(* Title: HOL/ex/Tarski.thy
Author: Florian Kammüller, Cambridge University Computer Laboratory
*)
section \<open>The Full Theorem of Tarski\<close>
theory Tarski
imports Main "HOL-Library.FuncSet"
begin
text \<open>
Minimal version of lattice theory plus the full theorem of Tarski:
The fixedpoints of a complete lattice themselves form a complete
lattice.
Illustrates first-class theories, using the Sigma representation of
structures. Tidied and converted to Isar by lcp.
\<close>
record 'a potype =
pset :: "'a set"
order :: "('a \ 'a) set"
definition monotone :: "['a \ 'a, 'a set, ('a \ 'a) set] \ bool"
where "monotone f A r \ (\x\A. \y\A. (x, y) \ r \ (f x, f y) \ r)"
definition least :: "['a \ bool, 'a potype] \ 'a"
where "least P po = (SOME x. x \ pset po \ P x \ (\y \ pset po. P y \ (x, y) \ order po))"
definition greatest :: "['a \ bool, 'a potype] \ 'a"
where "greatest P po = (SOME x. x \ pset po \ P x \ (\y \ pset po. P y \ (y, x) \ order po))"
definition lub :: "['a set, 'a potype] \ 'a"
where "lub S po = least (\x. \y\S. (y, x) \ order po) po"
definition glb :: "['a set, 'a potype] \ 'a"
where "glb S po = greatest (\x. \y\S. (x, y) \ order po) po"
definition isLub :: "['a set, 'a potype, 'a] \ bool"
where "isLub S po =
(\<lambda>L. L \<in> pset po \<and> (\<forall>y\<in>S. (y, L) \<in> order po) \<and>
(\<forall>z\<in>pset po. (\<forall>y\<in>S. (y, z) \<in> order po) \<longrightarrow> (L, z) \<in> order po))"
definition isGlb :: "['a set, 'a potype, 'a] \ bool"
where "isGlb S po =
(\<lambda>G. (G \<in> pset po \<and> (\<forall>y\<in>S. (G, y) \<in> order po) \<and>
(\<forall>z \<in> pset po. (\<forall>y\<in>S. (z, y) \<in> order po) \<longrightarrow> (z, G) \<in> order po)))"
definition "fix" :: "['a \ 'a, 'a set] \ 'a set"
where "fix f A = {x. x \ A \ f x = x}"
definition interval :: "[('a \ 'a) set, 'a, 'a] \ 'a set"
where "interval r a b = {x. (a, x) \ r \ (x, b) \ r}"
definition Bot :: "'a potype \ 'a"
where "Bot po = least (\x. True) po"
definition Top :: "'a potype \ 'a"
where "Top po = greatest (\x. True) po"
definition PartialOrder :: "'a potype set"
where "PartialOrder = {P. refl_on (pset P) (order P) \ antisym (order P) \ trans (order P)}"
definition CompleteLattice :: "'a potype set"
where "CompleteLattice =
{cl. cl \<in> PartialOrder \<and>
(\<forall>S. S \<subseteq> pset cl \<longrightarrow> (\<exists>L. isLub S cl L)) \<and>
(\<forall>S. S \<subseteq> pset cl \<longrightarrow> (\<exists>G. isGlb S cl G))}"
definition CLF_set :: "('a potype \ ('a \ 'a)) set"
where "CLF_set =
(SIGMA cl : CompleteLattice.
{f. f \<in> pset cl \<rightarrow> pset cl \<and> monotone f (pset cl) (order cl)})"
definition induced :: "['a set, ('a \ 'a) set] \ ('a \ 'a) set"
where "induced A r = {(a, b). a \ A \ b \ A \ (a, b) \ r}"
definition sublattice :: "('a potype \ 'a set) set"
where "sublattice =
(SIGMA cl : CompleteLattice.
