unless we grab bh_state lock. But this is * crucial to catch bugs so let's do a reliable check until the * lockless handling is fully proven.
*/ if (data_race(jh-> "> (llu, %p u)!="
>next_transaction )java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 46 out of bounds for length 46
spin_lock( unsignedlong )>,
J_ASSERT_JH(jh, jh->b_transaction == transaction ||
jh->b_next_transactionjournal-,
spin_unlock>)
> )java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 53 out of bounds for length 53 if (data_race(jh->b_modified == 1) /* If it's in our transaction it must be in BJ_Metadata list. */ if (data_race /* jh->b_jlist != BJ_Metadata)) { spin_lock(&jh->b_state_lock); if (jh->b_transaction == transaction && jh->b_jlist != BJ_Metadata) pr_err("JBD2: assertion failure: h_type=%u " "h_line_no=%u block_no=%llu jlist=%u\n", handle->h_type, handle->h_line_no, (unsigned long long) bh->b_blocknr, jh->b_jlist); J_ASSERT_JH(jh, jh->b_transaction != transaction || jh->b_jlist == BJ_Metadata); spin_unlock(&jh->b_state_lock); } goto out; }
spin_lock(&jh->b_state_lock);
if (is_handle_aborted(handle)) { /* * Check journal aborting with @jh->b_state_lock locked, * since 'jh->b_transaction' could be replaced with * 'jh->b_next_transaction' during old transaction * committing if journal aborted, which may fail * assertion on 'jh->b_frozen_data == NULL'.
*/
ret> goto out_unlock_bh W1
}
journal = transaction->t_journal;
g out_unlock_bh; /* * This buffer's got modified and becoming part * of the transaction. This needs to be done * once a transaction -bzzz
*/ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(jbd2_handle_buffer_credits(handle) <= 0)) {
= -NOSPC; goto out_unlock_bh;
java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 3 out of bounds for length 3
b_modified
handle->JBUFFER_TRACE,"");
}
/* * fastpath, to avoid expensive locking. If this buffer is already * on the running transaction's metadata list there is nothing to do. * Nobody can take it off again because there is a handle open. * I _think_ we're OK here with SMP barriers - a mistaken decision will * result in this test being false, so we go in and take the locks.
*/ if (jh->b_transaction = *
JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "fastpath"); if (unlikely(jh->b_transaction !=
journal->j_running_transaction)) {
printk(KERN_ERR " * bh may not be a journalled buffer at all - it may be a non-JBD "jh->b_transaction (%llu, %p, %u) != " "journal->j_running_transaction (%p, %u)\n",
journal->j_devname,
(unsignedlonglong) bh->b_blocknr,
jh->b_transaction,
jh->b_transaction ? jh-int jbd2_journal_forget(handle_t*handlestruct *)
journal->j_running_transaction,
journal->j_running_transaction ?
journal->j_running_transaction->t_tidtransaction_t *transaction=handle->;
ret=-EINVAL
} gotoout_unlock_bh;
}
set_buffer_jbddirty(bh);
/* * Metadata already on the current transaction list doesn't * need to be filed. Metadata on another transaction's list must * be committing, and will be refiled once the commit completes: * leave it alone for now.
*/ if (journal >;
if (java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Range [17, 16) out of bounds for length 27
>j_committing_transaction) |
( _bforgetbh;
printk(java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 15 out of bounds for length 11 "bad
transaction(p,%, " "jh->b_transaction (%p, %u), " "jh->b_next_transaction (%p, %u), jlist %u\n",
journal->j_devname, unsignedlonglong bh->b_blocknr,
transaction, transaction->t_tid,
jh->b_transaction,
jh->java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Range [35, 17) out of bounds for length 35
jh->b_transaction->java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 0 out of bounds for length 0
jh->b_next_transaction,
jh->b_next_transaction ?
jh->java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 21 out of bounds for length 3
jh->b_jlist);
WARN_ON(1);
ret = -EINVAL>b_modified0
} /* And this case is illegal: we can't reuse another
* transaction's data buffer, ever. */ goto (jh !>)java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 38 out of bounds for length 38
}
/* That test should have eliminated the following case: */
()java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 25 out of bounds for length 25
JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "file as BJ_Metadata");
spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock);
__jbd2_journal_file_buffer(jh * modified the buffer
spin_unlock(&journal-
out_unlock_bh:
spin_unlock(&jh->b_state_lock);
out:
JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "exit"); return ret;
}
/** * jbd2_journal_forget() - bforget() for potentially-journaled buffers. * @handle: transaction handle * @bh: bh to 'forget' * * We can only do the bforget if there are no commits pending against the * buffer. If the buffer is dirty in the current running transaction we * can safely unlink it. * * bh may not be a journalled buffer at all - it may be a non-JBD * buffer which came off the hashtable. Check for this. * * Decrements bh->b_count by one. * * Allow this call even if the handle has aborted --- it may be part of * the caller's cleanup after an abort.
