Quellcode-Bibliothek

^© Kompilation durch diese Firma

[Weder Korrektheit noch Funktionsfähigkeit der Software werden zugesichert.]

Datei: closest_approach_2D.pvs Sprache: PVS

Original von: Isabelle^©

(*  Title:      HOL/Topological_Spaces.thy
    Author:     Brian Huffman
    Author:     Johannes Hölzl
*)

section \<open>Topological Spaces\<close>

theory Topological_Spaces
  imports Main
begin

named_theorems continuous_intros "structural introduction rules for continuity"

subsection \<open>Topological space\<close>

class "open" =
  fixes "open" :: "'a set \ bool"

class topological_space = "open" +
  assumes open_UNIV [simp, intro]: "open UNIV"
  assumes open_Int [intro]: "open S \ open T \ open (S \ T)"
  assumes open_Union [intro]: "\S\K. open S \ open (\K)"
begin

definition closed :: "'a set \ bool"
  where "closed S \ open (- S)"

lemma open_empty [continuous_intros, intro, simp]: "open {}"
  using open_Union [of "{}"] by simp

lemma open_Un [continuous_intros, intro]: "open S \ open T \ open (S \ T)"
  using open_Union [of "{S, T}"] by simp

lemma open_UN [continuous_intros, intro]: "\x\A. open (B x) \ open (\x\A. B x)"
  using open_Union [of "B ` A"] by simp

lemma open_Inter [continuous_intros, intro]: "finite S \ \T\S. open T \ open (\S)"
  by (induct set: finite) auto

lemma open_INT [continuous_intros, intro]: "finite A \ \x\A. open (B x) \ open (\x\A. B x)"
  using open_Inter [of "B ` A"] by simp

lemma openI:
  assumes "\x. x \ S \ \T. open T \ x \ T \ T \ S"
  shows "open S"
proof -
  have "open (\{T. open T \ T \ S})" by auto
  moreover have "\{T. open T \ T \ S} = S" by (auto dest!: assms)
  ultimately show "open S" by simp
qed

lemma open_subopen: "open S \ (\x\S. \T. open T \ x \ T \ T \ S)"
by (auto intro: openI)

lemma closed_empty [continuous_intros, intro, simp]: "closed {}"
  unfolding closed_def by simp

lemma closed_Un [continuous_intros, intro]: "closed S \ closed T \ closed (S \ T)"
  unfolding closed_def by auto

lemma closed_UNIV [continuous_intros, intro, simp]: "closed UNIV"
  unfolding closed_def by simp

lemma closed_Int [continuous_intros, intro]: "closed S \ closed T \ closed (S \ T)"
  unfolding closed_def by auto

lemma closed_INT [continuous_intros, intro]: "\x\A. closed (B x) \ closed (\x\A. B x)"
  unfolding closed_def by auto

lemma closed_Inter [continuous_intros, intro]: "\S\K. closed S \ closed (\K)"
  unfolding closed_def uminus_Inf by auto

lemma closed_Union [continuous_intros, intro]: "finite S \ \T\S. closed T \ closed (\S)"
  by (induct set: finite) auto

lemma closed_UN [continuous_intros, intro]:
  "finite A \ \x\A. closed (B x) \ closed (\x\A. B x)"
  using closed_Union [of "B ` A"] by simp

lemma open_closed: "open S \ closed (- S)"
  by (simp add: closed_def)

lemma closed_open: "closed S \ open (- S)"
  by (rule closed_def)

lemma open_Diff [continuous_intros, intro]: "open S \ closed T \ open (S - T)"
  by (simp add: closed_open Diff_eq open_Int)

lemma closed_Diff [continuous_intros, intro]: "closed S \ open T \ closed (S - T)"
  by (simp add: open_closed Diff_eq closed_Int)

lemma open_Compl [continuous_intros, intro]: "closed S \ open (- S)"
  by (simp add: closed_open)

lemma closed_Compl [continuous_intros, intro]: "open S \ closed (- S)"
  by (simp add: open_closed)

lemma open_Collect_neg: "closed {x. P x} \ open {x. \ P x}"
  unfolding Collect_neg_eq by (rule open_Compl)

lemma open_Collect_conj:
  assumes "open {x. P x}" "open {x. Q x}"
  shows "open {x. P x \ Q x}"
  using open_Int[OF assms] by (simp add: Int_def)

lemma open_Collect_disj:
  assumes "open {x. P x}" "open {x. Q x}"
  shows "open {x. P x \ Q x}"
  using open_Un[OF assms] by (simp add: Un_def)

lemma open_Collect_ex: "(\i. open {x. P i x}) \ open {x. \i. P i x}"
  using open_UN[of UNIV "\i. {x. P i x}"] unfolding Collect_ex_eq by simp

lemma open_Collect_imp: "closed {x. P x} \ open {x. Q x} \ open {x. P x \ Q x}"
  unfolding imp_conv_disj by (intro open_Collect_disj open_Collect_neg)

lemma open_Collect_const: "open {x. P}"
  by (cases P) auto

lemma closed_Collect_neg: "open {x. P x} \ closed {x. \ P x}"
  unfolding Collect_neg_eq by (rule closed_Compl)

lemma closed_Collect_conj:
  assumes "closed {x. P x}" "closed {x. Q x}"
  shows "closed {x. P x \ Q x}"
  using closed_Int[OF assms] by (simp add: Int_def)

lemma closed_Collect_disj:
  assumes "closed {x. P x}" "closed {x. Q x}"
  shows "closed {x. P x \ Q x}"
  using closed_Un[OF assms] by (simp add: Un_def)

lemma closed_Collect_all: "(\i. closed {x. P i x}) \ closed {x. \i. P i x}"
  using closed_INT[of UNIV "\i. {x. P i x}"] by (simp add: Collect_all_eq)

lemma closed_Collect_imp: "open {x. P x} \ closed {x. Q x} \ closed {x. P x \ Q x}"
  unfolding imp_conv_disj by (intro closed_Collect_disj closed_Collect_neg)

lemma closed_Collect_const: "closed {x. P}"
  by (cases P) auto

end

subsection \<open>Hausdorff and other separation properties\<close>

class t0_space = topological_space +
  assumes t0_space: "x \ y \ \U. open U \ \ (x \ U \ y \ U)"

class t1_space = topological_space +
  assumes t1_space: "x \ y \ \U. open U \ x \ U \ y \ U"

instance t1_space \<subseteq> t0_space
  by standard (fast dest: t1_space)

context t1_space begin

lemma separation_t1: "x \ y \ (\U. open U \ x \ U \ y \ U)"
  using t1_space[of x y] by blast

lemma closed_singleton [iff]: "closed {a}"
proof -
  let ?T = "\{S. open S \ a \ S}"
  have "open ?T"
    by (simp add: open_Union)
  also have "?T = - {a}"
    by (auto simp add: set_eq_iff separation_t1)
  finally show "closed {a}"
    by (simp only: closed_def)
qed

lemma closed_insert [continuous_intros, simp]:
  assumes "closed S"
  shows "closed (insert a S)"
proof -
  from closed_singleton assms have "closed ({a} \ S)"
    by (rule closed_Un)
  then show "closed (insert a S)"
    by simp
qed

lemma finite_imp_closed: "finite S \ closed S"
  by (induct pred: finite) simp_all

end

text \<open>T2 spaces are also known as Hausdorff spaces.\<close>

class t2_space = topological_space +
  assumes hausdorff: "x \ y \ \U V. open U \ open V \ x \ U \ y \ V \ U \ V = {}"

instance t2_space \<subseteq> t1_space
  by standard (fast dest: hausdorff)

lemma (in t2_space) separation_t2: "x \ y \ (\U V. open U \ open V \ x \ U \ y \ V \ U \ V = {})"
  using hausdorff [of x y] by blast

lemma (in t0_space) separation_t0: "x \ y \ (\U. open U \ \ (x \ U \ y \ U))"
  using t0_space [of x y] by blast

text \<open>A classical separation axiom for topological space, the T3 axiom -- also called regularity:
if a point is not in a closed set, then there are open sets separating them.\<close>

class t3_space = t2_space +
  assumes t3_space: "closed S \ y \ S \ \U V. open U \ open V \ y \ U \ S \ V \ U \ V = {}"

text \<open>A classical separation axiom for topological space, the T4 axiom -- also called normality:
if two closed sets are disjoint, then there are open sets separating them.\<close>

class t4_space = t2_space +
  assumes t4_space: "closed S \ closed T \ S \ T = {} \ \U V. open U \ open V \ S \ U \ T \ V \ U \ V = {}"

