SSL PriorityAux.thy
Interaktion und PortierbarkeitIsabelle
(* Title: HOL/UNITY/Comp/PriorityAux.thy Author: Sidi O Ehmety, Cambridge University Computer Laboratory Copyright 2001 University of Cambridge
Auxiliary definitions needed in Priority.thy
*)
theory PriorityAux imports"../UNITY_Main" begin
typedecl vertex
definition symcl :: "(vertex*vertex)set=>(vertex*vertex)set"where "symcl r == r \ (r\)" \<comment> \<open>symmetric closure: removes the orientation of a relation\<close>
definition neighbors :: "[vertex, (vertex*vertex)set]=>vertex set"where "neighbors i r == ((r \ r\)``{i}) - {i}" \<comment> \<open>Neighbors of a vertex i\<close>
definition R :: "[vertex, (vertex*vertex)set]=>vertex set"where "R i r == r``{i}"
definition A :: "[vertex, (vertex*vertex)set]=>vertex set"where "A i r == (r\)``{i}"
definition reach :: "[vertex, (vertex*vertex)set]=> vertex set"where "reach i r == (r\<^sup>+)``{i}" \<comment> \<open>reachable and above vertices: the original notation was R* and A*\<close>
definition above :: "[vertex, (vertex*vertex)set]=> vertex set"where "above i r == ((r\)\<^sup>+)``{i}"
definition derive1 :: "[vertex, (vertex*vertex)set, (vertex*vertex)set]=>bool"where \<comment> \<open>The original definition\<close> "derive1 i r q == symcl r = symcl q &
(\<forall>k k'. k\<noteq>i & k'\<noteq>i -->((k,k') \<in> r) = ((k,k') \<in> q)) \<and>
A i r = {} & R i q = {}"
definition derive :: "[vertex, (vertex*vertex)set, (vertex*vertex)set]=>bool"where \<comment> \<open>Our alternative definition\<close> "derive i r q == A i r = {} & (q = reverse i r)"
axiomatizationwhere
finite_vertex_univ: "finite (UNIV :: vertex set)" \<comment> \<open>we assume that the universe of vertices is finite\<close>
(* Another form usefull in some situation *) lemma image0_r_iff_image0_trancl: "(r``{i}={}) = (\x. ((i,x) \ r\<^sup>+) = False)" apply auto apply (drule image0_trancl_iff_image0_r [THEN ssubst], auto) done
(* In finite universe acyclic coincides with wf *) lemma acyclic_eq_wf: "!!r::(vertex*vertex)set. acyclic r = wf r" by (auto simp add: wf_iff_acyclic_if_finite)
(* derive and derive1 are equivalent *) lemma derive_derive1_eq: "derive i r q = derive1 i r q" by auto
(* Lemma 1 *) lemma lemma1_a: "[| x \ reach i q; derive1 k r q |] ==> x\k --> x \ reach i r" apply (unfold reach_def) apply (erule ImageE) apply (erule trancl_induct) apply (cases "i=k", simp_all) apply (blast, blast, clarify) apply (drule_tac x = y in spec) apply (drule_tac x = z in spec) apply (blast dest: r_into_trancl intro: trancl_trans) done
lemma reach_lemma: "derive k r q ==> reach i q \ (reach i r \ {k})" apply clarify apply (drule lemma1_a) apply (auto simp add: derive_derive1_eq
simp del: reach_def derive_def derive1_def) done
(* An other possible formulation of the above theorem based on
the equivalence x \<in> reach y r = y \<in> above x r *) lemma reach_above_lemma: "(\i. reach i q \ (reach i r \ {k})) =
(\<forall>x. x\<noteq>k --> (\<forall>i. i \<notin> above x r --> i \<notin> above x q))" by (auto simp add: trancl_converse)
(* Lemma 2 *) lemma maximal_converse_image0: "(z, i) \ r\<^sup>+ \ (\y. (y, z) \ r \ (y,i) \ r\<^sup>+) = ((r\)``{z}={})" apply auto apply (frule_tac r = r in trancl_into_trancl2, auto) done
lemma above_lemma_a: "acyclic r ==> A i r\{}-->(\j \ above i r. A j r = {})" apply (simp add: acyclic_eq_wf wf_eq_minimal) apply (drule_tac x = " ((r\)\<^sup>+) ``{i}" in spec) apply auto apply (simp add: maximal_converse_image0 trancl_converse) done
lemma above_lemma_b: "acyclic r ==> above i r\{}-->(\j \ above i r. above j r = {})" apply (drule above_lemma_a) apply (auto simp add: image0_trancl_iff_image0_r) done
end
¤ Diese beiden folgenden Angebotsgruppen bietet das Unternehmen0.1Angebot
Wie Sie bei der Firma Beratungs- und Dienstleistungen beauftragen können
¤
Die Informationen auf dieser Webseite wurden
nach bestem Wissen sorgfältig zusammengestellt. Es wird jedoch weder Vollständigkeit, noch Richtigkeit,
noch Qualität der bereit gestellten Informationen zugesichert.
Bemerkung:
Die farbliche Syntaxdarstellung ist noch experimentell.