Quellcode-Bibliothek

^© Kompilation durch diese Firma

[Weder Korrektheit noch Funktionsfähigkeit der Software werden zugesichert.]

Datei: bug7348.v Sprache: Isabelle

Original von: Isabelle^©

(*  Title:      HOL/ex/Tarski.thy
    Author:     Florian Kammüller, Cambridge University Computer Laboratory
*)

section \<open>The Full Theorem of Tarski\<close>

theory Tarski
imports Main "HOL-Library.FuncSet"
begin

text \<open>
  Minimal version of lattice theory plus the full theorem of Tarski:
  The fixedpoints of a complete lattice themselves form a complete
  lattice.

  Illustrates first-class theories, using the Sigma representation of
  structures.  Tidied and converted to Isar by lcp.
\<close>

record 'a potype =
  pset  :: "'a set"
  order :: "('a \ 'a) set"

definition monotone :: "['a \ 'a, 'a set, ('a \ 'a) set] \ bool"
  where "monotone f A r \ (\x\A. \y\A. (x, y) \ r \ (f x, f y) \ r)"

definition least :: "['a \ bool, 'a potype] \ 'a"
  where "least P po = (SOME x. x \ pset po \ P x \ (\y \ pset po. P y \ (x, y) \ order po))"

definition greatest :: "['a \ bool, 'a potype] \ 'a"
  where "greatest P po = (SOME x. x \ pset po \ P x \ (\y \ pset po. P y \ (y, x) \ order po))"

definition lub :: "['a set, 'a potype] \ 'a"
  where "lub S po = least (\x. \y\S. (y, x) \ order po) po"

definition glb :: "['a set, 'a potype] \ 'a"
  where "glb S po = greatest (\x. \y\S. (x, y) \ order po) po"

definition isLub :: "['a set, 'a potype, 'a] \ bool"
  where "isLub S po =
    (\<lambda>L. L \<in> pset po \<and> (\<forall>y\<in>S. (y, L) \<in> order po) \<and>
      (\<forall>z\<in>pset po. (\<forall>y\<in>S. (y, z) \<in> order po) \<longrightarrow> (L, z) \<in> order po))"

definition isGlb :: "['a set, 'a potype, 'a] \ bool"
  where "isGlb S po =
    (\<lambda>G. (G \<in> pset po \<and> (\<forall>y\<in>S. (G, y) \<in> order po) \<and>
      (\<forall>z \<in> pset po. (\<forall>y\<in>S. (z, y) \<in> order po) \<longrightarrow> (z, G) \<in> order po)))"

definition "fix" :: "['a \ 'a, 'a set] \ 'a set"
  where "fix f A = {x. x \ A \ f x = x}"

definition interval :: "[('a \ 'a) set, 'a, 'a] \ 'a set"
  where "interval r a b = {x. (a, x) \ r \ (x, b) \ r}"

definition Bot :: "'a potype \ 'a"
  where "Bot po = least (\x. True) po"

definition Top :: "'a potype \ 'a"
  where "Top po = greatest (\x. True) po"

definition PartialOrder :: "'a potype set"
  where "PartialOrder = {P. refl_on (pset P) (order P) \ antisym (order P) \ trans (order P)}"

definition CompleteLattice :: "'a potype set"
  where "CompleteLattice =
    {cl. cl \<in> PartialOrder \<and>
      (\<forall>S. S \<subseteq> pset cl \<longrightarrow> (\<exists>L. isLub S cl L)) \<and>
      (\<forall>S. S \<subseteq> pset cl \<longrightarrow> (\<exists>G. isGlb S cl G))}"

definition CLF_set :: "('a potype \ ('a \ 'a)) set"
  where "CLF_set =
    (SIGMA cl : CompleteLattice.
      {f. f \<in> pset cl \<rightarrow> pset cl \<and> monotone f (pset cl) (order cl)})"

definition induced :: "['a set, ('a \ 'a) set] \ ('a \ 'a) set"
  where "induced A r = {(a, b). a \ A \ b \ A \ (a, b) \ r}"