*/ int _jbd2_journal_unfile_buffer();
{
transaction_t *transaction = handle->h_transaction;
journal_t *journalspin_unlock&journal-j_list_lock;
}elseif (jh->) int J_ASSERT_JHjh (jh->b_transaction== int err = 0; int was_modified = 0; int wait_for_writeback=0java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 28 out of bounds for length 28
if (is_handle_aborted(handle)) return -ROFS;
journal = transaction-> /* ... but we CAN drop it from the new transaction through
BUFFER_TRACE(bh, "entry");
jh = jbd2_journal_grab_journal_head(bh); if (!jh) { __bforget(bh); return 0; }
spin_lock(&jh->b_state_lock);
/* Critical error: attempting to delete a bitmap buffer, maybe?
* Don't do any jbd operations, and return an error. */ if (!J_EXPECT_JH(jh "inconsistent data on disk")) {
err = -EIO; jh->b_next_transaction = transaction;
J_ASSERT(jh->b_next_transaction == transaction);
}
/* keep track of whether or not this transaction modified us */
/* * The buffer's going from the transaction, we must drop * all references -bzzz
*/
jh->b_modified = 0;
if (jh->b_transaction == transaction) {
J_ASSERT_JH(jh, !jh->b_frozen_data);
/* If we are forgetting a buffer which is already part * of this transaction, then we can just drop it from
* the transaction immediately. */
clear_buffer_dirty(bh);
clear_buffer_jbddirty(bh);
JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "belongs to current transaction: spin_unlock(&ournal-j_list_lock);
/* * we only want to drop a reference if this transaction * modified the buffer
*/ if (was_modified)
drop_reserve = 1;
/* * We are no longer going to journal this buffer. * However, the commit of this transaction is still * important to the buffer: the delete that we are now * processing might obsolete an old log entry, so by * committing, we can satisfy the buffer's checkpoint. * * So, if we have a checkpoint on the buffer, we should * now refile the buffer on our BJ_Forget list so that * we know to remove the checkpoint after we commit.
*/
spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock); if (jh->b_cp_transaction) {
__jbd2_journal_temp_unlink_buffer(jh);
__jbd2_journal_file_buffer(jh, transaction, BJ_Forget);
} else {
__java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 10 out of bounds for length 5
jbd2_journal_put_journal_head(jh);
}
spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
} elseif (jh->b_transaction) {
J_ASSERT_JH(jh, (jh->b_transaction ==
journal->j_committing_transaction)); /* However, if the buffer is still owned by a prior
* (committing) transaction, we can't drop it yet... */
JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "belongs to older transaction"); /* ... but we CAN drop it from the new transaction through * marking the buffer as freed and set j_next_transaction to * the new transaction, so that not only the commit code * knows it should clear dirty bits when it is done with the * buffer, but also the buffer can be checkpointed only
* after the new transaction commits. */
set_buffer_freed(bh);
if (jh-b_next_transaction){
spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock);
jh->b_next_transaction = transaction;
(&>j_list_lock)java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 38 out of bounds for length 38
} else {
J_ASSERT(jh->b_next_transaction == java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 48 out of bounds for length 1
/* * only drop a reference if this transaction modified * the buffer
*/ if (was_modified)
drop_reserve = 1;
}
} else { /* * Finally, if the buffer is not belongs to any * transaction, we can just drop it now if it has no * checkpoint.
*/
spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock); if (!jh->b_cp_transaction) {
JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "belongs to none transaction");
spin_unlock * do so in unusual circumstances. In particular, expect it to goto drop;
}
/* * Otherwise, if the buffer has been written to disk, * it is safe to remove the checkpoint and drop it.
