(* Title: HOL/HOLCF/ex/Domain_Proofs.thy
Author: Brian Huffman
*)
section \<open>Internal domain package proofs done manually\<close>
theory Domain_Proofs
imports HOLCF
begin
(*
The definitions and proofs below are for the following recursive
datatypes:
domain 'a foo = Foo1 | Foo2 (lazy 'a) (lazy "'a bar")
and 'a bar = Bar (lazy "'a baz \<rightarrow> tr")
and 'a baz = Baz (lazy "'a foo convex_pd \<rightarrow> tr")
*)
(********************************************************************)
subsection \<open>Step 1: Define the new type combinators\<close>
text \<open>Start with the one-step non-recursive version\<close>
definition
foo_bar_baz_deflF ::
"udom defl \ udom defl \ udom defl \ udom defl \ udom defl \ udom defl \ udom defl"
where
"foo_bar_baz_deflF = (\ a. Abs_cfun (\(t1, t2, t3).
( ssum_defl\<cdot>DEFL(one)\<cdot>(sprod_defl\<cdot>(u_defl\<cdot>a)\<cdot>(u_defl\<cdot>t2))
, u_defl\<cdot>(sfun_defl\<cdot>(u_defl\<cdot>t3)\<cdot>DEFL(tr))
, u_defl\<cdot>(sfun_defl\<cdot>(u_defl\<cdot>(convex_defl\<cdot>t1))\<cdot>DEFL(tr)))))"
lemma foo_bar_baz_deflF_beta:
"foo_bar_baz_deflF\a\t =
( ssum_defl\<cdot>DEFL(one)\<cdot>(sprod_defl\<cdot>(u_defl\<cdot>a)\<cdot>(u_defl\<cdot>(fst (snd t))))
, u_defl\<cdot>(sfun_defl\<cdot>(u_defl\<cdot>(snd (snd t)))\<cdot>DEFL(tr))
, u_defl\<cdot>(sfun_defl\<cdot>(u_defl\<cdot>(convex_defl\<cdot>(fst t)))\<cdot>DEFL(tr)))"
unfolding foo_bar_baz_deflF_def
by (simp add: split_def)
text \<open>Individual type combinators are projected from the fixed point.\<close>
definition foo_defl :: "udom defl \ udom defl"
where "foo_defl = (\ a. fst (fix\(foo_bar_baz_deflF\a)))"
definition bar_defl :: "udom defl \ udom defl"
where "bar_defl = (\ a. fst (snd (fix\(foo_bar_baz_deflF\a))))"
definition baz_defl :: "udom defl \ udom defl"
where "baz_defl = (\ a. snd (snd (fix\(foo_bar_baz_deflF\a))))"
lemma defl_apply_thms:
"foo_defl\a = fst (fix\(foo_bar_baz_deflF\a))"
"bar_defl\a = fst (snd (fix\(foo_bar_baz_deflF\a)))"
"baz_defl\a = snd (snd (fix\(foo_bar_baz_deflF\a)))"
unfolding foo_defl_def bar_defl_def baz_defl_def by simp_all
text \<open>Unfold rules for each combinator.\<close>
lemma foo_defl_unfold:
"foo_defl\a = ssum_defl\DEFL(one)\(sprod_defl\(u_defl\a)\(u_defl\(bar_defl\a)))"
unfolding defl_apply_thms by (subst fix_eq, simp add: foo_bar_baz_deflF_beta)
lemma bar_defl_unfold: "bar_defl\a = u_defl\(sfun_defl\(u_defl\(baz_defl\a))\DEFL(tr))"
unfolding defl_apply_thms by (subst fix_eq, simp add: foo_bar_baz_deflF_beta)
lemma baz_defl_unfold: "baz_defl\a = u_defl\(sfun_defl\(u_defl\(convex_defl\(foo_defl\a)))\DEFL(tr))"
unfolding defl_apply_thms by (subst fix_eq, simp add: foo_bar_baz_deflF_beta)
text "The automation for the previous steps will be quite similar to
how the fixrec package works."
