Quelle Hotel_Example_Prolog.thy Sprache: Isabelle

theory Hotel_Example_Prolog
imports
  Hotel_Example
  "HOL-Library.Predicate_Compile_Alternative_Defs"
  "HOL-Library.Code_Prolog"
begin

declare Let_def[code_pred_inline]
(*
thm hotel_def
lemma [code_pred_inline]: "insert == (%y A x. y = x | A x)"
by (auto simp add: insert_iff[unfolded mem_def] fun_eq_iff intro!: eq_reflection)

lemma [code_pred_inline]: "(-) == (%A B x. A x \<and> \<not> B x)"
by (auto simp add: Diff_iff[unfolded mem_def] fun_eq_iff intro!: eq_reflection)
*)

definition issuedp :: "event list => key => bool"
where
  "issuedp evs k = (k \ issued evs)"

lemma [code_pred_def]:
  "issuedp [] Key0 = True"
  "issuedp (e # s) k = (issuedp s k \ (case e of Check_in g r (k1, k2) => k = k2 | _ => False))"
unfolding issuedp_def issued.simps initk_def
by (auto split: event.split)

definition cardsp
where
"cardsp s g k = (k \ cards s g)"

lemma [code_pred_def]:
  "cardsp [] g k = False"
  "cardsp (e # s) g k =
    (let C = cardsp s g
     in case e of Check_in g' r c => if g' = g then k = c \<or> C k else C k | _ => C k)"
unfolding cardsp_def [abs_def] cards.simps by (auto simp add: Let_def split: event.split)

definition
  "isinp evs r g = (g \ isin evs r)"

lemma [code_pred_def]:
  "isinp [] r g = False"
  "isinp (e # s) r g =
  (let G = isinp s r
   in case e of Check_in g' r c => G g
    | Enter g' r' c => if r' = r then g = g' \<or> G g else G g
    | Exit g' r' => if r' = r then ((g \ g') \ G g) else G g)"
unfolding isinp_def [abs_def] isin.simps by (auto simp add: Let_def split: event.split)

declare hotel.simps(1)[code_pred_def]
lemma [code_pred_def]:
"hotel (e # s) =
  (hotel s & (case e of Check_in g r (k, k') => k = currk s r & \ issuedp s k'
  | Enter g r (k, k') => cardsp s g (k, k') & (roomk s r = k \<or> roomk s r = k')
  | Exit g r => isinp s r g))"
unfolding hotel.simps issuedp_def cardsp_def isinp_def
by (auto split: event.split)

declare List.member_code [code_pred_def]

lemma [code_pred_def]: "no_Check_in s r = (\ (\g c. List.member s (Check_in g r c)))"
  by (simp add: no_Check_in_def)

lemma [code_pred_def]: "feels_safe s r =
(\<exists>s\<^sub>1 s\<^sub>2 s\<^sub>3 g c c'.
    s =
    s\<^sub>3 @
    [Enter g r c] @ s\<^sub>2 @ [Check_in g r c'] @ s\<^sub>1 &
    no_Check_in (s\<^sub>3 @ s\<^sub>2) r &
    (\<not> (\<exists> g'. isinp (s\<^sub>2 @ [Check_in g r c] @ s\<^sub>1) r g')))"
unfolding feels_safe_def isinp_def by auto

setup \<open>Code_Prolog.map_code_options (K
  {ensure_groundness = true,
  limit_globally = NONE,
  limited_types = [],
  limited_predicates = [],
  replacing = [],
  manual_reorder = []})\<close>

values_prolog 40 "{s. hotel s}"

setup \<open>
  Context.theory_map
    (Quickcheck.add_tester ("prolog", (Code_Prolog.active, Code_Prolog.test_goals)))
\<close>

lemma "\ hotel s; isinp s r g \ \ owns s r = Some g"
quickcheck[tester = prolog, iterations = 1, expect = counterexample]
oops

section \<open>Manual setup to find the counterexample\<close>

setup \<open>Code_Prolog.map_code_options (K
  {ensure_groundness = true,
   limit_globally = NONE,
   limited_types = [],
   limited_predicates = [(["hotel"], 4)],
   replacing = [(("hotel", "limited_hotel"), "quickcheck")],
   manual_reorder = []})\<close>

lemma
  "hotel s ==> feels_safe s r ==> isinp s r g ==> owns s r = Some g"
quickcheck[tester = prolog, iterations = 1, expect = no_counterexample]
oops

setup \<open>Code_Prolog.map_code_options (K
  {ensure_groundness = true,
   limit_globally = NONE,
   limited_types = [],
   limited_predicates = [(["hotel"], 5)],
   replacing = [(("hotel", "limited_hotel"), "quickcheck")],
   manual_reorder = []})\<close>

lemma
  "hotel s ==> feels_safe s r ==> isinp s r g ==> owns s r = Some g"
quickcheck[tester = prolog, iterations = 1, expect = counterexample]
oops

section \<open>Using a global limit for limiting the execution\<close>

text \<open>A global depth limit of 10 does not suffice to find the counterexample.\<close>

setup \<open>
  Code_Prolog.map_code_options (K
  {ensure_groundness = true,
  limit_globally = SOME 10,
  limited_types = [],
  limited_predicates = [],
  replacing = [],
  manual_reorder = []})
\<close>

lemma
  "hotel s ==> feels_safe s r ==> isinp s r g ==> owns s r = Some g"
quickcheck[tester = prolog, iterations = 1, expect = no_counterexample]
oops

text \<open>But a global depth limit of 11 does.\<close>

setup \<open>
  Code_Prolog.map_code_options (K
  {ensure_groundness = true,
  limit_globally = SOME 11,
  limited_types = [],
  limited_predicates = [],
  replacing = [],
  manual_reorder = []})
\<close>

lemma
  "hotel s ==> feels_safe s r ==> isinp s r g ==> owns s r = Some g"
quickcheck[tester = prolog, iterations = 1, expect = counterexample]
oops

end

quality94%

¤ Dauer der Verarbeitung: 0.14 Sekunden (vorverarbeitet) ¤

Wurzel

Suchen

Beweissystem der NASA

Beweissystem Isabelle

NIST Cobol Testsuite

Cephes Mathematical Library

Wiener Entwicklungsmethode

Haftungshinweis

Die Informationen auf dieser Webseite wurden nach bestem Wissen sorgfältig zusammengestellt. Es wird jedoch weder Vollständigkeit, noch Richtigkeit, noch Qualität der bereit gestellten Informationen zugesichert.

Bemerkung:

Die farbliche Syntaxdarstellung ist noch experimentell.