definition sublattice :: "('a potype \ 'a set) set"
  where "sublattice =
    (SIGMA cl : CompleteLattice.
      {S. S \<subseteq> pset cl \<and> \<lparr>pset = S, order = induced S (order cl)\<rparr> \<in> CompleteLattice})"

abbreviation sublat :: "['a set, 'a potype] \ bool" ("_ <<= _" [51, 50] 50)
  where "S <<= cl \ S \ sublattice `` {cl}"

definition dual :: "'a potype \ 'a potype"
  where "dual po = \pset = pset po, order = converse (order po)\"

locale S =
  fixes cl :: "'a potype"
    and A :: "'a set"
    and r :: "('a \ 'a) set"
  defines A_def: "A \ pset cl"
     and r_def: "r \ order cl"

locale PO = S +
  assumes cl_po: "cl \ PartialOrder"

locale CL = S +
  assumes cl_co: "cl \ CompleteLattice"

sublocale CL < po?: PO
  unfolding A_def r_def
  using CompleteLattice_def PO.intro cl_co by fastforce

locale CLF = S +
  fixes f :: "'a \ 'a"
    and P :: "'a set"
  assumes f_cl:  "(cl, f) \ CLF_set"
  defines P_def: "P \ fix f A"

sublocale CLF < cl?: CL
  unfolding A_def r_def CL_def
  using CLF_set_def f_cl by blast

locale Tarski = CLF +
  fixes Y :: "'a set"
    and intY1 :: "'a set"
    and v :: "'a"
  assumes Y_ss: "Y \ P"
  defines intY1_def: "intY1 \ interval r (lub Y cl) (Top cl)"
    and v_def: "v \
      glb {x. ((\<lambda>x \<in> intY1. f x) x, x) \<in> induced intY1 r \<and> x \<in> intY1}
        \<lparr>pset = intY1, order = induced intY1 r\<rparr>"

subsection \<open>Partial Order\<close>

context PO
begin

lemma dual: "PO (dual cl)"
proof
  show "dual cl \ PartialOrder"
  using cl_po unfolding PartialOrder_def dual_def by auto
qed

lemma PO_imp_refl_on [simp]: "refl_on A r"
  using cl_po by (simp add: PartialOrder_def A_def r_def)

lemma PO_imp_sym [simp]: "antisym r"
  using cl_po by (simp add: PartialOrder_def r_def)

lemma PO_imp_trans [simp]: "trans r"
  using cl_po by (simp add: PartialOrder_def r_def)

lemma reflE: "x \ A \ (x, x) \ r"
  using cl_po by (simp add: PartialOrder_def refl_on_def A_def r_def)

lemma antisymE: "\(a, b) \ r; (b, a) \ r\ \ a = b"
  using cl_po by (simp add: PartialOrder_def antisym_def r_def)

lemma transE: "\(a, b) \ r; (b, c) \ r\ \ (a, c) \ r"
  using cl_po by (simp add: PartialOrder_def r_def) (unfold trans_def, fast)

lemma monotoneE: "\monotone f A r; x \ A; y \ A; (x, y) \ r\ \ (f x, f y) \ r"
  by (simp add: monotone_def)

lemma po_subset_po:
  assumes "S \ A" shows "\pset = S, order = induced S r\ \ PartialOrder"
proof -
  have "refl_on S (induced S r)"
    using \<open>S \<subseteq> A\<close> by (auto simp: refl_on_def induced_def intro: reflE)
  moreover
  have "antisym (induced S r)"
    by (auto simp add: antisym_def induced_def intro: antisymE)
  moreover
  have "trans (induced S r)"
    by (auto simp add: trans_def induced_def intro: transE)
  ultimately show ?thesis
    by (simp add: PartialOrder_def)
qed

lemma indE: "\(x, y) \ induced S r; S \ A\ \ (x, y) \ r"
  by (simp add: induced_def)

lemma indI: "\(x, y) \ r; x \ S; y \ S\ \ (x, y) \ induced S r"
  by (simp add: induced_def)

end

lemma (in CL) CL_imp_ex_isLub: "S \ A \ \L. isLub S cl L"
  using cl_co by (simp add: CompleteLattice_def A_def)