(********************************************************************)
subsection \<open>Step 2: Define types, prove class instances\<close>
text \<open>Use \<open>pcpodef\<close> with the appropriate type combinator.\<close>
pcpodef 'a foo = "defl_set (foo_defl\DEFL('a))"
by (rule defl_set_bottom, rule adm_defl_set)
pcpodef 'a bar = "defl_set (bar_defl\DEFL('a))"
by (rule defl_set_bottom, rule adm_defl_set)
pcpodef 'a baz = "defl_set (baz_defl\DEFL('a))"
by (rule defl_set_bottom, rule adm_defl_set)
text \<open>Prove rep instance using lemma \<open>typedef_rep_class\<close>.\<close>
instantiation foo :: ("domain") "domain"
begin
definition emb_foo :: "'a foo \ udom"
where "emb_foo \ (\ x. Rep_foo x)"
definition prj_foo :: "udom \ 'a foo"
where "prj_foo \ (\ y. Abs_foo (cast\(foo_defl\DEFL('a))\y))"
definition defl_foo :: "'a foo itself \ udom defl"
where "defl_foo \ \a. foo_defl\DEFL('a)"
definition
"(liftemb :: 'a foo u \ udom u) \ u_map\emb"
definition
"(liftprj :: udom u \ 'a foo u) \ u_map\prj"
definition
"liftdefl \ \(t::'a foo itself). liftdefl_of\DEFL('a foo)"
instance
apply (rule typedef_domain_class)
apply (rule type_definition_foo)
apply (rule below_foo_def)
apply (rule emb_foo_def)
apply (rule prj_foo_def)
apply (rule defl_foo_def)
apply (rule liftemb_foo_def)
apply (rule liftprj_foo_def)
apply (rule liftdefl_foo_def)
done
end
instantiation bar :: ("domain") "domain"
begin
definition emb_bar :: "'a bar \ udom"
where "emb_bar \ (\ x. Rep_bar x)"
definition prj_bar :: "udom \ 'a bar"
where "prj_bar \ (\ y. Abs_bar (cast\(bar_defl\DEFL('a))\y))"
definition defl_bar :: "'a bar itself \ udom defl"
where "defl_bar \ \a. bar_defl\DEFL('a)"
definition
"(liftemb :: 'a bar u \ udom u) \ u_map\emb"
definition
"(liftprj :: udom u \ 'a bar u) \ u_map\prj"
definition
"liftdefl \ \(t::'a bar itself). liftdefl_of\DEFL('a bar)"
instance
apply (rule typedef_domain_class)
apply (rule type_definition_bar)
apply (rule below_bar_def)
apply (rule emb_bar_def)
apply (rule prj_bar_def)
apply (rule defl_bar_def)
apply (rule liftemb_bar_def)
apply (rule liftprj_bar_def)
apply (rule liftdefl_bar_def)
done
end
instantiation baz :: ("domain") "domain"
begin
definition emb_baz :: "'a baz \ udom"
where "emb_baz \ (\ x. Rep_baz x)"
definition prj_baz :: "udom \ 'a baz"
where "prj_baz \ (\ y. Abs_baz (cast\(baz_defl\DEFL('a))\y))"
definition defl_baz :: "'a baz itself \ udom defl"
where "defl_baz \ \a. baz_defl\DEFL('a)"
definition
"(liftemb :: 'a baz u \ udom u) \ u_map\emb"
definition
"(liftprj :: udom u \ 'a baz u) \ u_map\prj"
definition
"liftdefl \ \(t::'a baz itself). liftdefl_of\DEFL('a baz)"
instance
apply (rule typedef_domain_class)
apply (rule type_definition_baz)
apply (rule below_baz_def)
apply (rule emb_baz_def)
apply (rule prj_baz_def)
apply (rule defl_baz_def)
apply (rule liftemb_baz_def)
apply (rule liftprj_baz_def)
apply (rule liftdefl_baz_def)
done
end
text \<open>Prove DEFL rules using lemma \<open>typedef_DEFL\<close>.\<close>
lemma DEFL_foo: "DEFL('a foo) = foo_defl\DEFL('a)"
apply (rule typedef_DEFL)
apply (rule defl_foo_def)
done
lemma DEFL_bar: "DEFL('a bar) = bar_defl\DEFL('a)"
apply (rule typedef_DEFL)
apply (rule defl_bar_def)
done
