(* Title: HOL/Library/Nonpos_Ints.thy Author: Manuel Eberl, TU München *)
section‹Non-negative, non-positive integers and reals›
theory Nonpos_Ints imports Complex_Main begin
subsection‹Non-positive integers› text‹ The set of non-positive integers on a ring. (in analogy to the set of non-negative integers 🍋‹ℕ›) This is useful e.g. for the Gamma function. ›
definition nonpos_Ints (‹ℤ🪙≤🪙0›) where"ℤ🪙≤🪙0 = {of_int n |n. n ≤ 0}"
lemma neg_numeral_in_nonpos_Ints [simp,intro]: "-numeral n ∈ℤ🪙≤🪙0" unfolding nonpos_Ints_def by (auto intro!: exI[of _ "-numeral n::int"])
lemma one_notin_nonpos_Ints [simp]: "(1 :: 'a :: ring_char_0) ∉ℤ🪙≤🪙0" by (auto simp: nonpos_Ints_def)
lemma numeral_notin_nonpos_Ints [simp]: "(numeral n :: 'a :: ring_char_0) ∉ℤ🪙≤🪙0" by (auto simp: nonpos_Ints_def)
lemma minus_of_nat_in_nonpos_Ints [simp, intro]: "- of_nat n ∈ℤ🪙≤🪙0" proof - have"- of_nat n = of_int (-int n)"by simp alsohave"-int n ≤ 0"by simp hence"of_int (-int n) ∈ℤ🪙≤🪙0"unfolding nonpos_Ints_def by blast finallyshow ?thesis . qed
lemma of_nat_in_nonpos_Ints_iff: "(of_nat n :: 'a :: {ring_1,ring_char_0}) ∈ℤ🪙≤??0 ⟷ n = 0" proof assume"(of_nat n :: 'a) ∈ℤ🪙≤🪙0" thenobtain m where"of_nat n = (of_int m :: 'a)""m ≤ 0"by (auto simp: nonpos_Ints_def) hence"(of_int m :: 'a) = of_nat n"by simp alsohave"... = of_int (int n)"by simp finallyhave"m = int n"by (subst (asm) of_int_eq_iff) with‹m ≤ 0›show"n = 0"by auto qed simp
lemma nonpos_Ints_of_int: "n ≤ 0 ==> of_int n ∈ℤ🪙≤🪙0" unfolding nonpos_Ints_def by blast
lemma nonpos_IntsI: "x ∈ℤ==> x ≤ 0 ==> (x :: 'a :: linordered_idom) ∈ℤ🪙≤🪙0" unfolding nonpos_Ints_def Ints_def by auto
lemma nonpos_Ints_subset_Ints: "ℤ🪙≤🪙0 ⊆ℤ" unfolding nonpos_Ints_def Ints_def by blast
lemma nonpos_Ints_nonpos [dest]: "x ∈ℤ🪙≤🪙0 ==> x ≤ (0 :: 'a :: linordered_idom)" unfolding nonpos_Ints_def by auto
lemma nonpos_Ints_Int [dest]: "x ∈ℤ🪙≤🪙0 ==> x ∈ℤ" unfolding nonpos_Ints_def Ints_def by blast
lemma nonpos_Ints_cases: assumes"x ∈ℤ🪙≤🪙0" obtains n where"x = of_int n""n ≤ 0" using assms unfolding nonpos_Ints_def by (auto elim!: Ints_cases)
lemma nonpos_Ints_cases': assumes"x ∈ℤ🪙≤🪙0" obtains n where"x = -of_nat n" proof - from assms obtain m where"x = of_int m"and m: "m ≤ 0"by (auto elim!: nonpos_Ints_cases) hence"x = - of_int (-m)"by auto alsofrom m have"(of_int (-m) :: 'a) = of_nat (nat (-m))"by simp_all finallyshow ?thesis by (rule that) qed
