|
|
|
|
|
Quellcode-Bibliothek
© Kompilation durch diese Firma
[Weder Korrektheit noch Funktionsfähigkeit der Software werden zugesichert.]
Datei:
Predicate_Compile.thy
Sprache: Isabelle
|
|
(* Title: HOL/Archimedean_Field.thy
Author: Brian Huffman
*)
section \<open>Archimedean Fields, Floor and Ceiling Functions\<close>
theory Archimedean_Field
imports Main
begin
lemma cInf_abs_ge:
fixes S :: "'a::{linordered_idom,conditionally_complete_linorder} set"
assumes "S \ {}"
and bdd: "\x. x\S \ \x\ \ a"
shows "\Inf S\ \ a"
proof -
have "Sup (uminus ` S) = - (Inf S)"
proof (rule antisym)
show "- (Inf S) \ Sup (uminus ` S)"
apply (subst minus_le_iff)
apply (rule cInf_greatest [OF \<open>S \<noteq> {}\<close>])
apply (subst minus_le_iff)
apply (rule cSup_upper)
apply force
using bdd
apply (force simp: abs_le_iff bdd_above_def)
done
next
have *: "\x. x \ S \ Inf S \ x"
by (meson abs_le_iff bdd bdd_below_def cInf_lower minus_le_iff)
show "Sup (uminus ` S) \ - Inf S"
using \<open>S \<noteq> {}\<close> by (force intro: * cSup_least)
qed
with cSup_abs_le [of "uminus ` S"] assms show ?thesis
by fastforce
qed
lemma cSup_asclose:
fixes S :: "'a::{linordered_idom,conditionally_complete_linorder} set"
assumes S: "S \ {}"
and b: "\x\S. \x - l\ \ e"
shows "\Sup S - l\ \ e"
proof -
have *: "\x - l\ \ e \ l - e \ x \ x \ l + e" for x l e :: 'a
by arith
have "bdd_above S"
using b by (auto intro!: bdd_aboveI[of _ "l + e"])
with S b show ?thesis
unfolding * by (auto intro!: cSup_upper2 cSup_least)
qed
lemma cInf_asclose:
fixes S :: "'a::{linordered_idom,conditionally_complete_linorder} set"
assumes S: "S \ {}"
and b: "\x\S. \x - l\ \ e"
shows "\Inf S - l\ \ e"
proof -
have *: "\x - l\ \ e \ l - e \ x \ x \ l + e" for x l e :: 'a
by arith
have "bdd_below S"
using b by (auto intro!: bdd_belowI[of _ "l - e"])
with S b show ?thesis
unfolding * by (auto intro!: cInf_lower2 cInf_greatest)
qed
subsection \<open>Class of Archimedean fields\<close>
text \<open>Archimedean fields have no infinite elements.\<close>
class archimedean_field = linordered_field +
assumes ex_le_of_int: "\z. x \ of_int z"
lemma ex_less_of_int: "\z. x < of_int z"
for x :: "'a::archimedean_field"
proof -
from ex_le_of_int obtain z where "x \ of_int z" ..
then have "x < of_int (z + 1)" by simp
then show ?thesis ..
qed
lemma ex_of_int_less: "\z. of_int z < x"
for x :: "'a::archimedean_field"
proof -
from ex_less_of_int obtain z where "- x < of_int z" ..
then have "of_int (- z) < x" by simp
then show ?thesis ..
qed
lemma reals_Archimedean2: "\n. x < of_nat n"
for x :: "'a::archimedean_field"
proof -
obtain z where "x < of_int z"
using ex_less_of_int ..
also have "\ \ of_int (int (nat z))"
by simp
also have "\ = of_nat (nat z)"
by (simp only: of_int_of_nat_eq)
finally show ?thesis ..
qed
lemma real_arch_simple: "\n. x \ of_nat n"
for x :: "'a::archimedean_field"
proof -
obtain n where "x < of_nat n"
using reals_Archimedean2 ..
then have "x \ of_nat n"
by simp
then show ?thesis ..
qed
text \<open>Archimedean fields have no infinitesimal elements.\<close>
lemma reals_Archimedean:
fixes x :: "'a::archimedean_field"
assumes "0 < x"
shows "\n. inverse (of_nat (Suc n)) < x"
proof -
from \<open>0 < x\<close> have "0 < inverse x"
by (rule positive_imp_inverse_positive)
obtain n where "inverse x < of_nat n"
using reals_Archimedean2 ..