lemma DEFL_baz: "DEFL('a baz) = baz_defl\DEFL('a)"
apply (rule typedef_DEFL)
apply (rule defl_baz_def)
done
text \<open>Prove DEFL equations using type combinator unfold lemmas.\<close>
lemma DEFL_foo': "DEFL('a foo) = DEFL(one \<oplus> 'a\<^sub>\<bottom> \<otimes> ('a bar)\<^sub>\<bottom>)"
unfolding DEFL_foo DEFL_bar DEFL_baz domain_defl_simps
by (rule foo_defl_unfold)
lemma DEFL_bar': "DEFL('a bar) = DEFL(('a baz \ tr)\<^sub>\)"
unfolding DEFL_foo DEFL_bar DEFL_baz domain_defl_simps
by (rule bar_defl_unfold)
lemma DEFL_baz': "DEFL('a baz) = DEFL(('a foo convex_pd \ tr)\<^sub>\)"
unfolding DEFL_foo DEFL_bar DEFL_baz domain_defl_simps
by (rule baz_defl_unfold)
(********************************************************************)
subsection \<open>Step 3: Define rep and abs functions\<close>
text \<open>Define them all using \<open>prj\<close> and \<open>emb\<close>!\<close>
definition foo_rep :: "'a foo \ one \ ('a\<^sub>\ \ ('a bar)\<^sub>\)"
where "foo_rep \ prj oo emb"
definition foo_abs :: "one \ ('a\<^sub>\ \ ('a bar)\<^sub>\) \ 'a foo"
where "foo_abs \ prj oo emb"
definition bar_rep :: "'a bar \ ('a baz \ tr)\<^sub>\"
where "bar_rep \ prj oo emb"
definition bar_abs :: "('a baz \ tr)\<^sub>\ \ 'a bar"
where "bar_abs \ prj oo emb"
definition baz_rep :: "'a baz \ ('a foo convex_pd \ tr)\<^sub>\"
where "baz_rep \ prj oo emb"
definition baz_abs :: "('a foo convex_pd \ tr)\<^sub>\ \ 'a baz"
where "baz_abs \ prj oo emb"
text \<open>Prove isomorphism rules.\<close>
lemma foo_abs_iso: "foo_rep\(foo_abs\x) = x"
by (rule domain_abs_iso [OF DEFL_foo' foo_abs_def foo_rep_def])
lemma foo_rep_iso: "foo_abs\(foo_rep\x) = x"
by (rule domain_rep_iso [OF DEFL_foo' foo_abs_def foo_rep_def])
lemma bar_abs_iso: "bar_rep\(bar_abs\x) = x"
by (rule domain_abs_iso [OF DEFL_bar' bar_abs_def bar_rep_def])
lemma bar_rep_iso: "bar_abs\(bar_rep\x) = x"
by (rule domain_rep_iso [OF DEFL_bar' bar_abs_def bar_rep_def])
lemma baz_abs_iso: "baz_rep\(baz_abs\x) = x"
by (rule domain_abs_iso [OF DEFL_baz' baz_abs_def baz_rep_def])
lemma baz_rep_iso: "baz_abs\(baz_rep\x) = x"
by (rule domain_rep_iso [OF DEFL_baz' baz_abs_def baz_rep_def])
text \<open>Prove isodefl rules using \<open>isodefl_coerce\<close>.\<close>
lemma isodefl_foo_abs:
"isodefl d t \ isodefl (foo_abs oo d oo foo_rep) t"
by (rule isodefl_abs_rep [OF DEFL_foo' foo_abs_def foo_rep_def])
lemma isodefl_bar_abs:
"isodefl d t \ isodefl (bar_abs oo d oo bar_rep) t"
by (rule isodefl_abs_rep [OF DEFL_bar' bar_abs_def bar_rep_def])
lemma isodefl_baz_abs:
"isodefl d t \ isodefl (baz_abs oo d oo baz_rep) t"
by (rule isodefl_abs_rep [OF DEFL_baz' baz_abs_def baz_rep_def])
(********************************************************************)
subsection \<open>Step 4: Define map functions, prove isodefl property\<close>
text \<open>Start with the one-step non-recursive version.\<close>
text \<open>Note that the type of the map function depends on which
variables are used in positive and negative positions.\<close>
definition
foo_bar_baz_mapF ::
"('a \ 'b) \
('a foo \ 'b foo) \ ('a bar \ 'b bar) \ ('b baz \ 'a baz) \
('a foo \ 'b foo) \ ('a bar \ 'b bar) \ ('b baz \ 'a baz)"
where
"foo_bar_baz_mapF = (\ f. Abs_cfun (\(d1, d2, d3).