text \<open>T4 is stronger than T3, and weaker than metric.\<close>

instance t4_space \<subseteq> t3_space
proof
  fix S and y::'a assume "closed S" "y \ S"
  then show "\U V. open U \ open V \ y \ U \ S \ V \ U \ V = {}"
    using t4_space[of "{y}" S] by auto
qed

text \<open>A perfect space is a topological space with no isolated points.\<close>

class perfect_space = topological_space +
  assumes not_open_singleton: "\ open {x}"

lemma (in perfect_space) UNIV_not_singleton: "UNIV \ {x}"
  for x::'a
  by (metis (no_types) open_UNIV not_open_singleton)

subsection \<open>Generators for toplogies\<close>

inductive generate_topology :: "'a set set \ 'a set \ bool" for S :: "'a set set"
  where
    UNIV: "generate_topology S UNIV"
  | Int: "generate_topology S (a \ b)" if "generate_topology S a" and "generate_topology S b"
  | UN: "generate_topology S (\K)" if "(\k. k \ K \ generate_topology S k)"
  | Basis: "generate_topology S s" if "s \ S"

hide_fact (open) UNIV Int UN Basis

lemma generate_topology_Union:
  "(\k. k \ I \ generate_topology S (K k)) \ generate_topology S (\k\I. K k)"
  using generate_topology.UN [of "K ` I"] by auto

lemma topological_space_generate_topology: "class.topological_space (generate_topology S)"
  by standard (auto intro: generate_topology.intros)

subsection \<open>Order topologies\<close>

class order_topology = order + "open" +
  assumes open_generated_order: "open = generate_topology (range (\a. {..< a}) \ range (\a. {a <..}))"
begin

subclass topological_space
  unfolding open_generated_order
  by (rule topological_space_generate_topology)

lemma open_greaterThan [continuous_intros, simp]: "open {a <..}"
  unfolding open_generated_order by (auto intro: generate_topology.Basis)

lemma open_lessThan [continuous_intros, simp]: "open {..< a}"
  unfolding open_generated_order by (auto intro: generate_topology.Basis)

lemma open_greaterThanLessThan [continuous_intros, simp]: "open {a <..< b}"
   unfolding greaterThanLessThan_eq by (simp add: open_Int)

end

class linorder_topology = linorder + order_topology

lemma closed_atMost [continuous_intros, simp]: "closed {..a}"
  for a :: "'a::linorder_topology"
  by (simp add: closed_open)

lemma closed_atLeast [continuous_intros, simp]: "closed {a..}"
  for a :: "'a::linorder_topology"
  by (simp add: closed_open)

lemma closed_atLeastAtMost [continuous_intros, simp]: "closed {a..b}"
  for a b :: "'a::linorder_topology"
proof -
  have "{a .. b} = {a ..} \ {.. b}"
    by auto
  then show ?thesis
    by (simp add: closed_Int)
qed

lemma (in order) less_separate:
  assumes "x < y"
  shows "\a b. x \ {..< a} \ y \ {b <..} \ {..< a} \ {b <..} = {}"
proof (cases "\z. x < z \ z < y")
  case True
  then obtain z where "x < z \ z < y" ..
  then have "x \ {..< z} \ y \ {z <..} \ {z <..} \ {..< z} = {}"
    by auto
  then show ?thesis by blast
next
  case False
  with \<open>x < y\<close> have "x \<in> {..< y}" "y \<in> {x <..}" "{x <..} \<inter> {..< y} = {}"
    by auto
  then show ?thesis by blast
qed

instance linorder_topology \<subseteq> t2_space
proof
  fix x y :: 'a
  show "x \ y \ \U V. open U \ open V \ x \ U \ y \ V \ U \ V = {}"
    using less_separate [of x y] less_separate [of y x]
    by (elim neqE; metis open_lessThan open_greaterThan Int_commute)
qed

lemma (in linorder_topology) open_right:
  assumes "open S" "x \ S"
    and gt_ex: "x < y"
  shows "\b>x. {x ..< b} \ S"
  using assms unfolding open_generated_order
proof induct
  case UNIV
  then show ?case by blast
next
  case (Int A B)
  then obtain a b where "a > x" "{x ..< a} \ A" "b > x" "{x ..< b} \ B"
    by auto
  then show ?case
    by (auto intro!: exI[of _ "min a b"])
next
  case UN
  then show ?case by blast
next
  case Basis
  then show ?case
    by (fastforce intro: exI[of _ y] gt_ex)
qed

lemma (in linorder_topology) open_left:
  assumes "open S" "x \ S"
    and lt_ex: "y < x"
  shows "\b S"
  using assms unfolding open_generated_order
proof induction
  case UNIV
  then show ?case by blast
next
  case (Int A B)
  then obtain a b where "a < x" "{a <.. x} \ A" "b < x" "{b <.. x} \ B"
    by auto
  then show ?case
    by (auto intro!: exI[of _ "max a b"])
next
  case UN
  then show ?case by blast
next
  case Basis
  then show ?case
    by (fastforce intro: exI[of _ y] lt_ex)
qed

subsection \<open>Setup some topologies\<close>

subsubsection \<open>Boolean is an order topology\<close>

class discrete_topology = topological_space +
  assumes open_discrete: "\A. open A"

instance discrete_topology < t2_space
proof
  fix x y :: 'a
  assume "x \ y"
  then show "\U V. open U \ open V \ x \ U \ y \ V \ U \ V = {}"
    by (intro exI[of _ "{_}"]) (auto intro!: open_discrete)
qed

instantiation bool :: linorder_topology
begin

definition open_bool :: "bool set \ bool"
  where "open_bool = generate_topology (range (\a. {..< a}) \ range (\a. {a <..}))"

instance
  by standard (rule open_bool_def)

end

instance bool :: discrete_topology
proof
  fix A :: "bool set"
  have *: "{False <..} = {True}" "{..< True} = {False}"
    by auto
  have "A = UNIV \ A = {} \ A = {False <..} \ A = {..< True}"
    using subset_UNIV[of A] unfolding UNIV_bool * by blast
  then show "open A"
    by auto
qed

instantiation nat :: linorder_topology
begin

definition open_nat :: "nat set \ bool"
  where "open_nat = generate_topology (range (\a. {..< a}) \ range (\a. {a <..}))"

instance
  by standard (rule open_nat_def)

end

instance nat :: discrete_topology
proof
  fix A :: "nat set"
  have "open {n}" for n :: nat
  proof (cases n)
    case 0
    moreover have "{0} = {..<1::nat}"
      by auto
    ultimately show ?thesis
       by auto
  next
    case (Suc n')
    then have "{n} = {.. {n' <..}"
      by auto
    with Suc show ?thesis
      by (auto intro: open_lessThan open_greaterThan)
  qed
  then have "open (\a\A. {a})"
    by (intro open_UN) auto
  then show "open A"
    by simp
qed

instantiation int :: linorder_topology
begin

definition open_int :: "int set \ bool"
  where "open_int = generate_topology (range (\a. {..< a}) \ range (\a. {a <..}))"

instance
  by standard (rule open_int_def)

end

instance int :: discrete_topology
proof
  fix A :: "int set"
  have "{.. {i-1 <..} = {i}" for i :: int
    by auto
  then have "open {i}" for i :: int
    using open_Int[OF open_lessThan[of "i + 1"] open_greaterThan[of "i - 1"]] by auto
  then have "open (\a\A. {a})"
    by (intro open_UN) auto
  then show "open A"
    by simp
qed

subsubsection \<open>Topological filters\<close>

definition (in topological_space) nhds :: "'a \ 'a filter"
  where "nhds a = (INF S\{S. open S \ a \ S}. principal S)"

definition (in topological_space) at_within :: "'a \ 'a set \ 'a filter"
    ("at (_)/ within (_)" [1000, 60] 60)
  where "at a within s = inf (nhds a) (principal (s - {a}))"

abbreviation (in topological_space) at :: "'a \ 'a filter" ("at")
  where "at x \ at x within (CONST UNIV)"

abbreviation (in order_topology) at_right :: "'a \ 'a filter"
  where "at_right x \ at x within {x <..}"

abbreviation (in order_topology) at_left :: "'a \ 'a filter"
  where "at_left x \ at x within {..< x}"

lemma (in topological_space) nhds_generated_topology:
  "open = generate_topology T \ nhds x = (INF S\{S\T. x \ S}. principal S)"
  unfolding nhds_def
proof (safe intro!: antisym INF_greatest)
  fix S
  assume "generate_topology T S" "x \ S"
  then show "(INF S\{S \ T. x \ S}. principal S) \ principal S"
    by induct
      (auto intro: INF_lower order_trans simp: inf_principal[symmetric] simp del: inf_principal)
qed (auto intro!: INF_lower intro: generate_topology.intros)