{S. S \<subseteq> pset cl \<and> \<lparr>pset = S, order = induced S (order cl)\<rparr> \<in> CompleteLattice})"
abbreviation sublat :: "['a set, 'a potype] \ bool" ("_ <<= _" [51, 50] 50)
where "S <<= cl \ S \ sublattice `` {cl}"
definition dual :: "'a potype \ 'a potype"
where "dual po = \pset = pset po, order = converse (order po)\"
locale S =
fixes cl :: "'a potype"
and A :: "'a set"
and r :: "('a \ 'a) set"
defines A_def: "A \ pset cl"
and r_def: "r \ order cl"
locale PO = S +
assumes cl_po: "cl \ PartialOrder"
locale CL = S +
assumes cl_co: "cl \ CompleteLattice"
sublocale CL < po?: PO
unfolding A_def r_def
using CompleteLattice_def PO.intro cl_co by fastforce
locale CLF = S +
fixes f :: "'a \ 'a"
and P :: "'a set"
assumes f_cl: "(cl, f) \ CLF_set"
defines P_def: "P \ fix f A"
sublocale CLF < cl?: CL
unfolding A_def r_def CL_def
using CLF_set_def f_cl by blast
locale Tarski = CLF +
fixes Y :: "'a set"
and intY1 :: "'a set"
and v :: "'a"
assumes Y_ss: "Y \ P"
defines intY1_def: "intY1 \ interval r (lub Y cl) (Top cl)"
and v_def: "v \
glb {x. ((\<lambda>x \<in> intY1. f x) x, x) \<in> induced intY1 r \<and> x \<in> intY1}
\<lparr>pset = intY1, order = induced intY1 r\<rparr>"
subsection \<open>Partial Order\<close>
context PO
begin
lemma dual: "PO (dual cl)"
proof
show "dual cl \ PartialOrder"
using cl_po unfolding PartialOrder_def dual_def by auto
qed
lemma PO_imp_refl_on [simp]: "refl_on A r"
using cl_po by (simp add: PartialOrder_def A_def r_def)
lemma PO_imp_sym [simp]: "antisym r"
using cl_po by (simp add: PartialOrder_def r_def)
lemma PO_imp_trans [simp]: "trans r"
using cl_po by (simp add: PartialOrder_def r_def)
lemma reflE: "x \ A \ (x, x) \ r"
using cl_po by (simp add: PartialOrder_def refl_on_def A_def r_def)
lemma antisymE: "\(a, b) \ r; (b, a) \ r\ \ a = b"
using cl_po by (simp add: PartialOrder_def antisym_def r_def)
lemma transE: "\(a, b) \ r; (b, c) \ r\ \ (a, c) \ r"
using cl_po by (simp add: PartialOrder_def r_def) (unfold trans_def, fast)
lemma monotoneE: "\monotone f A r; x \ A; y \ A; (x, y) \ r\ \ (f x, f y) \ r"
by (simp add: monotone_def)
lemma po_subset_po:
assumes "S \ A" shows "\pset = S, order = induced S r\ \ PartialOrder"
proof -
have "refl_on S (induced S r)"
using \<open>S \<subseteq> A\<close> by (auto simp: refl_on_def induced_def intro: reflE)
moreover
have "antisym (induced S r)"
by (auto simp add: antisym_def induced_def intro: antisymE)
moreover
have "trans (induced S r)"
by (auto simp add: trans_def induced_def intro: transE)
ultimately show ?thesis
by (simp add: PartialOrder_def)
qed
lemma indE: "\(x, y) \ induced S r; S \ A\ \ (x, y) \ r"
by (simp add: induced_def)
lemma indI: "\(x, y) \ r; x \ S; y \ S\ \ (x, y) \ induced S r"
by (simp add: induced_def)
end
lemma (in CL) CL_imp_ex_isLub: "S \ A \ \L. isLub S cl L"
