(* Title: HOL/HOLCF/Cpodef.thy
Author: Brian Huffman
*)
section ‹Subtypes of pcpos
›
theory Cpodef
imports Cpo
keywords
"pcpodef" "cpodef" :: thy_goal_defn
begin
subsection ‹Proving a subtype
is a partial order
›
text ‹
A subtype of a partial order
is itself a partial order,
if the ordering
is defined
in the standard way.
›
theorem (
in below) typedef_class_po:
fixes Abs ::
"'b::po \ 'a"
assumes type:
"type_definition Rep Abs A"
and below:
"(\) \ \x y. Rep x \ Rep y"
shows "class.po below"
apply (rule
class.po.intro)
apply (unfold below)
apply (rule below_refl)
apply (fact below_trans)
apply (rule type_definition.Rep_inject [OF type,
THEN iffD1])
apply (fact below_antisym)
done
lemmas typedef_po_class = below.typedef_class_po [
THEN po.intro_of_class]
subsection ‹Proving a subtype
is finite
›
lemma typedef_finite_UNIV:
fixes Abs ::
"'a::type \ 'b::type"
assumes type:
"type_definition Rep Abs A"
shows "finite A \ finite (UNIV :: 'b set)"
proof -
assume "finite A"
then have "finite (Abs ` A)"
by (rule finite_imageI)
then show "finite (UNIV :: 'b set)"
by (simp only: type_definition.Abs_image [OF type])
qed
subsection ‹Proving a subtype
is chain-finite
›
lemma ch2ch_Rep:
assumes below:
"(\) \ \x y. Rep x \ Rep y"
shows "chain S \ chain (\i. Rep (S i))"
unfolding chain_def below .
theorem typedef_chfin:
fixes Abs ::
"'a::chfin \ 'b::po"
assumes type:
"type_definition Rep Abs A"
and below:
"(\) \ \x y. Rep x \ Rep y"
shows "OFCLASS('b, chfin_class)"
apply intro_classes
apply (drule ch2ch_Rep [OF below])
apply (drule chfin)
apply (unfold max_in_chain_def)
apply (simp add: type_definition.Rep_inject [OF type])
done
subsection ‹Proving a subtype
is complete
›
text ‹
A subtype of a cpo
is itself a cpo
if the ordering
is
defined
in the standard way,
and the defining subset
is closed
with respect
to limits of chains. A set
is
closed
if and only
if membership
in the set
is an
admissible predicate.
›
lemma typedef_is_lubI:
assumes below:
"(\) \ \x y. Rep x \ Rep y"
shows "range (\i. Rep (S i)) <<| Rep x \ range S <<| x"
by (simp add: is_lub_def is_ub_def below)
lemma Abs_inverse_lub_Rep:
fixes Abs ::
"'a::cpo \ 'b::po"
assumes type:
"type_definition Rep Abs A"
and below:
"(\) \ \x y. Rep x \ Rep y"
and adm:
"adm (\x. x \ A)"
shows "chain S \ Rep (Abs (\i. Rep (S i))) = (\i. Rep (S i))"
apply (rule type_definition.Abs_inverse [OF type])
apply (erule admD [OF adm ch2ch_Rep [OF below]])
apply (rule type_definition.Rep [OF type])
done
theorem typedef_is_lub:
fixes Abs ::
"'a::cpo \ 'b::po"
assumes type:
"type_definition Rep Abs A"
and below:
"(\) \ \x y. Rep x \ Rep y"
and adm:
"adm (\x. x \ A)"
assumes S:
"chain S"
shows "range S <<| Abs (\i. Rep (S i))"
proof -
from S
have "chain (\i. Rep (S i))"
by (rule ch2ch_Rep [OF below])
then have "range (\i. Rep (S i)) <<| (\i. Rep (S i))"
by (rule cpo_lubI)
then have "range (\i. Rep (S i)) <<| Rep (Abs (\i. Rep (S i)))"
by (simp only: Abs_inverse_lub_Rep [OF type below adm S])
then show "range S <<| Abs (\i. Rep (S i))"
by (rule typedef_is_lubI [OF below])
qed
lemmas typedef_lub = typedef_is_lub [
THEN lub_eqI]
theorem typedef_cpo:
fixes Abs ::
"'a::cpo \ 'b::po"
assumes type:
"type_definition Rep Abs A"
and below:
"(\) \ \x y. Rep x \ Rep y"
and adm:
"adm (\x. x \ A)"
shows "OFCLASS('b, cpo_class)"
proof
fix S ::
"nat \ 'b"
assume "chain S"
then have "range S <<| Abs (\i. Rep (S i))"
by (rule typedef_is_lub [OF type below adm])
then show "\x. range S <<| x" ..
qed
subsubsection
‹Continuity of
\emph{Rep}
and \emph{Abs}
›
text ‹For any sub-cpo, the
🍋‹Rep
› function is continuous.
›
theorem typedef_cont_Rep:
fixes Abs ::
"'a::cpo \ 'b::cpo"
assumes type:
"type_definition Rep Abs A"
and below:
"(\) \ \x y. Rep x \ Rep y"
and adm:
"adm (\x. x \ A)"
shows "cont (\x. f x) \ cont (\x. Rep (f x))"
apply (erule cont_apply [OF _ _ cont_const])
apply (rule contI)
apply (simp only: typedef_lub [OF type below adm])
apply (simp only: Abs_inverse_lub_Rep [OF type below adm])
apply (rule cpo_lubI)
apply (erule ch2ch_Rep [OF below])
done
text ‹
For a sub-cpo, we can make the
🍋‹Abs
› function continuous
only
if we
restrict its
domain to the defining subset
by
composing it
with another continuous
function.
