Spracherkennung für: .md vermutete Sprache: Unknown {[0] [0] [0]} [Methode: Schwerpunktbildung, einfache Gewichte, sechs Dimensionen]
# OpenClaw Incident Response Plan
## 1. Detection and triage
We monitor security signals from:
- GitHub Security Advisories (GHSA) and private vulnerability reports.
- Public GitHub issues/discussions when reports are not sensitive.
- Automated signals (for example Dependabot, CodeQL, npm advisories, and secret scanning).
Initial triage:
1. Confirm affected component, version, and trust boundary impact.
2. Classify as security issue vs hardening/no-action using the repository `SECURITY.md` scope and out-of-scope rules.
3. An incident owner responds accordingly.
## 2. Assessment
Severity guide:
- **Critical:** Package/release/repository compromise, active exploitation, or unauthenticated trust-boundary bypass with high-impact control or data exposure.
- **High:** Verified trust-boundary bypass requiring limited preconditions (for example authenticated but unauthorized high-impact action), or exposure of OpenClaw-owned sensitive credentials.
- **Medium:** Significant security weakness with practical impact but constrained exploitability or substantial prerequisites.
- **Low:** Defense-in-depth findings, narrowly scoped denial-of-service, or hardening/parity gaps without a demonstrated trust-boundary bypass.
## 3. Response
1. Acknowledge receipt to the reporter (private when sensitive).
2. Reproduce on supported releases and latest `main`, then implement and validate a patch with regression coverage.
3. For critical/high incidents, prepare patched release(s) as fast as practical.
4. For medium/low incidents, patch in normal release flow and document mitigation guidance.
## 4. Communication
We communicate through:
- GitHub Security Advisories in the affected repository.
- Release notes/changelog entries for fixed versions.
- Direct reporter follow-up on status and resolution.
Disclosure policy:
- Critical/high incidents should receive coordinated disclosure, with CVE issuance when appropriate.
- Low-risk hardening findings may be documented in release notes or advisories without CVE, depending on impact and user exposure.
## 5. Recovery and follow-up
After shipping the fix:
1. Verify remediations in CI and release artifacts.
2. Run a short post-incident review (timeline, root cause, detection gap, prevention plan).
3. Add follow-up hardening/tests/docs tasks and track them to completion.
[Dauer der Verarbeitung: 0.15 Sekunden, vorverarbeitet 2026-04-27]