then obtain m where "inverse x < of_nat (Suc m)"
using \<open>0 < inverse x\<close> by (cases n) (simp_all del: of_nat_Suc)
then have "inverse (of_nat (Suc m)) < inverse (inverse x)"
using \<open>0 < inverse x\<close> by (rule less_imp_inverse_less)
then have "inverse (of_nat (Suc m)) < x"
using \<open>0 < x\<close> by (simp add: nonzero_inverse_inverse_eq)
then show ?thesis ..
qed
lemma ex_inverse_of_nat_less:
fixes x :: "'a::archimedean_field"
assumes "0 < x"
shows "\n>0. inverse (of_nat n) < x"
using reals_Archimedean [OF \<open>0 < x\<close>] by auto
lemma ex_less_of_nat_mult:
fixes x :: "'a::archimedean_field"
assumes "0 < x"
shows "\n. y < of_nat n * x"
proof -
obtain n where "y / x < of_nat n"
using reals_Archimedean2 ..
with \<open>0 < x\<close> have "y < of_nat n * x"
by (simp add: pos_divide_less_eq)
then show ?thesis ..
qed
subsection \<open>Existence and uniqueness of floor function\<close>
lemma exists_least_lemma:
assumes "\ P 0" and "\n. P n"
shows "\n. \ P n \ P (Suc n)"
proof -
from \<open>\<exists>n. P n\<close> have "P (Least P)"
by (rule LeastI_ex)
with \<open>\<not> P 0\<close> obtain n where "Least P = Suc n"
by (cases "Least P") auto
then have "n < Least P"
by simp
then have "\ P n"
by (rule not_less_Least)
then have "\ P n \ P (Suc n)"
using \<open>P (Least P)\<close> \<open>Least P = Suc n\<close> by simp
then show ?thesis ..
qed
lemma floor_exists:
fixes x :: "'a::archimedean_field"
shows "\z. of_int z \ x \ x < of_int (z + 1)"
proof (cases "0 \ x")
case True
then have "\ x < of_nat 0"
by simp
then have "\n. \ x < of_nat n \ x < of_nat (Suc n)"
using reals_Archimedean2 by (rule exists_least_lemma)
then obtain n where "\ x < of_nat n \ x < of_nat (Suc n)" ..
then have "of_int (int n) \ x \ x < of_int (int n + 1)"
by simp
then show ?thesis ..
next
case False
then have "\ - x \ of_nat 0"
by simp
then have "\n. \ - x \ of_nat n \ - x \ of_nat (Suc n)"
using real_arch_simple by (rule exists_least_lemma)
then obtain n where "\ - x \ of_nat n \ - x \ of_nat (Suc n)" ..
then have "of_int (- int n - 1) \ x \ x < of_int (- int n - 1 + 1)"
by simp
then show ?thesis ..
qed
lemma floor_exists1: "\!z. of_int z \ x \ x < of_int (z + 1)"
for x :: "'a::archimedean_field"
proof (rule ex_ex1I)
show "\z. of_int z \ x \ x < of_int (z + 1)"
by (rule floor_exists)
next
fix y z
assume "of_int y \ x \ x < of_int (y + 1)"
and "of_int z \ x \ x < of_int (z + 1)"
with le_less_trans [of "of_int y" "x" "of_int (z + 1)"]
le_less_trans [of "of_int z" "x" "of_int (y + 1)"] show "y = z"
by (simp del: of_int_add)
qed
subsection \<open>Floor function\<close>
class floor_ceiling = archimedean_field +
fixes floor :: "'a \ int" ("\_\")
assumes floor_correct: "of_int \x\ \ x \ x < of_int (\x\ + 1)"
lemma floor_unique: "of_int z \ x \ x < of_int z + 1 \ \x\ = z"
using floor_correct [of x] floor_exists1 [of x] by auto
lemma floor_eq_iff: "\x\ = a \ of_int a \ x \ x < of_int a + 1"
using floor_correct floor_unique by auto
lemma of_int_floor_le [simp]: "of_int \x\ \ x"
using floor_correct ..