declare (in CL) cl_co [simp]

lemma isLub_lub: "(\L. isLub S cl L) \ isLub S cl (lub S cl)"
  by (simp add: lub_def least_def isLub_def some_eq_ex [symmetric])

lemma isGlb_glb: "(\G. isGlb S cl G) \ isGlb S cl (glb S cl)"
  by (simp add: glb_def greatest_def isGlb_def some_eq_ex [symmetric])

lemma isGlb_dual_isLub: "isGlb S cl = isLub S (dual cl)"
  by (simp add: isLub_def isGlb_def dual_def converse_unfold)

lemma isLub_dual_isGlb: "isLub S cl = isGlb S (dual cl)"
  by (simp add: isLub_def isGlb_def dual_def converse_unfold)

lemma (in PO) dualPO: "dual cl \ PartialOrder"
  using cl_po by (simp add: PartialOrder_def dual_def)

lemma Rdual:
  assumes major: "\S. S \ A \ \L. isLub S po L" and "S \ A" and "A = pset po"
  shows "\G. isGlb S po G"
proof
  show "isGlb S po (lub {y \ A. \k\S. (y, k) \ order po} po)"
    using major [of "{y. y \ A \ (\k \ S. (y, k) \ order po)}"] \S \ A\ \A = pset po\
    apply (simp add: isLub_lub isGlb_def)
    apply (auto simp add: isLub_def)
    done
qed

lemma lub_dual_glb: "lub S cl = glb S (dual cl)"
  by (simp add: lub_def glb_def least_def greatest_def dual_def converse_unfold)

lemma glb_dual_lub: "glb S cl = lub S (dual cl)"
  by (simp add: lub_def glb_def least_def greatest_def dual_def converse_unfold)

lemma CL_subset_PO: "CompleteLattice \ PartialOrder"
  by (auto simp: PartialOrder_def CompleteLattice_def)

lemmas CL_imp_PO = CL_subset_PO [THEN subsetD]

context CL
begin

lemma CO_refl_on: "refl_on A r"
  by (rule PO_imp_refl_on)

lemma CO_antisym: "antisym r"
  by (rule PO_imp_sym)

lemma CO_trans: "trans r"
  by (rule PO_imp_trans)

end

lemma CompleteLatticeI:
  "\po \ PartialOrder; \S. S \ pset po \ (\L. isLub S po L);
     \<forall>S. S \<subseteq> pset po \<longrightarrow> (\<exists>G. isGlb S po G)\<rbrakk>
    \<Longrightarrow> po \<in> CompleteLattice"
  unfolding CompleteLattice_def by blast

lemma (in CL) CL_dualCL: "dual cl \ CompleteLattice"
  using cl_co
  apply (simp add: CompleteLattice_def dual_def)
  apply (simp add: dualPO flip: dual_def isLub_dual_isGlb isGlb_dual_isLub)
  done

context PO
begin

lemma dualA_iff [simp]: "pset (dual cl) = pset cl"
  by (simp add: dual_def)

lemma dualr_iff [simp]: "(x, y) \ (order (dual cl)) \ (y, x) \ order cl"
  by (simp add: dual_def)

lemma monotone_dual:
  "monotone f (pset cl) (order cl) \ monotone f (pset (dual cl)) (order(dual cl))"
  by (simp add: monotone_def)

lemma interval_dual: "\x \ A; y \ A\ \ interval r x y = interval (order(dual cl)) y x"
  unfolding interval_def dualr_iff by (auto simp flip: r_def)

lemma interval_not_empty: "interval r a b \ {} \ (a, b) \ r"
  by (simp add: interval_def) (use transE in blast)

lemma interval_imp_mem: "x \ interval r a b \ (a, x) \ r"
  by (simp add: interval_def)

lemma left_in_interval: "\a \ A; b \ A; interval r a b \ {}\ \ a \ interval r a b"
  using interval_def interval_not_empty reflE by fastforce

lemma right_in_interval: "\a \ A; b \ A; interval r a b \ {}\ \ b \ interval r a b"
  by (simp add: A_def PO.dual PO.left_in_interval PO_axioms interval_dual)