lemma of_real_in_nonpos_Ints_iff: "(of_real x :: 'a :: real_algebra_1) ∈ℤ🪙≤🪙0 ⟷ x ∈ℤ🪙≤🪙0" proof assume"of_real x ∈ (ℤ🪙≤🪙0 :: 'a set)" thenobtain n where"(of_real x :: 'a) = of_int n""n ≤ 0"by (erule nonpos_Ints_cases) note‹of_real x = of_int n› alsohave"of_int n = of_real (of_int n)"by (rule of_real_of_int_eq [symmetric]) finallyhave"x = of_int n"by (subst (asm) of_real_eq_iff) with‹n ≤ 0›show"x ∈ℤ🪙≤🪙0"by (simp add: nonpos_Ints_of_int) qed (auto elim!: nonpos_Ints_cases intro!: nonpos_Ints_of_int)
lemma nonpos_Ints_altdef: "ℤ🪙≤🪙0 = {n ∈ℤ. (n :: 'a :: linordered_idom) ≤ 0}" by (auto intro!: nonpos_IntsI elim!: nonpos_Ints_cases)
lemma uminus_in_Nats_iff: "-x ∈ℕ⟷ x ∈ℤ🪙≤🪙0" proof assume"-x ∈ℕ" thenobtain n where"n ≥ 0""-x = of_int n"by (auto simp: Nats_altdef1) hence"-n ≤ 0""x = of_int (-n)"by (simp_all add: eq_commute minus_equation_iff[of x]) thus"x ∈ℤ🪙≤🪙0"unfolding nonpos_Ints_def by blast next assume"x ∈ℤ🪙≤🪙0" thenobtain n where"n ≤ 0""x = of_int n"by (auto simp: nonpos_Ints_def) hence"-n ≥ 0""-x = of_int (-n)"by (simp_all add: eq_commute minus_equation_iff[of x]) thus"-x ∈ℕ"unfolding Nats_altdef1 by blast qed
lemma uminus_in_nonpos_Ints_iff: "-x ∈ℤ🪙≤🪙0 ⟷ x ∈ℕ" using uminus_in_Nats_iff[of "-x"] by simp
lemma nonpos_Ints_mult: "x ∈ℤ🪙≤🪙0 ==> y ∈ℤ🪙≤🪙0 ==> x * y ∈ℕ" using Nats_mult[of "-x""-y"] by (simp add: uminus_in_Nats_iff)
lemma Nats_mult_nonpos_Ints: "x ∈ℕ==> y ∈ℤ🪙≤🪙0 ==> x * y ∈ℤ🪙≤🪙0" using Nats_mult[of x "-y"] by (simp add: uminus_in_Nats_iff)
lemma nonpos_Ints_mult_Nats: "x ∈ℤ🪙≤🪙0 ==> y ∈ℕ==> x * y ∈ℤ🪙≤🪙0" using Nats_mult[of "-x" y] by (simp add: uminus_in_Nats_iff)
lemma nonpos_Ints_add: "x ∈ℤ🪙≤🪙0 ==> y ∈ℤ🪙≤🪙0 ==> x + y ∈ℤ🪙≤🪙0" using Nats_add[of "-x""-y"] uminus_in_Nats_iff[of "y+x", simplified minus_add] by (simp add: uminus_in_Nats_iff add.commute)
lemma nonpos_Ints_diff_Nats: "x ∈ℤ🪙≤🪙0 ==> y ∈ℕ==> x - y ∈ℤ🪙≤🪙0" using Nats_add[of "-x""y"] uminus_in_Nats_iff[of "x-y", simplified minus_add] by (simp add: uminus_in_Nats_iff add.commute)
lemma Nats_diff_nonpos_Ints: "x ∈ℕ==> y ∈ℤ🪙≤🪙0 ==> x - y ∈ℕ" using Nats_add[of "x""-y"] by (simp add: uminus_in_Nats_iff add.commute)
lemma plus_of_nat_eq_0_imp: "z + of_nat n = 0 ==> z ∈ℤ🪙≤🪙0" proof - assume"z + of_nat n = 0" hence A: "z = - of_nat n"by (simp add: eq_neg_iff_add_eq_0) show"z ∈ℤ🪙≤🪙0"by (subst A) simp qed
subsection‹Non-negative reals›
definition nonneg_Reals :: "'a::real_algebra_1 set" (‹ℝ🪙≥🪙0›) where"ℝ🪙≥🪙0 = {of_real r | r. r ≥ 0}"
lemma nonneg_Reals_of_real_iff [simp]: "of_real r ∈ℝ🪙≥🪙0 ⟷ r ≥ 0" by (force simp add: nonneg_Reals_def)
lemma nonneg_Reals_subset_Reals: "ℝ🪙≥🪙0 ⊆ℝ" unfolding nonneg_Reals_def Reals_def by blast
lemma nonneg_Reals_Real [dest]: "x ∈ℝ🪙≥🪙0 ==> x ∈ℝ" unfolding nonneg_Reals_def Reals_def by blast
lemma nonneg_Reals_of_nat_I [simp]: "of_nat n ∈ℝ🪙≥🪙0" by (metis nonneg_Reals_of_real_iff of_nat_0_le_iff of_real_of_nat_eq)