using cl_co by (simp add: CompleteLattice_def A_def)
declare (in CL) cl_co [simp]
lemma isLub_lub: "(\L. isLub S cl L) \ isLub S cl (lub S cl)"
by (simp add: lub_def least_def isLub_def some_eq_ex [symmetric])
lemma isGlb_glb: "(\G. isGlb S cl G) \ isGlb S cl (glb S cl)"
by (simp add: glb_def greatest_def isGlb_def some_eq_ex [symmetric])
lemma isGlb_dual_isLub: "isGlb S cl = isLub S (dual cl)"
by (simp add: isLub_def isGlb_def dual_def converse_unfold)
lemma isLub_dual_isGlb: "isLub S cl = isGlb S (dual cl)"
by (simp add: isLub_def isGlb_def dual_def converse_unfold)
lemma (in PO) dualPO: "dual cl \ PartialOrder"
using cl_po by (simp add: PartialOrder_def dual_def)
lemma Rdual:
assumes major: "\S. S \ A \ \L. isLub S po L" and "S \ A" and "A = pset po"
shows "\G. isGlb S po G"
proof
show "isGlb S po (lub {y \ A. \k\S. (y, k) \ order po} po)"
using major [of "{y. y \ A \ (\k \ S. (y, k) \ order po)}"] \S \ A\ \A = pset po\
apply (simp add: isLub_lub isGlb_def)
apply (auto simp add: isLub_def)
done
qed
lemma lub_dual_glb: "lub S cl = glb S (dual cl)"
by (simp add: lub_def glb_def least_def greatest_def dual_def converse_unfold)
lemma glb_dual_lub: "glb S cl = lub S (dual cl)"
by (simp add: lub_def glb_def least_def greatest_def dual_def converse_unfold)
lemma CL_subset_PO: "CompleteLattice \ PartialOrder"
by (auto simp: PartialOrder_def CompleteLattice_def)
lemmas CL_imp_PO = CL_subset_PO [THEN subsetD]
context CL
begin
lemma CO_refl_on: "refl_on A r"
by (rule PO_imp_refl_on)
lemma CO_antisym: "antisym r"
by (rule PO_imp_sym)
lemma CO_trans: "trans r"
by (rule PO_imp_trans)
end
lemma CompleteLatticeI:
"\po \ PartialOrder; \S. S \ pset po \ (\L. isLub S po L);
\<forall>S. S \<subseteq> pset po \<longrightarrow> (\<exists>G. isGlb S po G)\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> po \<in> CompleteLattice"
unfolding CompleteLattice_def by blast
lemma (in CL) CL_dualCL: "dual cl \ CompleteLattice"
using cl_co
apply (simp add: CompleteLattice_def dual_def)
apply (simp add: dualPO flip: dual_def isLub_dual_isGlb isGlb_dual_isLub)
done
context PO
begin
lemma dualA_iff [simp]: "pset (dual cl) = pset cl"
by (simp add: dual_def)
lemma dualr_iff [simp]: "(x, y) \ (order (dual cl)) \ (y, x) \ order cl"
by (simp add: dual_def)
lemma monotone_dual:
"monotone f (pset cl) (order cl) \ monotone f (pset (dual cl)) (order(dual cl))"
by (simp add: monotone_def)
lemma interval_dual: "\x \ A; y \ A\ \ interval r x y = interval (order(dual cl)) y x"
unfolding interval_def dualr_iff by (auto simp flip: r_def)
lemma interval_not_empty: "interval r a b \ {} \ (a, b) \ r"
by (simp add: interval_def) (use transE in blast)
lemma interval_imp_mem: "x \ interval r a b \ (a, x) \ r"
by (simp add: interval_def)
lemma left_in_interval: "\a \ A; b \ A; interval r a b \ {}\ \ a \ interval r a b"
