(************************************************************************)
(* * The Rocq Prover / The Rocq Development Team *)
(* v * Copyright INRIA, CNRS and contributors *)
(* <O___,, * (see version control and CREDITS file for authors & dates) *)
(* \VV/ **************************************************************)
(* // * This file is distributed under the terms of the *)
(* * GNU Lesser General Public License Version 2.1 *)
(* * (see LICENSE file for the text of the license) *)
(************************************************************************)
(* This file is (C) Copyright 2006-2015 Microsoft Corporation and Inria. *)
(** #<style> .doc { font-family: monospace; white-space: pre; } </style># **)
Require Import ssreflect ssrfun.
(**
A theory of boolean predicates and operators. A large part of this file is
concerned with boolean reflection.
Definitions and notations:
is_true b == the coercion of b : bool to Prop (:= b = true).
This is just input and displayed as `b''.
reflect P b == the reflection inductive predicate, asserting
that the logical proposition P : Prop holds iff
the formula b : bool is equal to true. Lemmas
asserting reflect P b are often referred to as
"views".
iffP, appP, sameP, rwP :: lemmas for direct manipulation of reflection
views: iffP is used to prove reflection from
logical equivalence, appP to compose views, and
sameP and rwP to perform boolean and setoid
rewriting.
elimT :: coercion reflect >-> Funclass, which allows the
direct application of `reflect' views to
boolean assertions.
decidable P <-> P is effectively decidable (:= {P} + {~ P}).
contra, contraL, ... :: contraposition lemmas.
altP my_viewP :: natural alternative for reflection; given
lemma myviewP: reflect my_Prop my_formula,
have #[#myP | not_myP#]# := altP my_viewP.
generates two subgoals, in which my_formula has
been replaced by true and false, resp., with
new assumptions myP : my_Prop and
not_myP: ~~ my_formula.
Caveat: my_formula must be an APPLICATION, not
a variable, constant, let-in, etc. (due to the
poor behaviour of dependent index matching).
boolP my_formula :: boolean disjunction, equivalent to
altP (idP my_formula) but circumventing the
dependent index capture issue; destructing
boolP my_formula generates two subgoals with
assumptions my_formula and ~~ my_formula. As
with altP, my_formula must be an application.
\unless C, P <-> we can assume property P when a something that
holds under condition C (such as C itself).
:= forall G : Prop, (C -> G) -> (P -> G) -> G.
This is just C \/ P or rather its impredicative
encoding, whose usage better fits the above
description: given a lemma UCP whose conclusion
is \unless C, P we can assume P by writing:
wlog hP: / P by apply/UCP; (prove C -> goal).
or even apply: UCP id _ => hP if the goal is C.
classically P <-> we can assume P when proving is_true b.
:= forall b : bool, (P -> b) -> b.
This is equivalent to ~ (~ P) when P : Prop.
implies P Q == wrapper variant type that coerces to P -> Q and
can be used as a P -> Q view unambiguously.
Useful to avoid spurious insertion of <-> views
when Q is a conjunction of foralls, as in Lemma
all_and2 below; conversely, avoids confusion in
apply views for impredicative properties, such
as \unless C, P. Also supports contrapositives.
a && b == the boolean conjunction of a and b.
a || b == the boolean disjunction of a and b.
a ==> b == the boolean implication of b by a.
~~ a == the boolean negation of a.
a (+) b == the boolean exclusive or (or sum) of a and b.
#[# /\ P1 , P2 & P3 #]# == multiway logical conjunction, up to 5 terms.
#[# \/ P1 , P2 | P3 #]# == multiway logical disjunction, up to 4 terms.
#[#&& a, b, c & d#]# == iterated, right associative boolean conjunction
with arbitrary arity.
#[#|| a, b, c | d#]# == iterated, right associative boolean disjunction
with arbitrary arity.
#[#==> a, b, c => d#]# == iterated, right associative boolean implication
with arbitrary arity.
and3P, ... == specific reflection lemmas for iterated
connectives.
andTb, orbAC, ... == systematic names for boolean connective
properties (see suffix conventions below).
prop_congr == a tactic to move a boolean equality from
its coerced form in Prop to the equality
in bool.
bool_congr == resolution tactic for blindly weeding out
like terms from boolean equalities (can fail).
This file provides a theory of boolean predicates and relations:
pred T == the type of bool predicates (:= T -> bool).
simpl_pred T == the type of simplifying bool predicates, based on
the simpl_fun type from ssrfun.v.
mem_pred T == a specialized form of simpl_pred for "collective"
predicates (see below).
rel T == the type of bool relations.
:= T -> pred T or T -> T -> bool.
simpl_rel T == type of simplifying relations.
:= T -> simpl_pred T
predType == the generic predicate interface, supported for
for lists and sets.
pred_sort == the predType >-> Type projection; pred_sort is
itself a Coercion target class. Declaring a
coercion to pred_sort is an alternative way of
equipping a type with a predType structure, which
interoperates better with coercion subtyping.
This is used, e.g., for finite sets, so that finite
groups inherit the membership operation by
coercing to sets.
{pred T} == a type convertible to pred T, but whose head
constant is pred_sort. This type should be used
for parameters that can be used as collective
predicates (see below), as this will allow passing
in directly collections that implement predType
by coercion as described above, e.g., finite sets.
:= pred_sort (predPredType T)
If P is a predicate the proposition "x satisfies P" can be written
applicatively as (P x), or using an explicit connective as (x \in P); in
the latter case we say that P is a "collective" predicate. We use A, B
rather than P, Q for collective predicates:
x \in A == x satisfies the (collective) predicate A.
x \notin A == x doesn't satisfy the (collective) predicate A.
The pred T type can be used as a generic predicate type for either kind,
but the two kinds of predicates should not be confused. When a "generic"
pred T value of one type needs to be passed as the other the following
conversions should be used explicitly:
SimplPred P == a (simplifying) applicative equivalent of P.
mem A == an applicative equivalent of collective predicate A:
mem A x simplifies to x \in A, as mem A has in
fact type mem_pred T.
--> In user notation collective predicates _only_ occur as arguments to mem:
A only appears as (mem A). This is hidden by notation, e.g.,
x \in A := in_mem x (mem A) here, enum A := enum_mem (mem A) in fintype.
This makes it possible to unify the various ways in which A can be
interpreted as a predicate, for both pattern matching and display.
Alternatively one can use the syntax for explicit simplifying predicates
and relations (in the following x is bound in E):
#[#pred x | E#]# == simplifying (see ssrfun) predicate x => E.
#[#pred x : T | E#]# == predicate x => E, with a cast on the argument.
#[#pred : T | P#]# == constant predicate P on type T.
#[#pred x | E1 & E2#]# == #[#pred x | E1 && E2#]#; an x : T cast is allowed.
#[#pred x in A#]# == #[#pred x | x in A#]#.
#[#pred x in A | E#]# == #[#pred x | x in A & E#]#.
#[#pred x in A | E1 & E2#]# == #[#pred x in A | E1 && E2#]#.
#[#predU A & B#]# == union of two collective predicates A and B.
#[#predI A & B#]# == intersection of collective predicates A and B.
#[#predD A & B#]# == difference of collective predicates A and B.
#[#predC A#]# == complement of the collective predicate A.
#[#preim f of A#]# == preimage under f of the collective predicate A.
predU P Q, ..., preim f P == union, etc of applicative predicates.
pred_oapp A == the predicate A lifted to the option type
:= #[#pred x | oapp (mem A) false x#]#.
pred0 == the empty predicate.
predT == the total (always true) predicate.
if T : predArgType, then T coerces to predT.
{: T} == T cast to predArgType (e.g., {: bool * nat}).
In the following, x and y are bound in E:
#[#rel x y | E#]# == simplifying relation x, y => E.
#[#rel x y : T | E#]# == simplifying relation with arguments cast.
#[#rel x y in A & B | E#]# == #[#rel x y | #[#&& x \in A, y \in B & E#]# #]#.
#[#rel x y in A & B#]# == #[#rel x y | (x \in A) && (y \in B) #]#.
#[#rel x y in A | E#]# == #[#rel x y in A & A | E#]#.
#[#rel x y in A#]# == #[#rel x y in A & A#]#.
relU R S == union of relations R and S.
relpre f R == preimage of relation R under f.
xpredU, ..., xrelpre == lambda terms implementing predU, ..., etc.
Explicit values of type pred T (i.e., lamdba terms) should always be used
applicatively, while values of collection types implementing the predType
interface, such as sequences or sets should always be used as collective
predicates. Defined constants and functions of type pred T or simpl_pred T
as well as the explicit simpl_pred T values described below, can generally
be used either way. Note however that x \in A will not auto-simplify when
A is an explicit simpl_pred T value; the generic simplification rule inE
must be used (when A : pred T, the unfold_in rule can be used). Constants
of type pred T with an explicit simpl_pred value do not auto-simplify when
used applicatively, but can still be expanded with inE. This behavior can
be controlled as follows:
Let A : collective_pred T := #[#pred x | ... #]#.
The collective_pred T type is just an alias for pred T, but this cast
stops rewrite inE from expanding the definition of A, thus treating A
into an abstract collection (unfold_in or in_collective can be used to
expand manually).
Let A : applicative_pred T := #[#pred x | ... #]#.
This cast causes inE to turn x \in A into the applicative A x form;
A will then have to be unfolded explicitly with the /A rule. This will
also apply to any definition that reduces to A (e.g., Let B := A).
Canonical A_app_pred := ApplicativePred A.
This declaration, given after definition of A, similarly causes inE to
turn x \in A into A x, but in addition allows the app_predE rule to
turn A x back into x \in A; it can be used for any definition of type
pred T, which makes it especially useful for ambivalent predicates
as the relational transitive closure connect, that are used in both
applicative and collective styles.
Purely for aesthetics, we provide a subtype of collective predicates:
qualifier q T == a pred T pretty-printing wrapper. An A : qualifier q T
coerces to pred_sort and thus behaves as a collective
predicate, but x \in A and x \notin A are displayed as:
x \is A and x \isn't A when q = 0,
x \is a A and x \isn't a A when q = 1,
x \is an A and x \isn't an A when q = 2, respectively.
#[#qualify x | P#]# := Qualifier 0 (fun x => P), constructor for the above.
#[#qualify x : T | P#]#, #[#qualify a x | P#]#, #[#qualify an X | P#]#, etc.
variants of the above with type constraints and different
values of q.
We provide an internal interface to support attaching properties (such as
being multiplicative) to predicates:
pred_key p == phantom type that will serve as a support for properties
to be attached to p : {pred _}; instances should be
created with Fact/Qed so as to be opaque.
KeyedPred k_p == an instance of the interface structure that attaches
(k_p : pred_key P) to P; the structure projection is a
coercion to pred_sort.
KeyedQualifier k_q == an instance of the interface structure that attaches
(k_q : pred_key q) to (q : qualifier n T).
DefaultPredKey p == a default value for pred_key p; the vernacular command
Import DefaultKeying attaches this key to all predicates
that are not explicitly keyed.
Keys can be used to attach properties to predicates, qualifiers and
generic nouns in a way that allows them to be used transparently. The key
projection of a predicate property structure such as unsignedPred should
be a pred_key, not a pred, and corresponding lemmas will have the form
Lemma rpredN R S (oppS : @opprPred R S) (kS : keyed_pred oppS) :
{mono -%%R: x / x \in kS}.
Because x \in kS will be displayed as x \in S (or x \is S, etc), the
canonical instance of opprPred will not normally be exposed (it will also
be erased by /= simplification). In addition each predicate structure
should have a DefaultPredKey Canonical instance that simply issues the
property as a proof obligation (which can be caught by the Prop-irrelevant
feature of the ssreflect plugin).
Some properties of predicates and relations:
A =i B <-> A and B are extensionally equivalent.
{subset A <= B} <-> A is a (collective) subpredicate of B.
subpred P Q <-> P is an (applicative) subpredicate or Q.
subrel R S <-> R is a subrelation of S.
In the following R is in rel T:
reflexive R <-> R is reflexive.
irreflexive R <-> R is irreflexive.
symmetric R <-> R (in rel T) is symmetric (equation).
pre_symmetric R <-> R is symmetric (implication).
antisymmetric R <-> R is antisymmetric.
total R <-> R is total.
transitive R <-> R is transitive.
left_transitive R <-> R is a congruence on its left hand side.
right_transitive R <-> R is a congruence on its right hand side.
equivalence_rel R <-> R is an equivalence relation.
Localization of (Prop) predicates; if P1 is convertible to forall x, Qx,
P2 to forall x y, Qxy and P3 to forall x y z, Qxyz :
{for y, P1} <-> Qx{y / x}.
{in A, P1} <-> forall x, x \in A -> Qx.
{in A1 & A2, P2} <-> forall x y, x \in A1 -> y \in A2 -> Qxy.
{in A &, P2} <-> forall x y, x \in A -> y \in A -> Qxy.
{in A1 & A2 & A3, Q3} <-> forall x y z,
x \in A1 -> y \in A2 -> z \in A3 -> Qxyz.
{in A1 & A2 &, Q3} := {in A1 & A2 & A2, Q3}.
{in A1 && A3, Q3} := {in A1 & A1 & A3, Q3}.
{in A &&, Q3} := {in A & A & A, Q3}.
{in A, bijective f} <-> f has a right inverse in A.
{on C, P1} <-> forall x, (f x) \in C -> Qx
when P1 is also convertible to Pf f, e.g.,
{on C, involutive f}.
{on C &, P2} == forall x y, f x \in C -> f y \in C -> Qxy
when P2 is also convertible to Pf f, e.g.,
{on C &, injective f}.
{on C, P1' & g} == forall x, (f x) \in cd -> Qx
when P1' is convertible to Pf f
and P1' g is convertible to forall x, Qx, e.g.,
{on C, cancel f & g}.
{on C, bijective f} == f has a right inverse on C.
This file extends the lemma name suffix conventions of ssrfun as follows:
A -- associativity, as in andbA : associative andb.
AC -- right commutativity.
ACA -- self-interchange (inner commutativity), e.g.,
orbACA : (a || b) || (c || d) = (a || c) || (b || d).
b -- a boolean argument, as in andbb : idempotent_op andb.
C -- commutativity, as in andbC : commutative andb,
or predicate complement, as in predC.
CA -- left commutativity.
D -- predicate difference, as in predD.
E -- elimination, as in negbFE : ~~ b = false -> b.
F or f -- boolean false, as in andbF : b && false = false.
I -- left/right injectivity, as in addbI : right_injective addb,
or predicate intersection, as in predI.
l -- a left-hand operation, as andb_orl : left_distributive andb orb.
N or n -- boolean negation, as in andbN : a && (~~ a) = false.
P -- a characteristic property, often a reflection lemma, as in
andP : reflect (a /\ b) (a && b).
r -- a right-hand operation, as orb_andr : right_distributive orb andb.
T or t -- boolean truth, as in andbT: right_id true andb.
U -- predicate union, as in predU.
W -- weakening, as in in1W : (forall x, P) -> {in D, forall x, P}. **)
Set Implicit Arguments.
Unset Strict
Implicit.
Unset Printing
Implicit Defensive.
Notation reflect := Datatypes.reflect.
Notation ReflectT := Datatypes.ReflectT.
Notation ReflectF := Datatypes.ReflectF.
Reserved
Notation "~~ b" (at level 35,
right associativity).
Reserved
Notation "b ==> c" (at level 55,
right associativity).
Reserved
Notation "b1 (+) b2" (at level 50,
left associativity).
Reserved
Notation "x \in A" (at level 70, no associativity,
format
"'[hv' x '/ ' \in A ']'").
Reserved
Notation "x \notin A" (at level 70, no associativity,
format
"'[hv' x '/ ' \notin A ']'").
Reserved
Notation "x \is A" (at level 70, no associativity,
format
"'[hv' x '/ ' \is A ']'").
Reserved
Notation "x \isn't A" (at level 70, no associativity,
format
"'[hv' x '/ ' \isn't A ']'").