end

subsection \<open>sublattice\<close>

lemma (in PO) sublattice_imp_CL:
  "S <<= cl \ \pset = S, order = induced S r\ \ CompleteLattice"
  by (simp add: sublattice_def CompleteLattice_def r_def)

lemma (in CL) sublatticeI:
  "\S \ A; \pset = S, order = induced S r\ \ CompleteLattice\ \ S <<= cl"
  by (simp add: sublattice_def A_def r_def)

lemma (in CL) dual: "CL (dual cl)"
proof
  show "dual cl \ CompleteLattice"
  using cl_co
  by (simp add: CompleteLattice_def dualPO flip: isGlb_dual_isLub isLub_dual_isGlb)
qed

subsection \<open>lub\<close>

context CL
begin

lemma lub_unique: "\S \ A; isLub S cl x; isLub S cl L\ \ x = L"
  by (rule antisymE) (auto simp add: isLub_def r_def)

lemma lub_upper:
  assumes "S \ A" "x \ S" shows "(x, lub S cl) \ r"
proof -
  obtain L where "isLub S cl L"
    using CL_imp_ex_isLub \<open>S \<subseteq> A\<close> by auto
  then show ?thesis
    by (metis assms(2) isLub_def isLub_lub r_def)
qed

lemma lub_least:
  assumes "S \ A" and L: "L \ A" "\x \ S. (x, L) \ r" shows "(lub S cl, L) \ r"
proof -
  obtain L' where "isLub S cl L'"
    using CL_imp_ex_isLub \<open>S \<subseteq> A\<close> by auto
  then show ?thesis
    by (metis A_def L isLub_def isLub_lub r_def)
qed

lemma lub_in_lattice:
  assumes "S \ A" shows "lub S cl \ A"
proof -
  obtain L where "isLub S cl L"
    using CL_imp_ex_isLub \<open>S \<subseteq> A\<close> by auto
  then show ?thesis
    by (metis A_def isLub_def isLub_lub)
qed

lemma lubI:
  assumes A: "S \ A" "L \ A" and r: "\x \ S. (x, L) \ r"
     and clo: "\z. \z \ A; (\y \ S. (y, z) \ r)\ \ (L, z) \ r"
   shows "L = lub S cl"
proof -
  obtain L where "isLub S cl L"
    using CL_imp_ex_isLub assms(1) by auto
  then show ?thesis
    by (simp add: antisymE A clo lub_in_lattice lub_least lub_upper r)
qed

lemma lubIa: "\S \ A; isLub S cl L\ \ L = lub S cl"
  by (meson isLub_lub lub_unique)

lemma isLub_in_lattice: "isLub S cl L \ L \ A"
  by (simp add: isLub_def  A_def)

lemma isLub_upper: "\isLub S cl L; y \ S\ \ (y, L) \ r"
  by (simp add: isLub_def r_def)

lemma isLub_least: "\isLub S cl L; z \ A; \y \ S. (y, z) \ r\ \ (L, z) \ r"
  by (simp add: isLub_def A_def r_def)

lemma isLubI:
  "\L \ A; \y \ S. (y, L) \ r; (\z \ A. (\y \ S. (y, z)\r) \ (L, z) \ r)\ \ isLub S cl L"
  by (simp add: isLub_def A_def r_def)

end

subsection \<open>glb\<close>

context CL
begin

lemma glb_in_lattice: "S \ A \ glb S cl \ A"
  by (metis A_def CL.lub_in_lattice dualA_iff glb_dual_lub local.dual)

lemma glb_lower: "\S \ A; x \ S\ \ (glb S cl, x) \ r"
  by (metis A_def CL.lub_upper dualA_iff dualr_iff glb_dual_lub local.dual r_def)

end

text \<open>
  Reduce the sublattice property by using substructural properties;
  abandoned see \<open>Tarski_4.ML\<close>.
\<close>

context CLF
begin

lemma [simp]: "f \ pset cl \ pset cl \ monotone f (pset cl) (order cl)"
  using f_cl by (simp add: CLF_set_def)