using interval_def interval_not_empty reflE by fastforce
lemma right_in_interval: "\a \ A; b \ A; interval r a b \ {}\ \ b \ interval r a b"
by (simp add: A_def PO.dual PO.left_in_interval PO_axioms interval_dual)
end
subsection \<open>sublattice\<close>
lemma (in PO) sublattice_imp_CL:
"S <<= cl \ \pset = S, order = induced S r\ \ CompleteLattice"
by (simp add: sublattice_def CompleteLattice_def r_def)
lemma (in CL) sublatticeI:
"\S \ A; \pset = S, order = induced S r\ \ CompleteLattice\ \ S <<= cl"
by (simp add: sublattice_def A_def r_def)
lemma (in CL) dual: "CL (dual cl)"
proof
show "dual cl \ CompleteLattice"
using cl_co
by (simp add: CompleteLattice_def dualPO flip: isGlb_dual_isLub isLub_dual_isGlb)
qed
subsection \<open>lub\<close>
context CL
begin
lemma lub_unique: "\S \ A; isLub S cl x; isLub S cl L\ \ x = L"
by (rule antisymE) (auto simp add: isLub_def r_def)
lemma lub_upper:
assumes "S \ A" "x \ S" shows "(x, lub S cl) \ r"
proof -
obtain L where "isLub S cl L"
using CL_imp_ex_isLub \<open>S \<subseteq> A\<close> by auto
then show ?thesis
by (metis assms(2) isLub_def isLub_lub r_def)
qed
lemma lub_least:
assumes "S \ A" and L: "L \ A" "\x \ S. (x, L) \ r" shows "(lub S cl, L) \ r"
proof -
obtain L' where "isLub S cl L'"
using CL_imp_ex_isLub \<open>S \<subseteq> A\<close> by auto
then show ?thesis
by (metis A_def L isLub_def isLub_lub r_def)
qed
lemma lub_in_lattice:
assumes "S \ A" shows "lub S cl \ A"
proof -
obtain L where "isLub S cl L"
using CL_imp_ex_isLub \<open>S \<subseteq> A\<close> by auto
then show ?thesis
by (metis A_def isLub_def isLub_lub)
qed
lemma lubI:
assumes A: "S \ A" "L \ A" and r: "\x \ S. (x, L) \ r"
and clo: "\z. \z \ A; (\y \ S. (y, z) \ r)\ \ (L, z) \ r"
shows "L = lub S cl"
proof -
obtain L where "isLub S cl L"
using CL_imp_ex_isLub assms(1) by auto
then show ?thesis
by (simp add: antisymE A clo lub_in_lattice lub_least lub_upper r)
qed
lemma lubIa: "\S \ A; isLub S cl L\ \ L = lub S cl"
by (meson isLub_lub lub_unique)
lemma isLub_in_lattice: "isLub S cl L \ L \ A"
by (simp add: isLub_def A_def)
lemma isLub_upper: "\isLub S cl L; y \ S\ \ (y, L) \ r"
by (simp add: isLub_def r_def)
lemma isLub_least: "\isLub S cl L; z \ A; \y \ S. (y, z) \ r\ \ (L, z) \ r"
by (simp add: isLub_def A_def r_def)
lemma isLubI:
"\L \ A; \y \ S. (y, L) \ r; (\z \ A. (\y \ S. (y, z)\r) \ (L, z) \ r)\ \ isLub S cl L"
by (simp add: isLub_def A_def r_def)
end
subsection \<open>glb\<close>
context CL
begin
lemma glb_in_lattice: "S \ A \ glb S cl \ A"
by (metis A_def CL.lub_in_lattice dualA_iff glb_dual_lub local.dual)
lemma glb_lower: "\S \ A; x \ S\ \ (glb S cl, x) \ r"
by (metis A_def CL.lub_upper dualA_iff dualr_iff glb_dual_lub local.dual r_def)
end
text \<open>
Reduce the sublattice property by using substructural properties;
abandoned see \<open>Tarski_4.ML\<close>.
