(************************************************************************)
(* * The Coq Proof Assistant / The Coq Development Team *)
(* v * INRIA, CNRS and contributors - Copyright 1999-2018 *)
(* <O___,, * (see CREDITS file for the list of authors) *)
(* \VV/ **************************************************************)
(* // * This file is distributed under the terms of the *)
(* * GNU Lesser General Public License Version 2.1 *)
(* * (see LICENSE file for the text of the license) *)
(************************************************************************)
Require Import Rbase.
Require Import Rfunctions.
Require Import Compare.
Local Open Scope R_scope.
Implicit Type r : R.
(* classical is needed for [Un_cv_crit] *)
(*********************************************************)
(** * Definition of sequence and properties *)
(* *)
(*********************************************************)
Section sequence.
(*********)
Variable Un : nat -> R.
(*********)
Fixpoint Rmax_N (N:nat) : R :=
match N with
| O => Un 0
| S n => Rmax (Un (S n)) (Rmax_N n)
end.
(*********)
Definition EUn r : Prop := exists i : nat, r = Un i.
(*********)
Definition Un_cv (l:R) : Prop :=
forall eps:R,
eps > 0 ->
exists N : nat, (forall n:nat, (n >= N)%nat -> R_dist (Un n) l < eps).
(*********)
Definition Cauchy_crit : Prop :=
forall eps:R,
eps > 0 ->
exists N : nat,
(forall n m:nat,
(n >= N)%nat -> (m >= N)%nat -> R_dist (Un n) (Un m) < eps).
(*********)
Definition Un_growing : Prop := forall n:nat, Un n <= Un (S n).
(*********)
Lemma EUn_noempty : exists r : R, EUn r.
Proof.
unfold EUn; split with (Un 0); split with 0%nat; trivial.
Qed.
(*********)
Lemma Un_in_EUn : forall n:nat, EUn (Un n).
Proof.
intro; unfold EUn; split with n; trivial.
Qed.
(*********)
Lemma Un_bound_imp :
forall x:R, (forall n:nat, Un n <= x) -> is_upper_bound EUn x.
Proof.
intros; unfold is_upper_bound; intros; unfold EUn in H0; elim H0;
clear H0; intros; generalize (H x1); intro; rewrite <- H0 in H1;
trivial.
Qed.
(*********)
Lemma growing_prop :
forall n m:nat, Un_growing -> (n >= m)%nat -> Un n >= Un m.
Proof.
double induction n m; intros.
unfold Rge; right; trivial.
exfalso; unfold ge in H1; generalize (le_Sn_O n0); intro; auto.
cut (n0 >= 0)%nat.
generalize H0; intros; unfold Un_growing in H0;
apply
(Rge_trans (Un (S n0)) (Un n0) (Un 0) (Rle_ge (Un n0) (Un (S n0)) (H0 n0))
(H 0%nat H2 H3)).
elim n0; auto.
elim (lt_eq_lt_dec n1 n0); intro y.
elim y; clear y; intro y.
unfold ge in H2; generalize (le_not_lt n0 n1 (le_S_n n0 n1 H2)); intro;
exfalso; auto.
rewrite y; unfold Rge; right; trivial.
unfold ge in H0; generalize (H0 (S n0) H1 (lt_le_S n0 n1 y)); intro;
unfold Un_growing in H1;
apply
(Rge_trans (Un (S n1)) (Un n1) (Un (S n0))
(Rle_ge (Un n1) (Un (S n1)) (H1 n1)) H3).
Qed.
(*********)
Lemma Un_cv_crit_lub : Un_growing -> forall l, is_lub EUn l -> Un_cv l.
Proof.
intros Hug l H eps Heps.
cut (exists N, Un N > l - eps).
intros (N, H3).
exists N.
intros n H4.
unfold R_dist.
rewrite Rabs_left1, Ropp_minus_distr.
apply Rplus_lt_reg_l with (Un n - eps).
apply Rlt_le_trans with (Un N).
now replace (Un n - eps + (l - Un n)) with (l - eps) by ring.
replace (Un n - eps + eps) with (Un n) by ring.
apply Rge_le.
now apply growing_prop.
apply Rle_minus.
apply (proj1 H).
now exists n.
assert (Hi2pn: forall n, 0 < (/ 2)^n).
clear. intros n.
apply pow_lt.
apply Rinv_0_lt_compat.