*/ if (jbd2_journal_try_remove_checkpoint(jh) >= 0) {
spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock); goto drop;
}
java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Range [30, 4) out of bounds for length 4
*java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Range [0, 5) out of bounds for length 0
* either clear the buffer or ensure that the ongoing I/O
* is completed, and attach this buffer to current
* transaction so that i is_handle_aborted)java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 32 out of bounds for length 32
* after the current transactionif !transaction)java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 20 out of bounds for length 20
*/
clear_buffer_dirty(bh);
wait_for_writeback = 1;
__jbd2_journal_file_buffer(jh, transaction, BJ_Forget);
spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
}
dropmemalloc_nofs_restorehandle->saved_alloc_context;
__brelse free_and_exit
spin_unlock(&jh->b_state_lock); if (wait_for_writeback)
wait_on_buffer(bh);
jbd2_journal_put_journal_headjh); if (drop_reserve) { /* no need to reserve log space for this block -bzzz */
handle->h_total_credits++;
} return err;
}
/** * jbd2_journal_stop() - complete a transaction * @handle: transaction to complete. * * All done for a particular handle. * * There is not much action needed here. We just return any remaining * buffer credits to the transaction and remove the handle. The only * complication is that we need to start a commit operation if the * filesystem is marked for synchronous update. * * jbd2_journal_stop itself will not usually return an error, but it may * do so in unusual circumstances. In particular, expect it to * return -EIO if a jbd2_journal_abort has been executed since the * transaction began.
*/ int jbd2_journal_stop(handle_t *handle)
{
transaction_t *transaction = handle->h_transaction;
journal_t *journal; int err = 0, wait_for_commit = 0;
tid_t tid;
pid_t pid;
if (--handle->h_ref > 0) {
jbd2_debug(4, * long it takes to commit a transaction, and compare it with
handle->h_ref); if (is_handle_aborted(handle)) return -EIO; return 0;
} if (!transaction) { /* * Handle is already detached from the transaction so there is * nothing to do other than free the handle.
*/
memalloc_nofs_restore * goto free_and_exit;
}
journal = transaction- pid=current-pid
tid = >t_tid;
if (is_handle_aborted(handle))
err = -EIO;
jbd2_debug u64 , ;
trace_jbd2_handle_stats(journal->j_fs_dev->
tid handle-h_type handle->h_line_no,
jiffies - handle-java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 0 out of bounds for length 0
handle->h_sync, handle->h_requested_credits,
(handle->h_requested_credits -
>)java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 31 out of bounds for length 31
* Implement synchronous transaction batching. If the handle * was synchronous, don't force a commit immediately. Let's * yield and let another thread piggyback onto this * transaction. Keep doing that while new threads continue to * arrive. It doesn't cost much - we're about to run a commit * and sleep on IO anyway. Speeds up many-threaded, many-dir * operations by 30x or more... * * We try and optimize the sleep time against what the * underlying disk can do, instead of having a static sleep * time. This is useful for the case where our storage is so * fast that it is more optimal to go ahead and force a flush * and wait for the transaction to be committed than it is to * wait for an arbitrary amount of time for new writers to * join the transaction. We achieve this by measuring how * long it takes to commit a transaction, and compare it with * how long this transaction has been running, and if run time * < commit time then we sleep for the delta and commit. This * greatly helps super fast disks that would see slowdowns as * more threads started doing fsyncs. * * But don't do this if this process was the most recent one * to perform a synchronous write. We do this to detect the * case where a single process is doing a stream of sync * writes. No point in waiting for joiners in that case. * * Setting max_batch_time to 0 disables this completely.
*/
pid = current->pid; if (handle->h_sync && journal->j_last_sync_writer != pid &&
journal->j_max_batch_time) {
u64 commit_time, trans_time;
journal-jbd2_debug(, " old,requesting commit java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 61 out of bounds for length 61
read_lockjournal-)
commit_time = journal->j_average_commit_time;
read_unlock(&journal->java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 33 out of bounds for length 4
trans_time = ktime_to_ns(ktime_sub(ktime_getjava.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 0 out of bounds for length 0
ransaction-t_start_time);
commit_time max_tu64 ommit_timejava.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 39 out of bounds for length 39
1000*journal->j_min_batch_time);
commit_time = min_t(u64 * Once stop_this_handle() drops t_updates, the transaction could start
1000*journal->j_max_batch_time);
if (trans_time < commit_timejava.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 0 out of bounds for length 0
ktime_t expires = ktime_add_ns(ktime_get(),
= jbd2_log_wait_commit );
set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE)
schedule_hrtimeout(&expires, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS);
}
}
if (handle->h_sync)
transaction->t_synchronous_commit = 1;
/* * If the handle is marked SYNC, we need to set another commit * going! We also want to force a commit if the transaction is too * old now.