(
foo_abs oo
ssum_map\<cdot>ID\<cdot>(sprod_map\<cdot>(u_map\<cdot>f)\<cdot>(u_map\<cdot>d2))
oo foo_rep
,
bar_abs oo u_map\<cdot>(cfun_map\<cdot>d3\<cdot>ID) oo bar_rep
,
baz_abs oo u_map\<cdot>(cfun_map\<cdot>(convex_map\<cdot>d1)\<cdot>ID) oo baz_rep
)))"
lemma foo_bar_baz_mapF_beta:
"foo_bar_baz_mapF\f\d =
(
foo_abs oo
ssum_map\<cdot>ID\<cdot>(sprod_map\<cdot>(u_map\<cdot>f)\<cdot>(u_map\<cdot>(fst (snd d))))
oo foo_rep
,
bar_abs oo u_map\<cdot>(cfun_map\<cdot>(snd (snd d))\<cdot>ID) oo bar_rep
,
baz_abs oo u_map\<cdot>(cfun_map\<cdot>(convex_map\<cdot>(fst d))\<cdot>ID) oo baz_rep
)"
unfolding foo_bar_baz_mapF_def
by (simp add: split_def)
text \<open>Individual map functions are projected from the fixed point.\<close>
definition foo_map :: "('a \ 'b) \ ('a foo \ 'b foo)"
where "foo_map = (\ f. fst (fix\(foo_bar_baz_mapF\f)))"
definition bar_map :: "('a \ 'b) \ ('a bar \ 'b bar)"
where "bar_map = (\ f. fst (snd (fix\(foo_bar_baz_mapF\f))))"
definition baz_map :: "('a \ 'b) \ ('b baz \ 'a baz)"
where "baz_map = (\ f. snd (snd (fix\(foo_bar_baz_mapF\f))))"
lemma map_apply_thms:
"foo_map\f = fst (fix\(foo_bar_baz_mapF\f))"
"bar_map\f = fst (snd (fix\(foo_bar_baz_mapF\f)))"
"baz_map\f = snd (snd (fix\(foo_bar_baz_mapF\f)))"
unfolding foo_map_def bar_map_def baz_map_def by simp_all
text \<open>Prove isodefl rules for all map functions simultaneously.\<close>
lemma isodefl_foo_bar_baz:
assumes isodefl_d: "isodefl d t"
shows
"isodefl (foo_map\d) (foo_defl\t) \
isodefl (bar_map\<cdot>d) (bar_defl\<cdot>t) \<and>
isodefl (baz_map\<cdot>d) (baz_defl\<cdot>t)"
unfolding map_apply_thms defl_apply_thms
apply (rule parallel_fix_ind)
apply (intro adm_conj adm_isodefl cont2cont_fst cont2cont_snd cont_id)
apply (simp only: fst_strict snd_strict isodefl_bottom simp_thms)
apply (simp only: foo_bar_baz_mapF_beta
foo_bar_baz_deflF_beta
fst_conv snd_conv)
apply (elim conjE)
apply (intro
conjI
isodefl_foo_abs
isodefl_bar_abs
isodefl_baz_abs
domain_isodefl
isodefl_ID_DEFL isodefl_LIFTDEFL
isodefl_d
)
apply assumption+
done
lemmas isodefl_foo = isodefl_foo_bar_baz [THEN conjunct1]
lemmas isodefl_bar = isodefl_foo_bar_baz [THEN conjunct2, THEN conjunct1]
lemmas isodefl_baz = isodefl_foo_bar_baz [THEN conjunct2, THEN conjunct2]
text \<open>Prove map ID lemmas, using isodefl_DEFL_imp_ID\<close>
lemma foo_map_ID: "foo_map\ID = ID"
apply (rule isodefl_DEFL_imp_ID)
apply (subst DEFL_foo)
apply (rule isodefl_foo)
apply (rule isodefl_ID_DEFL)
done
lemma bar_map_ID: "bar_map\ID = ID"
apply (rule isodefl_DEFL_imp_ID)
apply (subst DEFL_bar)
apply (rule isodefl_bar)
apply (rule isodefl_ID_DEFL)
done
lemma baz_map_ID: "baz_map\ID = ID"
apply (rule isodefl_DEFL_imp_ID)
apply (subst DEFL_baz)
apply (rule isodefl_baz)
apply (rule isodefl_ID_DEFL)
done
(********************************************************************)
subsection \<open>Step 5: Define take functions, prove lub-take lemmas\<close>
definition
foo_bar_baz_takeF ::
"('a foo \ 'a foo) \ ('a bar \ 'a bar) \ ('a baz \ 'a baz) \
('a foo \ 'a foo) \ ('a bar \ 'a bar) \ ('a baz \ 'a baz)"
where
"foo_bar_baz_takeF = (\ p.
