Ziele Untersuchung
mit Columbo Integrität von
Datenbanken Interaktion und
Portierbarkeit Ergonomie der
Schnittstellen

Angebot Produkte Projekt Beratung

Mittel Analytik Modellierung Sprachen Algebra Logik Hardware Denken Kreativität

Zusammenhänge Gesellschaft Wirtschaft Branche Firma


products/Sources/formale Sprachen/Isabelle/ZF/Induct/ (Beweissystem Isabelle Version 2025-1^©) Datei vom 16.11.2025 mit Größe 5 kB

Quelle Ntree.thy Sprache: Isabelle

(*  Title:      ZF/Induct/Ntree.thy
    Author:     Lawrence C Paulson, Cambridge University Computer Laboratory
    Copyright   1994  University of Cambridge
*)

section \<open>Datatype definition n-ary branching trees\<close>

theory Ntree imports ZF begin

text \<open>
  Demonstrates a simple use of function space in a datatype
  definition.  Based upon theory \<open>Term\<close>.
\<close>

consts
  ntree :: "i \ i"
  maptree :: "i \ i"
  maptree2 :: "[i, i] \ i"

datatype "ntree(A)" = Branch ("a \ A", "h \ (\n \ nat. n -> ntree(A))")
  monos UN_mono [OF subset_refl Pi_mono]  \<comment> \<open>MUST have this form\<close>
  type_intros nat_fun_univ [THEN subsetD]
  type_elims UN_E

datatype "maptree(A)" = Sons ("a \ A", "h \ maptree(A) -||> maptree(A)")
  monos FiniteFun_mono1  \<comment> \<open>Use monotonicity in BOTH args\<close>
  type_intros FiniteFun_univ1 [THEN subsetD]

datatype "maptree2(A, B)" = Sons2 ("a \ A", "h \ B -||> maptree2(A, B)")
  monos FiniteFun_mono [OF subset_refl]
  type_intros FiniteFun_in_univ'

definition
  ntree_rec :: "[[i, i, i] \ i, i] \ i" where
  "ntree_rec(b) \
    Vrecursor(\<lambda>pr. ntree_case(\<lambda>x h. b(x, h, \<lambda>i \<in> domain(h). pr`(h`i))))"

definition
  ntree_copy :: "i \ i" where
  "ntree_copy(z) \ ntree_rec(\x h r. Branch(x,r), z)"

text \<open>
  \medskip \<open>ntree\<close>
\<close>

lemma ntree_unfold: "ntree(A) = A \ (\n \ nat. n -> ntree(A))"
  by (blast intro: ntree.intros [unfolded ntree.con_defs]
    elim: ntree.cases [unfolded ntree.con_defs])

lemma ntree_induct [consumes 1, case_names Branch, induct set: ntree]:
  assumes t: "t \ ntree(A)"
    and step: "\x n h. \x \ A; n \ nat; h \ n -> ntree(A); \i \ n. P(h`i)
\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P(Branch(x,h))"
  shows "P(t)"
  \<comment> \<open>A nicer induction rule than the standard one.\<close>
  using t
  apply induct
  apply (erule UN_E)
  apply (assumption | rule step)+
   apply (fast elim: fun_weaken_type)
  apply (fast dest: apply_type)
  done

lemma ntree_induct_eqn [consumes 1]:
  assumes t: "t \ ntree(A)"
    and f: "f \ ntree(A)->B"
    and g: "g \ ntree(A)->B"
    and step: "\x n h. \x \ A; n \ nat; h \ n -> ntree(A); f O h = g O h\ \
      f ` Branch(x,h) = g ` Branch(x,h)"
  shows "f`t=g`t"
  \<comment> \<open>Induction on \<^term>\<open>ntree(A)\<close> to prove an equation\<close>
  using t
  apply induct
  apply (assumption | rule step)+
  apply (insert f g)
  apply (rule fun_extension)
  apply (assumption | rule comp_fun)+
  apply (simp add: comp_fun_apply)
  done

text \<open>
  \medskip Lemmas to justify using \<open>Ntree\<close> in other recursive
  type definitions.
\<close>

