(* Title: HOL/Analysis/Regularity.thy Author: Fabian Immler, TU München
*)
section \<open>Regularity of Measures\<close>
theory Regularity (* FIX suggestion to rename e.g. RegularityMeasures and/ or move as
this theory consists of 1 result only *) imports Measure_Space Borel_Space begin
theorem fixes M::"'a::{second_countable_topology, complete_space} measure" assumes sb: "sets M = sets borel" assumes"emeasure M (space M) \ \" assumes"B \ sets borel" shows inner_regular: "emeasure M B =
(SUP K \<in> {K. K \<subseteq> B \<and> compact K}. emeasure M K)" (is "?inner B") and outer_regular: "emeasure M B =
(INF U \<in> {U. B \<subseteq> U \<and> open U}. emeasure M U)" (is "?outer B") proof - have Us: "UNIV = space M"by (metis assms(1) sets_eq_imp_space_eq space_borel) hence sU: "space M = UNIV"by simp interpret finite_measure M by rule fact have approx_inner: "\A. A \ sets M \
(\<And>e. e > 0 \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>K. K \<subseteq> A \<and> compact K \<and> emeasure M A \<le> emeasure M K + ennreal e) \<Longrightarrow> ?inner A" by (rule ennreal_approx_SUP)
(force intro!: emeasure_mono simp: compact_imp_closed emeasure_eq_measure)+ have approx_outer: "\A. A \ sets M \
(\<And>e. e > 0 \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>B. A \<subseteq> B \<and> open B \<and> emeasure M B \<le> emeasure M A + ennreal e) \<Longrightarrow> ?outer A" by (rule ennreal_approx_INF)
(force intro!: emeasure_mono simp: emeasure_eq_measure sb)+ from countable_dense_setE obtain X :: "'a set" where X: "countable X""\Y :: 'a set. open Y \ Y \ {} \ \d\X. d \ Y" by auto
{ fix r::real assume"r > 0"hence"\y. open (ball y r)" "\y. ball y r \ {}" by auto with X(2)[OF this] have x: "space M = (\x\X. cball x r)" by (auto simp add: sU) (metis dist_commute order_less_imp_le) let ?U = "\k. (\n\{0..k}. cball (from_nat_into X n) r)" have"(\k. emeasure M (\n\{0..k}. cball (from_nat_into X n) r)) \ M ?U" by (rule Lim_emeasure_incseq) (auto intro!: borel_closed bexI simp: incseq_def Us sb) alsohave"?U = space M" proof safe fix x from X(2)[OF open_ball[of x r]] \<open>r > 0\<close> obtain d where d: "d\<in>X" "d \<in> ball x r" by auto show"x \ ?U" using X(1) d by simp (auto intro!: exI [where x = "to_nat_on X d"] simp: dist_commute Bex_def) qed (simp add: sU) finallyhave"(\k. M (\n\{0..k}. cball (from_nat_into X n) r)) \ M (space M)" .
} note M_space = this
{ fix e ::real and n :: nat assume"e > 0""n > 0" hence"1/n > 0""e * 2 powr - n > 0"by (auto) from M_space[OF \<open>1/n>0\<close>] have"(\k. measure M (\i\{0..k}. cball (from_nat_into X i) (1/real n))) \ measure M (space M)" unfolding emeasure_eq_measure by (auto) from metric_LIMSEQ_D[OF this \<open>0 < e * 2 powr -n\<close>] obtain k where"dist (measure M (\i\{0..k}. cball (from_nat_into X i) (1/real n))) (measure M (space M)) <
e * 2 powr -n" by auto hence"measure M (\i\{0..k}. cball (from_nat_into X i) (1/real n)) \
measure M (space M) - e * 2 powr -real n" by (auto simp: dist_real_def) hence"\k. measure M (\i\{0..k}. cball (from_nat_into X i) (1/real n)) \
measure M (space M) - e * 2 powr - real n" ..