( foo_abs oo
ssum_map\<cdot>ID\<cdot>(sprod_map\<cdot>(u_map\<cdot>ID)\<cdot>(u_map\<cdot>(fst (snd p))))
oo foo_rep
, bar_abs oo
u_map\<cdot>(cfun_map\<cdot>(snd (snd p))\<cdot>ID) oo bar_rep
, baz_abs oo
u_map\<cdot>(cfun_map\<cdot>(convex_map\<cdot>(fst p))\<cdot>ID) oo baz_rep
))"
lemma foo_bar_baz_takeF_beta:
"foo_bar_baz_takeF\p =
( foo_abs oo
ssum_map\<cdot>ID\<cdot>(sprod_map\<cdot>(u_map\<cdot>ID)\<cdot>(u_map\<cdot>(fst (snd p))))
oo foo_rep
, bar_abs oo
u_map\<cdot>(cfun_map\<cdot>(snd (snd p))\<cdot>ID) oo bar_rep
, baz_abs oo
u_map\<cdot>(cfun_map\<cdot>(convex_map\<cdot>(fst p))\<cdot>ID) oo baz_rep
)"
unfolding foo_bar_baz_takeF_def by (rule beta_cfun, simp)
definition
foo_take :: "nat \ 'a foo \ 'a foo"
where
"foo_take = (\n. fst (iterate n\foo_bar_baz_takeF\\))"
definition
bar_take :: "nat \ 'a bar \ 'a bar"
where
"bar_take = (\n. fst (snd (iterate n\foo_bar_baz_takeF\\)))"
definition
baz_take :: "nat \ 'a baz \ 'a baz"
where
"baz_take = (\n. snd (snd (iterate n\foo_bar_baz_takeF\\)))"
lemma chain_take_thms: "chain foo_take" "chain bar_take" "chain baz_take"
unfolding foo_take_def bar_take_def baz_take_def
by (intro ch2ch_fst ch2ch_snd chain_iterate)+
lemma take_0_thms: "foo_take 0 = \" "bar_take 0 = \" "baz_take 0 = \"
unfolding foo_take_def bar_take_def baz_take_def
by (simp only: iterate_0 fst_strict snd_strict)+
lemma take_Suc_thms:
"foo_take (Suc n) =
foo_abs oo ssum_map\<cdot>ID\<cdot>(sprod_map\<cdot>(u_map\<cdot>ID)\<cdot>(u_map\<cdot>(bar_take n))) oo foo_rep"
"bar_take (Suc n) =
bar_abs oo u_map\<cdot>(cfun_map\<cdot>(baz_take n)\<cdot>ID) oo bar_rep"
"baz_take (Suc n) =
baz_abs oo u_map\<cdot>(cfun_map\<cdot>(convex_map\<cdot>(foo_take n))\<cdot>ID) oo baz_rep"
unfolding foo_take_def bar_take_def baz_take_def
by (simp only: iterate_Suc foo_bar_baz_takeF_beta fst_conv snd_conv)+
lemma lub_take_lemma:
"(\n. foo_take n, \n. bar_take n, \n. baz_take n)
= (foo_map\<cdot>(ID::'a \<rightarrow> 'a), bar_map\<cdot>(ID::'a \<rightarrow> 'a), baz_map\<cdot>(ID::'a \<rightarrow> 'a))"
apply (simp only: lub_Pair [symmetric] ch2ch_Pair chain_take_thms)
apply (simp only: map_apply_thms prod.collapse)
apply (simp only: fix_def2)
apply (rule lub_eq)
apply (rule nat.induct)
apply (simp only: iterate_0 Pair_strict take_0_thms)
apply (simp only: iterate_Suc prod_eq_iff fst_conv snd_conv
foo_bar_baz_mapF_beta take_Suc_thms simp_thms)
done
lemma lub_foo_take: "(\n. foo_take n) = ID"
apply (rule trans [OF _ foo_map_ID])
using lub_take_lemma
apply (elim Pair_inject)
apply assumption
done
lemma lub_bar_take: "(\n. bar_take n) = ID"
apply (rule trans [OF _ bar_map_ID])
using lub_take_lemma
apply (elim Pair_inject)
apply assumption
done
lemma lub_baz_take: "(\n. baz_take n) = ID"
apply (rule trans [OF _ baz_map_ID])
using lub_take_lemma
apply (elim Pair_inject)
apply assumption
done
end
¤ Dauer der Verarbeitung: 0.16 Sekunden
(vorverarbeitet)
¤
|
Haftungshinweis
Die Informationen auf dieser Webseite wurden
nach bestem Wissen sorgfältig zusammengestellt. Es wird jedoch weder Vollständigkeit, noch Richtigkeit,
noch Qualität der bereit gestellten Informationen zugesichert.
Bemerkung:
Die farbliche Syntaxdarstellung ist noch experimentell.
|