lemma ntree_mono: "A \ B \ ntree(A) \ ntree(B)"
    unfolding ntree.defs
  apply (rule lfp_mono)
    apply (rule ntree.bnd_mono)+
  apply (assumption | rule univ_mono basic_monos)+
  done

lemma ntree_univ: "ntree(univ(A)) \ univ(A)"
  \<comment> \<open>Easily provable by induction also\<close>
    unfolding ntree.defs ntree.con_defs
  apply (rule lfp_lowerbound)
   apply (rule_tac [2] A_subset_univ [THEN univ_mono])
  apply (blast intro: Pair_in_univ nat_fun_univ [THEN subsetD])
  done

lemma ntree_subset_univ: "A \ univ(B) \ ntree(A) \ univ(B)"
  by (rule subset_trans [OF ntree_mono ntree_univ])

text \<open>
  \medskip \<open>ntree\<close> recursion.
\<close>

lemma ntree_rec_Branch:
    "function(h) \
     ntree_rec(b, Branch(x,h)) = b(x, h, \<lambda>i \<in> domain(h). ntree_rec(b, h`i))"
  apply (rule ntree_rec_def [THEN def_Vrecursor, THEN trans])
  apply (simp add: ntree.con_defs rank_pair2 [THEN [2] lt_trans] rank_apply)
  done

lemma ntree_copy_Branch [simp]:
    "function(h) \
     ntree_copy (Branch(x, h)) = Branch(x, \<lambda>i \<in> domain(h). ntree_copy (h`i))"
  by (simp add: ntree_copy_def ntree_rec_Branch)

lemma ntree_copy_is_ident: "z \ ntree(A) \ ntree_copy(z) = z"
  by (induct z set: ntree)
    (auto simp add: domain_of_fun Pi_Collect_iff fun_is_function)

text \<open>
  \medskip \<open>maptree\<close>
\<close>

lemma maptree_unfold: "maptree(A) = A \ (maptree(A) -||> maptree(A))"
  by (fast intro!: maptree.intros [unfolded maptree.con_defs]
    elim: maptree.cases [unfolded maptree.con_defs])

lemma maptree_induct [consumes 1, induct set: maptree]:
  assumes t: "t \ maptree(A)"
    and step: "\x n h. \x \ A; h \ maptree(A) -||> maptree(A);
                  \<forall>y \<in> field(h). P(y)
\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P(Sons(x,h))"
  shows "P(t)"
  \<comment> \<open>A nicer induction rule than the standard one.\<close>
  using t
  apply induct
  apply (assumption | rule step)+
  apply (erule Collect_subset [THEN FiniteFun_mono1, THEN subsetD])
  apply (drule FiniteFun.dom_subset [THEN subsetD])
  apply (drule Fin.dom_subset [THEN subsetD])
  apply fast
  done

text \<open>
  \medskip \<open>maptree2\<close>
\<close>

lemma maptree2_unfold: "maptree2(A, B) = A \ (B -||> maptree2(A, B))"
  by (fast intro!: maptree2.intros [unfolded maptree2.con_defs]
    elim: maptree2.cases [unfolded maptree2.con_defs])

lemma maptree2_induct [consumes 1, induct set: maptree2]:
  assumes t: "t \ maptree2(A, B)"
    and step: "\x n h. \x \ A; h \ B -||> maptree2(A,B); \y \ range(h). P(y)
\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P(Sons2(x,h))"
  shows "P(t)"
  using t
  apply induct
  apply (assumption | rule step)+
   apply (erule FiniteFun_mono [OF subset_refl Collect_subset, THEN subsetD])
   apply (drule FiniteFun.dom_subset [THEN subsetD])
   apply (drule Fin.dom_subset [THEN subsetD])
   apply fast
   done

end

quality96%

¤ Dauer der Verarbeitung: 0.1 Sekunden (vorverarbeitet) ¤

Wurzel

Suchen

Beweissystem der NASA

Beweissystem Isabelle

NIST Cobol Testsuite

Cephes Mathematical Library

Wiener Entwicklungsmethode

Haftungshinweis

Die Informationen auf dieser Webseite wurden nach bestem Wissen sorgfältig zusammengestellt. Es wird jedoch weder Vollständigkeit, noch Richtigkeit, noch Qualität der bereit gestellten Informationen zugesichert.