declare f_cl [simp]

lemma f_in_funcset: "f \ A \ A"
  by (simp add: A_def)

lemma monotone_f: "monotone f A r"
  by (simp add: A_def r_def)

lemma CLF_dual: "(dual cl, f) \ CLF_set"
proof -
  have "Tarski.monotone f A (order (dual cl))"
    by (metis (no_types) A_def PO.monotone_dual PO_axioms dualA_iff monotone_f r_def)
  then show ?thesis
    by (simp add: A_def CLF_set_def CL_dualCL)
qed

lemma dual: "CLF (dual cl) f"
  by (rule CLF.intro) (rule CLF_dual)

end

subsection \<open>fixed points\<close>

lemma fix_subset: "fix f A \ A"
  by (auto simp: fix_def)

lemma fix_imp_eq: "x \ fix f A \ f x = x"
  by (simp add: fix_def)

lemma fixf_subset: "\A \ B; x \ fix (\y \ A. f y) A\ \ x \ fix f B"
  by (auto simp: fix_def)

subsection \<open>lemmas for Tarski, lub\<close>

context CLF
begin

lemma lubH_le_flubH:
  assumes "H = {x \ A. (x, f x) \ r}"
  shows "(lub H cl, f (lub H cl)) \ r"
proof (intro lub_least ballI)
  show "H \ A"
    using assms
    by auto
  show "f (lub H cl) \ A"
    using \<open>H \<subseteq> A\<close> f_in_funcset lub_in_lattice by auto
  show "(x, f (lub H cl)) \ r" if "x \ H" for x
  proof -
    have "(f x, f (lub H cl)) \ r"
      by (meson \<open>H \<subseteq> A\<close> in_mono lub_in_lattice lub_upper monotoneE monotone_f that)
    moreover have "(x, f x) \ r"
      using assms that by blast
    ultimately show ?thesis
      using po.transE by blast
  qed
qed

lemma lubH_is_fixp:
  assumes "H = {x \ A. (x, f x) \ r}"
  shows "lub H cl \ fix f A"
proof -
  have "(f (lub H cl), lub H cl) \ r"
  proof -
    have "(lub H cl, f (lub H cl)) \ r"
      using assms lubH_le_flubH by blast
    then have "(f (lub H cl), f (f (lub H cl))) \ r"
      by (meson PO_imp_refl_on monotoneE monotone_f refl_on_domain)
    then have "f (lub H cl) \ H"
      by (metis (no_types, lifting) PO_imp_refl_on assms mem_Collect_eq refl_on_domain)
    then show ?thesis
      by (simp add: assms lub_upper)
  qed
  with assms show ?thesis
    by (simp add: fix_def antisymE lubH_le_flubH lub_in_lattice)
qed

lemma fixf_le_lubH:
  assumes "H = {x \ A. (x, f x) \ r}" "x \ fix f A"
  shows "(x, lub H cl) \ r"
proof -
  have "x \ P \ x \ H"
    by (simp add: assms P_def fix_imp_eq [of _ f A] reflE fix_subset [of f A, THEN subsetD])
  with assms show ?thesis
    by (metis (no_types, lifting) P_def lub_upper mem_Collect_eq subset_eq)
qed

subsection \<open>Tarski fixpoint theorem 1, first part\<close>

lemma T_thm_1_lub: "lub P cl = lub {x \ A. (x, f x) \ r} cl"
proof -
  have "lub {x \ A. (x, f x) \ r} cl = lub (fix f A) cl"
  proof (rule antisymE)
    show "(lub {x \ A. (x, f x) \ r} cl, lub (fix f A) cl) \ r"
      by (simp add: fix_subset lubH_is_fixp lub_upper)
    have "\a. a \ fix f A \ a \ A"
      by (meson fix_subset subset_iff)
    then show "(lub (fix f A) cl, lub {x \ A. (x, f x) \ r} cl) \ r"
      by (simp add: fix_subset fixf_le_lubH lubH_is_fixp lub_least)
  qed
  then show ?thesis
    using P_def by auto
qed