lemma (in topological_space) eventually_nhds:
  "eventually P (nhds a) \ (\S. open S \ a \ S \ (\x\S. P x))"
  unfolding nhds_def by (subst eventually_INF_base) (auto simp: eventually_principal)

lemma eventually_eventually:
  "eventually (\y. eventually P (nhds y)) (nhds x) = eventually P (nhds x)"
  by (auto simp: eventually_nhds)

lemma (in topological_space) eventually_nhds_in_open:
  "open s \ x \ s \ eventually (\y. y \ s) (nhds x)"
  by (subst eventually_nhds) blast

lemma (in topological_space) eventually_nhds_x_imp_x: "eventually P (nhds x) \ P x"
  by (subst (asm) eventually_nhds) blast

lemma (in topological_space) nhds_neq_bot [simp]: "nhds a \ bot"
  by (simp add: trivial_limit_def eventually_nhds)

lemma (in t1_space) t1_space_nhds: "x \ y \ (\\<^sub>F x in nhds x. x \ y)"
  by (drule t1_space) (auto simp: eventually_nhds)

lemma (in topological_space) nhds_discrete_open: "open {x} \ nhds x = principal {x}"
  by (auto simp: nhds_def intro!: antisym INF_greatest INF_lower2[of "{x}"])

lemma (in discrete_topology) nhds_discrete: "nhds x = principal {x}"
  by (simp add: nhds_discrete_open open_discrete)

lemma (in discrete_topology) at_discrete: "at x within S = bot"
  unfolding at_within_def nhds_discrete by simp

lemma (in discrete_topology) tendsto_discrete:
  "filterlim (f :: 'b \ 'a) (nhds y) F \ eventually (\x. f x = y) F"
  by (auto simp: nhds_discrete filterlim_principal)

lemma (in topological_space) at_within_eq:
  "at x within s = (INF S\{S. open S \ x \ S}. principal (S \ s - {x}))"
  unfolding nhds_def at_within_def
  by (subst INF_inf_const2[symmetric]) (auto simp: Diff_Int_distrib)

lemma (in topological_space) eventually_at_filter:
  "eventually P (at a within s) \ eventually (\x. x \ a \ x \ s \ P x) (nhds a)"
  by (simp add: at_within_def eventually_inf_principal imp_conjL[symmetric] conj_commute)

lemma (in topological_space) at_le: "s \ t \ at x within s \ at x within t"
  unfolding at_within_def by (intro inf_mono) auto

lemma (in topological_space) eventually_at_topological:
  "eventually P (at a within s) \ (\S. open S \ a \ S \ (\x\S. x \ a \ x \ s \ P x))"
  by (simp add: eventually_nhds eventually_at_filter)

lemma (in topological_space) at_within_open: "a \ S \ open S \ at a within S = at a"
  unfolding filter_eq_iff eventually_at_topological by (metis open_Int Int_iff UNIV_I)

lemma (in topological_space) at_within_open_NO_MATCH:
  "a \ s \ open s \ NO_MATCH UNIV s \ at a within s = at a"
  by (simp only: at_within_open)

lemma (in topological_space) at_within_open_subset:
  "a \ S \ open S \ S \ T \ at a within T = at a"
  by (metis at_le at_within_open dual_order.antisym subset_UNIV)

lemma (in topological_space) at_within_nhd:
  assumes "x \ S" "open S" "T \ S - {x} = U \ S - {x}"
  shows "at x within T = at x within U"
  unfolding filter_eq_iff eventually_at_filter
proof (intro allI eventually_subst)
  have "eventually (\x. x \ S) (nhds x)"
    using \<open>x \<in> S\<close> \<open>open S\<close> by (auto simp: eventually_nhds)
  then show "\\<^sub>F n in nhds x. (n \ x \ n \ T \ P n) = (n \ x \ n \ U \ P n)" for P
    by eventually_elim (insert \<open>T \<inter> S - {x} = U \<inter> S - {x}\<close>, blast)
qed

lemma (in topological_space) at_within_empty [simp]: "at a within {} = bot"
  unfolding at_within_def by simp

lemma (in topological_space) at_within_union:
  "at x within (S \ T) = sup (at x within S) (at x within T)"
  unfolding filter_eq_iff eventually_sup eventually_at_filter
  by (auto elim!: eventually_rev_mp)

lemma (in topological_space) at_eq_bot_iff: "at a = bot \ open {a}"
  unfolding trivial_limit_def eventually_at_topological
  apply safe
   apply (case_tac "S = {a}")
    apply simp
   apply fast
  apply fast
  done

lemma (in perfect_space) at_neq_bot [simp]: "at a \ bot"
  by (simp add: at_eq_bot_iff not_open_singleton)

lemma (in order_topology) nhds_order:
  "nhds x = inf (INF a\{x <..}. principal {..< a}) (INF a\{..< x}. principal {a <..})"
proof -
  have 1: "{S \ range lessThan \ range greaterThan. x \ S} =
      (\<lambda>a. {..< a}) ` {x <..} \<union> (\<lambda>a. {a <..}) ` {..< x}"
    by auto
  show ?thesis
    by (simp only: nhds_generated_topology[OF open_generated_order] INF_union 1 INF_image comp_def)
qed

lemma (in topological_space) filterlim_at_within_If:
  assumes "filterlim f G (at x within (A \ {x. P x}))"
    and "filterlim g G (at x within (A \ {x. \P x}))"
  shows "filterlim (\x. if P x then f x else g x) G (at x within A)"
proof (rule filterlim_If)
  note assms(1)
  also have "at x within (A \ {x. P x}) = inf (nhds x) (principal (A \ Collect P - {x}))"
    by (simp add: at_within_def)
  also have "A \ Collect P - {x} = (A - {x}) \ Collect P"
    by blast
  also have "inf (nhds x) (principal \) = inf (at x within A) (principal (Collect P))"
    by (simp add: at_within_def inf_assoc)
  finally show "filterlim f G (inf (at x within A) (principal (Collect P)))" .
next
  note assms(2)
  also have "at x within (A \ {x. \ P x}) = inf (nhds x) (principal (A \ {x. \ P x} - {x}))"
    by (simp add: at_within_def)
  also have "A \ {x. \ P x} - {x} = (A - {x}) \ {x. \ P x}"
    by blast
  also have "inf (nhds x) (principal \) = inf (at x within A) (principal {x. \ P x})"
    by (simp add: at_within_def inf_assoc)
  finally show "filterlim g G (inf (at x within A) (principal {x. \ P x}))" .
qed

lemma (in topological_space) filterlim_at_If:
  assumes "filterlim f G (at x within {x. P x})"
    and "filterlim g G (at x within {x. \P x})"
  shows "filterlim (\x. if P x then f x else g x) G (at x)"
  using assms by (intro filterlim_at_within_If) simp_all
lemma (in linorder_topology) at_within_order:
  assumes "UNIV \ {x}"
  shows "at x within s =
    inf (INF a\<in>{x <..}. principal ({..< a} \<inter> s - {x}))
        (INF a\<in>{..< x}. principal ({a <..} \<inter> s - {x}))"
proof (cases "{x <..} = {}" "{..< x} = {}" rule: case_split [case_product case_split])
  case True_True
  have "UNIV = {..< x} \ {x} \ {x <..}"
    by auto
  with assms True_True show ?thesis
    by auto
qed (auto simp del: inf_principal simp: at_within_def nhds_order Int_Diff
      inf_principal[symmetric] INF_inf_const2 inf_sup_aci[where 'a="'a filter"])

lemma (in linorder_topology) at_left_eq:
  "y < x \ at_left x = (INF a\{..< x}. principal {a <..< x})"
  by (subst at_within_order)
     (auto simp: greaterThan_Int_greaterThan greaterThanLessThan_eq[symmetric] min.absorb2 INF_constant
           intro!: INF_lower2 inf_absorb2)

lemma (in linorder_topology) eventually_at_left:
  "y < x \ eventually P (at_left x) \ (\by>b. y < x \ P y)"
  unfolding at_left_eq
  by (subst eventually_INF_base) (auto simp: eventually_principal Ball_def)

lemma (in linorder_topology) at_right_eq:
  "x < y \ at_right x = (INF a\{x <..}. principal {x <..< a})"
  by (subst at_within_order)
     (auto simp: lessThan_Int_lessThan greaterThanLessThan_eq[symmetric] max.absorb2 INF_constant Int_commute
           intro!: INF_lower2 inf_absorb1)