Reserved
Notation "x \is 'a' A" (at level 70, no associativity,
format
"'[hv' x '/ ' \is 'a' A ']'").
Reserved
Notation "x \isn't 'a' A" (at level 70, no associativity,
format
"'[hv' x '/ ' \isn't 'a' A ']'").
Reserved
Notation "x \is 'an' A" (at level 70, no associativity,
format
"'[hv' x '/ ' \is 'an' A ']'").
Reserved
Notation "x \isn't 'an' A" (at level 70, no associativity,
format
"'[hv' x '/ ' \isn't 'an' A ']'").
Reserved
Notation "p1 =i p2" (at level 70, no associativity,
format
"'[hv' p1 '/ ' =i p2 ']'").
Reserved
Notation "{ 'subset' A <= B }" (at level 0, A, B at level 69,
format
"'[hv' { 'subset' A '/ ' <= B } ']'").
Reserved
Notation "{ : T }" (at level 0, format
"{ : T }").
Reserved
Notation "{ 'pred' T }" (at level 0, format
"{ 'pred' T }").
Reserved
Notation "[ 'predType' 'of' T ]" (at level 0,
format
"[ 'predType' 'of' T ]").
Reserved
Notation "[ 'pred' : T | E ]" (at level 0,
format
"'[hv' [ 'pred' : T | '/ ' E ] ']'").
Reserved
Notation "[ 'pred' x | E ]" (at level 0, x name,
format
"'[hv' [ 'pred' x | '/ ' E ] ']'").
Reserved
Notation "[ 'pred' x : T | E ]" (at level 0, x name,
format
"'[hv' [ 'pred' x : T | '/ ' E ] ']'").
Reserved
Notation "[ 'pred' x | E1 & E2 ]" (at level 0, x name,
format
"'[hv' [ 'pred' x | '/ ' E1 & '/ ' E2 ] ']'").
Reserved
Notation "[ 'pred' x : T | E1 & E2 ]" (at level 0, x name,
format
"'[hv' [ 'pred' x : T | '/ ' E1 & E2 ] ']'").
Reserved
Notation "[ 'pred' x 'in' A ]" (at level 0, x name,
format
"'[hv' [ 'pred' x 'in' A ] ']'").
Reserved
Notation "[ 'pred' x 'in' A | E ]" (at level 0, x name,
format
"'[hv' [ 'pred' x 'in' A | '/ ' E ] ']'").
Reserved
Notation "[ 'pred' x 'in' A | E1 & E2 ]" (at level 0, x name,
format
"'[hv' [ 'pred' x 'in' A | '/ ' E1 & '/ ' E2 ] ']'").
Reserved
Notation "[ 'qualify' x | P ]" (at level 0, x at level 99,
format
"'[hv' [ 'qualify' x | '/ ' P ] ']'").
Reserved
Notation "[ 'qualify' x : T | P ]" (at level 0, x at level 99,
format
"'[hv' [ 'qualify' x : T | '/ ' P ] ']'").
Reserved
Notation "[ 'qualify' 'a' x | P ]" (at level 0, x at level 99,
format
"'[hv' [ 'qualify' 'a' x | '/ ' P ] ']'").
Reserved
Notation "[ 'qualify' 'a' x : T | P ]" (at level 0, x at level 99,
format
"'[hv' [ 'qualify' 'a' x : T | '/ ' P ] ']'").
Reserved
Notation "[ 'qualify' 'an' x | P ]" (at level 0, x at level 99,
format
"'[hv' [ 'qualify' 'an' x | '/ ' P ] ']'").
Reserved
Notation "[ 'qualify' 'an' x : T | P ]" (at level 0, x at level 99,
format
"'[hv' [ 'qualify' 'an' x : T | '/ ' P ] ']'").
Reserved
Notation "[ 'rel' x y | E ]" (at level 0, x name, y name,
format
"'[hv' [ 'rel' x y | '/ ' E ] ']'").
Reserved
Notation "[ 'rel' x y : T | E ]" (at level 0, x name, y name,
format
"'[hv' [ 'rel' x y : T | '/ ' E ] ']'").
Reserved
Notation "[ 'rel' x y 'in' A & B | E ]" (at level 0, x name, y name,
format
"'[hv' [ 'rel' x y 'in' A & B | '/ ' E ] ']'").
Reserved
Notation "[ 'rel' x y 'in' A & B ]" (at level 0, x name, y name,
format
"'[hv' [ 'rel' x y 'in' A & B ] ']'").
Reserved
Notation "[ 'rel' x y 'in' A | E ]" (at level 0, x name, y name,
format
"'[hv' [ 'rel' x y 'in' A | '/ ' E ] ']'").
Reserved
Notation "[ 'rel' x y 'in' A ]" (at level 0, x name, y name,
format
"'[hv' [ 'rel' x y 'in' A ] ']'").
Reserved
Notation "[ 'mem' A ]" (at level 0, format
"[ 'mem' A ]").
Reserved
Notation "[ 'predI' A & B ]" (at level 0,
format
"[ 'predI' A & B ]").
Reserved
Notation "[ 'predU' A & B ]" (at level 0,
format
"[ 'predU' A & B ]").
Reserved
Notation "[ 'predD' A & B ]" (at level 0,
format
"[ 'predD' A & B ]").
Reserved
Notation "[ 'predC' A ]" (at level 0,
format
"[ 'predC' A ]").
Reserved
Notation "[ 'preim' f 'of' A ]" (at level 0,
format
"[ 'preim' f 'of' A ]").
Reserved
Notation "\unless C , P" (at level 200, C at level 100,
format
"'[hv' \unless C , '/ ' P ']'").
Reserved
Notation "{ 'for' x , P }" (at level 0,
format
"'[hv' { 'for' x , '/ ' P } ']'").
Reserved
Notation "{ 'in' d , P }" (at level 0,
format
"'[hv' { 'in' d , '/ ' P } ']'").
Reserved
Notation "{ 'in' d1 & d2 , P }" (at level 0,
format
"'[hv' { 'in' d1 & d2 , '/ ' P } ']'").
Reserved
Notation "{ 'in' d & , P }" (at level 0,
format
"'[hv' { 'in' d & , '/ ' P } ']'").
Reserved
Notation "{ 'in' d1 & d2 & d3 , P }" (at level 0,
format
"'[hv' { 'in' d1 & d2 & d3 , '/ ' P } ']'").
Reserved
Notation "{ 'in' d1 & & d3 , P }" (at level 0,
format
"'[hv' { 'in' d1 & & d3 , '/ ' P } ']'").
Reserved
Notation "{ 'in' d1 & d2 & , P }" (at level 0,
format
"'[hv' { 'in' d1 & d2 & , '/ ' P } ']'").
Reserved
Notation "{ 'in' d & & , P }" (at level 0,
format
"'[hv' { 'in' d & & , '/ ' P } ']'").
Reserved
Notation "{ 'on' cd , P }" (at level 0,
format
"'[hv' { 'on' cd , '/ ' P } ']'").
Reserved
Notation "{ 'on' cd & , P }" (at level 0,
format
"'[hv' { 'on' cd & , '/ ' P } ']'").
Reserved
Notation "{ 'on' cd , P & g }" (at level 0, g at level 8,
format
"'[hv' { 'on' cd , '/ ' P & g } ']'").
Reserved
Notation "{ 'in' d , 'bijective' f }" (at level 0, f at level 8,
format
"'[hv' { 'in' d , '/ ' 'bijective' f } ']'").
Reserved
Notation "{ 'on' cd , 'bijective' f }" (at level 0, f at level 8,
format
"'[hv' { 'on' cd , '/ ' 'bijective' f } ']'").
(**
We introduce a number of n-ary "list-style" notations that share a common
format, namely
#[#op arg1, arg2, ... last_separator last_arg#]#
This usually denotes a right-associative applications of op, e.g.,
#[#&& a, b, c & d#]# denotes a && (b && (c && d))
The last_separator must be a non-operator token. Here we use &, | or =>;
our default is &, but we try to match the intended meaning of op. The
separator is a workaround for limitations of the parsing engine; the same
limitations mean the separator cannot be omitted even when last_arg can.
The Notation declarations are complicated by the separate treatment for
some fixed arities (binary for bool operators, and all arities for Prop
operators).
We also use the square brackets in comprehension-style notations
#[#type var separator expr#]#
where "type" is the type of the comprehension (e.g., pred) and "separator"
is | or => . It is important that in other notations a leading square
bracket #[# is always followed by an operator symbol or a fixed identifier. **)
Reserved
Notation "[ /\ P1 & P2 ]" (at level 0).
Reserved
Notation "[ /\ P1 , P2 & P3 ]" (at level 0, format
"'[hv' [ /\ '[' P1 , '/' P2 ']' '/ ' & P3 ] ']'").
Reserved
Notation "[ /\ P1 , P2 , P3 & P4 ]" (at level 0, format
"'[hv' [ /\ '[' P1 , '/' P2 , '/' P3 ']' '/ ' & P4 ] ']'").
Reserved
Notation "[ /\ P1 , P2 , P3 , P4 & P5 ]" (at level 0, format
"'[hv' [ /\ '[' P1 , '/' P2 , '/' P3 , '/' P4 ']' '/ ' & P5 ] ']'").
Reserved
Notation "[ \/ P1 | P2 ]" (at level 0).
Reserved
Notation "[ \/ P1 , P2 | P3 ]" (at level 0, format
"'[hv' [ \/ '[' P1 , '/' P2 ']' '/ ' | P3 ] ']'").
Reserved
Notation "[ \/ P1 , P2 , P3 | P4 ]" (at level 0, format
"'[hv' [ \/ '[' P1 , '/' P2 , '/' P3 ']' '/ ' | P4 ] ']'").
Reserved
Notation "[ && b1 & c ]" (at level 0).
Reserved
Notation "[ && b1 , b2 , .. , bn & c ]" (at level 0, format
"'[hv' [ && '[' b1 , '/' b2 , '/' .. , '/' bn ']' '/ ' & c ] ']'").
Reserved
Notation "[ || b1 | c ]" (at level 0).
Reserved
Notation "[ || b1 , b2 , .. , bn | c ]" (at level 0, format
"'[hv' [ || '[' b1 , '/' b2 , '/' .. , '/' bn ']' '/ ' | c ] ']'").
Reserved
Notation "[ ==> b1 => c ]" (at level 0).
Reserved
Notation "[ ==> b1 , b2 , .. , bn => c ]" (at level 0, format
"'[hv' [ ==> '[' b1 , '/' b2 , '/' .. , '/' bn ']' '/' => c ] ']'").
(** Shorter delimiter **)
Delimit Scope bool_scope
with B.
Open Scope bool_scope.
(** An alternative to xorb that behaves somewhat better wrt simplification. **)
Definition addb b :=
if b
then negb
else id.
(** Notation for && and || is declared in Init.Datatypes. **)
Notation "~~ b" := (negb b) : bool_scope.
Notation "b ==> c" := (implb b c) : bool_scope.
Notation "b1 (+) b2" := (addb b1 b2) : bool_scope.
(** Constant is_true b := b = true is defined in Init.Datatypes. **)
Coercion is_true : bool >-> Sortclass.
(* Prop *)
Lemma prop_congr :
forall b b' : bool, b = b' -> b = b' :> Prop.
Proof.
by move=> b b' ->.
Qed.
Ltac prop_congr :=
apply: prop_congr.
(** Lemmas for trivial. **)
Lemma is_true_true : true.
Proof.
by [].
Qed.
Lemma not_false_is_true : ~ false.
Proof.
by [].
Qed.
Lemma is_true_locked_true : locked true.
Proof.
by unlock.
Qed.
#[
global]
Hint Resolve is_true_true not_false_is_true is_true_locked_true : core.
(** Shorter names. **)
Definition isT := is_true_true.
Definition notF := not_false_is_true.
(** Negation lemmas. **)
(**
We generally take NEGATION as the standard form of a false condition:
negative boolean hypotheses should be of the form ~~ b, rather than ~ b or
b = false, as much as possible. **)
Lemma negbT b : b = false -> ~~ b.
Proof.
by case: b.
Qed.
Lemma negbTE b : ~~ b -> b = false.
Proof.
by case: b.
Qed.
Lemma negbF b : (b : bool) -> ~~ b = false.
Proof.
by case: b.
Qed.
Lemma negbFE b : ~~ b = false -> b.
Proof.
by case: b.
Qed.
Lemma negbK : involutive negb.
Proof.
by case.
Qed.
Lemma negbNE b : ~~ ~~ b -> b.
Proof.
by case: b.
Qed.
Lemma negb_inj : injective negb.
Proof.
exact: can_inj negbK.
Qed.
Lemma negbLR b c : b = ~~ c -> ~~ b = c.
Proof.
exact: canLR negbK.
Qed.
Lemma negbRL b c : ~~ b = c -> b = ~~ c.
Proof.
exact: canRL negbK.
Qed.
Lemma contra (c b : bool) : (c -> b) -> ~~ b -> ~~ c.
Proof.
by case: b => //;
case: c.
Qed.
Definition contraNN := contra.
Lemma contraL (c b : bool) : (c -> ~~ b) -> b -> ~~ c.
Proof.
by case: b => //;
case: c.
Qed.
Definition contraTN := contraL.
Lemma contraR (c b : bool) : (~~ c -> b) -> ~~ b -> c.
Proof.
by case: b => //;
case: c.
Qed.
Definition contraNT := contraR.
Lemma contraLR (c b : bool) : (~~ c -> ~~ b) -> b -> c.
Proof.
by case: b => //;
case: c.
Qed.
Definition contraTT := contraLR.
Lemma contraT b : (~~ b -> false) -> b.
Proof.
by case: b => // ->.
Qed.
Lemma wlog_neg b : (~~ b -> b) -> b.
Proof.
by case: b => // ->.
Qed.
Lemma contraFT (c b : bool) : (~~ c -> b) -> b = false -> c.
Proof.
by move/contraR=> notb_c /negbT.
Qed.
Lemma contraFN (c b : bool) : (c -> b) -> b = false -> ~~ c.
Proof.
by move/contra=> notb_notc /negbT.
Qed.
Lemma contraTF (c b : bool) : (c -> ~~ b) -> b -> c = false.
Proof.
by move/contraL=> b_notc /b_notc/negbTE.
Qed.
Lemma contraNF (c b : bool) : (c -> b) -> ~~ b -> c = false.
Proof.
by move/contra=> notb_notc /notb_notc/negbTE.
Qed.
Lemma contraFF (c b : bool) : (c -> b) -> b = false -> c = false.
Proof.
by move/contraFN=> bF_notc /bF_notc/negbTE.
Qed.
(* additional contra lemmas involving [P,Q : Prop] *)
Lemma contra_not (P Q : Prop) : (Q -> P) -> (~ P -> ~ Q).
Proof.
by auto.
Qed.
Lemma contraPnot (P Q : Prop) : (Q -> ~ P) -> (P -> ~ Q).
Proof.
by auto.
Qed.
Lemma contraTnot (b : bool) (P : Prop) : (P -> ~~ b) -> (b -> ~ P).
Proof.
by case: b;
auto.
Qed.
Lemma contraNnot (P : Prop) (b : bool) : (P -> b) -> (~~ b -> ~ P).
Proof.
rewrite -{1}[b]negbK;
exact: contraTnot.
Qed.
Lemma contraPT (P : Prop) (b : bool) : (~~ b -> ~ P) -> P -> b.
Proof.
by case: b => //= /(_ isT) nP /nP.
Qed.
Lemma contra_notT (P : Prop) (b : bool) : (~~ b -> P) -> ~ P -> b.
Proof.
by case: b => //= /(_ isT) HP /(_ HP).
Qed.
Lemma contra_notN (P : Prop) (b : bool) : (b -> P) -> ~ P -> ~~ b.
Proof.
rewrite -{1}[b]negbK;
exact: contra_notT.
Qed.
Lemma contraPN (P : Prop) (b : bool) : (b -> ~ P) -> (P -> ~~ b).