lemma glbH_is_fixp:
  assumes "H = {x \ A. (f x, x) \ r}" shows "glb H cl \ P"
  \<comment> \<open>Tarski for glb\<close>
proof -
  have "glb H cl \ fix f (pset (dual cl))"
    using assms CLF.lubH_is_fixp [OF dual] PO.dualr_iff PO_axioms
    by (fastforce simp add: A_def r_def glb_dual_lub)
  then show ?thesis
    by (simp add: A_def P_def)
qed

lemma T_thm_1_glb: "glb P cl = glb {x \ A. (f x, x) \ r} cl"
  unfolding glb_dual_lub P_def A_def r_def
  using CLF.T_thm_1_lub dualA_iff dualr_iff local.dual by force

subsection \<open>interval\<close>

lemma rel_imp_elem: "(x, y) \ r \ x \ A"
  using CO_refl_on by (auto simp: refl_on_def)

lemma interval_subset: "\a \ A; b \ A\ \ interval r a b \ A"
  by (simp add: interval_def) (blast intro: rel_imp_elem)

lemma intervalI: "\(a, x) \ r; (x, b) \ r\ \ x \ interval r a b"
  by (simp add: interval_def)

lemma interval_lemma1: "\S \ interval r a b; x \ S\ \ (a, x) \ r"
  unfolding interval_def by fast

lemma interval_lemma2: "\S \ interval r a b; x \ S\ \ (x, b) \ r"
  unfolding interval_def by fast

lemma a_less_lub: "\S \ A; S \ {}; \x \ S. (a,x) \ r; \y \ S. (y, L) \ r\ \ (a, L) \ r"
  by (blast intro: transE)

lemma S_intv_cl: "\a \ A; b \ A; S \ interval r a b\ \ S \ A"
  by (simp add: subset_trans [OF _ interval_subset])

lemma L_in_interval:
  assumes "b \ A" and S: "S \ interval r a b" "isLub S cl L" "S \ {}"
  shows "L \ interval r a b"
proof (rule intervalI)
  show "(a, L) \ r"
    by (meson PO_imp_trans all_not_in_conv S interval_lemma1 isLub_upper transD)
  show "(L, b) \ r"
    using \<open>b \<in> A\<close> assms interval_lemma2 isLub_least by auto
qed

lemma G_in_interval:
  assumes "b \ A" and S: "S \ interval r a b" "isGlb S cl G" "S \ {}"
  shows "G \ interval r a b"
proof -
  have "a \ A"
    using S(1) \<open>S \<noteq> {}\<close> interval_lemma1 rel_imp_elem by blast
  with assms show ?thesis
    by (metis (no_types) A_def CLF.L_in_interval dualA_iff interval_dual isGlb_dual_isLub local.dual)
qed

lemma intervalPO:
  "\a \ A; b \ A; interval r a b \ {}\
    \<Longrightarrow> \<lparr>pset = interval r a b, order = induced (interval r a b) r\<rparr> \<in> PartialOrder"
  by (rule po_subset_po) (simp add: interval_subset)

lemma intv_CL_lub:
  assumes "a \ A" "b \ A" "interval r a b \ {}" and S: "S \ interval r a b"
  shows "\L. isLub S \pset = interval r a b, order = induced (interval r a b) r\ L"
proof -
  obtain L where L: "isLub S cl L"
    by (meson CL_imp_ex_isLub S_intv_cl assms(1) assms(2) assms(4))
  show ?thesis
    unfolding isLub_def potype.simps
    proof (intro exI impI conjI ballI)
    let ?L = "(if S = {} then a else L)"
    show Lin: "?L \ interval r a b"
      using L L_in_interval assms left_in_interval by auto
    show "(y, ?L) \ induced (interval r a b) r" if "y \ S" for y
    proof -
      have "S \ {}"
        using that by blast
      then show ?thesis
        using L Lin S indI isLub_upper that by auto
    qed
  show "(?L, z) \ induced (interval r a b) r"
    if "z \ interval r a b" and "\y\S. (y, z) \ induced (interval r a b) r" for z
      using that L
      apply (simp add: isLub_def induced_def interval_imp_mem)
      by (metis (full_types) A_def Lin \<open>a \<in> A\<close> \<open>b \<in> A\<close> interval_subset r_def subset_eq)
  qed
qed