now apply (IZR_lt 0 2).
pose (test := fun n => match Rle_lt_dec (Un n) (l - eps) with left _ => false | right _ => true end).
pose (sum := let fix aux n := match n with S n' => aux n' +
if test n' then (/ 2)^n else 0 | O => 0 end in aux).
assert (Hsum': forall m n, sum m <= sum (m + n)%nat <= sum m + (/2)^m - (/2)^(m + n)).
clearbody test.
clear -Hi2pn.
intros m.
induction n.
rewrite<- plus_n_O.
ring_simplify (sum m + (/ 2) ^ m - (/ 2) ^ m).
split ; apply Rle_refl.
rewrite <- plus_n_Sm.
simpl.
split.
apply Rle_trans with (sum (m + n)%nat + 0).
rewrite Rplus_0_r.
apply IHn.
apply Rplus_le_compat_l.
case (test (m + n)%nat).
apply Rlt_le.
exact (Hi2pn (S (m + n))).
apply Rle_refl.
apply Rle_trans with (sum (m + n)%nat + / 2 * (/ 2) ^ (m + n)).
apply Rplus_le_compat_l.
case (test (m + n)%nat).
apply Rle_refl.
apply Rlt_le.
exact (Hi2pn (S (m + n))).
apply Rplus_le_reg_r with (-(/ 2 * (/ 2) ^ (m + n))).
rewrite Rplus_assoc, Rplus_opp_r, Rplus_0_r.
apply Rle_trans with (1 := proj2 IHn).
apply Req_le.
field.
assert (Hsum: forall n, 0 <= sum n <= 1 - (/2)^n).
intros N.
generalize (Hsum' O N).
simpl.
now rewrite Rplus_0_l.
destruct (completeness (fun x : R => exists n : nat, x = sum n)) as (m, (Hm1, Hm2)).
exists 1.
intros x (n, H1).
rewrite H1.
apply Rle_trans with (1 := proj2 (Hsum n)).
apply Rlt_le.
apply Rplus_lt_reg_l with ((/2)^n - 1).
now ring_simplify.
exists 0. now exists O.
destruct (Rle_or_lt m 0) as [[Hm|Hm]|Hm].
elim Rlt_not_le with (1 := Hm).
apply Hm1.
now exists O.
assert (Hs0: forall n, sum n = 0).
intros n.
specialize (Hm1 (sum n) (ex_intro _ _ (eq_refl _))).
apply Rle_antisym with (2 := proj1 (Hsum n)).
now rewrite <- Hm.
assert (Hub: forall n, Un n <= l - eps).
intros n.
generalize (eq_refl (sum (S n))).
simpl sum at 1.
rewrite 2!Hs0, Rplus_0_l.
unfold test.
destruct Rle_lt_dec. easy.
intros H'.
elim Rgt_not_eq with (2 := H').
exact (Hi2pn (S n)).
clear -Heps H Hub.
destruct H as (_, H).
refine (False_ind _ (Rle_not_lt _ _ (H (l - eps) _) _)).
intros x (n, H1).
now rewrite H1.
apply Rplus_lt_reg_l with (eps - l).
now ring_simplify.
assert (Rabs (/2) < 1).
rewrite Rabs_pos_eq.
rewrite <- Rinv_1.
apply Rinv_lt_contravar.
rewrite Rmult_1_l.
now apply (IZR_lt 0 2).
now apply (IZR_lt 1 2).
apply Rlt_le.
apply Rinv_0_lt_compat.
now apply (IZR_lt 0 2).
destruct (pow_lt_1_zero (/2) H0 m Hm) as [N H4].
exists N.
apply Rnot_le_lt.
intros H5.
apply Rlt_not_le with (1 := H4 _ (le_refl _)).
rewrite Rabs_pos_eq. 2: now apply Rlt_le.
apply Hm2.
intros x (n, H6).
rewrite H6. clear x H6.
assert (Hs: sum N = 0).
clear H4.
induction N.
easy.
simpl.
assert (H6: Un N <= l - eps).
apply Rle_trans with (2 := H5).
apply Rge_le.
apply growing_prop ; try easy.
apply le_n_Sn.
rewrite (IHN H6), Rplus_0_l.
unfold test.
destruct Rle_lt_dec as [Hle|Hlt].
apply eq_refl.
now elim Rlt_not_le with (1 := Hlt).
destruct (le_or_lt N n) as [Hn|Hn].
rewrite le_plus_minus with (1 := Hn).
apply Rle_trans with (1 := proj2 (Hsum' N (n - N)%nat)).
rewrite Hs, Rplus_0_l.
set (k := (N + (n - N))%nat).
apply Rlt_le.
apply Rplus_lt_reg_l with ((/2)^k - (/2)^N).
now ring_simplify.
apply Rle_trans with (sum N).
rewrite le_plus_minus with (1 := Hn).
rewrite plus_Snm_nSm.
exact (proj1 (Hsum' _ _)).
rewrite Hs.
now apply Rlt_le.