lemma (in linorder_topology) eventually_at_right:
  "x < y \ eventually P (at_right x) \ (\b>x. \y>x. y < b \ P y)"
  unfolding at_right_eq
  by (subst eventually_INF_base) (auto simp: eventually_principal Ball_def)

lemma eventually_at_right_less: "\\<^sub>F y in at_right (x::'a::{linorder_topology, no_top}). x < y"
  using gt_ex[of x] eventually_at_right[of x] by auto

lemma trivial_limit_at_right_top: "at_right (top::_::{order_top,linorder_topology}) = bot"
  by (auto simp: filter_eq_iff eventually_at_topological)

lemma trivial_limit_at_left_bot: "at_left (bot::_::{order_bot,linorder_topology}) = bot"
  by (auto simp: filter_eq_iff eventually_at_topological)

lemma trivial_limit_at_left_real [simp]: "\ trivial_limit (at_left x)"
  for x :: "'a::{no_bot,dense_order,linorder_topology}"
  using lt_ex [of x]
  by safe (auto simp add: trivial_limit_def eventually_at_left dest: dense)

lemma trivial_limit_at_right_real [simp]: "\ trivial_limit (at_right x)"
  for x :: "'a::{no_top,dense_order,linorder_topology}"
  using gt_ex[of x]
  by safe (auto simp add: trivial_limit_def eventually_at_right dest: dense)

lemma (in linorder_topology) at_eq_sup_left_right: "at x = sup (at_left x) (at_right x)"
  by (auto simp: eventually_at_filter filter_eq_iff eventually_sup
      elim: eventually_elim2 eventually_mono)

lemma (in linorder_topology) eventually_at_split:
  "eventually P (at x) \ eventually P (at_left x) \ eventually P (at_right x)"
  by (subst at_eq_sup_left_right) (simp add: eventually_sup)

lemma (in order_topology) eventually_at_leftI:
  assumes "\x. x \ {a<.. P x" "a < b"
  shows   "eventually P (at_left b)"
  using assms unfolding eventually_at_topological by (intro exI[of _ "{a<..}"]) auto

lemma (in order_topology) eventually_at_rightI:
  assumes "\x. x \ {a<.. P x" "a < b"
  shows   "eventually P (at_right a)"
  using assms unfolding eventually_at_topological by (intro exI[of _ "{..]) auto

lemma eventually_filtercomap_nhds:
  "eventually P (filtercomap f (nhds x)) \ (\S. open S \ x \ S \ (\x. f x \ S \ P x))"
  unfolding eventually_filtercomap eventually_nhds by auto

lemma eventually_filtercomap_at_topological:
  "eventually P (filtercomap f (at A within B)) \
     (\<exists>S. open S \<and> A \<in> S \<and> (\<forall>x. f x \<in> S \<inter> B - {A} \<longrightarrow> P x))" (is "?lhs = ?rhs")
  unfolding at_within_def filtercomap_inf eventually_inf_principal filtercomap_principal
          eventually_filtercomap_nhds eventually_principal by blast

lemma eventually_at_right_field:
  "eventually P (at_right x) \ (\b>x. \y>x. y < b \ P y)"
  for x :: "'a::{linordered_field, linorder_topology}"
  using linordered_field_no_ub[rule_format, of x]
  by (auto simp: eventually_at_right)

lemma eventually_at_left_field:
  "eventually P (at_left x) \ (\by>b. y < x \ P y)"
  for x :: "'a::{linordered_field, linorder_topology}"
  using linordered_field_no_lb[rule_format, of x]
  by (auto simp: eventually_at_left)

subsubsection \<open>Tendsto\<close>

abbreviation (in topological_space)
  tendsto :: "('b \ 'a) \ 'a \ 'b filter \ bool" (infixr "\" 55)
  where "(f \ l) F \ filterlim f (nhds l) F"

definition (in t2_space) Lim :: "'f filter \ ('f \ 'a) \ 'a"
  where "Lim A f = (THE l. (f \ l) A)"

lemma (in topological_space) tendsto_eq_rhs: "(f \ x) F \ x = y \ (f \ y) F"
  by simp

named_theorems tendsto_intros "introduction rules for tendsto"
setup \<open>
  Global_Theory.add_thms_dynamic (\<^binding>\<open>tendsto_eq_intros\<close>,
    fn context =>
      Named_Theorems.get (Context.proof_of context) \<^named_theorems>\<open>tendsto_intros\<close>
      |> map_filter (try (fn thm => @{thm tendsto_eq_rhs} OF [thm])))
\<close>

context topological_space begin

lemma tendsto_def:
   "(f \ l) F \ (\S. open S \ l \ S \ eventually (\x. f x \ S) F)"
   unfolding nhds_def filterlim_INF filterlim_principal by auto

lemma tendsto_cong: "(f \ c) F \ (g \ c) F" if "eventually (\x. f x = g x) F"
  by (rule filterlim_cong [OF refl refl that])

lemma tendsto_mono: "F \ F' \ (f \ l) F' \ (f \ l) F"
  unfolding tendsto_def le_filter_def by fast

lemma tendsto_ident_at [tendsto_intros, simp, intro]: "((\x. x) \ a) (at a within s)"
  by (auto simp: tendsto_def eventually_at_topological)

lemma tendsto_const [tendsto_intros, simp, intro]: "((\x. k) \ k) F"
  by (simp add: tendsto_def)

lemma filterlim_at:
  "(LIM x F. f x :> at b within s) \ eventually (\x. f x \ s \ f x \ b) F \ (f \ b) F"
  by (simp add: at_within_def filterlim_inf filterlim_principal conj_commute)

lemma (in -)
  assumes "filterlim f (nhds L) F"
  shows tendsto_imp_filterlim_at_right:
          "eventually (\x. f x > L) F \ filterlim f (at_right L) F"
    and tendsto_imp_filterlim_at_left:
          "eventually (\x. f x < L) F \ filterlim f (at_left L) F"
  using assms by (auto simp: filterlim_at elim: eventually_mono)

lemma  filterlim_at_withinI:
  assumes "filterlim f (nhds c) F"
  assumes "eventually (\x. f x \ A - {c}) F"
  shows   "filterlim f (at c within A) F"
  using assms by (simp add: filterlim_at)

lemma filterlim_atI:
  assumes "filterlim f (nhds c) F"
  assumes "eventually (\x. f x \ c) F"
  shows   "filterlim f (at c) F"
  using assms by (intro filterlim_at_withinI) simp_all

lemma topological_tendstoI:
  "(\S. open S \ l \ S \ eventually (\x. f x \ S) F) \ (f \ l) F"
  by (auto simp: tendsto_def)

lemma topological_tendstoD:
  "(f \ l) F \ open S \ l \ S \ eventually (\x. f x \ S) F"
  by (auto simp: tendsto_def)

lemma tendsto_bot [simp]: "(f \ a) bot"
  by (simp add: tendsto_def)

lemma tendsto_eventually: "eventually (\x. f x = l) net \ ((\x. f x) \ l) net"
  by (rule topological_tendstoI) (auto elim: eventually_mono)

end

lemma (in topological_space) filterlim_within_subset:
  "filterlim f l (at x within S) \ T \ S \ filterlim f l (at x within T)"
  by (blast intro: filterlim_mono at_le)

lemmas tendsto_within_subset = filterlim_within_subset

lemma (in order_topology) order_tendsto_iff:
  "(f \ x) F \ (\lx. l < f x) F) \ (\u>x. eventually (\x. f x < u) F)"
  by (auto simp: nhds_order filterlim_inf filterlim_INF filterlim_principal)

lemma (in order_topology) order_tendstoI:
  "(\a. a < y \ eventually (\x. a < f x) F) \ (\a. y < a \ eventually (\x. f x < a) F) \
    (f \<longlongrightarrow> y) F"
  by (auto simp: order_tendsto_iff)

lemma (in order_topology) order_tendstoD:
  assumes "(f \ y) F"
  shows "a < y \ eventually (\x. a < f x) F"
    and "y < a \ eventually (\x. f x < a) F"
  using assms by (auto simp: order_tendsto_iff)

lemma (in linorder_topology) tendsto_max[tendsto_intros]:
  assumes X: "(X \ x) net"
    and Y: "(Y \ y) net"
  shows "((\x. max (X x) (Y x)) \ max x y) net"
proof (rule order_tendstoI)
  fix a
  assume "a < max x y"
  then show "eventually (\x. a < max (X x) (Y x)) net"
    using order_tendstoD(1)[OF X, of a] order_tendstoD(1)[OF Y, of a]
    by (auto simp: less_max_iff_disj elim: eventually_mono)
next
  fix a
  assume "max x y < a"
  then show "eventually (\x. max (X x) (Y x) < a) net"
    using order_tendstoD(2)[OF X, of a] order_tendstoD(2)[OF Y, of a]
    by (auto simp: eventually_conj_iff)
qed