lemmas intv_CL_glb = intv_CL_lub [THEN Rdual]

lemma interval_is_sublattice: "\a \ A; b \ A; interval r a b \ {}\ \ interval r a b <<= cl"
  apply (rule sublatticeI)
   apply (simp add: interval_subset)
  by (simp add: CompleteLatticeI intervalPO intv_CL_glb intv_CL_lub)

lemmas interv_is_compl_latt = interval_is_sublattice [THEN sublattice_imp_CL]

subsection \<open>Top and Bottom\<close>

lemma Top_dual_Bot: "Top cl = Bot (dual cl)"
  by (simp add: Top_def Bot_def least_def greatest_def)

lemma Bot_dual_Top: "Bot cl = Top (dual cl)"
  by (simp add: Top_def Bot_def least_def greatest_def)

lemma Bot_in_lattice: "Bot cl \ A"
  unfolding Bot_def least_def
  apply (rule_tac a = "glb A cl" in someI2)
  using glb_in_lattice glb_lower by (auto simp: A_def r_def)

lemma Top_in_lattice: "Top cl \ A"
  using A_def CLF.Bot_in_lattice Top_dual_Bot local.dual by force

lemma Top_prop: "x \ A \ (x, Top cl) \ r"
  unfolding Top_def greatest_def
  apply (rule_tac a = "lub A cl" in someI2)
  using lub_in_lattice lub_upper by (auto simp: A_def r_def)

lemma Bot_prop: "x \ A \ (Bot cl, x) \ r"
  using A_def Bot_dual_Top CLF.Top_prop dualA_iff dualr_iff local.dual r_def by fastforce

lemma Top_intv_not_empty: "x \ A \ interval r x (Top cl) \ {}"
  using Top_prop intervalI reflE by force

lemma Bot_intv_not_empty: "x \ A \ interval r (Bot cl) x \ {}"
  using Bot_dual_Top Bot_prop intervalI reflE by fastforce

text \<open>the set of fixed points form a partial order\<close>
proposition fixf_po: "\pset = P, order = induced P r\ \ PartialOrder"
  by (simp add: P_def fix_subset po_subset_po)

end

context Tarski
begin

lemma Y_subset_A: "Y \ A"
  by (rule subset_trans [OF _ fix_subset]) (rule Y_ss [simplified P_def])

lemma lubY_in_A: "lub Y cl \ A"
  by (rule Y_subset_A [THEN lub_in_lattice])

lemma lubY_le_flubY: "(lub Y cl, f (lub Y cl)) \ r"
proof (intro lub_least Y_subset_A ballI)
  show "f (lub Y cl) \ A"
    by (meson Tarski.monotone_def lubY_in_A monotone_f reflE rel_imp_elem)
  show "(x, f (lub Y cl)) \ r" if "x \ Y" for x
  proof
    have "\A. Y \ A \ x \ A"
      using that by blast
    moreover have "(x, lub Y cl) \ r"
      using that by (simp add: Y_subset_A lub_upper)
    ultimately show "(x, f (lub Y cl)) \ r"
      by (metis (no_types) Tarski.Y_ss Tarski_axioms Y_subset_A fix_imp_eq lubY_in_A monotoneE monotone_f)
  qed auto
qed

lemma intY1_subset: "intY1 \ A"
  unfolding intY1_def using Top_in_lattice interval_subset lubY_in_A by auto

lemmas intY1_elem = intY1_subset [THEN subsetD]

lemma intY1_f_closed:
  assumes "x \ intY1" shows "f x \ intY1"
proof (simp add: intY1_def interval_def, rule conjI)
  show "(lub Y cl, f x) \ r"
    using assms intY1_elem interval_imp_mem lubY_in_A unfolding intY1_def
    using lubY_le_flubY monotoneE monotone_f po.transE by blast
  then show "(f x, Top cl) \ r"
    by (meson PO_imp_refl_on Top_prop refl_onD2)
qed

