(* Title: HOL/Bali/AxExample.thy Author: David von Oheimb
*)
subsection \<open>Example of a proof based on the Bali axiomatic semantics\<close>
theory AxExample imports AxSem Example begin
definition
arr_inv :: "st \ bool" where "arr_inv = (\s. \obj a T el. globs s (Stat Base) = Some obj \
values obj (Inl (arr, Base)) = Some (Addr a) \<and>
heap s a = Some \<lparr>tag=Arr T 2,values=el\<rparr>)"
ML \<open> fun inst1_tac ctxt s t xs st =
(case AList.lookup (op =) (rev (Term.add_var_names (Thm.prop_of st) [])) s of
SOME i => PRIMITIVE (Rule_Insts.read_instantiate ctxt [(((s, i), Position.none), t)] xs) st
| NONE => Seq.empty);
theorem ax_test: "tprg,({}::'a triple set)\
{Normal (\<lambda>Y s Z::'a. heap_free four s \<and> \<not>initd Base s \<and> \<not> initd Ext s)}
.test [Class Base].
{\<lambda>Y s Z. abrupt s = Some (Xcpt (Std IndOutBound))}" apply (unfold test_def arr_viewed_from_def) apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 1" (*;;*)) defer(* We begin with the last assertion, to synthesise the intermediate assertions, like in the fashion of the weakest
precondition. *) apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 1" (* Try *)) defer apply (tactic \<open>inst1_tac \<^context> "Q" "\Y s Z. arr_inv (snd s) \ tprg,s\catch SXcpt NullPointer" []\) prefer 2 apply simp apply (rule_tac P' = "Normal (\Y s Z. arr_inv (snd s))" in conseq1) prefer 2 apply clarsimp apply (rule_tac Q' = "(\Y s Z. Q Y s Z)\=False\=\" and Q = Q for Q in conseq2) prefer 2 apply simp apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 1" (* While *)) prefer 2 apply (rule ax_impossible [THEN conseq1], clarsimp) apply (rule_tac P' = "Normal P" and P = P for P in conseq1) prefer 2 apply clarsimp apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 1") apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 1" (* AVar *)) prefer 2 apply (rule ax_subst_Val_allI) apply (tactic \<open>inst1_tac \<^context> "P'" "\<lambda>a. Normal (PP a\<leftarrow>x)" ["PP", "x"]\<close>) apply (simp del: avar_def2 peek_and_def2) apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 1") apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 1") (* just for clarification: *) apply (rule_tac Q' = "Normal (\Var:(v, f) u ua. fst (snd (avar tprg (Intg 2) v u)) = Some (Xcpt (Std IndOutBound)))" in conseq2) prefer 2 apply (clarsimp simp add: split_beta) apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 1" (* FVar *)) apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 2" (* StatRef *)) apply (rule ax_derivs.Done [THEN conseq1]) apply (clarsimp simp add: arr_inv_def inited_def in_bounds_def) defer apply (rule ax_SXAlloc_catch_SXcpt) apply (rule_tac Q' = "(\Y (x, s) Z. x = Some (Xcpt (Std NullPointer)) \ arr_inv s) \. heap_free two" in conseq2) prefer 2 apply (simp add: arr_inv_new_obj) apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 1") apply (rule_tac C = "Ext"in ax_Call_known_DynT) apply (unfold DynT_prop_def) apply (simp (no_asm)) apply (intro strip) apply (rule_tac P' = "Normal P" and P = P for P in conseq1) apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 1" (* Methd *)) apply (rule ax_thin [OF _ empty_subsetI]) apply (simp (no_asm) add: body_def2) apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 1" (* Body *)) (* apply (rule_tac [2] ax_derivs.Abrupt) *) defer apply (simp (no_asm)) apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 1") (* Comp *) (* The first statement in the composition ((Ext)z).vee = 1; Return Null will throw an exception (since z is null). So we can handle
Return Null with the Abrupt rule *) apply (rule_tac [2] ax_derivs.Abrupt)