lemma le_floor_iff: "z \ \x\ \ of_int z \ x"
proof
assume "z \ \x\"
then have "(of_int z :: 'a) \ of_int \x\" by simp
also have "of_int \x\ \ x" by (rule of_int_floor_le)
finally show "of_int z \ x" .
next
assume "of_int z \ x"
also have "x < of_int (\x\ + 1)" using floor_correct ..
finally show "z \ \x\" by (simp del: of_int_add)
qed
lemma floor_less_iff: "\x\ < z \ x < of_int z"
by (simp add: not_le [symmetric] le_floor_iff)
lemma less_floor_iff: "z < \x\ \ of_int z + 1 \ x"
using le_floor_iff [of "z + 1" x] by auto
lemma floor_le_iff: "\x\ \ z \ x < of_int z + 1"
by (simp add: not_less [symmetric] less_floor_iff)
lemma floor_split[arith_split]: "P \t\ \ (\i. of_int i \ t \ t < of_int i + 1 \ P i)"
by (metis floor_correct floor_unique less_floor_iff not_le order_refl)
lemma floor_mono:
assumes "x \ y"
shows "\x\ \ \y\"
proof -
have "of_int \x\ \ x" by (rule of_int_floor_le)
also note \<open>x \<le> y\<close>
finally show ?thesis by (simp add: le_floor_iff)
qed
lemma floor_less_cancel: "\x\ < \y\ \ x < y"
by (auto simp add: not_le [symmetric] floor_mono)
lemma floor_of_int [simp]: "\of_int z\ = z"
by (rule floor_unique) simp_all
lemma floor_of_nat [simp]: "\of_nat n\ = int n"
using floor_of_int [of "of_nat n"] by simp
lemma le_floor_add: "\x\ + \y\ \ \x + y\"
by (simp only: le_floor_iff of_int_add add_mono of_int_floor_le)
text \<open>Floor with numerals.\<close>
lemma floor_zero [simp]: "\0\ = 0"
using floor_of_int [of 0] by simp
lemma floor_one [simp]: "\1\ = 1"
using floor_of_int [of 1] by simp
lemma floor_numeral [simp]: "\numeral v\ = numeral v"
using floor_of_int [of "numeral v"] by simp
lemma floor_neg_numeral [simp]: "\- numeral v\ = - numeral v"
using floor_of_int [of "- numeral v"] by simp
lemma zero_le_floor [simp]: "0 \ \x\ \ 0 \ x"
by (simp add: le_floor_iff)
lemma one_le_floor [simp]: "1 \ \x\ \ 1 \ x"
by (simp add: le_floor_iff)
lemma numeral_le_floor [simp]: "numeral v \ \x\ \ numeral v \ x"
by (simp add: le_floor_iff)
lemma neg_numeral_le_floor [simp]: "- numeral v \ \x\ \ - numeral v \ x"
by (simp add: le_floor_iff)
lemma zero_less_floor [simp]: "0 < \x\ \ 1 \ x"
by (simp add: less_floor_iff)
lemma one_less_floor [simp]: "1 < \x\ \ 2 \ x"
by (simp add: less_floor_iff)
lemma numeral_less_floor [simp]: "numeral v < \x\ \ numeral v + 1 \ x"
by (simp add: less_floor_iff)
lemma neg_numeral_less_floor [simp]: "- numeral v < \x\ \ - numeral v + 1 \ x"
by (simp add: less_floor_iff)
lemma floor_le_zero [simp]: "\x\ \ 0 \ x < 1"
by (simp add: floor_le_iff)
lemma floor_le_one [simp]: "\x\ \ 1 \ x < 2"
by (simp add: floor_le_iff)
lemma floor_le_numeral [simp]: "\x\ \ numeral v \ x < numeral v + 1"
by (simp add: floor_le_iff)
lemma floor_le_neg_numeral [simp]: "\x\ \ - numeral v \ x < - numeral v + 1"
by (simp add: floor_le_iff)
lemma floor_less_zero [simp]: "\x\ < 0 \ x < 0"
by (simp add: floor_less_iff)
lemma floor_less_one [simp]: "\x\ < 1 \ x < 1"
by (simp add: floor_less_iff)
lemma floor_less_numeral [simp]: "\x\ < numeral v \ x < numeral v"
by (simp add: floor_less_iff)
lemma floor_less_neg_numeral [simp]: "\x\ < - numeral v \ x < - numeral v"