Proof.
by case: b => //=; move/(_ isT) => HP /HP.
Qed.
Lemma contraFnot (P : Prop) (b : bool) : (P -> b) -> b = false -> ~ P.
Proof.
by case: b => //;
auto.
Qed.
Lemma contraPF (P : Prop) (b : bool) : (b -> ~ P) -> P -> b = false.
Proof.
by case: b => // /(_ isT).
Qed.
Lemma contra_notF (P : Prop) (b : bool) : (b -> P) -> ~ P -> b = false.
Proof.
by case: b => // /(_ isT).
Qed.
(**
Coercion of sum-style datatypes into bool, which makes it possible
to use ssr's boolean if rather than Rocq's "generic" if. **)
Coercion isSome T (u : option T) :=
if u is Some _
then true
else false.
Coercion is_inl A B (u : A + B) :=
if u is inl _
then true
else false.
Coercion is_left A B (u : {A} + {B}) :=
if u is
left _
then true
else false.
Coercion is_inleft A B (u : A + {B}) :=
if u is inleft _
then true
else false.
Prenex Implicits isSome is_inl is_left is_inleft.
Definition decidable P := {P} + {~ P}.
(**
Lemmas for ifs with large conditions, which allow reasoning about the
condition without repeating it inside the proof (the latter IS
preferable when the condition is short).
Usage :
if the goal contains (if cond then ...) = ...
case: ifP => Hcond.
generates two subgoal, with the assumption Hcond : cond = true/false
Rewrite if_same eliminates redundant ifs
Rewrite (fun_if f) moves a function f inside an if
Rewrite if_arg moves an argument inside a function-valued if **)
Section BoolIf.
Variables (A B :
Type) (x : A) (f : A -> B) (b : bool) (vT vF : A).
Variant if_spec (not_b : Prop) : bool -> A ->
Set :=
| IfSpecTrue of b : if_spec not_b true vT
| IfSpecFalse of not_b : if_spec not_b false vF.
Lemma ifP : if_spec (b = false) b (
if b
then vT
else vF).
Proof.
by case def_b: b; constructor.
Qed.
Lemma ifPn : if_spec (~~ b) b (
if b
then vT
else vF).
Proof.
by case def_b: b; constructor;
rewrite ?def_b.
Qed.
Lemma ifT : b -> (
if b
then vT
else vF) = vT.
Proof.
by move->.
Qed.
Lemma ifF : b = false -> (
if b
then vT
else vF) = vF.
Proof.
by move->.
Qed.
Lemma ifN : ~~ b -> (
if b
then vT
else vF) = vF.
Proof.
by move/negbTE->.
Qed.
Lemma if_same : (
if b
then vT
else vT) = vT.
Proof.
by case b.
Qed.
Lemma if_neg : (
if ~~ b
then vT
else vF) =
if b
then vF
else vT.
Proof.
by case b.
Qed.
Lemma fun_if : f (
if b
then vT
else vF) =
if b
then f vT
else f vF.
Proof.
by case b.
Qed.
Lemma if_arg (fT fF : A -> B) :
(
if b
then fT
else fF) x =
if b
then fT x
else fF x.
Proof.
by case b.
Qed.
(** Turning a boolean "if" form into an application. **)
Definition if_expr :=
if b
then vT
else vF.
Lemma ifE : (
if b
then vT
else vF) = if_expr.
Proof.
by [].
Qed.
End BoolIf.
(** Core (internal) reflection lemmas, used for the three kinds of views. **)
Section ReflectCore.
Variables (P Q : Prop) (b c : bool).
Hypothesis Hb : reflect P b.
Lemma introNTF : (
if c
then ~ P
else P) -> ~~ b = c.
Proof.
by case c;
case Hb.
Qed.
Lemma introTF : (
if c
then P
else ~ P) -> b = c.
Proof.
by case c;
case Hb.
Qed.
Lemma elimNTF : ~~ b = c ->
if c
then ~ P
else P.
Proof.
by move <-;
case Hb.
Qed.
Lemma elimTF : b = c ->
if c
then P
else ~ P.
Proof.
by move <-;
case Hb.
Qed.
Lemma equivPif : (Q -> P) -> (P -> Q) ->
if b
then Q
else ~ Q.
Proof.
by case Hb;
auto.
Qed.
Lemma xorPif : Q \/ P -> ~ (Q /\ P) ->
if b
then ~ Q
else Q.
Proof.
by case Hb => [? _ H ? | ? H _];
case: H.
Qed.
End ReflectCore.
(** Internal negated reflection lemmas **)
Section ReflectNegCore.
Variables (P Q : Prop) (b c : bool).
Hypothesis Hb : reflect P (~~ b).
Lemma introTFn : (
if c
then ~ P
else P) -> b = c.
Proof.
by move/(introNTF Hb) <-;
case b.
Qed.
Lemma elimTFn : b = c ->
if c
then ~ P
else P.
Proof.
by move <-;
apply: (elimNTF Hb);
case b.
Qed.
Lemma equivPifn : (Q -> P) -> (P -> Q) ->
if b
then ~ Q
else Q.
Proof.
by rewrite -if_neg;
apply: equivPif.
Qed.
Lemma xorPifn : Q \/ P -> ~ (Q /\ P) ->
if b
then Q
else ~ Q.
Proof.
by rewrite -if_neg;
apply: xorPif.
Qed.
End ReflectNegCore.
(** User-oriented reflection lemmas **)
Section Reflect.
Variables (P Q : Prop) (b b' c : bool).
Hypotheses (Pb : reflect P b) (Pb' : reflect P (~~ b')).
Lemma introT : P -> b.
Proof.
exact: introTF true _.
Qed.
Lemma introF : ~ P -> b = false.
Proof.
exact: introTF false _.
Qed.
Lemma introN : ~ P -> ~~ b.
Proof.
exact: introNTF true _.
Qed.
Lemma introNf : P -> ~~ b = false.
Proof.
exact: introNTF false _.
Qed.
Lemma introTn : ~ P -> b'.
Proof.
exact: introTFn true _.
Qed.
Lemma introFn : P -> b' = false.
Proof.
exact: introTFn false _.
Qed.
Lemma elimT : b -> P.
Proof.
exact: elimTF true _.
Qed.
Lemma elimF : b = false -> ~ P.
Proof.
exact: elimTF false _.
Qed.
Lemma elimN : ~~ b -> ~P.
Proof.
exact: elimNTF true _.
Qed.
Lemma elimNf : ~~ b = false -> P.
Proof.
exact: elimNTF false _.
Qed.
Lemma elimTn : b' -> ~ P.
Proof.
exact: elimTFn true _.
Qed.
Lemma elimFn : b' = false -> P.
Proof.
exact: elimTFn false _.
Qed.
Lemma introP : (b -> Q) -> (~~ b -> ~ Q) -> reflect Q b.
Proof.
by case b; constructor;
auto.
Qed.
Lemma iffP : (P -> Q) -> (Q -> P) -> reflect Q b.
Proof.
by case: Pb; constructor;
auto.
Qed.
Lemma equivP : (P <-> Q) -> reflect Q b.
Proof.
by case;
apply: iffP.
Qed.
Lemma sumboolP (decQ : decidable Q) : reflect Q decQ.
Proof.
by case: decQ; constructor.
Qed.
Lemma appP : reflect Q b -> P -> Q.
Proof.
by move=> Qb; move/introT;
case: Qb.
Qed.
Lemma sameP : reflect P c -> b = c.
Proof.
by case; [
apply: introT |
apply: introF].
Qed.
Lemma decPcases :
if b
then P
else ~ P.
Proof.
by case Pb.
Qed.
Definition decP : decidable P.
by case: b decPcases; [
left |
right].
Defined.
Lemma rwP : P <-> b.
Proof.
by split; [
apply: introT |
apply: elimT].
Qed.
Lemma rwP2 : reflect Q b -> (P <-> Q).
Proof.
by move=> Qb;
split=> ?; [
apply: appP |
apply: elimT;
case: Qb].
Qed.
(** Predicate family to reflect excluded middle in bool. **)
Variant alt_spec : bool ->
Type :=
| AltTrue of P : alt_spec true
| AltFalse of ~~ b : alt_spec false.
Lemma altP : alt_spec b.
Proof.
by case def_b: b / Pb; constructor;
rewrite ?def_b.
Qed.
Lemma eqbLR (b1 b2 : bool) : b1 = b2 -> b1 -> b2.
Proof.
by move->.
Qed.
Lemma eqbRL (b1 b2 : bool) : b1 = b2 -> b2 -> b1.
Proof.
by move->.
Qed.
End Reflect.
Hint View for move/ elimTF|3 elimNTF|3 elimTFn|3 introT|2 introTn|2 introN|2.
Hint View for
apply/ introTF|3 introNTF|3 introTFn|3 elimT|2 elimTn|2 elimN|2.
Hint View for
apply// equivPif|3 xorPif|3 equivPifn|3 xorPifn|3.
(** Allow the direct application of a reflection lemma to a boolean assertion. **)
Coercion elimT : reflect >-> Funclass.
#[universes(template)]
Variant implies P Q := Implies of P -> Q.
Lemma impliesP P Q : implies P Q -> P -> Q.
Proof.
by case.
Qed.
Lemma impliesPn (P Q : Prop) : implies P Q -> ~ Q -> ~ P.
Proof.
by case=> iP ? /iP.
Qed.
Coercion impliesP : implies >-> Funclass.
Hint View for move/ impliesPn|2 impliesP|2.
Hint View for
apply/ impliesPn|2 impliesP|2.
(** Impredicative or, which can emulate a classical not-implies. **)
Definition unless condition property : Prop :=
forall goal : Prop, (condition ->
goal) -> (property ->
goal) ->
goal.
Notation "\unless C , P" := (unless C P) : type_scope.
Lemma unlessL C P : implies C (\unless C, P).
Proof.
by split=> hC G /(_ hC).
Qed.
Lemma unlessR C P : implies P (\unless C, P).
Proof.
by split=> hP G _ /(_ hP).
Qed.
Lemma unless_sym C P : implies (\unless C, P) (\unless P, C).
Proof.
by split;
apply; [
apply/unlessR |
apply/unlessL].
Qed.
Lemma unlessP (C P : Prop) : (\unless C, P) <-> C \/ P.
Proof.
by split=> [|[/unlessL | /unlessR]];
apply; [
left |
right].
Qed.
Lemma bind_unless C P {Q} : implies (\unless C, P) (\unless (\unless C, Q), P).
Proof.
by split;
apply=> [hC|hP]; [
apply/unlessL/unlessL |
apply/unlessR].
Qed.
Lemma unless_contra b C : implies (~~ b -> C) (\unless C, b).
Proof.
by split;
case: b => [_ | hC]; [
apply/unlessR |
apply/unlessL/hC].
Qed.
(**
Classical reasoning becomes directly accessible for any bool subgoal.
Note that we cannot use "unless" here for lack of universe polymorphism. **)
Definition classically P : Prop :=
forall b : bool, (P -> b) -> b.
Lemma classicP (P : Prop) : classically P <-> ~ ~ P.
Proof.
split=> [cP nP | nnP [] // nP]; last
by case nnP; move/nP.
by have: P -> false; [move/nP | move/cP].
Qed.
Lemma classicW P : P -> classically P.
Proof.
by move=> hP _ ->.
Qed.
Lemma classic_bind P Q : (P -> classically Q) -> classically P -> classically Q.
Proof.
by move=> iPQ cP b /iPQ-/cP.
Qed.
Lemma classic_EM P : classically (decidable P).
Proof.
by case=> // undecP;
apply/undecP;
right=> notP;
apply/notF/undecP;
left.
Qed.
Lemma classic_pick T P : classically ({x : T | P x} + (
forall x, ~ P x)).
Proof.
case=> // undecP;
apply/undecP;
right=> x Px.
by apply/notF/undecP;
left;
exists x.
Qed.
Lemma classic_imply P Q : (P -> classically Q) -> classically (P -> Q).
Proof.
move=> iPQ []// notPQ;
apply/notPQ=> /iPQ-cQ.
by case: notF;
apply: cQ => hQ;
apply: notPQ.
Qed.
Lemma classic_sigW T (P : T -> Prop) :
classically (
exists x, P x) <-> classically ({x | P x}).
Proof.
by split;
apply: classic_bind => -[x Px];
apply/classicW;
exists x.
Qed.
Lemma classic_ex T (P : T -> Prop) :
~ (
forall x, ~ P x) -> classically (
exists x, P x).
Proof.
move=> NfNP;
apply/classicP => exPF;
apply: NfNP => x Px.
by apply: exPF;
exists x.
Qed.
(**
List notations for wider connectives; the Prop connectives have a fixed
width so as to avoid iterated destruction (we go up to width 5 for /\, and
width 4 for or). The bool connectives have arbitrary widths, but denote
expressions that associate to the RIGHT. This is consistent with the right
associativity of list expressions and thus more convenient in most proofs. **)
Inductive and3 (P1 P2 P3 : Prop) : Prop := And3 of P1 & P2 & P3.
Inductive and4 (P1 P2 P3 P4 : Prop) : Prop := And4 of P1 & P2 & P3 & P4.
Inductive and5 (P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 : Prop) : Prop :=
And5 of P1 & P2 & P3 & P4 & P5.
Inductive or3 (P1 P2 P3 : Prop) : Prop := Or31 of P1 | Or32 of P2 | Or33 of P3.
Inductive or4 (P1 P2 P3 P4 : Prop) : Prop :=
Or41 of P1 | Or42 of P2 | Or43 of P3 | Or44 of P4.
Notation "[ /\ P1 & P2 ]" := (and P1 P2) (only parsing) : type_scope.
Notation "[ /\ P1 , P2 & P3 ]" := (and3 P1 P2 P3) : type_scope.
Notation "[ /\ P1 , P2 , P3 & P4 ]" := (and4 P1 P2 P3 P4) : type_scope.
Notation "[ /\ P1 , P2 , P3 , P4 & P5 ]" := (and5 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5) : type_scope.
Notation "[ \/ P1 | P2 ]" := (or P1 P2) (only parsing) : type_scope.
Notation "[ \/ P1 , P2 | P3 ]" := (or3 P1 P2 P3) : type_scope.
Notation "[ \/ P1 , P2 , P3 | P4 ]" := (or4 P1 P2 P3 P4) : type_scope.
Notation "[ && b1 & c ]" := (b1 && c) (only parsing) : bool_scope.
Notation "[ && b1 , b2 , .. , bn & c ]" := (b1 && (b2 && .. (bn && c) .. ))
: bool_scope.
Notation "[ || b1 | c ]" := (b1 || c) (only parsing) : bool_scope.
Notation "[ || b1 , b2 , .. , bn | c ]" := (b1 || (b2 || .. (bn || c) .. ))
: bool_scope.
Notation "[ ==> b1 , b2 , .. , bn => c ]" :=
(b1 ==> (b2 ==> .. (bn ==> c) .. )) : bool_scope.
Notation "[ ==> b1 => c ]" := (b1 ==> c) (only parsing) : bool_scope.
Section AllAnd.
Variables (T :
Type) (P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 : T -> Prop).
Local Notation a P := (
forall x, P x).
Lemma all_and2 : implies (
forall x, [/\ P1 x & P2 x]) [/\ a P1 & a P2].
Proof.
by split=> haveP;
split=> x;
case: (haveP x).
Qed.
Lemma all_and3 : implies (
forall x, [/\ P1 x, P2 x & P3 x])
[/\ a P1, a P2 & a P3].
Proof.
by split=> haveP;
split=> x;
case: (haveP x).
Qed.
Lemma all_and4 : implies (
forall x, [/\ P1 x, P2 x, P3 x & P4 x])
[/\ a P1, a P2, a P3 & a P4].
Proof.
by split=> haveP;
split=> x;
case: (haveP x).
Qed.
Lemma all_and5 : implies (
forall x, [/\ P1 x, P2 x, P3 x, P4 x & P5 x])
[/\ a P1, a P2, a P3, a P4 & a P5].