\<close>
context CLF
begin
lemma [simp]: "f \ pset cl \ pset cl \ monotone f (pset cl) (order cl)"
using f_cl by (simp add: CLF_set_def)
declare f_cl [simp]
lemma f_in_funcset: "f \ A \ A"
by (simp add: A_def)
lemma monotone_f: "monotone f A r"
by (simp add: A_def r_def)
lemma CLF_dual: "(dual cl, f) \ CLF_set"
proof -
have "Tarski.monotone f A (order (dual cl))"
by (metis (no_types) A_def PO.monotone_dual PO_axioms dualA_iff monotone_f r_def)
then show ?thesis
by (simp add: A_def CLF_set_def CL_dualCL)
qed
lemma dual: "CLF (dual cl) f"
by (rule CLF.intro) (rule CLF_dual)
end
subsection \<open>fixed points\<close>
lemma fix_subset: "fix f A \ A"
by (auto simp: fix_def)
lemma fix_imp_eq: "x \ fix f A \ f x = x"
by (simp add: fix_def)
lemma fixf_subset: "\A \ B; x \ fix (\y \ A. f y) A\ \ x \ fix f B"
by (auto simp: fix_def)
subsection \<open>lemmas for Tarski, lub\<close>
context CLF
begin
lemma lubH_le_flubH:
assumes "H = {x \ A. (x, f x) \ r}"
shows "(lub H cl, f (lub H cl)) \ r"
proof (intro lub_least ballI)
show "H \ A"
using assms
by auto
show "f (lub H cl) \ A"
using \<open>H \<subseteq> A\<close> f_in_funcset lub_in_lattice by auto
show "(x, f (lub H cl)) \ r" if "x \ H" for x
proof -
have "(f x, f (lub H cl)) \ r"
by (meson \<open>H \<subseteq> A\<close> in_mono lub_in_lattice lub_upper monotoneE monotone_f that)
moreover have "(x, f x) \ r"
using assms that by blast
ultimately show ?thesis
using po.transE by blast
qed
qed
lemma lubH_is_fixp:
assumes "H = {x \ A. (x, f x) \ r}"
shows "lub H cl \ fix f A"
proof -
have "(f (lub H cl), lub H cl) \ r"
proof -
have "(lub H cl, f (lub H cl)) \ r"
using assms lubH_le_flubH by blast
then have "(f (lub H cl), f (f (lub H cl))) \ r"
by (meson PO_imp_refl_on monotoneE monotone_f refl_on_domain)
then have "f (lub H cl) \ H"
by (metis (no_types, lifting) PO_imp_refl_on assms mem_Collect_eq refl_on_domain)
then show ?thesis
by (simp add: assms lub_upper)
qed
with assms show ?thesis
by (simp add: fix_def antisymE lubH_le_flubH lub_in_lattice)
qed
lemma fixf_le_lubH:
assumes "H = {x \ A. (x, f x) \ r}" "x \ fix f A"
shows "(x, lub H cl) \ r"
proof -
have "x \ P \ x \ H"
by (simp add: assms P_def fix_imp_eq [of _ f A] reflE fix_subset [of f A, THEN subsetD])
with assms show ?thesis
by (metis (no_types, lifting) P_def lub_upper mem_Collect_eq subset_eq)
qed
subsection \<open>Tarski fixpoint theorem 1, first part\<close>
lemma T_thm_1_lub: "lub P cl = lub {x \ A. (x, f x) \ r} cl"
proof -
have "lub {x \ A. (x, f x) \ r} cl = lub (fix f A) cl"
proof (rule antisymE)
show "(lub {x \ A. (x, f x) \ r} cl, lub (fix f A) cl) \ r"
by (simp add: fix_subset lubH_is_fixp lub_upper)
have "\a. a \ fix f A \ a \ A"
by (meson fix_subset subset_iff)
then show "(lub (fix f A) cl, lub {x \ A. (x, f x) \ r} cl) \ r"
by (simp add: fix_subset fixf_le_lubH lubH_is_fixp lub_least)
qed
then show ?thesis
using P_def by auto
qed
lemma glbH_is_fixp:
assumes "H = {x \ A. (f x, x) \ r}" shows "glb H cl \ P"
\<comment> \<open>Tarski for glb\<close>
proof -
have "glb H cl \ fix f (pset (dual cl))"
using assms CLF.lubH_is_fixp [OF dual] PO.dualr_iff PO_axioms
by (fastforce simp add: A_def r_def glb_dual_lub)
then show ?thesis
by (simp add: A_def P_def)
qed
lemma T_thm_1_glb: "glb P cl = glb {x \ A. (f x, x) \ r} cl"
unfolding glb_dual_lub P_def A_def r_def
using CLF.T_thm_1_lub dualA_iff dualr_iff local.dual by force
subsection \<open>interval\<close>
lemma rel_imp_elem: "(x, y) \ r \ x \ A"
using CO_refl_on by (auto simp: refl_on_def)
lemma interval_subset: "\a \ A; b \ A\ \ interval r a b \ A"
by (simp add: interval_def) (blast intro: rel_imp_elem)
lemma intervalI: "\(a, x) \ r; (x, b) \ r\ \ x \ interval r a b"
by (simp add: interval_def)
lemma interval_lemma1: "\S \ interval r a b; x \ S\ \ (a, x) \ r"
unfolding interval_def by fast
lemma interval_lemma2: "\S \ interval r a b; x \ S\ \ (x, b) \ r"
unfolding interval_def by fast
lemma a_less_lub: "\S \ A; S \ {}; \x \ S. (a,x) \ r; \y \ S. (y, L) \ r\ \ (a, L) \ r"
by (blast intro: transE)
lemma S_intv_cl: "\a \ A; b \ A; S \ interval r a b\ \ S \ A"
by (simp add: subset_trans [OF _ interval_subset])
lemma L_in_interval:
assumes "b \ A" and S: "S \ interval r a b" "isLub S cl L" "S \ {}"
shows "L \ interval r a b"
proof (rule intervalI)
show "(a, L) \ r"
by (meson PO_imp_trans all_not_in_conv S interval_lemma1 isLub_upper transD)
show "(L, b) \ r"
using \<open>b \<in> A\<close> assms interval_lemma2 isLub_least by auto
qed
lemma G_in_interval:
assumes "b \ A" and S: "S \ interval r a b" "isGlb S cl G" "S \ {}"
shows "G \ interval r a b"
proof -
have "a \ A"
using S(1) \<open>S \<noteq> {}\<close> interval_lemma1 rel_imp_elem by blast
with assms show ?thesis
by (metis (no_types) A_def CLF.L_in_interval dualA_iff interval_dual isGlb_dual_isLub local.dual)
qed
lemma intervalPO:
"\a \ A; b \ A; interval r a b \ {}\
\<Longrightarrow> \<lparr>pset = interval r a b, order = induced (interval r a b) r\<rparr> \<in> PartialOrder"
by (rule po_subset_po) (simp add: interval_subset)
lemma intv_CL_lub:
assumes "a \ A" "b \ A" "interval r a b \ {}" and S: "S \ interval r a b"
shows "\L. isLub S \pset = interval r a b, order = induced (interval r a b) r\ L"
proof -
obtain L where L: "isLub S cl L"
by (meson CL_imp_ex_isLub S_intv_cl assms(1) assms(2) assms(4))
show ?thesis
unfolding isLub_def potype.simps
proof (intro exI impI conjI ballI)
let ?L = "(if S = {} then a else L)"
show Lin: "?L \ interval r a b"
using L L_in_interval assms left_in_interval by auto
show "(y, ?L) \ induced (interval r a b) r" if "y \ S" for y
proof -
have "S \ {}"
using that by blast
then show ?thesis
using L Lin S indI isLub_upper that by auto
qed
show "(?L, z) \ induced (interval r a b) r"
if "z \ interval r a b" and "\y\S. (y, z) \ induced (interval r a b) r" for z
using that L