lemma (in linorder_topology) tendsto_min[tendsto_intros]:
  assumes X: "(X \ x) net"
    and Y: "(Y \ y) net"
  shows "((\x. min (X x) (Y x)) \ min x y) net"
proof (rule order_tendstoI)
  fix a
  assume "a < min x y"
  then show "eventually (\x. a < min (X x) (Y x)) net"
    using order_tendstoD(1)[OF X, of a] order_tendstoD(1)[OF Y, of a]
    by (auto simp: eventually_conj_iff)
next
  fix a
  assume "min x y < a"
  then show "eventually (\x. min (X x) (Y x) < a) net"
    using order_tendstoD(2)[OF X, of a] order_tendstoD(2)[OF Y, of a]
    by (auto simp: min_less_iff_disj elim: eventually_mono)
qed

lemma (in order_topology)
  assumes "a < b"
  shows at_within_Icc_at_right: "at a within {a..b} = at_right a"
    and at_within_Icc_at_left:  "at b within {a..b} = at_left b"
  using order_tendstoD(2)[OF tendsto_ident_at assms, of "{a<..}"]
  using order_tendstoD(1)[OF tendsto_ident_at assms, of "{..]
  by (auto intro!: order_class.antisym filter_leI
      simp: eventually_at_filter less_le
      elim: eventually_elim2)

lemma (in order_topology) at_within_Icc_at: "a < x \ x < b \ at x within {a..b} = at x"
  by (rule at_within_open_subset[where S="{a<..]) auto

lemma (in t2_space) tendsto_unique:
  assumes "F \ bot"
    and "(f \ a) F"
    and "(f \ b) F"
  shows "a = b"
proof (rule ccontr)
  assume "a \ b"
  obtain U V where "open U" "open V" "a \ U" "b \ V" "U \ V = {}"
    using hausdorff [OF \<open>a \<noteq> b\<close>] by fast
  have "eventually (\x. f x \ U) F"
    using \<open>(f \<longlongrightarrow> a) F\<close> \<open>open U\<close> \<open>a \<in> U\<close> by (rule topological_tendstoD)
  moreover
  have "eventually (\x. f x \ V) F"
    using \<open>(f \<longlongrightarrow> b) F\<close> \<open>open V\<close> \<open>b \<in> V\<close> by (rule topological_tendstoD)
  ultimately
  have "eventually (\x. False) F"
  proof eventually_elim
    case (elim x)
    then have "f x \ U \ V" by simp
    with \<open>U \<inter> V = {}\<close> show ?case by simp
  qed
  with \<open>\<not> trivial_limit F\<close> show "False"
    by (simp add: trivial_limit_def)
qed

lemma (in t2_space) tendsto_const_iff:
  fixes a b :: 'a
  assumes "\ trivial_limit F"
  shows "((\x. a) \ b) F \ a = b"
  by (auto intro!: tendsto_unique [OF assms tendsto_const])

lemma (in t2_space) tendsto_unique':
assumes "F \ bot"
shows "\\<^sub>\\<^sub>1l. (f \ l) F"
using Uniq_def assms local.tendsto_unique by fastforce

lemma Lim_in_closed_set:
  assumes "closed S" "eventually (\x. f(x) \ S) F" "F \ bot" "(f \ l) F"
  shows "l \ S"
proof (rule ccontr)
  assume "l \ S"
  with \<open>closed S\<close> have "open (- S)" "l \<in> - S"
    by (simp_all add: open_Compl)
  with assms(4) have "eventually (\x. f x \ - S) F"
    by (rule topological_tendstoD)
  with assms(2) have "eventually (\x. False) F"
    by (rule eventually_elim2) simp
  with assms(3) show "False"
    by (simp add: eventually_False)
qed

lemma (in t3_space) nhds_closed:
  assumes "x \ A" and "open A"
  shows   "\A'. x \ A' \ closed A' \ A' \ A \ eventually (\y. y \ A') (nhds x)"
proof -
  from assms have "\U V. open U \ open V \ x \ U \ - A \ V \ U \ V = {}"
    by (intro t3_space) auto
  then obtain U V where UV: "open U" "open V" "x \ U" "-A \ V" "U \ V = {}"
    by auto
  have "eventually (\y. y \ U) (nhds x)"
    using \<open>open U\<close> and \<open>x \<in> U\<close> by (intro eventually_nhds_in_open)
  hence "eventually (\y. y \ -V) (nhds x)"
    by eventually_elim (use UV in auto)
  with UV show ?thesis by (intro exI[of _ "-V"]) auto
qed

lemma (in order_topology) increasing_tendsto:
  assumes bdd: "eventually (\n. f n \ l) F"
    and en: "\x. x < l \ eventually (\n. x < f n) F"
  shows "(f \ l) F"
  using assms by (intro order_tendstoI) (auto elim!: eventually_mono)

lemma (in order_topology) decreasing_tendsto:
  assumes bdd: "eventually (\n. l \ f n) F"
    and en: "\x. l < x \ eventually (\n. f n < x) F"
  shows "(f \ l) F"
  using assms by (intro order_tendstoI) (auto elim!: eventually_mono)

lemma (in order_topology) tendsto_sandwich:
  assumes ev: "eventually (\n. f n \ g n) net" "eventually (\n. g n \ h n) net"
  assumes lim: "(f \ c) net" "(h \ c) net"
  shows "(g \ c) net"
proof (rule order_tendstoI)
  fix a
  show "a < c \ eventually (\x. a < g x) net"
    using order_tendstoD[OF lim(1), of a] ev by (auto elim: eventually_elim2)
next
  fix a
  show "c < a \ eventually (\x. g x < a) net"
    using order_tendstoD[OF lim(2), of a] ev by (auto elim: eventually_elim2)
qed

lemma (in t1_space) limit_frequently_eq:
  assumes "F \ bot"
    and "frequently (\x. f x = c) F"
    and "(f \ d) F"
  shows "d = c"
proof (rule ccontr)
  assume "d \ c"
  from t1_space[OF this] obtain U where "open U" "d \ U" "c \ U"
    by blast
  with assms have "eventually (\x. f x \ U) F"
    unfolding tendsto_def by blast
  then have "eventually (\x. f x \ c) F"
    by eventually_elim (insert \<open>c \<notin> U\<close>, blast)
  with assms(2) show False
    unfolding frequently_def by contradiction
qed

lemma (in t1_space) tendsto_imp_eventually_ne:
  assumes  "(f \ c) F" "c \ c'"
  shows "eventually (\z. f z \ c') F"
proof (cases "F=bot")
  case True
  thus ?thesis by auto
next
  case False
  show ?thesis
  proof (rule ccontr)
    assume "\ eventually (\z. f z \ c') F"
    then have "frequently (\z. f z = c') F"
      by (simp add: frequently_def)
    from limit_frequently_eq[OF False this \<open>(f \<longlongrightarrow> c) F\<close>] and \<open>c \<noteq> c'\<close> show False
      by contradiction
  qed
qed

lemma (in linorder_topology) tendsto_le:
  assumes F: "\ trivial_limit F"
    and x: "(f \ x) F"
    and y: "(g \ y) F"
    and ev: "eventually (\x. g x \ f x) F"
  shows "y \ x"
proof (rule ccontr)
  assume "\ y \ x"
  with less_separate[of x y] obtain a b where xy: "x < a" "b < y" "{.. {b<..} = {}"
    by (auto simp: not_le)
  then have "eventually (\x. f x < a) F" "eventually (\x. b < g x) F"
    using x y by (auto intro: order_tendstoD)
  with ev have "eventually (\x. False) F"
    by eventually_elim (insert xy, fastforce)
  with F show False
    by (simp add: eventually_False)
qed

lemma (in linorder_topology) tendsto_lowerbound:
  assumes x: "(f \ x) F"
      and ev: "eventually (\i. a \ f i) F"
      and F: "\ trivial_limit F"
  shows "a \ x"
  using F x tendsto_const ev by (rule tendsto_le)

lemma (in linorder_topology) tendsto_upperbound:
  assumes x: "(f \ x) F"
      and ev: "eventually (\i. a \ f i) F"
      and F: "\ trivial_limit F"
  shows "a \ x"
  by (rule tendsto_le [OF F tendsto_const x ev])