Proof.
by split=> haveP;
split=> x;
case: (haveP x).
Qed.
End AllAnd.
Arguments all_and2 {T P1 P2}.
Arguments all_and3 {T P1 P2 P3}.
Arguments all_and4 {T P1 P2 P3 P4}.
Arguments all_and5 {T P1 P2 P3 P4 P5}.
Lemma pair_andP P Q : P /\ Q <-> P * Q.
Proof.
by split;
case.
Qed.
Section ReflectConnectives.
Variable b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 : bool.
Lemma idP : reflect b1 b1.
Proof.
by case b1; constructor.
Qed.
Lemma boolP : alt_spec b1 b1 b1.
Proof.
exact: (altP idP).
Qed.
(* Left-to-right reflection of ~~b1 to (b1 = false), no-op otherwise. *)
Lemma idPn : reflect (~~ b1) (~~ b1).
Proof.
by case b1; constructor.
Qed.
Lemma negP : reflect (~ b1) (~~ b1).
Proof.
by case b1; constructor;
auto.
Qed.
Lemma negPn : reflect b1 (~~ ~~ b1).
Proof.
by case b1; constructor.
Qed.
(* Right-to-left reflection, no-op otherwise.
C.f., https://github.com/math-comp/math-comp/issues/284
To change `b1 = false` into `~~ b1`, use `apply/negbTE` or `apply/idPn` (goal)
or `move/negbT` or `move/idPn` (hypothesis). *)
Lemma negPf : reflect (b1 = false) (~~ b1).
Proof.
by case b1; constructor.
Qed.
Lemma andP : reflect (b1 /\ b2) (b1 && b2).
Proof.
by case b1;
case b2; constructor=> //;
case.
Qed.
Lemma and3P : reflect [/\ b1, b2 & b3] [&& b1, b2 & b3].
Proof.
by case b1;
case b2;
case b3; constructor;
try by case.
Qed.
Lemma and4P : reflect [/\ b1, b2, b3 & b4] [&& b1, b2, b3 & b4].
Proof.
by case b1;
case b2;
case b3;
case b4; constructor;
try by case.
Qed.
Lemma and5P : reflect [/\ b1, b2, b3, b4 & b5] [&& b1, b2, b3, b4 & b5].
Proof.
by case b1;
case b2;
case b3;
case b4;
case b5; constructor;
try by case.
Qed.
Lemma orP : reflect (b1 \/ b2) (b1 || b2).
Proof.
by case b1;
case b2; constructor;
auto;
case.
Qed.
Lemma or3P : reflect [\/ b1, b2 | b3] [|| b1, b2 | b3].
Proof.
case b1; first
by constructor; constructor 1.
case b2; first
by constructor; constructor 2.
case b3; first
by constructor; constructor 3.
by constructor;
case.
Qed.
Lemma or4P : reflect [\/ b1, b2, b3 | b4] [|| b1, b2, b3 | b4].
Proof.
case b1; first
by constructor; constructor 1.
case b2; first
by constructor; constructor 2.
case b3; first
by constructor; constructor 3.
case b4; first
by constructor; constructor 4.
by constructor;
case.
Qed.
Lemma nandP : reflect (~~ b1 \/ ~~ b2) (~~ (b1 && b2)).
Proof.
by case b1;
case b2; constructor;
auto;
case;
auto.
Qed.
Lemma norP : reflect (~~ b1 /\ ~~ b2) (~~ (b1 || b2)).
Proof.
by case b1;
case b2; constructor;
auto;
case;
auto.
Qed.
Lemma implyP : reflect (b1 -> b2) (b1 ==> b2).
Proof.
by case b1;
case b2; constructor;
auto.
Qed.
End ReflectConnectives.
Arguments idP {b1}.
Arguments idPn {b1}.
Arguments negP {b1}.
Arguments negPn {b1}.
Arguments negPf {b1}.
Arguments andP {b1 b2}.
Arguments and3P {b1 b2 b3}.
Arguments and4P {b1 b2 b3 b4}.
Arguments and5P {b1 b2 b3 b4 b5}.
Arguments orP {b1 b2}.
Arguments or3P {b1 b2 b3}.
Arguments or4P {b1 b2 b3 b4}.
Arguments nandP {b1 b2}.
Arguments norP {b1 b2}.
Arguments implyP {b1 b2}.
Prenex Implicits idP idPn negP negPn negPf.
Prenex Implicits andP and3P and4P and5P orP or3P or4P nandP norP implyP.
Section ReflectCombinators.
Variables (P Q : Prop) (p q : bool).
Hypothesis rP : reflect P p.
Hypothesis rQ : reflect Q q.
Lemma negPP : reflect (~ P) (~~ p).
Proof.
by apply:(iffP negP);
apply: contra_not => /rP.
Qed.
Lemma andPP : reflect (P /\ Q) (p && q).
Proof.
by apply: (iffP andP) => -[/rP ? /rQ ?].
Qed.
Lemma orPP : reflect (P \/ Q) (p || q).
Proof.
by apply: (iffP orP) => -[/rP ?|/rQ ?];
tauto.
Qed.
Lemma implyPP : reflect (P -> Q) (p ==> q).
Proof.
by apply: (iffP implyP) => pq /rP /pq /rQ.
Qed.
End ReflectCombinators.
Arguments negPP {P p}.
Arguments andPP {P Q p q}.
Arguments orPP {P Q p q}.
Arguments implyPP {P Q p q}.
Prenex Implicits negPP andPP orPP implyPP.
(** Shorter, more systematic names for the boolean connectives laws. **)
Lemma andTb : left_id true andb.
Proof.
by [].
Qed.
Lemma andFb : left_zero false andb.
Proof.
by [].
Qed.
Lemma andbT : right_id true andb.
Proof.
by case.
Qed.
Lemma andbF : right_zero false andb.
Proof.
by case.
Qed.
Lemma andbb : idempotent_op andb.
Proof.
by case.
Qed.
Lemma andbC : commutative andb.
Proof.
by do 2!
case.
Qed.
Lemma andbA : associative andb.
Proof.
by do 3!
case.
Qed.
Lemma andbCA : left_commutative andb.
Proof.
by do 3!
case.
Qed.
Lemma andbAC : right_commutative andb.
Proof.
by do 3!
case.
Qed.
Lemma andbACA : interchange andb andb.
Proof.
by do 4!
case.
Qed.
Lemma orTb :
forall b, true || b.
Proof.
by [].
Qed.
Lemma orFb : left_id false orb.
Proof.
by [].
Qed.
Lemma orbT :
forall b, b || true.
Proof.
by case.
Qed.
Lemma orbF : right_id false orb.
Proof.
by case.
Qed.
Lemma orbb : idempotent_op orb.
Proof.
by case.
Qed.
Lemma orbC : commutative orb.
Proof.
by do 2!
case.
Qed.
Lemma orbA : associative orb.
Proof.
by do 3!
case.
Qed.
Lemma orbCA : left_commutative orb.
Proof.
by do 3!
case.
Qed.
Lemma orbAC : right_commutative orb.
Proof.
by do 3!
case.
Qed.
Lemma orbACA : interchange orb orb.
Proof.
by do 4!
case.
Qed.
Lemma andbN b : b && ~~ b = false.
Proof.
by case: b.
Qed.
Lemma andNb b : ~~ b && b = false.
Proof.
by case: b.
Qed.
Lemma orbN b : b || ~~ b = true.
Proof.
by case: b.
Qed.
Lemma orNb b : ~~ b || b = true.
Proof.
by case: b.
Qed.
Lemma andb_orl : left_distributive andb orb.
Proof.
by do 3!
case.
Qed.
Lemma andb_orr : right_distributive andb orb.
Proof.
by do 3!
case.
Qed.
Lemma orb_andl : left_distributive orb andb.
Proof.
by do 3!
case.
Qed.
Lemma orb_andr : right_distributive orb andb.
Proof.
by do 3!
case.
Qed.
Lemma andb_idl (a b : bool) : (b -> a) -> a && b = b.
Proof.
by case: a;
case: b => // ->.
Qed.
Lemma andb_idr (a b : bool) : (a -> b) -> a && b = a.
Proof.
by case: a;
case: b => // ->.
Qed.
Lemma andb_id2l (a b c : bool) : (a -> b = c) -> a && b = a && c.
Proof.
by case: a;
case: b;
case: c => // ->.
Qed.
Lemma andb_id2r (a b c : bool) : (b -> a = c) -> a && b = c && b.
Proof.
by case: a;
case: b;
case: c => // ->.
Qed.
Lemma orb_idl (a b : bool) : (a -> b) -> a || b = b.
Proof.
by case: a;
case: b => // ->.
Qed.
Lemma orb_idr (a b : bool) : (b -> a) -> a || b = a.
Proof.
by case: a;
case: b => // ->.
Qed.
Lemma orb_id2l (a b c : bool) : (~~ a -> b = c) -> a || b = a || c.
Proof.
by case: a;
case: b;
case: c => // ->.
Qed.
Lemma orb_id2r (a b c : bool) : (~~ b -> a = c) -> a || b = c || b.
Proof.
by case: a;
case: b;
case: c => // ->.
Qed.
Lemma negb_and (a b : bool) : ~~ (a && b) = ~~ a || ~~ b.
Proof.
by case: a;
case: b.
Qed.
Lemma negb_or (a b : bool) : ~~ (a || b) = ~~ a && ~~ b.
Proof.
by case: a;
case: b.
Qed.
(** Pseudo-cancellation -- i.e, absorption **)
Lemma andbK a b : a && b || a = a.
Proof.
by case: a;
case: b.
Qed.
Lemma andKb a b : a || b && a = a.
Proof.
by case: a;
case: b.
Qed.
Lemma orbK a b : (a || b) && a = a.
Proof.
by case: a;
case: b.
Qed.
Lemma orKb a b : a && (b || a) = a.
Proof.
by case: a;
case: b.
Qed.
(** Imply **)
Lemma implybT b : b ==> true.
Proof.
by case: b.
Qed.
Lemma implybF b : (b ==> false) = ~~ b.
Proof.
by case: b.
Qed.
Lemma implyFb b : false ==> b.
Proof.
by [].
Qed.
Lemma implyTb b : (true ==> b) = b.
Proof.
by [].
Qed.
Lemma implybb b : b ==> b.
Proof.
by case: b.
Qed.
Lemma negb_imply a b : ~~ (a ==> b) = a && ~~ b.
Proof.
by case: a;
case: b.
Qed.
Lemma implybE a b : (a ==> b) = ~~ a || b.
Proof.
by case: a;
case: b.
Qed.
Lemma implyNb a b : (~~ a ==> b) = a || b.
Proof.
by case: a;
case: b.
Qed.
Lemma implybN a b : (a ==> ~~ b) = (b ==> ~~ a).
Proof.
by case: a;
case: b.
Qed.
Lemma implybNN a b : (~~ a ==> ~~ b) = b ==> a.
Proof.
by case: a;
case: b.
Qed.
Lemma implyb_idl (a b : bool) : (~~ a -> b) -> (a ==> b) = b.
Proof.
by case: a;
case: b => // ->.
Qed.
Lemma implyb_idr (a b : bool) : (b -> ~~ a) -> (a ==> b) = ~~ a.
Proof.
by case: a;
case: b => // ->.
Qed.
Lemma implyb_id2l (a b c : bool) : (a -> b = c) -> (a ==> b) = (a ==> c).
Proof.
by case: a;
case: b;
case: c => // ->.
Qed.
(** Addition (xor) **)
Lemma addFb : left_id false addb.
Proof.
by [].
Qed.
Lemma addbF : right_id false addb.
Proof.
by case.
Qed.
Lemma addbb : self_inverse false addb.
Proof.
by case.
Qed.
Lemma addbC : commutative addb.
Proof.
by do 2!
case.
Qed.
Lemma addbA : associative addb.
Proof.
by do 3!
case.
Qed.
Lemma addbCA : left_commutative addb.
Proof.
by do 3!
case.
Qed.
Lemma addbAC : right_commutative addb.
Proof.
by do 3!
case.
Qed.
Lemma addbACA : interchange addb addb.
Proof.
by do 4!
case.
Qed.
Lemma andb_addl : left_distributive andb addb.
Proof.
by do 3!
case.
Qed.
Lemma andb_addr : right_distributive andb addb.
Proof.
by do 3!
case.
Qed.
Lemma addKb : left_loop id addb.
Proof.
by do 2!
case.
Qed.
Lemma addbK : right_loop id addb.
Proof.
by do 2!
case.
Qed.
Lemma addIb : left_injective addb.
Proof.
by do 3!
case.
Qed.
Lemma addbI : right_injective addb.
Proof.
by do 3!
case.
Qed.
Lemma addTb b : true (+) b = ~~ b.
Proof.
by [].
Qed.
Lemma addbT b : b (+) true = ~~ b.
Proof.
by case: b.
Qed.
Lemma addbN a b : a (+) ~~ b = ~~ (a (+) b).
Proof.
by case: a;
case: b.
Qed.
Lemma addNb a b : ~~ a (+) b = ~~ (a (+) b).
Proof.
by case: a;
case: b.
Qed.
Lemma addbP a b : reflect (~~ a = b) (a (+) b).
Proof.
by case: a;
case: b; constructor.
Qed.
Arguments addbP {a b}.
(**
Resolution tactic for blindly weeding out common terms from boolean
equalities. When faced with a goal of the form (andb/orb/addb b1 b2) = b3
they will try to locate b1 in b3 and remove it. This can fail! **)
Ltac bool_congr :=
match goal with
| |- (?X1 && ?X2 = ?X3) => first
[
symmetry;
rewrite -1?(andbC X1) -?(andbCA X1); congr 1 (andb X1);
symmetry
|
case: (X1); [
rewrite ?andTb ?andbT // |
by rewrite ?andbF /= ] ]
| |- (?X1 || ?X2 = ?X3) => first
[
symmetry;
rewrite -1?(orbC X1) -?(orbCA X1); congr 1 (orb X1);
symmetry
|
case: (X1); [
by rewrite ?orbT //= |
rewrite ?orFb ?orbF ] ]
| |- (?X1 (+) ?X2 = ?X3) =>
symmetry;
rewrite -1?(addbC X1) -?(addbCA X1); congr 1 (addb X1);
symmetry
| |- (~~ ?X1 = ?X2) => congr 1 negb
end.
(**
Predicates, i.e., packaged functions to bool.
- pred T, the basic type for predicates over a type T, is simply an alias
for T -> bool.
We actually distinguish two kinds of predicates, which we call applicative
and collective, based on the syntax used to test them at some x in T:
- For an applicative predicate P, one uses prefix syntax:
P x
Also, most operations on applicative predicates use prefix syntax as
well (e.g., predI P Q).
- For a collective predicate A, one uses infix syntax:
x \in A
and all operations on collective predicates use infix syntax as well
(e.g., #[#predI A & B#]#).
There are only two kinds of applicative predicates:
- pred T, the alias for T -> bool mentioned above
- simpl_pred T, an alias for simpl_fun T bool with a coercion to pred T
that auto-simplifies on application (see ssrfun).
On the other hand, the set of collective predicate types is open-ended via
- predType T, a Structure that can be used to put Canonical collective
predicate interpretation on other types, such as lists, tuples,
finite sets, etc.
Indeed, we define such interpretations for applicative predicate types,
which can therefore also be used with the infix syntax, e.g.,
x \in predI P Q
Moreover these infix forms are convertible to their prefix counterpart
(e.g., predI P Q x which in turn simplifies to P x && Q x). The converse
is not true, however; collective predicate types cannot, in general, be
used applicatively, because of restrictions on implicit coercions.
However, we do define an explicit generic coercion
- mem : forall (pT : predType), pT -> mem_pred T
where mem_pred T is a variant of simpl_pred T that preserves the infix
syntax, i.e., mem A x auto-simplifies to x \in A.
Indeed, the infix "collective" operators are notation for a prefix
operator with arguments of type mem_pred T or pred T, applied to coerced
collective predicates, e.g.,
Notation "x \in A" := (in_mem x (mem A)).