lemma nonneg_Reals_cases: assumes"x ∈ℝ🪙≥🪙0" obtains r where"x = of_real r""r ≥ 0" using assms unfolding nonneg_Reals_def by (auto elim!: Reals_cases)
lemma nonneg_Reals_zero_I [simp]: "0 ∈ℝ🪙≥🪙0" unfolding nonneg_Reals_def by auto
lemma uminus_nonpos_Reals_iff [simp]: "-x ∈ℝ🪙≤🪙0 ⟷ x ∈ℝ🪙≥🪙0" by (metis (no_types) minus_minus uminus_nonneg_Reals_iff)
lemma nonpos_Reals_zero_I [simp]: "0 ∈ℝ🪙≤🪙0" unfolding nonpos_Reals_def by force
lemma nonpos_Reals_one_I [simp]: "1 ∉ℝ🪙≤🪙0" using nonneg_Reals_minus_one_I uminus_nonneg_Reals_iff by blast
lemma nonpos_Reals_numeral_I [simp]: "numeral w ∉ℝ🪙≤🪙0" using nonneg_Reals_minus_numeral_I uminus_nonneg_Reals_iff by blast
lemma nonpos_Reals_add_I [simp]: "[a ∈ℝ🪙≤🪙0; b ∈ℝ🪙≤🪙0]==> a + b ∈ℝ🪙≤🪙0" by (metis nonneg_Reals_add_I add_uminus_conv_diff minus_diff_eq minus_minus uminus_nonpos_Reals_iff)
lemma nonpos_Reals_mult_I1: "[a ∈ℝ🪙≥🪙0; b ∈ℝ🪙≤🪙0]==> a * b ∈ℝ🪙≤🪙0" by (metis nonneg_Reals_mult_I mult_minus_right uminus_nonneg_Reals_iff)
lemma nonpos_Reals_mult_I2: "[a ∈ℝ🪙≤🪙0; b ∈ℝ🪙≥🪙0]==> a * b ∈ℝ🪙≤🪙0" by (metis nonneg_Reals_mult_I mult_minus_left uminus_nonneg_Reals_iff)
lemma nonpos_Reals_inverse_I: fixes a :: "'a::real_div_algebra" shows"a ∈ℝ🪙≤🪙0 ==> inverse a ∈ℝ🪙≤🪙0" using nonneg_Reals_inverse_I uminus_nonneg_Reals_iff by fastforce
lemma nonpos_Reals_divide_I1: fixes a :: "'a::real_div_algebra" shows"[a ∈ℝ🪙≥🪙0; b ∈ℝ🪙≤🪙0]==> a / b ∈ℝ🪙≤🪙0" by (simp add: nonpos_Reals_inverse_I nonpos_Reals_mult_I1 divide_inverse)
lemma nonpos_Reals_divide_I2: fixes a :: "'a::real_div_algebra" shows"[a ∈ℝ🪙≤🪙0; b ∈ℝ🪙≥🪙0]==> a / b ∈ℝ🪙≤🪙0" by (metis nonneg_Reals_divide_I minus_divide_left uminus_nonneg_Reals_iff)
lemma complex_nonpos_Reals_iff: "z ∈ℝ🪙≤🪙0 ⟷ Re z ≤ 0 ∧ Im z = 0" using complex_is_Real_iff by (force simp add: nonpos_Reals_def)
lemma ii_not_nonpos_Reals [iff]: "i∉ℝ🪙≤🪙0" by (simp add: complex_nonpos_Reals_iff)
lemma plus_one_in_nonpos_Ints_imp: "z + 1 ∈ℤ🪙≤🪙0 ==> z ∈ℤ🪙≤🪙0" using nonpos_Ints_diff_Nats[of "z+1""1"] by simp_all
lemma of_int_in_nonpos_Ints_iff: "(of_int n :: 'a :: ring_char_0) ∈ℤ🪙≤🪙0 ⟷ n ≤ 0" by (auto simp: nonpos_Ints_def)
lemma one_plus_of_int_in_nonpos_Ints_iff: "(1 + of_int n :: 'a :: ring_char_0) ∈ℤ🪙≤🪙0 ⟷ n ≤ -1" proof - have"1 + of_int n = (of_int (n + 1) :: 'a)"by simp alsohave"…∈ℤ🪙≤🪙0 ⟷ n + 1 ≤ 0"by (subst of_int_in_nonpos_Ints_iff) simp_all alsohave"…⟷ n ≤ -1"by presburger finallyshow ?thesis . qed
lemma one_minus_of_nat_in_nonpos_Ints_iff: "(1 - of_nat n :: 'a :: ring_char_0) ∈ℤ🪙≤🪙0 ⟷ n > 0" proof - have"(1 - of_nat n :: 'a) = of_int (1 - int n)"by simp alsohave"…∈ℤ🪙≤🪙0 ⟷ n > 0"by (subst of_int_in_nonpos_Ints_iff) presburger finallyshow ?thesis . qed