lemma filterlim_at_within_not_equal:
  fixes f::"'a \ 'b::t2_space"
  assumes "filterlim f (at a within s) F"
  shows "eventually (\w. f w\s \ f w \b) F"
proof (cases "a=b")
  case True
  then show ?thesis using assms by (simp add: filterlim_at)
next
  case False
  from hausdorff[OF this] obtain U V where UV:"open U" "open V" "a \ U" "b \ V" "U \ V = {}"
    by auto
  have "(f \ a) F" using assms filterlim_at by auto
  then have "\\<^sub>F x in F. f x \ U" using UV unfolding tendsto_def by auto
  moreover have  "\\<^sub>F x in F. f x \ s \ f x\a" using assms filterlim_at by auto
  ultimately show ?thesis
    apply eventually_elim
    using UV by auto
qed

subsubsection \<open>Rules about \<^const>\<open>Lim\<close>\<close>

lemma tendsto_Lim: "\ trivial_limit net \ (f \ l) net \ Lim net f = l"
  unfolding Lim_def using tendsto_unique [of net f] by auto

lemma Lim_ident_at: "\ trivial_limit (at x within s) \ Lim (at x within s) (\x. x) = x"
  by (rule tendsto_Lim[OF _ tendsto_ident_at]) auto

lemma eventually_Lim_ident_at:
  "(\\<^sub>F y in at x within X. P (Lim (at x within X) (\x. x)) y) \
    (\<forall>\<^sub>F y in at x within X. P x y)" for x::"'a::t2_space"
  by (cases "at x within X = bot") (auto simp: Lim_ident_at)

lemma filterlim_at_bot_at_right:
  fixes f :: "'a::linorder_topology \ 'b::linorder"
  assumes mono: "\x y. Q x \ Q y \ x \ y \ f x \ f y"
    and bij: "\x. P x \ f (g x) = x" "\x. P x \ Q (g x)"
    and Q: "eventually Q (at_right a)"
    and bound: "\b. Q b \ a < b"
    and P: "eventually P at_bot"
  shows "filterlim f at_bot (at_right a)"
proof -
  from P obtain x where x: "\y. y \ x \ P y"
    unfolding eventually_at_bot_linorder by auto
  show ?thesis
  proof (intro filterlim_at_bot_le[THEN iffD2] allI impI)
    fix z
    assume "z \ x"
    with x have "P z" by auto
    have "eventually (\x. x \ g z) (at_right a)"
      using bound[OF bij(2)[OF \<open>P z\<close>]]
      unfolding eventually_at_right[OF bound[OF bij(2)[OF \<open>P z\<close>]]]
      by (auto intro!: exI[of _ "g z"])
    with Q show "eventually (\x. f x \ z) (at_right a)"
      by eventually_elim (metis bij \<open>P z\<close> mono)
  qed
qed

lemma filterlim_at_top_at_left:
  fixes f :: "'a::linorder_topology \ 'b::linorder"
  assumes mono: "\x y. Q x \ Q y \ x \ y \ f x \ f y"
    and bij: "\x. P x \ f (g x) = x" "\x. P x \ Q (g x)"
    and Q: "eventually Q (at_left a)"
    and bound: "\b. Q b \ b < a"
    and P: "eventually P at_top"
  shows "filterlim f at_top (at_left a)"
proof -
  from P obtain x where x: "\y. x \ y \ P y"
    unfolding eventually_at_top_linorder by auto
  show ?thesis
  proof (intro filterlim_at_top_ge[THEN iffD2] allI impI)
    fix z
    assume "x \ z"
    with x have "P z" by auto
    have "eventually (\x. g z \ x) (at_left a)"
      using bound[OF bij(2)[OF \<open>P z\<close>]]
      unfolding eventually_at_left[OF bound[OF bij(2)[OF \<open>P z\<close>]]]
      by (auto intro!: exI[of _ "g z"])
    with Q show "eventually (\x. z \ f x) (at_left a)"
      by eventually_elim (metis bij \<open>P z\<close> mono)
  qed
qed

lemma filterlim_split_at:
  "filterlim f F (at_left x) \ filterlim f F (at_right x) \
    filterlim f F (at x)"
  for x :: "'a::linorder_topology"
  by (subst at_eq_sup_left_right) (rule filterlim_sup)

lemma filterlim_at_split:
  "filterlim f F (at x) \ filterlim f F (at_left x) \ filterlim f F (at_right x)"
  for x :: "'a::linorder_topology"
  by (subst at_eq_sup_left_right) (simp add: filterlim_def filtermap_sup)

lemma eventually_nhds_top:
  fixes P :: "'a :: {order_top,linorder_topology} \ bool"
    and b :: 'a
  assumes "b < top"
  shows "eventually P (nhds top) \ (\bz. b < z \ P z))"
  unfolding eventually_nhds
proof safe
  fix S :: "'a set"
  assume "open S" "top \ S"
  note open_left[OF this \<open>b < top\<close>]
  moreover assume "\s\S. P s"
  ultimately show "\bz>b. P z"
    by (auto simp: subset_eq Ball_def)
next
  fix b
  assume "b < top" "\z>b. P z"
  then show "\S. open S \ top \ S \ (\xa\S. P xa)"
    by (intro exI[of _ "{b <..}"]) auto
qed

lemma tendsto_at_within_iff_tendsto_nhds:
  "(g \ g l) (at l within S) \ (g \ g l) (inf (nhds l) (principal S))"
  unfolding tendsto_def eventually_at_filter eventually_inf_principal
  by (intro ext all_cong imp_cong) (auto elim!: eventually_mono)

subsection \<open>Limits on sequences\<close>

abbreviation (in topological_space)
  LIMSEQ :: "[nat \ 'a, 'a] \ bool" ("((_)/ \ (_))" [60, 60] 60)
  where "X \ L \ (X \ L) sequentially"

abbreviation (in t2_space) lim :: "(nat \ 'a) \ 'a"
  where "lim X \ Lim sequentially X"

definition (in topological_space) convergent :: "(nat \ 'a) \ bool"
  where "convergent X = (\L. X \ L)"

lemma lim_def: "lim X = (THE L. X \ L)"
  unfolding Lim_def ..

lemma lim_explicit:
  "f \ f0 \ (\S. open S \ f0 \ S \ (\N. \n\N. f n \ S))"
  unfolding tendsto_def eventually_sequentially by auto

subsection \<open>Monotone sequences and subsequences\<close>

text \<open>
  Definition of monotonicity.
  The use of disjunction here complicates proofs considerably.
  One alternative is to add a Boolean argument to indicate the direction.
  Another is to develop the notions of increasing and decreasing first.
\<close>
definition monoseq :: "(nat \ 'a::order) \ bool"
  where "monoseq X \ (\m. \n\m. X m \ X n) \ (\m. \n\m. X n \ X m)"

abbreviation incseq :: "(nat \ 'a::order) \ bool"
  where "incseq X \ mono X"

lemma incseq_def: "incseq X \ (\m. \n\m. X n \ X m)"
  unfolding mono_def ..

abbreviation decseq :: "(nat \ 'a::order) \ bool"
  where "decseq X \ antimono X"

lemma decseq_def: "decseq X \ (\m. \n\m. X n \ X m)"
  unfolding antimono_def ..

subsubsection \<open>Definition of subsequence.\<close>

(* For compatibility with the old "subseq" *)
lemma strict_mono_leD: "strict_mono r \ m \ n \ r m \ r n"
  by (erule (1) monoD [OF strict_mono_mono])

lemma strict_mono_id: "strict_mono id"
  by (simp add: strict_mono_def)

lemma incseq_SucI: "(\n. X n \ X (Suc n)) \ incseq X"
  using lift_Suc_mono_le[of X] by (auto simp: incseq_def)

lemma incseqD: "incseq f \ i \ j \ f i \ f j"
  by (auto simp: incseq_def)

lemma incseq_SucD: "incseq A \ A i \ A (Suc i)"
  using incseqD[of A i "Suc i"] by auto

lemma incseq_Suc_iff: "incseq f \ (\n. f n \ f (Suc n))"
  by (auto intro: incseq_SucI dest: incseq_SucD)

lemma incseq_const[simp, intro]: "incseq (\x. k)"
  unfolding incseq_def by auto

lemma decseq_SucI: "(\n. X (Suc n) \ X n) \ decseq X"
  using order.lift_Suc_mono_le[OF dual_order, of X] by (auto simp: decseq_def)

lemma decseqD: "decseq f \ i \ j \ f j \ f i"
  by (auto simp: decseq_def)

lemma decseq_SucD: "decseq A \ A (Suc i) \ A i"
  using decseqD[of A i "Suc i"] by auto

lemma decseq_Suc_iff: "decseq f \ (\n. f (Suc n) \ f n)"
  by (auto intro: decseq_SucI dest: decseq_SucD)

lemma decseq_const[simp, intro]: "decseq (\x. k)"
  unfolding decseq_def by auto

lemma monoseq_iff: "monoseq X \ incseq X \ decseq X"
  unfolding monoseq_def incseq_def decseq_def ..