This prevents the variability in the predicate type from interfering with
the application of generic lemmas. Moreover this also makes it much easier
to define generic lemmas, because the simplest type -- pred T -- can be
used as the type of generic collective predicates, provided one takes care
not to use it applicatively; this avoids the burden of having to declare a
different predicate type for each predicate parameter of each section or
lemma.
In detail, we ensure that the head normal form of mem A is always of the
eta-long MemPred (fun x => pA x) form, where pA is the pred interpretation of
A following its predType pT, i.e., the _expansion_ of topred A. For a pred T
evar ?P, (mem ?P) converts MemPred (fun x => ?P x), whose argument is a Miller
pattern and therefore always unify: unifying (mem A) with (mem ?P) always
yields ?P = pA, because the rigid constant MemPred aligns the unification.
Furthermore, we ensure pA is always either A or toP .... A where toP ... is
the expansion of @topred T pT, and toP is declared as a Coercion, so pA will
_display_ as A in either case, and the instances of @mem T (predPredType T) pA
appearing in the premises or right-hand side of a generic lemma parameterized
by ?P will be indistinguishable from @mem T pT A.
Users should take care not to inadvertently "strip" (mem A) down to the
coerced A, since this will expose the internal toP coercion: Rocq could then
display terms A x that cannot be typed as such. The topredE lemma can be used
to restore the x \in A syntax in this case. While -topredE can conversely be
used to change x \in P into P x for an applicative P, it is safer to use the
inE, unfold_in or and memE lemmas instead, as they do not run the risk of
exposing internal coercions. As a consequence it is better to explicitly
cast a generic applicative predicate to simpl_pred using the SimplPred
constructor when it is used as a collective predicate (see, e.g.,
Lemma eq_big in bigop).
We also sometimes "instantiate" the predType structure by defining a
coercion to the sort of the predPredType structure, conveniently denoted
{pred T}. This works better for types such as {set T} that have subtypes that
coerce to them, since the same coercion will be inserted by the application
of mem, or of any lemma that expects a generic collective predicates with
type {pred T} := pred_sort (predPredType T) = pred T; thus {pred T} should be
the preferred type for generic collective predicate parameters.
This device also lets us turn any Type aT : predArgType into the total
predicate over that type, i.e., fun _: aT => true. This allows us to write,
e.g., ##|'I_n| for the cardinal of the (finite) type of integers less than n.
**)
(** Boolean predicates. *)
Definition pred T := T -> bool.
Identity Coercion fun_of_pred : pred >-> Funclass.
Definition subpred T (p1 p2 : pred T) :=
forall x : T, p1 x -> p2 x.
(* Notation for some manifest predicates. *)
Notation xpred0 := (
fun=> false).
Notation xpredT := (
fun=> true).
Notation xpredI := (
fun (p1 p2 : pred _) x => p1 x && p2 x).
Notation xpredU := (
fun (p1 p2 : pred _) x => p1 x || p2 x).
Notation xpredC := (
fun (p : pred _) x => ~~ p x).
Notation xpredD := (
fun (p1 p2 : pred _) x => ~~ p2 x && p1 x).
Notation xpreim := (
fun f (p : pred _) x => p (f x)).
(** The packed class interface for pred-like types. **)
Structure predType T :=
PredType {pred_sort :>
Type; topred : pred_sort -> pred T}.
Definition clone_pred T U :=
fun pT & @pred_sort T pT -> U =>
fun toP (pT' := @PredType T U toP) & phant_id pT' pT => pT'.
Notation "[ 'predType' 'of' T ]" := (@clone_pred _ T _ id _ id) : form_scope.
Canonical predPredType T := PredType (@id (pred T)).
Set Warnings
"-redundant-canonical-projection".
Canonical boolfunPredType T := PredType (@id (T -> bool)).
Set Warnings
"redundant-canonical-projection".
(** The type of abstract collective predicates.
While {pred T} is convertible to pred T, it presents the pred_sort coercion
class, which crucially does _not_ coerce to Funclass. Term whose type P coerces
to {pred T} cannot be applied to arguments, but they _can_ be used as if P
had a canonical predType instance, as the coercion will be inserted if the
unification P =~= pred_sort ?pT fails, changing the problem into the trivial
{pred T} =~= pred_sort ?pT (solution ?pT := predPredType P).
Additional benefits of this approach are that any type coercing to P will
also inherit this behaviour, and that the coercion will be apparent in the
elaborated expression. The latter may be important if the coercion is also
a canonical structure projector - see mathcomp/fingroup/fingroup.v. The
main drawback of implementing predType by coercion in this way is that the
type of the value must be known when the unification constraint is imposed:
if we only register the constraint and then later discover later that the
expression had type P it will be too late to insert a coercion, whereas a
canonical instance of predType for P would have solved the deferred constraint.
Finally, definitions, lemmas and sections should use type {pred T} for
their generic collective type parameters, as this will make it possible to
apply such definitions and lemmas directly to values of types that implement
predType by coercion to {pred T} (values of types that implement predType
without coercing to {pred T} will have to be coerced explicitly using topred).
**)
Notation "{ 'pred' T }" := (pred_sort (predPredType T)) : type_scope.
(** The type of self-simplifying collective predicates. **)
Definition simpl_pred T := simpl_fun T bool.
Definition SimplPred {T} (p : pred T) : simpl_pred T := SimplFun p.
(** Some simpl_pred constructors. **)
Definition pred0 {T} := @SimplPred T xpred0.
Definition predT {T} := @SimplPred T xpredT.
Definition predI {T} (p1 p2 : pred T) := SimplPred (xpredI p1 p2).
Definition predU {T} (p1 p2 : pred T) := SimplPred (xpredU p1 p2).
Definition predC {T} (p : pred T) := SimplPred (xpredC p).
Definition predD {T} (p1 p2 : pred T) := SimplPred (xpredD p1 p2).
Definition preim {aT rT} (f : aT -> rT) (d : pred rT) := SimplPred (xpreim f d).
Notation "[ 'pred' : T | E ]" := (SimplPred (
fun _ : T => E%B)) :
function_scope.
Notation "[ 'pred' x | E ]" := (SimplPred (
fun x => E%B)) : function_scope.
Notation "[ 'pred' x | E1 & E2 ]" := [pred x | E1 && E2 ] : function_scope.
Notation "[ 'pred' x : T | E ]" :=
(SimplPred (
fun x : T => E%B)) (only parsing) : function_scope.
Notation "[ 'pred' x : T | E1 & E2 ]" :=
[pred x : T | E1 && E2 ] (only parsing) : function_scope.
(** Coercions for simpl_pred.
As simpl_pred T values are used both applicatively and collectively we
need simpl_pred to coerce to both pred T _and_ {pred T}. However it is
undesirable to have two distinct constants for what are essentially identical
coercion functions, as this confuses the SSReflect keyed matching algorithm.
While the Rocq Coercion declarations appear to disallow such Coercion aliasing,
it is possible to work around this limitation with a combination of modules
and functors, which we do below.
In addition we also give a predType instance for simpl_pred, which will
be preferred to the {pred T} coercion to solve simpl_pred T =~= pred_sort ?pT
constraints; note however that the pred_of_simpl coercion _will_ be used
when a simpl_pred T is passed as a {pred T}, since the simplPredType T
structure for simpl_pred T is _not_ convertible to predPredType T. **)
Module PredOfSimpl.
Definition coerce T (sp : simpl_pred T) : pred T := fun_of_simpl sp.
End PredOfSimpl.
Notation pred_of_simpl := PredOfSimpl.coerce.
Coercion pred_of_simpl : simpl_pred >-> pred.
Canonical simplPredType T := PredType (@pred_of_simpl T).
Module Type PredSortOfSimplSignature.
Parameter coerce :
forall T, simpl_pred T -> {pred T}.
End PredSortOfSimplSignature.
Module DeclarePredSortOfSimpl (PredSortOfSimpl : PredSortOfSimplSignature).
Coercion PredSortOfSimpl.coerce : simpl_pred >-> pred_sort.
End DeclarePredSortOfSimpl.
Module Export PredSortOfSimplCoercion := DeclarePredSortOfSimpl PredOfSimpl.
(** Type to pred coercion.
This lets us use types of sort predArgType as a synonym for their universal
predicate. We define this predicate as a simpl_pred T rather than a pred T or
a {pred T} so that /= and inE reduce (T x) and x \in T to true, respectively.
Unfortunately, this can't be used for existing types like bool whose sort
is already fixed (at least, not without redefining bool, true, false and
all bool operations and lemmas); we provide syntax to recast a given type
in predArgType as a workaround. **)
Definition predArgType :=
Type.
Bind
Scope type_scope
with predArgType.
Identity Coercion sort_of_predArgType : predArgType >-> Sortclass.
Coercion pred_of_argType (T : predArgType) : simpl_pred T := predT.
Notation "{ : T }" := (T%
type : predArgType) : type_scope.
(** Boolean relations.
Simplifying relations follow the coding pattern of 2-argument simplifying
functions: the simplifying type constructor is applied to the _last_
argument. This design choice will let the in_simpl component of inE expand
membership in simpl_rel as well. We provide an explicit coercion to rel T
to avoid eta-expansion during coercion; this coercion self-simplifies so it
should be invisible.
**)
Definition rel T := T -> pred T.
Identity Coercion fun_of_rel : rel >-> Funclass.
Definition subrel T (r1 r2 : rel T) :=
forall x y : T, r1 x y -> r2 x y.
Definition simpl_rel T := T -> simpl_pred T.
Coercion rel_of_simpl T (sr : simpl_rel T) : rel T :=
fun x : T => sr x.
Arguments rel_of_simpl {T} sr x /.
Notation xrelU := (
fun (r1 r2 : rel _) x y => r1 x y || r2 x y).
Notation xrelpre := (
fun f (r : rel _) x y => r (f x) (f y)).
Definition SimplRel {T} (r : rel T) : simpl_rel T :=
fun x => SimplPred (r x).
Definition relU {T} (r1 r2 : rel T) := SimplRel (xrelU r1 r2).
Definition relpre {aT rT} (f : aT -> rT) (r : rel rT) := SimplRel (xrelpre f r).
Notation "[ 'rel' x y | E ]" := (SimplRel (
fun x y => E%B))
(only parsing) : function_scope.
Notation "[ 'rel' x y : T | E ]" :=
(SimplRel (
fun x y : T => E%B)) (only parsing) : function_scope.
Lemma subrelUl T (r1 r2 : rel T) : subrel r1 (relU r1 r2).
Proof.
by move=> x y r1xy;
apply/orP;
left.
Qed.
Lemma subrelUr T (r1 r2 : rel T) : subrel r2 (relU r1 r2).
Proof.
by move=> x y r2xy;
apply/orP;
right.
Qed.
(** Variant of simpl_pred specialised to the membership operator. **)
Variant mem_pred T := Mem of pred T.
(**
We mainly declare pred_of_mem as a coercion so that it is not displayed.
Similarly to pred_of_simpl, it will usually not be inserted by type
inference, as all mem_pred mp =~= pred_sort ?pT unification problems will
be solve by the memPredType instance below; pred_of_mem will however
be used if a mem_pred T is used as a {pred T}, which is desirable as it
will avoid a redundant mem in a collective, e.g., passing (mem A) to a lemma
exception a generic collective predicate p : {pred T} and premise x \in P
will display a subgoal x \in A rather than x \in mem A.
Conversely, pred_of_mem will _not_ if it is used id (mem A) is used
applicatively or as a pred T; there the simpl_of_mem coercion defined below
will be used, resulting in a subgoal that displays as mem A x by simplifies
to x \in A.
**)
Coercion pred_of_mem {T} mp : {pred T} :=
let: Mem p := mp in [eta p].
Canonical memPredType T := PredType (@pred_of_mem T).
Definition in_mem {T} (x : T) mp := pred_of_mem mp x.
Definition eq_mem {T} mp1 mp2 :=
forall x : T, in_mem x mp1 = in_mem x mp2.
Definition sub_mem {T} mp1 mp2 :=
forall x : T, in_mem x mp1 -> in_mem x mp2.
Arguments in_mem {T} x mp :
simpl never.
Global Typeclasses
Opaque eq_mem sub_mem.
(** The [simpl_of_mem; pred_of_simpl] path provides a new mem_pred >-> pred
coercion, but does _not_ override the pred_of_mem : mem_pred >-> pred_sort
explicit coercion declaration above.
**)
Coercion simpl_of_mem {T} mp := SimplPred (
fun x : T => in_mem x mp).
Lemma sub_refl T (mp : mem_pred T) : sub_mem mp mp.
Proof.
by [].
Qed.
Arguments sub_refl {T mp} [x] mp_x.
(**
It is essential to interlock the production of the Mem constructor inside
the branch of the predType match, to ensure that unifying mem A with
Mem [eta ?p] sets ?p := toP A (or ?p := P if toP = id and A = [eta P]),
rather than topred pT A, had we put mem A := Mem (topred A).
**)
Definition mem T (pT : predType T) : pT -> mem_pred T :=
let: PredType toP := pT in
fun A => Mem [eta toP A].
Arguments mem {T pT} A : rename,
simpl never.
Notation "x \in A" := (in_mem x (mem A)) (only parsing) : bool_scope.
Notation "x \in A" := (in_mem x (mem A)) (only printing) : bool_scope.
Notation "x \notin A" := (~~ (x \in A)) : bool_scope.
Notation "A =i B" := (eq_mem (mem A) (mem B)) : type_scope.
Notation "{ 'subset' A <= B }" := (sub_mem (mem A) (mem B)) : type_scope.
Notation "[ 'in' A ]" := (in_mem^~ (mem A))
(at level 0, format
"[ 'in' A ]") : function_scope.
Notation "[ 'mem' A ]" :=
(pred_of_simpl (simpl_of_mem (mem A))) (only parsing) : function_scope.
Notation "[ 'predI' A & B ]" := (predI [in A] [in B]) : function_scope.
Notation "[ 'predU' A & B ]" := (predU [in A] [in B]) : function_scope.
Notation "[ 'predD' A & B ]" := (predD [in A] [in B]) : function_scope.
Notation "[ 'predC' A ]" := (predC [in A]) : function_scope.
Notation "[ 'preim' f 'of' A ]" := (preim f [in A]) : function_scope.
Notation "[ 'pred' x 'in' A ]" := [pred x | x \in A] : function_scope.
Notation "[ 'pred' x 'in' A | E ]" := [pred x | x \in A & E] : function_scope.
Notation "[ 'pred' x 'in' A | E1 & E2 ]" :=
[pred x | x \in A & E1 && E2 ] : function_scope.
Notation "[ 'rel' x y 'in' A & B | E ]" :=
[rel x y | (x \in A) && (y \in B) && E] : function_scope.
Notation "[ 'rel' x y 'in' A & B ]" :=
[rel x y | (x \in A) && (y \in B)] : function_scope.
Notation "[ 'rel' x y 'in' A | E ]" := [rel x y in A & A | E] : function_scope.
Notation "[ 'rel' x y 'in' A ]" := [rel x y in A & A] : function_scope.
(** Aliases of pred T that let us tag instances of simpl_pred as applicative
or collective, via bespoke coercions. This tagging will give control over
the simplification behaviour of inE and other rewriting lemmas below.
For this control to work it is crucial that collective_of_simpl _not_
be convertible to either applicative_of_simpl or pred_of_simpl. Indeed
they differ here by a commutative conversion (of the match and lambda).
**)
Definition applicative_pred T := pred T.
Definition collective_pred T := pred T.
Coercion applicative_pred_of_simpl T (sp : simpl_pred T) : applicative_pred T :=
fun_of_simpl sp.
Coercion collective_pred_of_simpl T (sp : simpl_pred T) : collective_pred T :=
let: SimplFun p := sp in p.
(** Explicit simplification rules for predicate application and membership. **)
Section PredicateSimplification.
Variables T :
Type.