} note k=this hence"\e\{0<..}. \(n::nat)\{0<..}. \k.
measure M (\<Union>i\<in>{0..k}. cball (from_nat_into X i) (1/real n)) \<ge> measure M (space M) - e * 2 powr - real n" by blast thenobtain k where k: "\e\{0<..}. \n\{0<..}. measure M (space M) - e * 2 powr - real (n::nat) \<le> measure M (\<Union>i\<in>{0..k e n}. cball (from_nat_into X i) (1 / n))" by metis hence k: "\e n. e > 0 \ n > 0 \ measure M (space M) - e * 2 powr - n \<le> measure M (\<Union>i\<in>{0..k e n}. cball (from_nat_into X i) (1 / n))" unfolding Ball_def by blast have approx_space: "\K \ {K. K \ space M \ compact K}. emeasure M (space M) \ emeasure M K + ennreal e"
(is"?thesis e") if"0 < e"for e :: real proof -
define B where [abs_def]: "B n = (\i\{0..k e (Suc n)}. cball (from_nat_into X i) (1 / Suc n))" for n have"\n. closed (B n)" by (auto simp: B_def) hence [simp]: "\n. B n \ sets M" by (simp add: sb) from k[OF \<open>e > 0\<close> zero_less_Suc] have"\n. measure M (space M) - measure M (B n) \ e * 2 powr - real (Suc n)" by (simp add: algebra_simps B_def finite_measure_compl) hence B_compl_le: "\n::nat. measure M (space M - B n) \ e * 2 powr - real (Suc n)" by (simp add: finite_measure_compl)
define K where"K = (\n. B n)" from\<open>closed (B _)\<close> have "closed K" by (auto simp: K_def) hence [simp]: "K \ sets M" by (simp add: sb) have"measure M (space M) - measure M K = measure M (space M - K)" by (simp add: finite_measure_compl) alsohave"\ = emeasure M (\n. space M - B n)" by (auto simp: K_def emeasure_eq_measure) alsohave"\ \ (\n. emeasure M (space M - B n))" by (rule emeasure_subadditive_countably) (auto simp: summable_def) alsohave"\ \ (\n. ennreal (e*2 powr - real (Suc n)))" using B_compl_le by (intro suminf_le) (simp_all add: emeasure_eq_measure ennreal_leI) alsohave"\ \ (\n. ennreal (e * (1 / 2) ^ Suc n))" by (simp add: powr_minus powr_realpow field_simps del: of_nat_Suc) alsohave"\ = ennreal e * (\n. ennreal ((1 / 2) ^ Suc n))" unfolding ennreal_power[symmetric] using\<open>0 < e\<close> by (simp add: ac_simps ennreal_mult' divide_ennreal[symmetric] divide_ennreal_def
ennreal_power[symmetric]) alsohave"\ = e" by (subst suminf_ennreal_eq[OF zero_le_power power_half_series]) auto finallyhave"measure M (space M) \ measure M K + e" using\<open>0 < e\<close> by simp hence"emeasure M (space M) \ emeasure M K + e" using\<open>0 < e\<close> by (simp add: emeasure_eq_measure flip: ennreal_plus) moreoverhave"compact K" unfolding compact_eq_totally_bounded proof safe show"complete K"using\<open>closed K\<close> by (simp add: complete_eq_closed) fix e'::real assume "0 < e'" thenobtain n where n: "1 / real (Suc n) < e'"by (rule nat_approx_posE) let ?k = "from_nat_into X ` {0..k e (Suc n)}" have"finite ?k"by simp moreoverhave"K \ (\x\?k. ball x e')" unfolding K_def B_def using n by force ultimatelyshow"\k. finite k \ K \ (\x\k. ball x e')" by blast qed ultimately show ?thesis by (auto simp: sU) qed
{ fix A::"'a set"assume"closed A"hence"A \ sets borel" by (simp add: compact_imp_closed) hence [simp]: "A \ sets M" by (simp add: sb) have"?inner A" proof (rule approx_inner) fix e::real assume"e > 0" from approx_space[OF this] obtain K where
K: "K \ space M" "compact K" "emeasure M (space M) \ emeasure M K + e" by (auto simp: emeasure_eq_measure) hence [simp]: "K \ sets M" by (simp add: sb compact_imp_closed) have"measure M A - measure M (A \ K) = measure M (A - A \ K)" by (subst finite_measure_Diff) auto alsohave"A - A \ K = A \ K - K" by auto alsohave"measure M \ = measure M (A \ K) - measure M K" by (subst finite_measure_Diff) auto alsohave"\ \ measure M (space M) - measure M K" by (simp add: emeasure_eq_measure sU sb finite_measure_mono) alsohave"\ \ e" using K \<open>0 < e\<close> by (simp add: emeasure_eq_measure flip: ennreal_plus) finallyhave"emeasure M A \ emeasure M (A \ K) + ennreal e" using\<open>0<e\<close> by (simp add: emeasure_eq_measure algebra_simps flip: ennreal_plus) moreoverhave"A \ K \ A" "compact (A \ K)" using \closed A\ \compact K\ by auto ultimatelyshow"\K \ A. compact K \ emeasure M A \ emeasure M K + ennreal e" by blast qed simp have"?outer A" proof cases assume"A \ {}" let ?G = "\d. {x. infdist x A < d}"
{ fix d have"?G d = (\x. infdist x A) -` {.. alsohave"open \" by (intro continuous_open_vimage) (auto intro!: continuous_infdist continuous_ident) finallyhave"open (?G d)" .