›
theorem typedef_cont_Abs:
fixes Abs ::
"'a::cpo \ 'b::cpo"
fixes f ::
"'c::cpo \ 'a::cpo"
assumes type:
"type_definition Rep Abs A"
and below:
"(\) \ \x y. Rep x \ Rep y"
and adm:
"adm (\x. x \ A)" (* not used *)
and f_in_A:
"\x. f x \ A"
shows "cont f \ cont (\x. Abs (f x))"
unfolding cont_def is_lub_def is_ub_def ball_simps below
by (simp add: type_definition.Abs_inverse [OF type f_in_A])
subsection ‹Proving subtype elements are compact
›
theorem typedef_compact:
fixes Abs ::
"'a::cpo \ 'b::cpo"
assumes type:
"type_definition Rep Abs A"
and below:
"(\) \ \x y. Rep x \ Rep y"
and adm:
"adm (\x. x \ A)"
shows "compact (Rep k) \ compact k"
proof (unfold compact_def)
have cont_Rep:
"cont Rep"
by (rule typedef_cont_Rep [OF type below adm cont_id])
assume "adm (\x. Rep k \ x)"
with cont_Rep
have "adm (\x. Rep k \ Rep x)" by (rule adm_subst)
then show "adm (\x. k \ x)" by (unfold below)
qed
subsection ‹Proving a subtype
is pointed
›
text ‹
A subtype of a cpo has a least element
if and only
if
the defining subset has a least element.
›
theorem typedef_pcpo_generic:
fixes Abs ::
"'a::cpo \ 'b::cpo"
assumes type:
"type_definition Rep Abs A"
and below:
"(\) \ \x y. Rep x \ Rep y"
and z_in_A:
"z \ A"
and z_least:
"\x. x \ A \ z \ x"
shows "OFCLASS('b, pcpo_class)"
apply (intro_classes)
apply (rule_tac x=
"Abs z" in exI, rule allI)
apply (unfold below)
apply (subst type_definition.Abs_inverse [OF type z_in_A])
apply (rule z_least [OF type_definition.Rep [OF type]])
done
text ‹
As a special
case, a subtype of a pcpo has a least element
if the defining subset
contains 🍋‹⊥›.
›
theorem typedef_pcpo:
fixes Abs ::
"'a::pcpo \ 'b::cpo"
assumes type:
"type_definition Rep Abs A"
and below:
"(\) \ \x y. Rep x \ Rep y"
and bottom_in_A:
"\ \ A"
shows "OFCLASS('b, pcpo_class)"
by (rule typedef_pcpo_generic [OF type below bottom_in_A], rule minimal)
subsubsection
‹Strictness of
\emph{Rep}
and \emph{Abs}
›
text ‹
For a sub-pcpo
where 🍋‹⊥› is a member of the defining
subset,
🍋‹Rep
› and 🍋‹Abs
› are both strict.
›
theorem typedef_Abs_strict:
assumes type:
"type_definition Rep Abs A"
and below:
"(\) \ \x y. Rep x \ Rep y"
and bottom_in_A:
"\ \ A"
shows "Abs \ = \"
apply (rule bottomI, unfold below)
apply (simp add: type_definition.Abs_inverse [OF type bottom_in_A])
done
theorem typedef_Rep_strict:
assumes type:
"type_definition Rep Abs A"
and below:
"(\) \ \x y. Rep x \ Rep y"
and bottom_in_A:
"\ \ A"
shows "Rep \ = \"
apply (rule typedef_Abs_strict [OF type below bottom_in_A,
THEN subst])
apply (rule type_definition.Abs_inverse [OF type bottom_in_A])
done
theorem typedef_Abs_bottom_iff:
assumes type:
"type_definition Rep Abs A"
and below:
"(\) \ \x y. Rep x \ Rep y"
and bottom_in_A:
"\ \ A"
shows "x \ A \ (Abs x = \) = (x = \)"
apply (rule typedef_Abs_strict [OF type below bottom_in_A,
THEN subst])
apply (simp add: type_definition.Abs_inject [OF type] bottom_in_A)
done
theorem typedef_Rep_bottom_iff:
assumes type:
"type_definition Rep Abs A"
and below:
"(\) \ \x y. Rep x \ Rep y"
and bottom_in_A:
"\ \ A"
shows "(Rep x = \) = (x = \)"
apply (rule typedef_Rep_strict [OF type below bottom_in_A,
THEN subst])
apply (simp add: type_definition.Rep_inject [OF type])
done
subsection ‹Proving a subtype
is flat
›
theorem typedef_flat:
fixes Abs ::
"'a::flat \ 'b::pcpo"
assumes type:
"type_definition Rep Abs A"
and below:
"(\) \ \x y. Rep x \ Rep y"
and bottom_in_A:
"\ \ A"
shows "OFCLASS('b, flat_class)"
apply (intro_classes)
apply (unfold below)
apply (simp add: type_definition.Rep_inject [OF type, symmetric])
apply (simp add: typedef_Rep_strict [OF type below bottom_in_A])
apply (simp add: ax_flat)
done
subsection ‹HOLCF type
definition package
›
ML_file
‹Tools/
cpodef.ML
›
end