Implicit Types (p : pred T) (pT : predType T) (sp : simpl_pred T).
Implicit Types (mp : mem_pred T).
(**
The following four bespoke structures provide fine-grained control over
matching the various predicate forms. While all four follow a common pattern
of using a canonical projection to match a particular form of predicate
(in pred T, simpl_pred, mem_pred and mem_pred, respectively), and display
the matched predicate in the structure type, each is in fact used for a
different, specific purpose:
- registered_applicative_pred: this user-facing structure is used to
declare values of type pred T meant to be used applicatively. The
structure parameter merely displays this same value, and is used to avoid
undesirable, visible occurrence of the structure in the right hand side
of rewrite rules such as app_predE.
There is a canonical instance of registered_applicative_pred for values
of the applicative_of_simpl coercion, which handles the
Definition Apred : applicative_pred T := [pred x | ...] idiom.
This instance is mainly intended for the in_applicative component of inE,
in conjunction with manifest_mem_pred and applicative_mem_pred.
- manifest_simpl_pred: the only instance of this structure matches manifest
simpl_pred values of the form SimplPred p, displaying p in the structure
type. This structure is used in in_simpl to detect and selectively expand
collective predicates of this form. An explicit SimplPred p pattern would
_NOT_ work for this purpose, as then the left-hand side of in_simpl would
reduce to in_mem ?x (Mem [eta ?p]) and would thus match _any_ instance
of \in, not just those arising from a manifest simpl_pred.
- manifest_mem_pred: similar to manifest_simpl_pred, the one instance of this
structure matches manifest mem_pred values of the form Mem [eta ?p]. The
purpose is different however: to match and display in ?p the actual
predicate appearing in an ... \in ... expression matched by the left hand
side of the in_applicative component of inE; then
- applicative_mem_pred is a telescope refinement of manifest_mem_pred p with
a default constructor that checks that the predicate p is the value of a
registered_applicative_pred; any unfolding occurring during this check
does _not_ affect the value of p passed to in_applicative, since that
has been fixed earlier by the manifest_mem_pred match. In particular the
definition of a predicate using the applicative_pred_of_simpl idiom above
will not be expanded - this very case is the reason in_applicative uses
a mem_pred telescope in its left hand side. The more straightforward
?x \in applicative_pred_value ?ap (equivalent to in_mem ?x (Mem ?ap))
with ?ap : registered_applicative_pred ?p would set ?p := [pred x | ...]
rather than ?p := Apred in the example above.
Also note that the in_applicative component of inE must be come before the
in_simpl one, as the latter also matches terms of the form x \in Apred.
Finally, no component of inE matches x \in Acoll, when
Definition Acoll : collective_pred T := [pred x | ...].
as the collective_pred_of_simpl is _not_ convertible to pred_of_simpl. **)
Structure registered_applicative_pred p := RegisteredApplicativePred {
applicative_pred_value :> pred T;
_ : applicative_pred_value = p
}.
Definition ApplicativePred p := RegisteredApplicativePred (erefl p).
Canonical applicative_pred_applicative sp :=
ApplicativePred (applicative_pred_of_simpl sp).
Structure manifest_simpl_pred p := ManifestSimplPred {
simpl_pred_value :> simpl_pred T;
_ : simpl_pred_value = SimplPred p
}.
Canonical expose_simpl_pred p := ManifestSimplPred (erefl (SimplPred p)).
Structure manifest_mem_pred p := ManifestMemPred {
mem_pred_value :> mem_pred T;
_ : mem_pred_value = Mem [eta p]
}.
Canonical expose_mem_pred p := ManifestMemPred (erefl (Mem [eta p])).
Structure applicative_mem_pred p :=
ApplicativeMemPred {applicative_mem_pred_value :> manifest_mem_pred p}.
Canonical check_applicative_mem_pred p (ap : registered_applicative_pred p) :=
[eta @ApplicativeMemPred ap].
Lemma mem_topred pT (pp : pT) : mem (topred pp) = mem pp.
Proof.
by case: pT pp.
Qed.
Lemma topredE pT x (pp : pT) : topred pp x = (x \in pp).
Proof.
by rewrite -mem_topred.
Qed.
Lemma app_predE x p (ap : registered_applicative_pred p) : ap x = (x \in p).
Proof.
by case: ap => _ /= ->.
Qed.
Lemma in_applicative x p (amp : applicative_mem_pred p) : in_mem x amp = p x.
Proof.
by case: amp => -[_ /= ->].
Qed.
Lemma in_collective x p (msp : manifest_simpl_pred p) :
(x \in collective_pred_of_simpl msp) = p x.
Proof.
by case: msp => _ /= ->.
Qed.
Lemma in_simpl x p (msp : manifest_simpl_pred p) :
in_mem x (Mem [eta pred_of_simpl msp]) = p x.
Proof.
by case: msp => _ /= ->.
Qed.
(**
Because of the explicit eta expansion in the left-hand side, this lemma
should only be used in the left-to-right direction.
**)
Lemma unfold_in x p : (x \in ([eta p] : pred T)) = p x.
Proof.
by [].
Qed.
Lemma simpl_predE p : SimplPred p =1 p.
Proof.
by [].
Qed.
Definition inE := (in_applicative, in_simpl, simpl_predE).
(* to be extended *)
Lemma mem_simpl sp : mem sp = sp :> pred T.
Proof.
by [].
Qed.
Definition memE := mem_simpl.
(* could be extended *)
Lemma mem_mem mp :
(mem mp = mp) * (mem (mp : simpl_pred T) = mp) * (mem (mp : pred T) = mp).
Proof.
by case: mp.
Qed.
End PredicateSimplification.
(** Qualifiers and keyed predicates. **)
Variant qualifier (q : nat) T := Qualifier of {pred T}.
Coercion has_quality n T (q : qualifier n T) : {pred T} :=
fun x =>
let: Qualifier _ p := q in p x.
Arguments has_quality n {T}.
Lemma qualifE n T p x : (x \in @Qualifier n T p) = p x.
Proof.
by [].
Qed.
Notation "x \is A" := (x \in has_quality 0 A) (only parsing) : bool_scope.
Notation "x \is A" := (x \in has_quality 0 A) (only printing) : bool_scope.
Notation "x \is 'a' A" := (x \in has_quality 1 A) (only parsing) : bool_scope.
Notation "x \is 'a' A" := (x \in has_quality 1 A) (only printing) : bool_scope.
Notation "x \is 'an' A" := (x \in has_quality 2 A) (only parsing) : bool_scope.
Notation "x \is 'an' A" := (x \in has_quality 2 A) (only printing) : bool_scope.
Notation "x \isn't A" := (x \notin has_quality 0 A) : bool_scope.
Notation "x \isn't 'a' A" := (x \notin has_quality 1 A) : bool_scope.
Notation "x \isn't 'an' A" := (x \notin has_quality 2 A) : bool_scope.
Notation "[ 'qualify' x | P ]" := (Qualifier 0 (
fun x => P%B)) : form_scope.
Notation "[ 'qualify' x : T | P ]" :=
(Qualifier 0 (
fun x : T => P%B)) (only parsing) : form_scope.
Notation "[ 'qualify' 'a' x | P ]" := (Qualifier 1 (
fun x => P%B)) : form_scope.
Notation "[ 'qualify' 'a' x : T | P ]" :=
(Qualifier 1 (
fun x : T => P%B)) (only parsing) : form_scope.
Notation "[ 'qualify' 'an' x | P ]" :=
(Qualifier 2 (
fun x => P%B)) : form_scope.
Notation "[ 'qualify' 'an' x : T | P ]" :=
(Qualifier 2 (
fun x : T => P%B)) (only parsing) : form_scope.
(** Keyed predicates: support for property-bearing predicate interfaces. **)
Section KeyPred.
Variable T :
Type.
Variant pred_key (p : {pred T}) : Prop := DefaultPredKey.
Variable p : {pred T}.
Structure keyed_pred (k : pred_key p) :=
PackKeyedPred {unkey_pred :> {pred T}; _ : unkey_pred =i p}.
Variable k : pred_key p.
Definition KeyedPred := @PackKeyedPred k p (frefl _).
Variable k_p : keyed_pred k.
Lemma keyed_predE : k_p =i p.
Proof.
by case: k_p.
Qed.
(**
Instances that strip the mem cast; the first one has "pred_of_mem" as its
projection head value, while the second has "pred_of_simpl". The latter
has the side benefit of preempting accidental misdeclarations.
Note: pred_of_mem is the registered mem >-> pred_sort coercion, while
[simpl_of_mem; pred_of_simpl] is the mem >-> pred >=> Funclass coercion. We
must write down the coercions explicitly as the Canonical head constant
computation does not strip casts. **)
Canonical keyed_mem :=
@PackKeyedPred k (pred_of_mem (mem k_p)) keyed_predE.
Canonical keyed_mem_simpl :=
@PackKeyedPred k (pred_of_simpl (mem k_p)) keyed_predE.
End KeyPred.
Local Notation in_unkey x S := (x \in @unkey_pred _ S _ _) (only parsing).
Notation "x \in S" := (in_unkey x S) (only printing) : bool_scope.
Section KeyedQualifier.
Variables (T :
Type) (n : nat) (q : qualifier n T).
Structure keyed_qualifier (k : pred_key q) :=
PackKeyedQualifier {unkey_qualifier; _ : unkey_qualifier = q}.
Definition KeyedQualifier k := PackKeyedQualifier k (erefl q).
Variables (k : pred_key q) (k_q : keyed_qualifier k).
Fact keyed_qualifier_suproof : unkey_qualifier k_q =i q.
Proof.
by case: k_q => /= _ ->.
Qed.
Canonical keyed_qualifier_keyed := PackKeyedPred k keyed_qualifier_suproof.
End KeyedQualifier.
Notation "x \is A" :=
(in_unkey x (has_quality 0 A)) (only printing) : bool_scope.
Notation "x \is 'a' A" :=
(in_unkey x (has_quality 1 A)) (only printing) : bool_scope.
Notation "x \is 'an' A" :=
(in_unkey x (has_quality 2 A)) (only printing) : bool_scope.
Module DefaultKeying.
Canonical default_keyed_pred T p := KeyedPred (@DefaultPredKey T p).
Canonical default_keyed_qualifier T n (q : qualifier n T) :=
KeyedQualifier (DefaultPredKey q).
End DefaultKeying.
(** Skolemizing with conditions. **)
Lemma all_tag_cond_dep I T (C : pred I) U :
(
forall x, T x) -> (
forall x, C x -> {y : T x & U x y}) ->
{f :
forall x, T x &
forall x, C x -> U x (f x)}.
Proof.
move=> f0 fP;
apply: all_tag (
fun x y => C x -> U x y) _ => x.
by case Cx: (C x); [
case/fP: Cx => y;
exists y |
exists (f0 x)].
Qed.
Lemma all_tag_cond I T (C : pred I) U :
T -> (
forall x, C x -> {y : T & U x y}) ->
{f : I -> T &
forall x, C x -> U x (f x)}.
Proof.
by move=> y0;
apply: all_tag_cond_dep.
Qed.
Lemma all_sig_cond_dep I T (C : pred I) P :
(
forall x, T x) -> (
forall x, C x -> {y : T x | P x y}) ->
{f :
forall x, T x |
forall x, C x -> P x (f x)}.
Proof.
by move=> f0 /(all_tag_cond_dep f0)[f];
exists f.
Qed.
Lemma all_sig_cond I T (C : pred I) P :
T -> (
forall x, C x -> {y : T | P x y}) ->
{f : I -> T |
forall x, C x -> P x (f x)}.
Proof.
by move=> y0;
apply: all_sig_cond_dep.
Qed.
Lemma all_sig2_cond {I T} (C : pred I) P Q :
T -> (
forall x, C x -> {y : T | P x y & Q x y}) ->
{f : I -> T |
forall x, C x -> P x (f x) &
forall x, C x -> Q x (f x)}.
Proof.
by move=> /all_sig_cond/[
apply]-[f Pf];
exists f => i Di; have [] := Pf i Di.
Qed.
Section RelationProperties.
(**
Caveat: reflexive should not be used to state lemmas, as auto and trivial
will not expand the constant. **)
Variable T :
Type.
Variable R : rel T.
Definition total :=
forall x y, R x y || R y x.
Definition transitive :=
forall y x z, R x y -> R y z -> R x z.
Definition symmetric :=
forall x y, R x y = R y x.
Definition antisymmetric :=
forall x y, R x y && R y x -> x = y.
Definition pre_symmetric :=
forall x y, R x y -> R y x.
Lemma symmetric_from_pre : pre_symmetric -> symmetric.
Proof.
by move=> symR x y;
apply/idP/idP;
apply: symR.
Qed.
Definition reflexive :=
forall x, R x x.
Definition irreflexive :=
forall x, R x x = false.
Definition left_transitive :=
forall x y, R x y -> R x =1 R y.
Definition right_transitive :=
forall x y, R x y -> R^~ x =1 R^~ y.
Section PER.
Hypotheses (symR : symmetric) (trR : transitive).
Lemma sym_left_transitive : left_transitive.
Proof.
by move=> x y Rxy z;
apply/idP/idP;
apply: trR;
rewrite // symR.
Qed.
Lemma sym_right_transitive : right_transitive.
Proof.
by move=> x y /sym_left_transitive Rxy z;
rewrite !(symR z) Rxy.
Qed.
End PER.
(**
We define the equivalence property with prenex quantification so that it
can be localized using the {in ..., ..} form defined below. **)
Definition equivalence_rel :=
forall x y z, R z z * (R x y -> R x z = R y z).
Lemma equivalence_relP : equivalence_rel <-> reflexive /\ left_transitive.
Proof.
split=> [eqiR | [Rxx trR] x y z]; last
by split=> [|/trR->].
by split=> [x | x y Rxy z]; [
rewrite (eqiR x x x) |
rewrite (eqiR x y z)].
Qed.
End RelationProperties.
Lemma rev_trans T (R : rel T) : transitive R -> transitive (
fun x y => R y x).
Proof.
by move=> trR x y z Ryx Rzy;
apply: trR Rzy Ryx.
Qed.
(** Property localization **)
Local Notation "{ 'all1' P }" := (
forall x, P x : Prop) (at level 0).
Local Notation "{ 'all2' P }" := (
forall x y, P x y : Prop) (at level 0).
Local Notation "{ 'all3' P }" := (
forall x y z, P x y z: Prop) (at level 0).
Local Notation ph := (phantom _).
Section LocalProperties.
Variables T1 T2 T3 :
Type.
Variables (d1 : mem_pred T1) (d2 : mem_pred T2) (d3 : mem_pred T3).
Local Notation ph := (phantom Prop).
Definition prop_for (x : T1) P & ph {all1 P} := P x.
Lemma forE x P phP : @prop_for x P phP = P x.
Proof.
by [].
Qed.
Definition prop_in1 P & ph {all1 P} :=
forall x, in_mem x d1 -> P x.
Definition prop_in11 P & ph {all2 P} :=
forall x y, in_mem x d1 -> in_mem y d2 -> P x y.
Definition prop_in2 P & ph {all2 P} :=
forall x y, in_mem x d1 -> in_mem y d1 -> P x y.
Definition prop_in111 P & ph {all3 P} :=
forall x y z, in_mem x d1 -> in_mem y d2 -> in_mem z d3 -> P x y z.
Definition prop_in12 P & ph {all3 P} :=
forall x y z, in_mem x d1 -> in_mem y d2 -> in_mem z d2 -> P x y z.
Definition prop_in21 P & ph {all3 P} :=
forall x y z, in_mem x d1 -> in_mem y d1 -> in_mem z d2 -> P x y z.
Definition prop_in3 P & ph {all3 P} :=
forall x y z, in_mem x d1 -> in_mem y d1 -> in_mem z d1 -> P x y z.
Variable f : T1 -> T2.
Definition prop_on1 Pf P & phantom T3 (Pf f) & ph {all1 P} :=
forall x, in_mem (f x) d2 -> P x.