apply (rule ax_derivs.Expr) (* Expr *) apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 1") (* Ass *) prefer 2 apply (rule ax_subst_Var_allI) apply (tactic \<open>inst1_tac \<^context> "P'" "\<lambda>a vs l vf. PP a vs l vf\<leftarrow>x \<and>. p" ["PP", "x", "p"]\<close>) apply (rule allI) apply (tactic \<open>simp_tac (\<^context> |> Simplifier.del_loop "split_all_tac" |> Simplifier.del_simps [@{thm peek_and_def2}, @{thm heap_def2}, @{thm subst_res_def2}, @{thm normal_def2}]) 1\<close>) apply (rule ax_derivs.Abrupt) apply (simp (no_asm)) apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 1" (* FVar *)) apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 2", tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 2", tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 2") apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 1") apply (tactic \<open>inst1_tac \<^context> "R" "\<lambda>a'. Normal ((\<lambda>Vals:vs (x, s) Z. arr_inv s \<and> inited Ext (globs s) \<and> a' \<noteq> Null \<and> vs = [Null]) \<and>. heap_free two)" []\<close>) apply fastforce prefer 4 apply (rule ax_derivs.Done [THEN conseq1],force) apply (rule ax_subst_Val_allI) apply (tactic \<open>inst1_tac \<^context> "P'" "\<lambda>a. Normal (PP a\<leftarrow>x)" ["PP", "x"]\<close>) apply (simp (no_asm) del: peek_and_def2 heap_free_def2 normal_def2 o_apply) apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 1") prefer 2 apply (rule ax_subst_Val_allI) apply (tactic \<open>inst1_tac \<^context> "P'" "\<lambda>aa v. Normal (QQ aa v\<leftarrow>y)" ["QQ", "y"]\<close>) apply (simp del: peek_and_def2 heap_free_def2 normal_def2) apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 1") apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 1") apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 1") apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 1") (* end method call *) apply (simp (no_asm)) (* just for clarification: *) apply (rule_tac Q' = "Normal ((\Y (x, s) Z. arr_inv s \ (\a. the (locals s (VName e)) = Addr a \ obj_class (the (globs s (Inl a))) = Ext \
invocation_declclass tprg IntVir s (the (locals s (VName e))) (ClassT Base) \<lparr>name = foo, parTs = [Class Base]\<rparr> = Ext)) \<and>. initd Ext \<and>. heap_free two)" in conseq2) prefer 2 apply clarsimp apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 1") apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 1") defer apply (rule ax_subst_Var_allI) apply (tactic \<open>inst1_tac \<^context> "P'" "\<lambda>vf. Normal (PP vf \<and>. p)" ["PP", "p"]\<close>) apply (simp (no_asm) del: split_paired_All peek_and_def2 initd_def2 heap_free_def2 normal_def2) apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 1" (* NewC *)) apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 1" (* ax_Alloc *)) (* just for clarification: *) apply (rule_tac Q' = "Normal ((\Y s Z. arr_inv (store s) \ vf=lvar (VName e) (store s)) \. heap_free three \. initd Ext)" in conseq2) prefer 2 apply (simp add: invocation_declclass_def dynmethd_def) apply (unfold dynlookup_def) apply (simp add: dynmethd_Ext_foo) apply (force elim!: arr_inv_new_obj atleast_free_SucD atleast_free_weaken) (* begin init *) apply (rule ax_InitS) apply force apply (simp (no_asm)) apply (tactic \<open>simp_tac (\<^context> |> Simplifier.del_loop "split_all_tac") 1\<close>) apply (rule ax_Init_Skip_lemma) apply (tactic \<open>simp_tac (\<^context> |> Simplifier.del_loop "split_all_tac") 1\<close>) apply (rule ax_InitS [THEN conseq1] (* init Base *)) apply force apply (simp (no_asm)) apply (unfold arr_viewed_from_def) apply (rule allI) apply (rule_tac P' = "Normal P" and P = P for P in conseq1) apply (tactic \<open>simp_tac (\<^context> |> Simplifier.del_loop "split_all_tac") 1\<close>) apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 1") apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 1") apply (rule_tac [2] ax_subst_Var_allI) apply (tactic \<open>inst1_tac \<^context> "P'" "\<lambda>vf l vfa. Normal (P vf l vfa)" ["P"]\<close>) apply (tactic \<open>simp_tac (\<^context> |> Simplifier.del_loop "split_all_tac" |> Simplifier.del_simps [@{thm split_paired_All}, @{thm peek_and_def2}, @{thm heap_free_def2}, @{thm initd_def2}, @{thm normal_def2}, @{thm supd_lupd}]) 2\<close>) apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 2" (* NewA *)) apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 3" (* ax_Alloc_Arr *)) apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 3") apply (tactic \<open>inst1_tac \<^context> "P" "\<lambda>vf