Qed.
(*********)
Lemma Un_cv_crit : Un_growing -> bound EUn -> exists l : R, Un_cv l.
Proof.
intros Hug Heub.
exists (proj1_sig (completeness EUn Heub EUn_noempty)).
destruct (completeness EUn Heub EUn_noempty) as (l, H).
now apply Un_cv_crit_lub.
Qed.
(*********)
Lemma finite_greater :
forall N:nat, exists M : R, (forall n:nat, (n <= N)%nat -> Un n <= M).
Proof.
intro; induction N as [| N HrecN].
split with (Un 0); intros; rewrite (le_n_O_eq n H);
apply (Req_le (Un n) (Un n) (eq_refl (Un n))).
elim HrecN; clear HrecN; intros; split with (Rmax (Un (S N)) x); intros;
elim (Rmax_Rle (Un (S N)) x (Un n)); intros; clear H1;
inversion H0.
rewrite <- H1; rewrite <- H1 in H2;
apply
(H2 (or_introl (Un n <= x) (Req_le (Un n) (Un n) (eq_refl (Un n))))).
apply (H2 (or_intror (Un n <= Un (S N)) (H n H3))).
Qed.
(*********)
Lemma cauchy_bound : Cauchy_crit -> bound EUn.
Proof.
unfold Cauchy_crit, bound; intros; unfold is_upper_bound;
unfold Rgt in H; elim (H 1 Rlt_0_1); clear H; intros;
generalize (H x); intro; generalize (le_dec x); intro;
elim (finite_greater x); intros; split with (Rmax x0 (Un x + 1));
clear H; intros; unfold EUn in H; elim H; clear H;
intros; elim (H1 x2); clear H1; intro y.
unfold ge in H0; generalize (H0 x2 (le_n x) y); clear H0; intro;
rewrite <- H in H0; unfold R_dist in H0; elim (Rabs_def2 (Un x - x1) 1 H0);
clear H0; intros; elim (Rmax_Rle x0 (Un x + 1) x1);
intros; apply H4; clear H3 H4; right; clear H H0 y;
apply (Rlt_le x1 (Un x + 1)); generalize (Rlt_minus (-1) (Un x - x1) H1);
clear H1; intro; apply (Rminus_lt x1 (Un x + 1));
cut (-1 - (Un x - x1) = x1 - (Un x + 1));
[ intro; rewrite H0 in H; assumption | ring ].
generalize (H2 x2 y); clear H2 H0; intro; rewrite <- H in H0;
elim (Rmax_Rle x0 (Un x + 1) x1); intros; clear H1;
apply H2; left; assumption.
Qed.
End sequence.
(*****************************************************************)
(** * Definition of Power Series and properties *)
(* *)
(*****************************************************************)
Section Isequence.
(*********)
Variable An : nat -> R.
(*********)
Definition Pser (x l:R) : Prop := infinite_sum (fun n:nat => An n * x ^ n) l.
End Isequence.
Lemma GP_infinite :
forall x:R, Rabs x < 1 -> Pser (fun n:nat => 1) x (/ (1 - x)).
Proof.
intros; unfold Pser; unfold infinite_sum; intros;
elim (Req_dec x 0).
intros; exists 0%nat; intros; rewrite H1; rewrite Rminus_0_r; rewrite Rinv_1;
cut (sum_f_R0 (fun n0:nat => 1 * 0 ^ n0) n = 1).
intros; rewrite H3; rewrite R_dist_eq; auto.
elim n; simpl.
ring.
intros; rewrite H3; ring.
intro; cut (0 < eps * (Rabs (1 - x) * Rabs (/ x))).