Definition prop_on2 Pf P & phantom T3 (Pf f) & ph {all2 P} :=
forall x y, in_mem (f x) d2 -> in_mem (f y) d2 -> P x y.
End LocalProperties.
Definition inPhantom := Phantom Prop.
Definition onPhantom {T} P (x : T) := Phantom Prop (P x).
Definition bijective_in aT rT (d : mem_pred aT) (f : aT -> rT) :=
exists2 g, prop_in1 d (inPhantom (cancel f g))
& prop_on1 d (Phantom _ (cancel g)) (onPhantom (cancel g) f).
Definition bijective_on aT rT (cd : mem_pred rT) (f : aT -> rT) :=
exists2 g, prop_on1 cd (Phantom _ (cancel f)) (onPhantom (cancel f) g)
& prop_in1 cd (inPhantom (cancel g f)).
Notation "{ 'for' x , P }" := (prop_for x (inPhantom P)) : type_scope.
Notation "{ 'in' d , P }" := (prop_in1 (mem d) (inPhantom P)) : type_scope.
Notation "{ 'in' d1 & d2 , P }" :=
(prop_in11 (mem d1) (mem d2) (inPhantom P)) : type_scope.
Notation "{ 'in' d & , P }" := (prop_in2 (mem d) (inPhantom P)) : type_scope.
Notation "{ 'in' d1 & d2 & d3 , P }" :=
(prop_in111 (mem d1) (mem d2) (mem d3) (inPhantom P)) : type_scope.
Notation "{ 'in' d1 & & d3 , P }" :=
(prop_in21 (mem d1) (mem d3) (inPhantom P)) : type_scope.
Notation "{ 'in' d1 & d2 & , P }" :=
(prop_in12 (mem d1) (mem d2) (inPhantom P)) : type_scope.
Notation "{ 'in' d & & , P }" := (prop_in3 (mem d) (inPhantom P)) : type_scope.
Notation "{ 'on' cd , P }" :=
(prop_on1 (mem cd) (inPhantom P) (inPhantom P)) : type_scope.
Notation "{ 'on' cd & , P }" :=
(prop_on2 (mem cd) (inPhantom P) (inPhantom P)) : type_scope.
Local Arguments onPhantom : clear scopes.
Notation "{ 'on' cd , P & g }" :=
(prop_on1 (mem cd) (Phantom (_ -> Prop) P) (onPhantom P g)) : type_scope.
Notation "{ 'in' d , 'bijective' f }" := (bijective_in (mem d) f) : type_scope.
Notation "{ 'on' cd , 'bijective' f }" :=
(bijective_on (mem cd) f) : type_scope.
(**
Weakening and monotonicity lemmas for localized predicates.
Note that using these lemmas in backward reasoning will force expansion of
the predicate definition, as Rocq needs to expose the quantifier to apply
these lemmas. We define a few specialized variants to avoid this for some
of the ssrfun predicates. **)
Section LocalGlobal.
Variables T1 T2 T3 : predArgType.
Variables (D1 : {pred T1}) (D2 : {pred T2}) (D3 : {pred T3}).
Variables (d1 d1' : mem_pred T1) (d2 d2' : mem_pred T2) (d3 d3' : mem_pred T3).
Variables (f f' : T1 -> T2) (g : T2 -> T1) (h : T3).
Variables (P1 : T1 -> Prop) (P2 : T1 -> T2 -> Prop).
Variable P3 : T1 -> T2 -> T3 -> Prop.
Variable Q1 : (T1 -> T2) -> T1 -> Prop.
Variable Q1l : (T1 -> T2) -> T3 -> T1 -> Prop.
Variable Q2 : (T1 -> T2) -> T1 -> T1 -> Prop.
Hypothesis sub1 : sub_mem d1 d1'.
Hypothesis sub2 : sub_mem d2 d2'.
Hypothesis sub3 : sub_mem d3 d3'.
Lemma in1W : {all1 P1} -> {in D1, {all1 P1}}.
Proof.
by move=> ? ?.
Qed.
Lemma in2W : {all2 P2} -> {in D1 & D2, {all2 P2}}.
Proof.
by move=> ? ?.
Qed.
Lemma in3W : {all3 P3} -> {in D1 & D2 & D3, {all3 P3}}.
Proof.
by move=> ? ?.
Qed.
Lemma in1T : {in T1, {all1 P1}} -> {all1 P1}.
Proof.
by move=> ? ?;
auto.
Qed.
Lemma in2T : {in T1 & T2, {all2 P2}} -> {all2 P2}.
Proof.
by move=> ? ?;
auto.
Qed.
Lemma in3T : {in T1 & T2 & T3, {all3 P3}} -> {all3 P3}.
Proof.
by move=> ? ?;
auto.
Qed.
Lemma sub_in1 (Ph : ph {all1 P1}) : prop_in1 d1' Ph -> prop_in1 d1 Ph.
Proof.
by move=> allP x /sub1;
apply: allP.
Qed.
Lemma sub_in11 (Ph : ph {all2 P2}) : prop_in11 d1' d2' Ph -> prop_in11 d1 d2 Ph.
Proof.
by move=> allP x1 x2 /sub1 d1x1 /sub2;
apply: allP.
Qed.
Lemma sub_in111 (Ph : ph {all3 P3}) :
prop_in111 d1' d2' d3' Ph -> prop_in111 d1 d2 d3 Ph.
Proof.
by move=> allP x1 x2 x3 /sub1 d1x1 /sub2 d2x2 /sub3;
apply: allP.
Qed.
Let allQ1 f'' := {all1 Q1 f''}.
Let allQ1l f'' h' := {all1 Q1l f'' h'}.
Let allQ2 f'' := {all2 Q2 f''}.
Lemma on1W : allQ1 f -> {on D2, allQ1 f}.
Proof.
by move=> ? ?.
Qed.
Lemma on1lW : allQ1l f h -> {on D2, allQ1l f & h}.
Proof.
by move=> ? ?.
Qed.
Lemma on2W : allQ2 f -> {on D2 &, allQ2 f}.
Proof.
by move=> ? ?.
Qed.
Lemma on1T : {on T2, allQ1 f} -> allQ1 f.
Proof.
by move=> ? ?;
auto.
Qed.
Lemma on1lT : {on T2, allQ1l f & h} -> allQ1l f h.
Proof.
by move=> ? ?;
auto.
Qed.
Lemma on2T : {on T2 &, allQ2 f} -> allQ2 f.
Proof.
by move=> ? ?;
auto.
Qed.
Lemma subon1 (Phf : ph (allQ1 f)) (Ph : ph (allQ1 f)) :
prop_on1 d2' Phf Ph -> prop_on1 d2 Phf Ph.
Proof.
by move=> allQ x /sub2;
apply: allQ.
Qed.
Lemma subon1l (Phf : ph (allQ1l f)) (Ph : ph (allQ1l f h)) :
prop_on1 d2' Phf Ph -> prop_on1 d2 Phf Ph.
Proof.
by move=> allQ x /sub2;
apply: allQ.
Qed.
Lemma subon2 (Phf : ph (allQ2 f)) (Ph : ph (allQ2 f)) :
prop_on2 d2' Phf Ph -> prop_on2 d2 Phf Ph.
Proof.
by move=> allQ x y /sub2=> d2fx /sub2;
apply: allQ.
Qed.
Lemma can_in_inj : {in D1, cancel f g} -> {in D1 &, injective f}.
Proof.
by move=> fK x y /fK{2}<- /fK{2}<- ->.
Qed.
Lemma canLR_in x y : {in D1, cancel f g} -> y \in D1 -> x = f y -> g x = y.
Proof.
by move=> fK D1y ->;
rewrite fK.
Qed.
Lemma canRL_in x y : {in D1, cancel f g} -> x \in D1 -> f x = y -> x = g y.
Proof.
by move=> fK D1x <-;
rewrite fK.
Qed.
Lemma on_can_inj : {on D2, cancel f & g} -> {on D2 &, injective f}.
Proof.
by move=> fK x y /fK{2}<- /fK{2}<- ->.
Qed.
Lemma canLR_on x y : {on D2, cancel f & g} -> f y \in D2 -> x = f y -> g x = y.
Proof.
by move=> fK D2fy ->;
rewrite fK.
Qed.
Lemma canRL_on x y : {on D2, cancel f & g} -> f x \in D2 -> f x = y -> x = g y.
Proof.
by move=> fK D2fx <-;
rewrite fK.
Qed.
Lemma inW_bij : bijective f -> {in D1, bijective f}.
Proof.
by case=> g' fK g'K;
exists g' => * ? *;
auto.
Qed.
Lemma onW_bij : bijective f -> {on D2, bijective f}.
Proof.
by case=> g' fK g'K;
exists g' => * ? *;
auto.
Qed.
Lemma inT_bij : {in T1, bijective f} -> bijective f.
Proof.
by case=> g' fK g'K;
exists g' => * ? *;
auto.
Qed.
Lemma onT_bij : {on T2, bijective f} -> bijective f.
Proof.
by case=> g' fK g'K;
exists g' => * ? *;
auto.
Qed.
Lemma sub_in_bij (D1' : pred T1) :
{subset D1 <= D1'} -> {in D1', bijective f} -> {in D1, bijective f}.
Proof.
by move=> subD [g' fK g'K];
exists g' => x; move/subD; [
apply: fK |
apply: g'K].
Qed.
Lemma subon_bij (D2' : pred T2) :
{subset D2 <= D2'} -> {on D2', bijective f} -> {on D2, bijective f}.
Proof.
by move=> subD [g' fK g'K];
exists g' => x; move/subD; [
apply: fK |
apply: g'K].
Qed.
Lemma in_on1P : {in D1, {on D2, allQ1 f}} <->
{in [pred x in D1 | f x \in D2], allQ1 f}.
Proof.
split => allf x; have := allf x;
rewrite inE => Q1f; first
by case/andP.
by move=> ? ?;
apply: Q1f;
apply/andP.
Qed.
Lemma in_on1lP : {in D1, {on D2, allQ1l f & h}} <->
{in [pred x in D1 | f x \in D2], allQ1l f h}.
Proof.
split => allf x; have := allf x;
rewrite inE => Q1f; first
by case/andP.
by move=> ? ?;
apply: Q1f;
apply/andP.
Qed.
Lemma in_on2P : {in D1 &, {on D2 &, allQ2 f}} <->
{in [pred x in D1 | f x \in D2] &, allQ2 f}.
Proof.
split => allf x y; have := allf x y;
rewrite !inE => Q2f.
by move=> /andP[? ?] /andP[? ?];
apply: Q2f.
by move=> ? ? ? ?;
apply: Q2f;
apply/andP.
Qed.
Lemma on1W_in : {in D1, allQ1 f} -> {in D1, {on D2, allQ1 f}}.
Proof.
by move=> D1f ? /D1f.
Qed.
Lemma on1lW_in : {in D1, allQ1l f h} -> {in D1, {on D2, allQ1l f & h}}.
Proof.
by move=> D1f ? /D1f.
Qed.
Lemma on2W_in : {in D1 &, allQ2 f} -> {in D1 &, {on D2 &, allQ2 f}}.
Proof.
by move=> D1f ? ? ? ? ? ?;
apply: D1f.
Qed.
Lemma in_on1W : allQ1 f -> {in D1, {on D2, allQ1 f}}.
Proof.
by move=> allf ? ? ?;
apply: allf.
Qed.
Lemma in_on1lW : allQ1l f h -> {in D1, {on D2, allQ1l f & h}}.
Proof.
by move=> allf ? ? ?;
apply: allf.
Qed.
Lemma in_on2W : allQ2 f -> {in D1 &, {on D2 &, allQ2 f}}.
Proof.
by move=> allf ? ? ? ? ? ?;
apply: allf.
Qed.
Lemma on1S : (
forall x, f x \in D2) -> {on D2, allQ1 f} -> allQ1 f.
Proof.
by move=> ? fD1 ?;
apply: fD1.
Qed.
Lemma on1lS : (
forall x, f x \in D2) -> {on D2, allQ1l f & h} -> allQ1l f h.
Proof.
by move=> ? fD1 ?;
apply: fD1.
Qed.
Lemma on2S : (
forall x, f x \in D2) -> {on D2 &, allQ2 f} -> allQ2 f.
Proof.
by move=> ? fD1 ? ?;
apply: fD1.
Qed.
Lemma on1S_in : {homo f : x / x \in D1 >-> x \in D2} ->
{in D1, {on D2, allQ1 f}} -> {in D1, allQ1 f}.
Proof.
by move=> fD fD1 ? ?;
apply/fD1/fD.
Qed.
Lemma on1lS_in : {homo f : x / x \in D1 >-> x \in D2} ->
{in D1, {on D2, allQ1l f & h}} -> {in D1, allQ1l f h}.
Proof.
by move=> fD fD1 ? ?;
apply/fD1/fD.
Qed.
Lemma on2S_in : {homo f : x / x \in D1 >-> x \in D2} ->
{in D1 &, {on D2 &, allQ2 f}} -> {in D1 &, allQ2 f}.
Proof.
by move=> fD fD1 ? ? ? ?;
apply: fD1 => //;
apply: fD.
Qed.
Lemma in_on1S : (
forall x, f x \in D2) -> {in T1, {on D2, allQ1 f}} -> allQ1 f.
Proof.
by move=> fD2 fD1 ?;
apply: fD1.
Qed.
Lemma in_on1lS : (
forall x, f x \in D2) ->
{in T1, {on D2, allQ1l f & h}} -> allQ1l f h.
Proof.
by move=> fD2 fD1 ?;
apply: fD1.
Qed.
Lemma in_on2S : (
forall x, f x \in D2) ->
{in T1 &, {on D2 &, allQ2 f}} -> allQ2 f.
Proof.
by move=> fD2 fD1 ? ?;
apply: fD1.
Qed.
End LocalGlobal.
Arguments in_on1P {T1 T2 D1 D2 f Q1}.
Arguments in_on1lP {T1 T2 T3 D1 D2 f h Q1l}.
Arguments in_on2P {T1 T2 D1 D2 f Q2}.
Arguments on1W_in {T1 T2 D1} D2 {f Q1}.
Arguments on1lW_in {T1 T2 T3 D1} D2 {f h Q1l}.
Arguments on2W_in {T1 T2 D1} D2 {f Q2}.
Arguments in_on1W {T1 T2} D1 D2 {f Q1}.
Arguments in_on1lW {T1 T2 T3} D1 D2 {f h Q1l}.
Arguments in_on2W {T1 T2} D1 D2 {f Q2}.
Arguments on1S {T1 T2} D2 {f Q1}.
Arguments on1lS {T1 T2 T3} D2 {f h Q1l}.
Arguments on2S {T1 T2} D2 {f Q2}.
Arguments on1S_in {T1 T2 D1} D2 {f Q1}.
Arguments on1lS_in {T1 T2 T3 D1} D2 {f h Q1l}.
Arguments on2S_in {T1 T2 D1} D2 {f Q2}.
Arguments in_on1S {T1 T2} D2 {f Q1}.
Arguments in_on1lS {T1 T2 T3} D2 {f h Q1l}.
Arguments in_on2S {T1 T2} D2 {f Q2}.
Lemma can_in_pcan [rT aT :
Type] (A : {pred aT}) [f : aT -> rT] [g : rT -> aT] :
{in A, cancel f g} -> {in A, pcancel f (
fun y : rT => Some (g y))}.
Proof.
by move=> fK x Ax;
rewrite fK.
Qed.
Lemma pcan_in_inj [rT aT :
Type] [A : {pred aT}]
[f : aT -> rT] [g : rT -> option aT] :
{in A, pcancel f g} -> {in A &, injective f}.
Proof.
by move=> fK x y Ax Ay /(congr1 g);
rewrite !fK// => -[].
Qed.
Lemma in_inj_comp A B C (f : B -> A) (h : C -> B) (P : pred B) (Q : pred C) :
{in P &, injective f} -> {in Q &, injective h} -> {homo h : x / Q x >-> P x} ->
{in Q &, injective (f \o h)}.