lemma intY1_mono: "monotone (\ x \ intY1. f x) intY1 (induced intY1 r)"
  apply (auto simp add: monotone_def induced_def intY1_f_closed)
  apply (blast intro: intY1_elem monotone_f [THEN monotoneE])
  done

lemma intY1_is_cl: "\pset = intY1, order = induced intY1 r\ \ CompleteLattice"
  unfolding intY1_def
  by (simp add: Top_in_lattice Top_intv_not_empty interv_is_compl_latt lubY_in_A)

lemma v_in_P: "v \ P"
proof -
  have "v \ fix (restrict f intY1) intY1"
    unfolding v_def
    apply (rule CLF.glbH_is_fixp
        [OF CLF.intro, unfolded CLF_set_def, of "\pset = intY1, order = induced intY1 r\", simplified])
    using intY1_f_closed intY1_is_cl intY1_mono apply blast+
    done
  then show ?thesis
    unfolding P_def
  by (meson fixf_subset intY1_subset)
qed

lemma z_in_interval: "\z \ P; \y\Y. (y, z) \ induced P r\ \ z \ intY1"
  unfolding intY1_def P_def
  by (meson Top_prop Y_subset_A fix_subset in_mono indE intervalI lub_least)

lemma tarski_full_lemma: "\L. isLub Y \pset = P, order = induced P r\ L"
proof
  have "(y, v) \ induced P r" if "y \ Y" for y
  proof -
    have "(y, lub Y cl) \ r"
      by (simp add: Y_subset_A lub_upper that)
    moreover have "(lub Y cl, v) \ r"
      by (metis (no_types, lifting) CL.glb_in_lattice CL.intro intY1_def intY1_is_cl interval_imp_mem lub_dual_glb mem_Collect_eq select_convs(1) subsetI v_def)
    ultimately have "(y, v) \ r"
      using po.transE by blast
    then show ?thesis
      using Y_ss indI that v_in_P by auto
  qed
  moreover have "(v, z) \ induced P r" if "z \ P" "\y\Y. (y, z) \ induced P r" for z
  proof (rule indI)
    have "((\x \ intY1. f x) z, z) \ induced intY1 r"
      by (metis P_def fix_imp_eq in_mono indI intY1_subset reflE restrict_apply' that z_in_interval)
    then show "(v, z) \ r"
      by (metis (no_types, lifting) CL.glb_lower CL_def indE intY1_is_cl intY1_subset mem_Collect_eq select_convs(1,2) subsetI that v_def z_in_interval)
  qed (auto simp: that v_in_P)
  ultimately
  show "isLub Y \pset = P, order = induced P r\ v"
    by (simp add: isLub_def v_in_P)
qed

end

lemma CompleteLatticeI_simp:
  "\po \ PartialOrder; \S. S \ A \ \L. isLub S po L; A = pset po\ \ po \ CompleteLattice"
  by (metis CompleteLatticeI Rdual)

theorem (in CLF) Tarski_full: "\pset = P, order = induced P r\ \ CompleteLattice"
proof (intro CompleteLatticeI_simp allI impI)
  show "\pset = P, order = induced P r\ \ PartialOrder"
    by (simp add: fixf_po)
  show "\S. S \ P \ \L. isLub S \pset = P, order = induced P r\ L"
    unfolding P_def A_def r_def
  proof (rule Tarski.tarski_full_lemma [OF Tarski.intro [OF _ Tarski_axioms.intro]])
    show "CLF cl f" ..
  qed
qed auto

end

¤ Dauer der Verarbeitung: 0.7 Sekunden (vorverarbeitet) ¤

Druckansicht unsichere Verbindung
Druckansicht sprechenden Kalenders
in der Quellcodebibliothek suchen

Haftungshinweis

Die Informationen auf dieser Webseite wurden nach bestem Wissen sorgfältig zusammengestellt. Es wird jedoch weder Vollständigkeit, noch Richtigkeit, noch Qualität der bereit gestellten Informationen zugesichert.

Bemerkung:

Die farbliche Syntaxdarstellung ist noch experimentell.