l vfa. Normal (P vf l vfa\<leftarrow>\<diamondsuit>)" ["P"]\<close>) apply (tactic \<open>simp_tac (\<^context> |> Simplifier.del_loop "split_all_tac") 2\<close>) apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 2") apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 1" (* FVar *)) apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 2" (* StatRef *)) apply (rule ax_derivs.Done [THEN conseq1]) apply (tactic \<open>inst1_tac \<^context> "Q" "\<lambda>vf. Normal ((\<lambda>Y s Z. vf=lvar (VName e) (snd s)) \<and>. heap_free four \<and>. initd Base \<and>. initd Ext)" []\<close>) apply (clarsimp split del: if_split) apply (frule atleast_free_weaken [THEN atleast_free_weaken]) apply (drule initedD) apply (clarsimp elim!: atleast_free_SucD simp add: arr_inv_def) apply force apply (tactic \<open>simp_tac (\<^context> |> Simplifier.del_loop "split_all_tac") 1\<close>) apply (rule ax_triv_Init_Object [THEN peek_and_forget2, THEN conseq1]) apply (rule wf_tprg) apply clarsimp apply (tactic \<open>inst1_tac \<^context> "P" "\<lambda>vf. Normal ((\<lambda>Y s Z. vf = lvar (VName e) (snd s)) \<and>. heap_free four \<and>. initd Ext)" []\<close>) apply clarsimp apply (tactic \<open>inst1_tac \<^context> "PP" "\<lambda>vf. Normal ((\<lambda>Y s Z. vf = lvar (VName e) (snd s)) \<and>. heap_free four \<and>. Not \<circ> initd Base)" []\<close>) apply clarsimp (* end init *) apply (rule conseq1) apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 1") apply clarsimp done
(* while (true) { if (i) {throw xcpt;} else i=j }
*) lemma Loop_Xcpt_benchmark: "Q = (\Y (x,s) Z. x \ None \ the_Bool (the (locals s i))) \
G,({}::'a triple set)\{Normal (\Y s Z::'a. True)}
.lab1\<bullet> While(Lit (Bool True)) (If(Acc (LVar i)) (Throw (Acc (LVar xcpt))) Else
(Expr (Ass (LVar i) (Acc (LVar j))))). {Q}" apply (rule_tac P' = "Q" and Q' = "Q\=False\=\" in conseq12) apply safe apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 1" (* Loop *)) apply (rule ax_Normal_cases) prefer 2 apply (rule ax_derivs.Abrupt [THEN conseq1], clarsimp simp add: Let_def) apply (rule conseq1) apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 1") apply clarsimp prefer 2 apply clarsimp apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 1" (* If *)) apply (tactic \<open>inst1_tac \<^context> "P'" "Normal (\<lambda>s.. (\<lambda>Y s Z. True)\<down>=Val (the (locals s i)))" []\<close>) apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 1") apply (rule conseq1) apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 1") apply clarsimp apply (rule allI) apply (rule ax_escape) apply auto apply (rule conseq1) apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 1" (* Throw *)) apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 1") apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 1") apply clarsimp apply (rule_tac Q' = "Normal (\Y s Z. True)" in conseq2) prefer 2 apply clarsimp apply (rule conseq1) apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 1") apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 1") prefer 2 apply (rule ax_subst_Var_allI) apply (tactic \<open>inst1_tac \<^context> "P'" "\<lambda>b Y ba Z vf. \<lambda>Y (x,s) Z. x=None \<and> snd vf = snd (lvar i s)" []\<close>) apply (rule allI) apply (rule_tac P' = "Normal P" and P = P for P in conseq1) prefer 2 apply clarsimp apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 1") apply (rule conseq1) apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 1") apply clarsimp apply (tactic "ax_tac \<^context> 1") apply clarsimp done
end
¤ Die Informationen auf dieser Webseite wurden
nach bestem Wissen sorgfältig zusammengestellt. Es wird jedoch weder Vollständigkeit, noch Richtigkeit,
noch Qualität der bereit gestellten Informationen zugesichert.0.14Bemerkung:
(vorverarbeitet)
¤
Die Informationen auf dieser Webseite wurden
nach bestem Wissen sorgfältig zusammengestellt. Es wird jedoch weder Vollständigkeit, noch Richtigkeit,
noch Qualität der bereit gestellten Informationen zugesichert.
Bemerkung:
Die farbliche Syntaxdarstellung ist noch experimentell.