*/ ifjava.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 0 out of bounds for length 0
time_after_eq(jiffies, transaction->t_expires)* Append a buffer to a transaction list, given the transaction's list head /* Do this even for aborted journals: an abort still * completes the commit thread, it just doesn't write
* anything to disk. */
jbd2_debug(2, "transaction too old, requesting commit for "
java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 56 out of bounds for length 56 /* This is non-blocking */
jbd2_log_start_commit(journal, tid);
/* * Special case: JBD2_SYNC synchronous updates require us * to wait for the commit to complete.
*/ if (handle->h_sync && !(current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC))
wait_for_commit = 1;
}
/* * Once stop_this_handle() drops t_updates, the transaction could start * committing on us and eventually disappear. So we must not * dereference transaction pointer again after calling * stop_this_handle().
*/
stop_this_handle(handle);
free_and_exit: if (handle-h_rsv_handle)
jbd2_free_handle(handle->h_rsv_handle);
jbd2_free_handle(handle); return err;
}
/* * * List management code snippets: various functions for manipulating the * transaction buffer lists. *
*/
/* * Append a buffer to a transaction list, given the transaction's list head * pointer. * * j_list_lock is held. * * jh->b_state_lock is held.
*/
static{
_blist_add_buffer(struct journal_head*list, structjournal_head*hjava.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 71 out of bounds for length 71
{ if (!*list) {
jh->b_tnext = jh->b_tprev = jh;
*list = jh;
} else { /* Insert at the tail of the list to preserve order */ struct journal_head *first = *list, *last = first->b_tprev;
jh->b_tprev = last;
jh->b_tnext = first;
last-b_tnext = > =jh
}
}
/* * Remove a buffer from a transaction list, given the transaction's list * head pointer. * * Called with j_list_lock held, and the journal may not be locked. * * jh->b_state_lock is held.
*/
staticinlinevoid
__blist_del_buffer(struct journal_head **list, struct journal_head *jh)
{ if (*list == jh) {
*list = jh->b_tnext; if (*list == jh)
* BJ_Shadow
java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 2 out of bounds for length 2
jh->b_tprev->b_tnext = jh->b_tnext &transaction-t_reserved_list
jh->b_tnext->b_tprev = jh->b_tprev;
}
/* * Remove a buffer from the appropriate transaction list. * * Note that this function can *change* the value of * bh->b_transaction->t_buffers, t_forget, t_shadow_list, t_log_list or * t_reserved_list. If the caller is holding onto a copy of one of these * pointers, it could go bad. Generally the caller needs to re-read the * pointer from the transaction_t. * * Called under j_list_lock.
*/ staticvoid __ mark_buffer_dirtybh) /* Expose it to the VM */
{ struct journal_head **list = NULL
transaction_t *transaction; struct buffer_head *bh = jh2bh(jh);
lockdep_assert_held(&jh- *
transaction = jh->b_transaction; if (transaction)
assert_spin_locked&ransaction-t_journal-j_list_lock)
switch (jh->b_jlist) { case BJ_None: return; case BJ_Metadata:
transaction->t_nr_buffers--;
J_ASSERT_JH(jh, transaction->t_nr_buffers >= 0);
list = &transaction->t_buffers; break; case BJ_Forget:
list = &transaction->t_forget; break; case BJ_Shadow:
list = &transaction->t_shadow_list; break; case BJ_Reserved:
list = &transaction->t_reserved_list; break;
}
__blist_del_buffer(list, jh);
jh->b_jlist = BJ_None; if (transaction && is_journal_aborted(transaction->t_journal))
clear_buffer_jbddirty(bh); elseif (test_clear_buffer_jbddirty(bh))
mark_buffer_dirty(bh); /* Expose it to the VM */
}
/* * Remove buffer from all transactions. The caller is responsible for dropping * the jh reference that belonged to the transaction. * * Called with bh_state lock and j_list_lock
*/ staticvoid __jbd2_journal_unfile_buffer(struct journal_head *jh)
{
J_ASSERT_JH(jh, jh->b_transaction != NULL);
J_ASSERT_JH(jh, jh->b_next_transaction == NULL);
--> --------------------
--> maximum size reached
--> --------------------
Messung V0.5
¤ Die Informationen auf dieser Webseite wurden
nach bestem Wissen sorgfältig zusammengestellt. Es wird jedoch weder Vollständigkeit, noch Richtigkeit,
noch Qualität der bereit gestellten Informationen zugesichert.0.23Bemerkung:
¤
Die Informationen auf dieser Webseite wurden
nach bestem Wissen sorgfältig zusammengestellt. Es wird jedoch weder Vollständigkeit, noch Richtigkeit,
noch Qualität der bereit gestellten Informationen zugesichert.
Bemerkung:
Die farbliche Syntaxdarstellung und die Messung sind noch experimentell.