apply (simp add: isLub_def induced_def interval_imp_mem)
by (metis (full_types) A_def Lin \<open>a \<in> A\<close> \<open>b \<in> A\<close> interval_subset r_def subset_eq)
qed
qed
lemmas intv_CL_glb = intv_CL_lub [THEN Rdual]
lemma interval_is_sublattice: "\a \ A; b \ A; interval r a b \ {}\ \ interval r a b <<= cl"
apply (rule sublatticeI)
apply (simp add: interval_subset)
by (simp add: CompleteLatticeI intervalPO intv_CL_glb intv_CL_lub)
lemmas interv_is_compl_latt = interval_is_sublattice [THEN sublattice_imp_CL]
subsection \<open>Top and Bottom\<close>
lemma Top_dual_Bot: "Top cl = Bot (dual cl)"
by (simp add: Top_def Bot_def least_def greatest_def)
lemma Bot_dual_Top: "Bot cl = Top (dual cl)"
by (simp add: Top_def Bot_def least_def greatest_def)
lemma Bot_in_lattice: "Bot cl \ A"
unfolding Bot_def least_def
apply (rule_tac a = "glb A cl" in someI2)
using glb_in_lattice glb_lower by (auto simp: A_def r_def)
lemma Top_in_lattice: "Top cl \ A"
using A_def CLF.Bot_in_lattice Top_dual_Bot local.dual by force
lemma Top_prop: "x \ A \ (x, Top cl) \ r"
unfolding Top_def greatest_def
apply (rule_tac a = "lub A cl" in someI2)
using lub_in_lattice lub_upper by (auto simp: A_def r_def)
lemma Bot_prop: "x \ A \ (Bot cl, x) \ r"
using A_def Bot_dual_Top CLF.Top_prop dualA_iff dualr_iff local.dual r_def by fastforce
lemma Top_intv_not_empty: "x \ A \ interval r x (Top cl) \ {}"
using Top_prop intervalI reflE by force
lemma Bot_intv_not_empty: "x \ A \ interval r (Bot cl) x \ {}"
using Bot_dual_Top Bot_prop intervalI reflE by fastforce
text \<open>the set of fixed points form a partial order\<close>
proposition fixf_po: "\pset = P, order = induced P r\ \ PartialOrder"
by (simp add: P_def fix_subset po_subset_po)
end
context Tarski
begin
lemma Y_subset_A: "Y \ A"
by (rule subset_trans [OF _ fix_subset]) (rule Y_ss [simplified P_def])
lemma lubY_in_A: "lub Y cl \ A"
by (rule Y_subset_A [THEN lub_in_lattice])
lemma lubY_le_flubY: "(lub Y cl, f (lub Y cl)) \ r"
proof (intro lub_least Y_subset_A ballI)
show "f (lub Y cl) \ A"
by (meson Tarski.monotone_def lubY_in_A monotone_f reflE rel_imp_elem)
show "(x, f (lub Y cl)) \ r" if "x \ Y" for x
proof
have "\A. Y \ A \ x \ A"
using that by blast
moreover have "(x, lub Y cl) \ r"
using that by (simp add: Y_subset_A lub_upper)
ultimately show "(x, f (lub Y cl)) \ r"
by (metis (no_types) Tarski.Y_ss Tarski_axioms Y_subset_A fix_imp_eq lubY_in_A monotoneE monotone_f)
qed auto
qed
lemma intY1_subset: "intY1 \ A"
unfolding intY1_def using Top_in_lattice interval_subset lubY_in_A by auto
lemmas intY1_elem = intY1_subset [THEN subsetD]
lemma intY1_f_closed:
assumes "x \ intY1" shows "f x \ intY1"
proof (simp add: intY1_def interval_def, rule conjI)
show "(lub Y cl, f x) \ r"
using assms intY1_elem interval_imp_mem lubY_in_A unfolding intY1_def
using lubY_le_flubY monotoneE monotone_f po.transE by blast
then show "(f x, Top cl) \ r"