} note open_G = this from in_closed_iff_infdist_zero[OF \<open>closed A\<close> \<open>A \<noteq> {}\<close>] have"A = {x. infdist x A = 0}"by auto alsohave"\ = (\i. ?G (1/real (Suc i)))" proof (auto simp del: of_nat_Suc, rule ccontr) fix x assume"infdist x A \ 0" thenhave pos: "infdist x A > 0"using infdist_nonneg[of x A] by simp thenobtain n where n: "1 / real (Suc n) < infdist x A"by (rule nat_approx_posE) assume"\i. infdist x A < 1 / real (Suc i)" thenhave"infdist x A < 1 / real (Suc n)"by auto with n show False by simp qed alsohave"M \ = (INF n. emeasure M (?G (1 / real (Suc n))))" proof (rule INF_emeasure_decseq[symmetric], safe) fix i::nat from open_G[of "1 / real (Suc i)"] show"?G (1 / real (Suc i)) \ sets M" by (simp add: sb borel_open) next show"decseq (\i. {x. infdist x A < 1 / real (Suc i)})" by (auto intro: less_trans intro!: divide_strict_left_mono
simp: decseq_def le_eq_less_or_eq) qed simp finally have"emeasure M A = (INF n. emeasure M {x. infdist x A < 1 / real (Suc n)})" . moreover have"\ \ (INF U\{U. A \ U \ open U}. emeasure M U)" proof (intro INF_mono) fix m have"?G (1 / real (Suc m)) \ {U. A \ U \ open U}" using open_G by auto moreoverhave"M (?G (1 / real (Suc m))) \ M (?G (1 / real (Suc m)))" by simp ultimatelyshow"\U\{U. A \ U \ open U}.
emeasure M U \<le> emeasure M {x. infdist x A < 1 / real (Suc m)}" by blast qed moreover have"emeasure M A \ (INF U\{U. A \ U \ open U}. emeasure M U)" by (rule INF_greatest) (auto intro!: emeasure_mono simp: sb) ultimatelyshow ?thesis by simp qed (auto intro!: INF_eqI) note\<open>?inner A\<close> \<open>?outer A\<close> } note closed_in_D = this from\<open>B \<in> sets borel\<close> have"Int_stable (Collect closed)""Collect closed \ Pow UNIV" "B \ sigma_sets UNIV (Collect closed)" by (auto simp: Int_stable_def borel_eq_closed) thenshow"?inner B""?outer B" proof (induct B rule: sigma_sets_induct_disjoint) case empty
{ case 1 show ?caseby (intro SUP_eqI[symmetric]) auto }
{ case 2 show ?caseby (intro INF_eqI[symmetric]) (auto elim!: meta_allE[of _ "{}"]) } next case (basic B)
{ case 1 from basic closed_in_D show ?caseby auto }
{ case 2 from basic closed_in_D show ?caseby auto } next case (compl B) note inner = compl(2) and outer = compl(3) from compl have [simp]: "B \ sets M" by (auto simp: sb borel_eq_closed) case 2 have"M (space M - B) = M (space M) - emeasure M B"by (auto simp: emeasure_compl) alsohave"\ = (INF K\{K. K \ B \ compact K}. M (space M) - M K)" by (subst ennreal_SUP_const_minus) (auto simp: less_top[symmetric] inner) alsohave"\ = (INF U\{U. U \ B \ compact U}. M (space M - U))" by (auto simp add: emeasure_compl sb compact_imp_closed) alsohave"\ \ (INF U\{U. U \ B \ closed U}. M (space M - U))" by (rule INF_superset_mono) (auto simp add: compact_imp_closed) alsohave"(INF U\{U. U \ B \ closed U}. M (space M - U)) =
(INF U\<in>{U. space M - B \<subseteq> U \<and> open U}. emeasure M U)" apply (rule arg_cong [of _ _ Inf]) using sU apply (auto simp add: image_iff) apply (rule exI [of _ "UNIV - y"for y]) apply safe apply (auto simp add: double_diff) done finallyhave "(INF U\{U. space M - B \ U \ open U}. emeasure M U) \ emeasure M (space M - B)" . moreoverhave "(INF U\{U. space M - B \ U \ open U}. emeasure M U) \ emeasure M (space M - B)" by (auto simp: sb sU intro!: INF_greatest emeasure_mono) ultimatelyshow ?caseby (auto intro!: antisym simp: sets_eq_imp_space_eq[OF sb])