lemma monoseq_Suc: "monoseq X \ (\n. X n \ X (Suc n)) \ (\n. X (Suc n) \ X n)"
  unfolding monoseq_iff incseq_Suc_iff decseq_Suc_iff ..

lemma monoI1: "\m. \n \ m. X m \ X n \ monoseq X"
  by (simp add: monoseq_def)

lemma monoI2: "\m. \n \ m. X n \ X m \ monoseq X"
  by (simp add: monoseq_def)

lemma mono_SucI1: "\n. X n \ X (Suc n) \ monoseq X"
  by (simp add: monoseq_Suc)

lemma mono_SucI2: "\n. X (Suc n) \ X n \ monoseq X"
  by (simp add: monoseq_Suc)

lemma monoseq_minus:
  fixes a :: "nat \ 'a::ordered_ab_group_add"
  assumes "monoseq a"
  shows "monoseq (\ n. - a n)"
proof (cases "\m. \n \ m. a m \ a n")
  case True
  then have "\m. \n \ m. - a n \ - a m" by auto
  then show ?thesis by (rule monoI2)
next
  case False
  then have "\m. \n \ m. - a m \ - a n"
    using \<open>monoseq a\<close>[unfolded monoseq_def] by auto
  then show ?thesis by (rule monoI1)
qed

subsubsection \<open>Subsequence (alternative definition, (e.g. Hoskins)\<close>

lemma strict_mono_Suc_iff: "strict_mono f \ (\n. f n < f (Suc n))"
proof (intro iffI strict_monoI)
  assume *: "\n. f n < f (Suc n)"
  fix m n :: nat assume "m < n"
  thus "f m < f n"
    by (induction rule: less_Suc_induct) (use * in auto)
qed (auto simp: strict_mono_def)

lemma strict_mono_add: "strict_mono (\n::'a::linordered_semidom. n + k)"
  by (auto simp: strict_mono_def)

text \<open>For any sequence, there is a monotonic subsequence.\<close>
lemma seq_monosub:
  fixes s :: "nat \ 'a::linorder"
  shows "\f. strict_mono f \ monoseq (\n. (s (f n)))"
proof (cases "\n. \p>n. \m\p. s m \ s p")
  case True
  then have "\f. \n. (\m\f n. s m \ s (f n)) \ f n < f (Suc n)"
    by (intro dependent_nat_choice) (auto simp: conj_commute)
  then obtain f :: "nat \ nat"
    where f: "strict_mono f" and mono: "\n m. f n \ m \ s m \ s (f n)"
    by (auto simp: strict_mono_Suc_iff)
  then have "incseq f"
    unfolding strict_mono_Suc_iff incseq_Suc_iff by (auto intro: less_imp_le)
  then have "monoseq (\n. s (f n))"
    by (auto simp add: incseq_def intro!: mono monoI2)
  with f show ?thesis
    by auto
next
  case False
  then obtain N where N: "p > N \ \m>p. s p < s m" for p
    by (force simp: not_le le_less)
  have "\f. \n. N < f n \ f n < f (Suc n) \ s (f n) \ s (f (Suc n))"
  proof (intro dependent_nat_choice)
    fix x
    assume "N < x" with N[of x]
    show "\y>N. x < y \ s x \ s y"
      by (auto intro: less_trans)
  qed auto
  then show ?thesis
    by (auto simp: monoseq_iff incseq_Suc_iff strict_mono_Suc_iff)
qed

lemma seq_suble:
  assumes sf: "strict_mono (f :: nat \ nat)"
  shows "n \ f n"
proof (induct n)
  case 0
  show ?case by simp
next
  case (Suc n)
  with sf [unfolded strict_mono_Suc_iff, rule_format, of n] have "n < f (Suc n)"
     by arith
  then show ?case by arith
qed

lemma eventually_subseq:
  "strict_mono r \ eventually P sequentially \ eventually (\n. P (r n)) sequentially"
  unfolding eventually_sequentially by (metis seq_suble le_trans)

lemma not_eventually_sequentiallyD:
  assumes "\ eventually P sequentially"
  shows "\r::nat\nat. strict_mono r \ (\n. \ P (r n))"
proof -
  from assms have "\n. \m\n. \ P m"
    unfolding eventually_sequentially by (simp add: not_less)
  then obtain r where "\n. r n \ n" "\n. \ P (r n)"
    by (auto simp: choice_iff)
  then show ?thesis
    by (auto intro!: exI[of _ "\n. r (((Suc \ r) ^^ Suc n) 0)"]
             simp: less_eq_Suc_le strict_mono_Suc_iff)
qed

lemma sequentially_offset:
  assumes "eventually (\i. P i) sequentially"
  shows "eventually (\i. P (i + k)) sequentially"
  using assms by (rule eventually_sequentially_seg [THEN iffD2])

lemma seq_offset_neg:
  "(f \ l) sequentially \ ((\i. f(i - k)) \ l) sequentially"
  apply (erule filterlim_compose)
  apply (simp add: filterlim_def le_sequentially eventually_filtermap eventually_sequentially, arith)
  done

lemma filterlim_subseq: "strict_mono f \ filterlim f sequentially sequentially"
  unfolding filterlim_iff by (metis eventually_subseq)

lemma strict_mono_o: "strict_mono r \ strict_mono s \ strict_mono (r \ s)"
  unfolding strict_mono_def by simp

lemma strict_mono_compose: "strict_mono r \ strict_mono s \ strict_mono (\x. r (s x))"
  using strict_mono_o[of r s] by (simp add: o_def)

lemma incseq_imp_monoseq:  "incseq X \ monoseq X"
  by (simp add: incseq_def monoseq_def)

lemma decseq_imp_monoseq:  "decseq X \ monoseq X"
  by (simp add: decseq_def monoseq_def)

lemma decseq_eq_incseq: "decseq X = incseq (\n. - X n)"
  for X :: "nat \ 'a::ordered_ab_group_add"
  by (simp add: decseq_def incseq_def)

lemma INT_decseq_offset:
  assumes "decseq F"
  shows "(\i. F i) = (\i\{n..}. F i)"
proof safe
  fix x i
  assume x: "x \ (\i\{n..}. F i)"
  show "x \ F i"
  proof cases
    from x have "x \ F n" by auto
    also assume "i \ n" with \decseq F\ have "F n \ F i"
      unfolding decseq_def by simp
    finally show ?thesis .
  qed (insert x, simp)
qed auto

lemma LIMSEQ_const_iff: "(\n. k) \ l \ k = l"
  for k l :: "'a::t2_space"
  using trivial_limit_sequentially by (rule tendsto_const_iff)

lemma LIMSEQ_SUP: "incseq X \ X \ (SUP i. X i :: 'a::{complete_linorder,linorder_topology})"
  by (intro increasing_tendsto)
    (auto simp: SUP_upper less_SUP_iff incseq_def eventually_sequentially intro: less_le_trans)

lemma LIMSEQ_INF: "decseq X \ X \ (INF i. X i :: 'a::{complete_linorder,linorder_topology})"
  by (intro decreasing_tendsto)
    (auto simp: INF_lower INF_less_iff decseq_def eventually_sequentially intro: le_less_trans)

lemma LIMSEQ_ignore_initial_segment: "f \ a \ (\n. f (n + k)) \ a"
  unfolding tendsto_def by (subst eventually_sequentially_seg[where k=k])

lemma LIMSEQ_offset: "(\n. f (n + k)) \ a \ f \ a"
  unfolding tendsto_def
  by (subst (asm) eventually_sequentially_seg[where k=k])

lemma LIMSEQ_Suc: "f \ l \ (\n. f (Suc n)) \ l"
  by (drule LIMSEQ_ignore_initial_segment [where k="Suc 0"]) simp

lemma LIMSEQ_imp_Suc: "(\n. f (Suc n)) \ l \ f \ l"
  by (rule LIMSEQ_offset [where k="Suc 0"]) simp

lemma LIMSEQ_lessThan_iff_atMost:
  shows "(\n. f {.. x \ (\n. f {..n}) \ x"
  apply (subst filterlim_sequentially_Suc [symmetric])
  apply (simp only: lessThan_Suc_atMost)
  done

lemma (in t2_space) LIMSEQ_Uniq: "\\<^sub>\\<^sub>1l. X \ l"
by (simp add: tendsto_unique')