Proof.
by move=> Pf Qh QP x y xQ yQ xy;
apply Qh => //;
apply Pf => //;
apply QP.
Qed.
Lemma can_in_comp [A B C :
Type] (D : {pred B}) (D' : {pred C})
[f : B -> A] [h : C -> B] [f' : A -> B] [h' : B -> C] :
{homo h : x / x \in D' >-> x \in D} ->
{in D, cancel f f'} -> {in D', cancel h h'} ->
{in D', cancel (f \o h) (h' \o f')}.
Proof.
by move=> hD fK hK c cD /=;
rewrite fK ?hK ?hD.
Qed.
Lemma pcan_in_comp [A B C :
Type] (D : {pred B}) (D' : {pred C})
[f : B -> A] [h : C -> B] [f' : A -> option B] [h' : B -> option C] :
{homo h : x / x \in D' >-> x \in D} ->
{in D, pcancel f f'} -> {in D', pcancel h h'} ->
{in D', pcancel (f \o h) (obind h' \o f')}.
Proof.
by move=> hD fK hK c cD /=;
rewrite fK/= ?hK ?hD.
Qed.
Definition pred_oapp T (D : {pred T}) : pred (option T) :=
[pred x | oapp (mem D) false x].
Lemma ocan_in_comp [A B C :
Type] (D : {pred B}) (D' : {pred C})
[f : B -> option A] [h : C -> option B] [f' : A -> B] [h' : B -> C] :
{homo h : x / x \in D' >-> x \in pred_oapp D} ->
{in D, ocancel f f'} -> {in D', ocancel h h'} ->
{in D', ocancel (obind f \o h) (h' \o f')}.
Proof.
move=> hD fK hK c cD /=;
rewrite -[RHS]hK/=;
case hcE : (h c) => [b|]//=.
have bD : b \in D
by have := hD _ cD;
rewrite hcE inE.
by rewrite -[b in RHS]fK;
case: (f b) => //=; have /hK := cD;
rewrite hcE.
Qed.
Section in_sig.
Variables T1 T2 T3 :
Type.
Variables (D1 : {pred T1}) (D2 : {pred T2}) (D3 : {pred T3}).
Variable P1 : T1 -> Prop.
Variable P2 : T1 -> T2 -> Prop.
Variable P3 : T1 -> T2 -> T3 -> Prop.
Lemma in1_sig : {in D1, {all1 P1}} ->
forall x : sig D1, P1 (sval x).
Proof.
by move=> DP [x Dx]; have := DP _ Dx.
Qed.
Lemma in2_sig : {in D1 & D2, {all2 P2}} ->
forall (x : sig D1) (y : sig D2), P2 (sval x) (sval y).
Proof.
by move=> DP [x Dx] [y Dy]; have := DP _ _ Dx Dy.
Qed.
Lemma in3_sig : {in D1 & D2 & D3, {all3 P3}} ->
forall (x : sig D1) (y : sig D2) (z : sig D3), P3 (sval x) (sval y) (sval z).
Proof.
by move=> DP [x Dx] [y Dy] [z Dz]; have := DP _ _ _ Dx Dy Dz.
Qed.
End in_sig.
Arguments in1_sig {T1 D1 P1}.
Arguments in2_sig {T1 T2 D1 D2 P2}.
Arguments in3_sig {T1 T2 T3 D1 D2 D3 P3}.
Lemma sub_in2 T d d' (P : T -> T -> Prop) :
sub_mem d d' ->
forall Ph : ph {all2 P}, prop_in2 d' Ph -> prop_in2 d Ph.
Proof.
by move=> /= sub_dd';
apply: sub_in11.
Qed.
Lemma sub_in3 T d d' (P : T -> T -> T -> Prop) :
sub_mem d d' ->
forall Ph : ph {all3 P}, prop_in3 d' Ph -> prop_in3 d Ph.
Proof.
by move=> /= sub_dd';
apply: sub_in111.
Qed.
Lemma sub_in12 T1 T d1 d1' d d' (P : T1 -> T -> T -> Prop) :
sub_mem d1 d1' -> sub_mem d d' ->
forall Ph : ph {all3 P}, prop_in12 d1' d' Ph -> prop_in12 d1 d Ph.
Proof.
by move=> /= sub1 sub;
apply: sub_in111.
Qed.
Lemma sub_in21 T T3 d d' d3 d3' (P : T -> T -> T3 -> Prop) :
sub_mem d d' -> sub_mem d3 d3' ->
forall Ph : ph {all3 P}, prop_in21 d' d3' Ph -> prop_in21 d d3 Ph.
Proof.
by move=> /= sub sub3;
apply: sub_in111.
Qed.
Lemma equivalence_relP_in T (R : rel T) (A : pred T) :
{in A & &, equivalence_rel R}
<-> {in A, reflexive R} /\ {in A &,
forall x y, R x y -> {in A, R x =1 R y}}.
Proof.
split=> [eqiR | [Rxx trR] x y z *]; last
by split=> [|/trR-> //];
apply: Rxx.
by split=> [x Ax|x y Ax Ay Rxy z Az]; [
rewrite (eqiR x x) |
rewrite (eqiR x y)].
Qed.
Section MonoHomoMorphismTheory.
Variables (aT rT sT :
Type) (f : aT -> rT) (g : rT -> aT).
Variables (aP : pred aT) (rP : pred rT) (aR : rel aT) (rR : rel rT).
Lemma monoW : {mono f : x / aP x >-> rP x} -> {homo f : x / aP x >-> rP x}.
Proof.
by move=> hf x ax;
rewrite hf.
Qed.
Lemma mono2W :
{mono f : x y / aR x y >-> rR x y} -> {homo f : x y / aR x y >-> rR x y}.
Proof.
by move=> hf x y axy;
rewrite hf.
Qed.
Hypothesis fgK : cancel g f.
Lemma homoRL :
{homo f : x y / aR x y >-> rR x y} ->
forall x y, aR (g x) y -> rR x (f y).
Proof.
by move=> Hf x y /Hf;
rewrite fgK.
Qed.
Lemma homoLR :
{homo f : x y / aR x y >-> rR x y} ->
forall x y, aR x (g y) -> rR (f x) y.
Proof.
by move=> Hf x y /Hf;
rewrite fgK.
Qed.
Lemma homo_mono :
{homo f : x y / aR x y >-> rR x y} -> {homo g : x y / rR x y >-> aR x y} ->
{mono g : x y / rR x y >-> aR x y}.
Proof.
move=> mf mg x y;
case: (boolP (rR _ _))=> [/mg //|].
by apply: contraNF=> /mf;
rewrite !fgK.
Qed.
Lemma monoLR :
{mono f : x y / aR x y >-> rR x y} ->
forall x y, rR (f x) y = aR x (g y).
Proof.
by move=> mf x y;
rewrite -{1}[y]fgK mf.
Qed.
Lemma monoRL :
{mono f : x y / aR x y >-> rR x y} ->
forall x y, rR x (f y) = aR (g x) y.
Proof.
by move=> mf x y;
rewrite -{1}[x]fgK mf.
Qed.
Lemma can_mono :
{mono f : x y / aR x y >-> rR x y} -> {mono g : x y / rR x y >-> aR x y}.
Proof.
by move=> mf x y /=;
rewrite -mf !fgK.
Qed.
End MonoHomoMorphismTheory.
Section MonoHomoMorphismTheory_in.
Variables (aT rT : predArgType) (f : aT -> rT) (g : rT -> aT).
Variables (aD : {pred aT}) (rD : {pred rT}).
Variable (aP : pred aT) (rP : pred rT) (aR : rel aT) (rR : rel rT).
Lemma mono1W_in :
{in aD, {mono f : x / aP x >-> rP x}} ->
{in aD, {homo f : x / aP x >-> rP x}}.
Proof.
by move=> hf x hx ax;
rewrite hf.
Qed.
#[deprecated(since=
"Coq 8.16", note=
"Use mono1W_in instead.")]
Notation mono2W_in := mono1W_in.
Lemma monoW_in :
{in aD &, {mono f : x y / aR x y >-> rR x y}} ->
{in aD &, {homo f : x y / aR x y >-> rR x y}}.
Proof.
by move=> hf x y hx hy axy;
rewrite hf.
Qed.
Hypothesis fgK : {in rD, {on aD, cancel g & f}}.
Hypothesis mem_g : {homo g : x / x \in rD >-> x \in aD}.
Lemma homoRL_in :
{in aD &, {homo f : x y / aR x y >-> rR x y}} ->
{in rD & aD,
forall x y, aR (g x) y -> rR x (f y)}.
Proof.
by move=> Hf x y hx hy /Hf;
rewrite fgK ?mem_g// ?inE;
apply.
Qed.
Lemma homoLR_in :
{in aD &, {homo f : x y / aR x y >-> rR x y}} ->
{in aD & rD,
forall x y, aR x (g y) -> rR (f x) y}.
Proof.
by move=> Hf x y hx hy /Hf;
rewrite fgK ?mem_g// ?inE;
apply.
Qed.
Lemma homo_mono_in :
{in aD &, {homo f : x y / aR x y >-> rR x y}} ->
{in rD &, {homo g : x y / rR x y >-> aR x y}} ->
{in rD &, {mono g : x y / rR x y >-> aR x y}}.
Proof.
move=> mf mg x y hx hy;
case: (boolP (rR _ _))=> [/mg //|]; first
exact.
by apply: contraNF=> /mf;
rewrite !fgK ?mem_g//;
apply.
Qed.
Lemma monoLR_in :
{in aD &, {mono f : x y / aR x y >-> rR x y}} ->
{in aD & rD,
forall x y, rR (f x) y = aR x (g y)}.
Proof.
by move=> mf x y hx hy;
rewrite -{1}[y]fgK ?mem_g// mf ?mem_g.
Qed.
Lemma monoRL_in :
{in aD &, {mono f : x y / aR x y >-> rR x y}} ->
{in rD & aD,
forall x y, rR x (f y) = aR (g x) y}.
Proof.
by move=> mf x y hx hy;
rewrite -{1}[x]fgK ?mem_g// mf ?mem_g.
Qed.
Lemma can_mono_in :
{in aD &, {mono f : x y / aR x y >-> rR x y}} ->
{in rD &, {mono g : x y / rR x y >-> aR x y}}.
Proof.
by move=> mf x y hx hy;
rewrite -mf ?mem_g// !fgK ?mem_g.
Qed.
End MonoHomoMorphismTheory_in.
Arguments homoRL_in {aT rT f g aD rD aR rR}.
Arguments homoLR_in {aT rT f g aD rD aR rR}.
Arguments homo_mono_in {aT rT f g aD rD aR rR}.
Arguments monoLR_in {aT rT f g aD rD aR rR}.
Arguments monoRL_in {aT rT f g aD rD aR rR}.
Arguments can_mono_in {aT rT f g aD rD aR rR}.
Section HomoMonoMorphismFlip.
Variables (aT rT :
Type) (aR : rel aT) (rR : rel rT) (f : aT -> rT).
Variable (aD aD' : {pred aT}).
Lemma homo_sym : {homo f : x y / aR x y >-> rR x y} ->
{homo f : y x / aR x y >-> rR x y}.
Proof.
by move=> fR y x;
apply: fR.
Qed.
Lemma mono_sym : {mono f : x y / aR x y >-> rR x y} ->
{mono f : y x / aR x y >-> rR x y}.
Proof.
by move=> fR y x;
apply: fR.
Qed.
Lemma homo_sym_in : {in aD &, {homo f : x y / aR x y >-> rR x y}} ->
{in aD &, {homo f : y x / aR x y >-> rR x y}}.
Proof.
by move=> fR y x yD xD;
apply: fR.
Qed.
Lemma mono_sym_in : {in aD &, {mono f : x y / aR x y >-> rR x y}} ->
{in aD &, {mono f : y x / aR x y >-> rR x y}}.
Proof.
by move=> fR y x yD xD;
apply: fR.
Qed.
Lemma homo_sym_in11 : {in aD & aD', {homo f : x y / aR x y >-> rR x y}} ->
{in aD' & aD, {homo f : y x / aR x y >-> rR x y}}.
Proof.
by move=> fR y x yD xD;
apply: fR.
Qed.
Lemma mono_sym_in11 : {in aD & aD', {mono f : x y / aR x y >-> rR x y}} ->
{in aD' & aD, {mono f : y x / aR x y >-> rR x y}}.
Proof.
by move=> fR y x yD xD;
apply: fR.
Qed.
End HomoMonoMorphismFlip.
Arguments homo_sym {aT rT} [aR rR f].
Arguments mono_sym {aT rT} [aR rR f].
Arguments homo_sym_in {aT rT} [aR rR f aD].
Arguments mono_sym_in {aT rT} [aR rR f aD].
Arguments homo_sym_in11 {aT rT} [aR rR f aD aD'].
Arguments mono_sym_in11 {aT rT} [aR rR f aD aD'].
Section CancelOn.
Variables (aT rT : predArgType) (aD : {pred aT}) (rD : {pred rT}).
Variables (f : aT -> rT) (g : rT -> aT).
Lemma onW_can : cancel g f -> {on aD, cancel g & f}.
Proof.
by move=> fgK x xaD;
apply: fgK.
Qed.
Lemma onW_can_in : {in rD, cancel g f} -> {in rD, {on aD, cancel g & f}}.
Proof.
by move=> fgK x xrD xaD;
apply: fgK.
Qed.
Lemma in_onW_can : cancel g f -> {in rD, {on aD, cancel g & f}}.
Proof.
by move=> fgK x xrD xaD;
apply: fgK.
Qed.
Lemma onS_can : (
forall x, g x \in aD) -> {on aD, cancel g & f} -> cancel g f.
Proof.
by move=> mem_g fgK x;
apply: fgK.
Qed.
Lemma onS_can_in : {homo g : x / x \in rD >-> x \in aD} ->
{in rD, {on aD, cancel g & f}} -> {in rD, cancel g f}.
Proof.
by move=> mem_g fgK x x_rD;
apply/fgK/mem_g.
Qed.
Lemma in_onS_can : (
forall x, g x \in aD) ->
{in rT, {on aD, cancel g & f}} -> cancel g f.
Proof.
by move=> mem_g fgK x;
apply/fgK.
Qed.
End CancelOn.
Arguments onW_can {aT rT} aD {f g}.
Arguments onW_can_in {aT rT} aD {rD f g}.
Arguments in_onW_can {aT rT} aD rD {f g}.
Arguments onS_can {aT rT} aD {f g}.
Arguments onS_can_in {aT rT} aD {rD f g}.
Arguments in_onS_can {aT rT} aD {f g}.
Section inj_can_sym_in_on.
Variables (aT rT : predArgType) (aD : {pred aT}) (rD : {pred rT}).
Variables (f : aT -> rT) (g : rT -> aT).
Lemma inj_can_sym_in_on :
{homo f : x / x \in aD >-> x \in rD} -> {in aD, {on rD, cancel f & g}} ->
{in rD &, {on aD &, injective g}} -> {in rD, {on aD, cancel g & f}}.
Proof.
by move=> fD fK gI x x_rD gx_aD;
apply: gI;
rewrite ?inE ?fK ?fD.
Qed.
Lemma inj_can_sym_on : {in aD, cancel f g} ->
{on aD &, injective g} -> {on aD, cancel g & f}.
Proof.
by move=> fK gI x gx_aD;
apply: gI;
rewrite ?inE ?fK.
Qed.
Lemma inj_can_sym_in : {homo f \o g : x / x \in rD} -> {on rD, cancel f & g} ->
{in rD &, injective g} -> {in rD, cancel g f}.
Proof.
by move=> fgD fK gI x x_rD;
apply: gI;
rewrite ?fK ?fgD.
Qed.
End inj_can_sym_in_on.
Arguments inj_can_sym_in_on {aT rT aD rD f g}.
Arguments inj_can_sym_on {aT rT aD f g}.
Arguments inj_can_sym_in {aT rT rD f g}.