case 1 have"M (space M - B) = M (space M) - emeasure M B"by (auto simp: emeasure_compl) alsohave"\ = (SUP U\ {U. B \ U \ open U}. M (space M) - M U)" unfolding outer by (subst ennreal_INF_const_minus) auto alsohave"\ = (SUP U\{U. B \ U \ open U}. M (space M - U))" by (auto simp add: emeasure_compl sb compact_imp_closed) alsohave"\ = (SUP K\{K. K \ space M - B \ closed K}. emeasure M K)" unfolding SUP_image [of _ "\u. space M - u" _, symmetric, unfolded comp_def] apply (rule arg_cong [of _ _ Sup]) using sU apply (auto intro!: imageI) done alsohave"\ = (SUP K\{K. K \ space M - B \ compact K}. emeasure M K)" proof (safe intro!: antisym SUP_least) fix K assume"closed K""K \ space M - B" from closed_in_D[OF \<open>closed K\<close>] have K_inner: "emeasure M K = (SUP K\{Ka. Ka \ K \ compact Ka}. emeasure M K)" by simp show"emeasure M K \ (SUP K\{K. K \ space M - B \ compact K}. emeasure M K)" unfolding K_inner using\<open>K \<subseteq> space M - B\<close> by (auto intro!: SUP_upper SUP_least) qed (fastforce intro!: SUP_least SUP_upper simp: compact_imp_closed) finallyshow ?caseby (auto intro!: antisym simp: sets_eq_imp_space_eq[OF sb]) next case (union D) thenhave"range D \ sets M" by (auto simp: sb borel_eq_closed) with union have M[symmetric]: "(\i. M (D i)) = M (\i. D i)" by (intro suminf_emeasure) alsohave"(\n. \i (\i. M (D i))" by (intro summable_LIMSEQ) auto finallyhave measure_LIMSEQ: "(\n. \i measure M (\i. D i)" by (simp add: emeasure_eq_measure sum_nonneg) have"(\i. D i) \ sets M" using \range D \ sets M\ by auto
case 1 show ?case proof (rule approx_inner) fix e::real assume"e > 0" with measure_LIMSEQ have"\no. \n\no. \(\ix. D x)\ < e/2" by (auto simp: lim_sequentially dist_real_def simp del: less_divide_eq_numeral1) hence"\n0. \(\ix. D x)\ < e/2" by auto thenobtain n0 where n0: "\(\ii. D i)\ < e/2" unfolding choice_iff by blast have"ennreal (\ii by (auto simp add: emeasure_eq_measure) alsohave"\ \ (\i. M (D i))" by (rule sum_le_suminf) auto alsohave"\ = M (\i. D i)" by (simp add: M) alsohave"\ = measure M (\i. D i)" by (simp add: emeasure_eq_measure) finallyhave n0: "measure M (\i. D i) - (\i using n0 by (auto simp: sum_nonneg) have"\i. \K. K \ D i \ compact K \ emeasure M (D i) \ emeasure M K + e/(2*Suc n0)" proof fix i from\<open>0 < e\<close> have "0 < e/(2*Suc n0)" by simp have"emeasure M (D i) = (SUP K\{K. K \ (D i) \ compact K}. emeasure M K)" using union by blast from SUP_approx_ennreal[OF \<open>0 < e/(2*Suc n0)\<close> _ this] show"\K. K \ D i \ compact K \ emeasure M (D i) \ emeasure M K + e/(2*Suc n0)" by (auto simp: emeasure_eq_measure intro: less_imp_le compact_empty) qed thenobtain K where K: "\i. K i \ D i" "\i. compact (K i)" "\i. emeasure M (D i) \ emeasure M (K i) + e/(2*Suc n0)" unfolding choice_iff by blast let ?K = "\i\{.. have"disjoint_family_on K {..using K \<open>disjoint_family D\<close> unfolding disjoint_family_on_def by blast hence mK: "measure M ?K = (\i by (intro finite_measure_finite_Union) (auto simp: sb compact_imp_closed) have"measure M (\i. D i) < (\i alsohave"(\i (\i using K \<open>0 < e\<close> by (auto intro: sum_mono simp: emeasure_eq_measure simp flip: ennreal_plus) alsohave"\ = (\ii by (simp add: sum.distrib) alsohave"\ \ (\i0 < e\ by (auto simp: field_simps intro!: mult_left_mono) finally have"measure M (\i. D