lemma (in t2_space) LIMSEQ_unique: "X \ a \ X \ b \ a = b"
  using trivial_limit_sequentially by (rule tendsto_unique)

lemma LIMSEQ_le_const: "X \ x \ \N. \n\N. a \ X n \ a \ x"
  for a x :: "'a::linorder_topology"
  by (simp add: eventually_at_top_linorder tendsto_lowerbound)

lemma LIMSEQ_le: "X \ x \ Y \ y \ \N. \n\N. X n \ Y n \ x \ y"
  for x y :: "'a::linorder_topology"
  using tendsto_le[of sequentially Y y X x] by (simp add: eventually_sequentially)

lemma LIMSEQ_le_const2: "X \ x \ \N. \n\N. X n \ a \ x \ a"
  for a x :: "'a::linorder_topology"
  by (rule LIMSEQ_le[of X x "\n. a"]) auto

lemma Lim_bounded: "f \ l \ \n\M. f n \ C \ l \ C"
  for l :: "'a::linorder_topology"
  by (intro LIMSEQ_le_const2) auto

lemma Lim_bounded2:
  fixes f :: "nat \ 'a::linorder_topology"
  assumes lim:"f \ l" and ge: "\n\N. f n \ C"
  shows "l \ C"
  using ge
  by (intro tendsto_le[OF trivial_limit_sequentially lim tendsto_const])
     (auto simp: eventually_sequentially)

lemma lim_mono:
  fixes X Y :: "nat \ 'a::linorder_topology"
  assumes "\n. N \ n \ X n \ Y n"
    and "X \ x"
    and "Y \ y"
  shows "x \ y"
  using assms(1) by (intro LIMSEQ_le[OF assms(2,3)]) auto

lemma Sup_lim:
  fixes a :: "'a::{complete_linorder,linorder_topology}"
  assumes "\n. b n \ s"
    and "b \ a"
  shows "a \ Sup s"
  by (metis Lim_bounded assms complete_lattice_class.Sup_upper)

lemma Inf_lim:
  fixes a :: "'a::{complete_linorder,linorder_topology}"
  assumes "\n. b n \ s"
    and "b \ a"
  shows "Inf s \ a"
  by (metis Lim_bounded2 assms complete_lattice_class.Inf_lower)

lemma SUP_Lim:
  fixes X :: "nat \ 'a::{complete_linorder,linorder_topology}"
  assumes inc: "incseq X"
    and l: "X \ l"
  shows "(SUP n. X n) = l"
  using LIMSEQ_SUP[OF inc] tendsto_unique[OF trivial_limit_sequentially l]
  by simp

lemma INF_Lim:
  fixes X :: "nat \ 'a::{complete_linorder,linorder_topology}"
  assumes dec: "decseq X"
    and l: "X \ l"
  shows "(INF n. X n) = l"
  using LIMSEQ_INF[OF dec] tendsto_unique[OF trivial_limit_sequentially l]
  by simp

lemma convergentD: "convergent X \ \L. X \ L"
  by (simp add: convergent_def)

lemma convergentI: "X \ L \ convergent X"
  by (auto simp add: convergent_def)

lemma convergent_LIMSEQ_iff: "convergent X \ X \ lim X"
  by (auto intro: theI LIMSEQ_unique simp add: convergent_def lim_def)

lemma convergent_const: "convergent (\n. c)"
  by (rule convergentI) (rule tendsto_const)

lemma monoseq_le:
  "monoseq a \ a \ x \
    (\<forall>n. a n \<le> x) \<and> (\<forall>m. \<forall>n\<ge>m. a m \<le> a n) \<or>
    (\<forall>n. x \<le> a n) \<and> (\<forall>m. \<forall>n\<ge>m. a n \<le> a m)"
  for x :: "'a::linorder_topology"
  by (metis LIMSEQ_le_const LIMSEQ_le_const2 decseq_def incseq_def monoseq_iff)

lemma LIMSEQ_subseq_LIMSEQ: "X \ L \ strict_mono f \ (X \ f) \ L"
  unfolding comp_def by (rule filterlim_compose [of X, OF _ filterlim_subseq])

lemma convergent_subseq_convergent: "convergent X \ strict_mono f \ convergent (X \ f)"
  by (auto simp: convergent_def intro: LIMSEQ_subseq_LIMSEQ)

lemma limI: "X \ L \ lim X = L"
  by (rule tendsto_Lim) (rule trivial_limit_sequentially)

lemma lim_le: "convergent f \ (\n. f n \ x) \ lim f \ x"
  for x :: "'a::linorder_topology"
  using LIMSEQ_le_const2[of f "lim f" x] by (simp add: convergent_LIMSEQ_iff)

lemma lim_const [simp]: "lim (\m. a) = a"
  by (simp add: limI)

subsubsection \<open>Increasing and Decreasing Series\<close>

lemma incseq_le: "incseq X \ X \ L \ X n \ L"
  for L :: "'a::linorder_topology"
  by (metis incseq_def LIMSEQ_le_const)

lemma decseq_ge: "decseq X \ X \ L \ L \ X n"
  for L :: "'a::linorder_topology"
  by (metis decseq_def LIMSEQ_le_const2)

subsection \<open>First countable topologies\<close>

class first_countable_topology = topological_space +
  assumes first_countable_basis:
    "\A::nat \ 'a set. (\i. x \ A i \ open (A i)) \ (\S. open S \ x \ S \ (\i. A i \ S))"

lemma (in first_countable_topology) countable_basis_at_decseq:
  obtains A :: "nat \ 'a set" where
    "\i. open (A i)" "\i. x \ (A i)"
    "\S. open S \ x \ S \ eventually (\i. A i \ S) sequentially"
proof atomize_elim
  from first_countable_basis[of x] obtain A :: "nat \ 'a set"
    where nhds: "\i. open (A i)" "\i. x \ A i"
      and incl: "\S. open S \ x \ S \ \i. A i \ S"
    by auto
  define F where "F n = (\i\n. A i)" for n
  show "\A. (\i. open (A i)) \ (\i. x \ A i) \
    (\<forall>S. open S \<longrightarrow> x \<in> S \<longrightarrow> eventually (\<lambda>i. A i \<subseteq> S) sequentially)"
  proof (safe intro!: exI[of _ F])
    fix i
    show "open (F i)"
      using nhds(1) by (auto simp: F_def)
    show "x \ F i"
      using nhds(2) by (auto simp: F_def)
  next
    fix S
    assume "open S" "x \ S"
    from incl[OF this] obtain i where "F i \ S"
      unfolding F_def by auto
    moreover have "\j. i \ j \ F j \ F i"
      by (simp add: Inf_superset_mono F_def image_mono)
    ultimately show "eventually (\i. F i \ S) sequentially"
      by (auto simp: eventually_sequentially)
  qed
qed

lemma (in first_countable_topology) nhds_countable:
  obtains X :: "nat \ 'a set"
  where "decseq X" "\n. open (X n)" "\n. x \ X n" "nhds x = (INF n. principal (X n))"
proof -
  from first_countable_basis obtain A :: "nat \ 'a set"
    where *: "\n. x \ A n" "\n. open (A n)" "\S. open S \ x \ S \ \i. A i \ S"
    by metis
  show thesis
  proof
    show "decseq (\n. \i\n. A i)"
      by (simp add: antimono_iff_le_Suc atMost_Suc)
    show "x \ (\i\n. A i)" "\n. open (\i\n. A i)" for n
      using * by auto
--> --------------------

--> maximum size reached

--> --------------------

¤ Dauer der Verarbeitung: 0.98 Sekunden (vorverarbeitet) ¤

Kontakt Drucken
Kontakt sprechenden Kalenders
Eigene Datei ansehen

Quellcode-Bibliothek

^© Kompilation durch diese Firma

[Weder Korrektheit noch Funktionsfähigkeit der Software werden zugesichert.]

Datei: closest_approach_2D.pvs Sprache: PVS

Original von: Isabelle^©

¤ Dauer der Verarbeitung: 0.98 Sekunden (vorverarbeitet) ¤

schauen Sie vor die Tür

Die Firma ist wie angegeben erreichbar.

Bot Zugriff

Quellcode-Bibliothek

© Kompilation durch diese Firma

[Weder Korrektheit noch Funktionsfähigkeit der Software werden zugesichert.]

Datei: closest_approach_2D.pvs Sprache: PVS

Original von: Isabelle©

¤ Dauer der Verarbeitung: 0.98 Sekunden (vorverarbeitet) ¤

schauen Sie vor die Tür

Die Firma ist wie angegeben erreichbar.

Bot Zugriff

^© Kompilation durch diese Firma

Original von: Isabelle^©