lemma fraction_not_in_Nats: assumes"¬n dvd m""n ≠ 0" shows"of_int m / of_int n ∉ (ℕ :: 'a :: {division_ring,ring_char_0} set)" proof assume"of_int m / of_int n ∈ (ℕ :: 'a set)" alsonote Nats_subset_Ints finallyhave"of_int m / of_int n ∈ (ℤ :: 'a set)" . moreoverhave"of_int m / of_int n ∉ (ℤ :: 'a set)" using assms by (intro fraction_not_in_Ints) ultimatelyshow False by contradiction qed
lemma not_in_Ints_imp_not_in_nonpos_Ints: "z ∉ℤ==> z ∉ℤ🪙≤🪙0" by (auto simp: Ints_def nonpos_Ints_def)
lemma double_in_nonpos_Ints_imp: assumes"2 * (z :: 'a :: field_char_0) ∈ℤ🪙≤🪙0" shows"z ∈ℤ🪙≤🪙0 ∨ z + 1/2 ∈ℤ🪙≤🪙0"
proof- from assms obtain k where k: "2 * z = - of_nat k"by (elim nonpos_Ints_cases') thus ?thesis by (cases "even k") (auto elim!: evenE oddE simp: field_simps) qed
lemma fraction_numeral_Ints_iff [simp]: "numeral a / numeral b ∈ (ℤ :: 'a :: {division_ring, ring_char_0} set) ⟷ (numeral b :: int) dvd numeral a" (is"?L=?R") proof show"?L ==> ?R" by (metis fraction_not_in_Ints of_int_numeral zero_neq_numeral) assume ?R thenobtain k::int where"numeral a = numeral b * (of_int k :: 'a)" unfolding dvd_def by (metis of_int_mult of_int_numeral) thenshow ?L by (metis Ints_of_int divide_eq_eq mult.commute of_int_mult of_int_numeral) qed
lemma fraction_numeral_Ints_iff1 [simp]: "1 / numeral b ∈ (ℤ :: 'a :: {division_ring, ring_char_0} set) ⟷ b = Num.One" (is"?L=?R") using fraction_numeral_Ints_iff [of Num.One, where 'a='a] by simp
lemma fraction_numeral_Nats_iff [simp]: "numeral a / numeral b ∈ (ℕ :: 'a :: {division_ring, ring_char_0} set) ⟷ (numeral b :: int) dvd numeral a" (is"?L=?R") proof show"?L ==> ?R" using Nats_subset_Ints fraction_numeral_Ints_iff by blast assume ?R thenobtain k::nat where"numeral a = numeral b * (of_nat k :: 'a)" unfolding dvd_def by (metis dvd_def int_dvd_int_iff of_nat_mult of_nat_numeral) thenshow ?L by (metis mult_of_nat_commute nonzero_divide_eq_eq of_nat_in_Nats
zero_neq_numeral) qed
lemma fraction_numeral_Nats_iff1 [simp]: "1 / numeral b ∈ (ℕ :: 'a :: {division_ring, ring_char_0} set) ⟷ b = Num.One" (is"?L=?R") using fraction_numeral_Nats_iff [of Num.One, where 'a='a] by simp
end
Messung V0.5 in Prozent
¤ Dauer der Verarbeitung: 0.18 Sekunden
(vorverarbeitet am 2026-05-03)
¤
Die Informationen auf dieser Webseite wurden
nach bestem Wissen sorgfältig zusammengestellt. Es wird jedoch weder Vollständigkeit, noch Richtigkeit,
noch Qualität der bereit gestellten Informationen zugesichert.
Bemerkung:
Die farbliche Syntaxdarstellung und die Messung sind noch experimentell.