i) < (\i by auto hence"M (\i. D i) < M ?K + e" using\<open>0<e\<close> by (auto simp: mK emeasure_eq_measure sum_nonneg ennreal_less_iff simp flip: ennreal_plus) moreover have"?K \ (\i. D i)" using K by auto moreover have"compact ?K"using K by auto ultimately have"?K\(\i. D i) \ compact ?K \ emeasure M (\i. D i) \ emeasure M ?K + ennreal e" by simp thus"\K\\i. D i. compact K \ emeasure M (\i. D i) \ emeasure M K + ennreal e" .. qed fact case 2 show ?case proof (rule approx_outer[OF \<open>(\<Union>i. D i) \<in> sets M\<close>]) fix e::real assume"e > 0" have"\i::nat. \U. D i \ U \ open U \ e/(2 powr Suc i) > emeasure M U - emeasure M (D i)" proof fix i::nat from\<open>0 < e\<close> have "0 < e/(2 powr Suc i)" by simp have"emeasure M (D i) = (INF U\{U. (D i) \ U \ open U}. emeasure M U)" using union by blast from INF_approx_ennreal[OF \<open>0 < e/(2 powr Suc i)\<close> this] show"\U. D i \ U \ open U \ e/(2 powr Suc i) > emeasure M U - emeasure M (D i)" using\<open>0<e\<close> by (auto simp: emeasure_eq_measure sum_nonneg ennreal_less_iff ennreal_minus
finite_measure_mono sb
simp flip: ennreal_plus) qed thenobtain U where U: "\i. D i \ U i" "\i. open (U i)" "\i. e/(2 powr Suc i) > emeasure M (U i) - emeasure M (D i)" unfolding choice_iff by blast let ?U = "\i. U i" have"ennreal (measure M ?U - measure M (\i. D i)) = M ?U - M (\i. D i)" using U(1,2) by (subst ennreal_minus[symmetric])
(auto intro!: finite_measure_mono simp: sb emeasure_eq_measure) alsohave"\ = M (?U - (\i. D i))" using U \(\i. D i) \ sets M\ by (subst emeasure_Diff) (auto simp: sb) alsohave"\ \ M (\i. U i - D i)" using U \range D \ sets M\ by (intro emeasure_mono) (auto simp: sb intro!: sets.countable_nat_UN sets.Diff) alsohave"\ \ (\i. M (U i - D i))" using U \range D \ sets M\ by (intro emeasure_subadditive_countably) (auto intro!: sets.Diff simp: sb) alsohave"\ \ (\i. ennreal e/(2 powr Suc i))" using U \range D \ sets M\ using\<open>0<e\<close> by (intro suminf_le, subst emeasure_Diff)
(auto simp: emeasure_Diff emeasure_eq_measure sb ennreal_minus
finite_measure_mono divide_ennreal ennreal_less_iff
intro: less_imp_le) alsohave"\ \ (\n. ennreal (e * (1 / 2) ^ Suc n))" using\<open>0<e\<close> by (simp add: powr_minus powr_realpow field_simps divide_ennreal del: of_nat_Suc) alsohave"\ = ennreal e * (\n. ennreal ((1 / 2) ^ Suc n))" unfolding ennreal_power[symmetric] using\<open>0 < e\<close> by (simp add: ac_simps ennreal_mult' divide_ennreal[symmetric] divide_ennreal_def
ennreal_power[symmetric]) alsohave"\ = ennreal e" by (subst suminf_ennreal_eq[OF zero_le_power power_half_series]) auto finallyhave"emeasure M ?U \ emeasure M (\i. D i) + ennreal e" using\<open>0<e\<close> by (simp add: emeasure_eq_measure flip: ennreal_plus) moreover have"(\i. D i) \ ?U" using U by auto moreover have"open ?U"using U by auto ultimately have"(\i. D i) \ ?U \ open ?U \ emeasure M ?U \ emeasure M (\i. D i) + ennreal e" by simp thus"\B. (\i. D i) \ B \ open B \ emeasure M B \ emeasure M (\i. D i) + ennreal e" .. qed qed qed
end
¤ Dauer der Verarbeitung: 0.17 Sekunden
(vorverarbeitet)
¤
Die Informationen auf dieser Webseite wurden
nach bestem Wissen sorgfältig zusammengestellt. Es wird jedoch weder Vollständigkeit, noch Richtigkeit,
noch Qualität der bereit gestellten Informationen zugesichert.
Bemerkung:
Die farbliche Syntaxdarstellung ist noch experimentell.