by (meson PO_imp_refl_on Top_prop refl_onD2)
qed
lemma intY1_mono: "monotone (\ x \ intY1. f x) intY1 (induced intY1 r)"
apply (auto simp add: monotone_def induced_def intY1_f_closed)
apply (blast intro: intY1_elem monotone_f [THEN monotoneE])
done
lemma intY1_is_cl: "\pset = intY1, order = induced intY1 r\ \ CompleteLattice"
unfolding intY1_def
by (simp add: Top_in_lattice Top_intv_not_empty interv_is_compl_latt lubY_in_A)
lemma v_in_P: "v \ P"
proof -
have "v \ fix (restrict f intY1) intY1"
unfolding v_def
apply (rule CLF.glbH_is_fixp
[OF CLF.intro, unfolded CLF_set_def, of "\pset = intY1, order = induced intY1 r\", simplified])
using intY1_f_closed intY1_is_cl intY1_mono apply blast+
done
then show ?thesis
unfolding P_def
by (meson fixf_subset intY1_subset)
qed
lemma z_in_interval: "\z \ P; \y\Y. (y, z) \ induced P r\ \ z \ intY1"
unfolding intY1_def P_def
by (meson Top_prop Y_subset_A fix_subset in_mono indE intervalI lub_least)
lemma tarski_full_lemma: "\L. isLub Y \pset = P, order = induced P r\ L"
proof
have "(y, v) \ induced P r" if "y \ Y" for y
proof -
have "(y, lub Y cl) \ r"
by (simp add: Y_subset_A lub_upper that)
moreover have "(lub Y cl, v) \ r"
by (metis (no_types, lifting) CL.glb_in_lattice CL.intro intY1_def intY1_is_cl interval_imp_mem lub_dual_glb mem_Collect_eq select_convs(1) subsetI v_def)
ultimately have "(y, v) \ r"
using po.transE by blast
then show ?thesis
using Y_ss indI that v_in_P by auto
qed
moreover have "(v, z) \ induced P r" if "z \ P" "\y\Y. (y, z) \ induced P r" for z
proof (rule indI)
have "((\x \ intY1. f x) z, z) \ induced intY1 r"
by (metis P_def fix_imp_eq in_mono indI intY1_subset reflE restrict_apply' that z_in_interval)
then show "(v, z) \ r"
by (metis (no_types, lifting) CL.glb_lower CL_def indE intY1_is_cl intY1_subset mem_Collect_eq select_convs(1,2) subsetI that v_def z_in_interval)
qed (auto simp: that v_in_P)
ultimately
show "isLub Y \pset = P, order = induced P r\ v"
by (simp add: isLub_def v_in_P)
qed
end
lemma CompleteLatticeI_simp:
"\po \ PartialOrder; \S. S \ A \ \L. isLub S po L; A = pset po\ \ po \ CompleteLattice"
by (metis CompleteLatticeI Rdual)
theorem (in CLF) Tarski_full: "\pset = P, order = induced P r\ \ CompleteLattice"
proof (intro CompleteLatticeI_simp allI impI)
show "\pset = P, order = induced P r\ \ PartialOrder"
by (simp add: fixf_po)
show "\S. S \ P \ \L. isLub S \pset = P, order = induced P r\ L"
unfolding P_def A_def r_def
proof (rule Tarski.tarski_full_lemma [OF Tarski.intro [OF _ Tarski_axioms.intro]])
show "CLF cl f" ..
qed
qed auto
end
¤ Dauer der Verarbeitung: 0.36 Sekunden
(vorverarbeitet)
¤
|
Haftungshinweis
Die Informationen auf dieser Webseite wurden
nach bestem Wissen sorgfältig zusammengestellt. Es wird jedoch weder Vollständigkeit, noch Richtigkeit,
noch Qualität der bereit gestellten Informationen zugesichert.
Bemerkung:
Die farbliche Syntaxdarstellung ist noch experimentell.
|