intro; elim (pow_lt_1_zero x H (eps * (Rabs (1 - x) * Rabs (/ x))) H2);
intro N; intros; exists N; intros;
cut
(sum_f_R0 (fun n0:nat => 1 * x ^ n0) n = sum_f_R0 (fun n0:nat => x ^ n0) n).
intros; rewrite H5;
apply
(Rmult_lt_reg_l (Rabs (1 - x))
(R_dist (sum_f_R0 (fun n0:nat => x ^ n0) n) (/ (1 - x))) eps).
apply Rabs_pos_lt.
apply Rminus_eq_contra.
apply Rlt_dichotomy_converse.
right; unfold Rgt.
apply (Rle_lt_trans x (Rabs x) 1).
apply RRle_abs.
assumption.
unfold R_dist; rewrite <- Rabs_mult.
rewrite Rmult_minus_distr_l.
cut
((1 - x) * sum_f_R0 (fun n0:nat => x ^ n0) n =
- (sum_f_R0 (fun n0:nat => x ^ n0) n * (x - 1))).
intro; rewrite H6.
rewrite GP_finite.
rewrite Rinv_r.
cut (- (x ^ (n + 1) - 1) - 1 = - x ^ (n + 1)).
intro; rewrite H7.
rewrite Rabs_Ropp; cut ((n + 1)%nat = S n); auto.
intro H8; rewrite H8; simpl; rewrite Rabs_mult;
apply
(Rlt_le_trans (Rabs x * Rabs (x ^ n))
(Rabs x * (eps * (Rabs (1 - x) * Rabs (/ x)))) (
Rabs (1 - x) * eps)).
apply Rmult_lt_compat_l.
apply Rabs_pos_lt.
assumption.
auto.
cut
(Rabs x * (eps * (Rabs (1 - x) * Rabs (/ x))) =
Rabs x * Rabs (/ x) * (eps * Rabs (1 - x))).
clear H8; intros; rewrite H8; rewrite <- Rabs_mult; rewrite Rinv_r.
rewrite Rabs_R1; cut (1 * (eps * Rabs (1 - x)) = Rabs (1 - x) * eps).
intros; rewrite H9; unfold Rle; right; reflexivity.
ring.
assumption.
ring.
ring.
ring.
apply Rminus_eq_contra.
apply Rlt_dichotomy_converse.
right; unfold Rgt.
apply (Rle_lt_trans x (Rabs x) 1).
apply RRle_abs.
assumption.
ring; ring.
elim n; simpl.
ring.
intros; rewrite H5.
ring.
apply Rmult_lt_0_compat.
auto.
apply Rmult_lt_0_compat.
apply Rabs_pos_lt.
apply Rminus_eq_contra.
apply Rlt_dichotomy_converse.
right; unfold Rgt.
apply (Rle_lt_trans x (Rabs x) 1).
apply RRle_abs.
assumption.
apply Rabs_pos_lt.
apply Rinv_neq_0_compat.
assumption.
Qed.
(* Convergence is preserved after shifting the indices. *)
Lemma CV_shift :
forall f k l, Un_cv (fun n => f (n + k)%nat) l -> Un_cv f l.
intros f' k l cvfk eps ep; destruct (cvfk eps ep) as [N Pn].
exists (N + k)%nat; intros n nN; assert (tmp: (n = (n - k) + k)%nat).
rewrite Nat.sub_add;[ | apply le_trans with (N + k)%nat]; auto with arith.
rewrite tmp; apply Pn; apply Nat.le_add_le_sub_r; assumption.
Qed.
Lemma CV_shift' :
forall f k l, Un_cv f l -> Un_cv (fun n => f (n + k)%nat) l.
intros f' k l cvf eps ep; destruct (cvf eps ep) as [N Pn].
exists N; intros n nN; apply Pn; auto with arith.
Qed.
(* Growing property is preserved after shifting the indices (one way only) *)
Lemma Un_growing_shift :
forall k un, Un_growing un -> Un_growing (fun n => un (n + k)%nat).
Proof.
intros k un P n; apply P.
Qed.
¤ Dauer der Verarbeitung: 0.22 Sekunden
(vorverarbeitet)
¤
|
Haftungshinweis
Die Informationen auf dieser Webseite wurden
nach bestem Wissen sorgfältig zusammengestellt. Es wird jedoch weder Vollständigkeit, noch Richtigkeit,
noch Qualität der bereit gestellten Informationen zugesichert.
Bemerkung:
Die farbliche Syntaxdarstellung ist noch experimentell.
|