by (simp add: floor_less_iff)
lemma le_mult_floor_Ints:
assumes "0 \ a" "a \ Ints"
shows "of_int (\a\ * \b\) \ (of_int\a * b\ :: 'a :: linordered_idom)"
by (metis Ints_cases assms floor_less_iff floor_of_int linorder_not_less mult_left_mono of_int_floor_le of_int_less_iff of_int_mult)
text \<open>Addition and subtraction of integers.\<close>
lemma floor_add_int: "\x\ + z = \x + of_int z\"
using floor_correct [of x] by (simp add: floor_unique[symmetric])
lemma int_add_floor: "z + \x\ = \of_int z + x\"
using floor_correct [of x] by (simp add: floor_unique[symmetric])
lemma one_add_floor: "\x\ + 1 = \x + 1\"
using floor_add_int [of x 1] by simp
lemma floor_diff_of_int [simp]: "\x - of_int z\ = \x\ - z"
using floor_add_int [of x "- z"] by (simp add: algebra_simps)
lemma floor_uminus_of_int [simp]: "\- (of_int z)\ = - z"
by (metis floor_diff_of_int [of 0] diff_0 floor_zero)
lemma floor_diff_numeral [simp]: "\x - numeral v\ = \x\ - numeral v"
using floor_diff_of_int [of x "numeral v"] by simp
lemma floor_diff_one [simp]: "\x - 1\ = \x\ - 1"
using floor_diff_of_int [of x 1] by simp
lemma le_mult_floor:
assumes "0 \ a" and "0 \ b"
shows "\a\ * \b\ \ \a * b\"
proof -
have "of_int \a\ \ a" and "of_int \b\ \ b"
by (auto intro: of_int_floor_le)
then have "of_int (\a\ * \b\) \ a * b"
using assms by (auto intro!: mult_mono)
also have "a * b < of_int (\a * b\ + 1)"
using floor_correct[of "a * b"] by auto
finally show ?thesis
unfolding of_int_less_iff by simp
qed
lemma floor_divide_of_int_eq: "\of_int k / of_int l\ = k div l"
for k l :: int
proof (cases "l = 0")
case True
then show ?thesis by simp
next
case False
have *: "\of_int (k mod l) / of_int l :: 'a\ = 0"
proof (cases "l > 0")
case True
then show ?thesis
by (auto intro: floor_unique)
next
case False
obtain r where "r = - l"
by blast
then have l: "l = - r"
by simp
with \<open>l \<noteq> 0\<close> False have "r > 0"
by simp
with l show ?thesis
using pos_mod_bound [of r]
by (auto simp add: zmod_zminus2_eq_if less_le field_simps intro: floor_unique)
qed
have "(of_int k :: 'a) = of_int (k div l * l + k mod l)"
by simp
also have "\ = (of_int (k div l) + of_int (k mod l) / of_int l) * of_int l"
using False by (simp only: of_int_add) (simp add: field_simps)
finally have "(of_int k / of_int l :: 'a) = \ / of_int l"
by simp
then have "(of_int k / of_int l :: 'a) = of_int (k div l) + of_int (k mod l) / of_int l"
using False by (simp only:) (simp add: field_simps)
then have "\of_int k / of_int l :: 'a\ = \of_int (k div l) + of_int (k mod l) / of_int l :: 'a\"
by simp
then have "\of_int k / of_int l :: 'a\ = \of_int (k mod l) / of_int l + of_int (k div l) :: 'a\"
by (simp add: ac_simps)
then have "\of_int k / of_int l :: 'a\ = \of_int (k mod l) / of_int l :: 'a\ + k div l"
by (simp add: floor_add_int)
with * show ?thesis
by simp
qed
lemma floor_divide_of_nat_eq: "\of_nat m / of_nat n\ = of_nat (m div n)"
for m n :: nat
proof (cases "n = 0")
case True
then show ?thesis by simp
next
case False
then have *: "\of_nat (m mod n) / of_nat n :: 'a\ = 0"
by (auto intro: floor_unique)
have "(of_nat m :: 'a) = of_nat (m div n * n + m mod n)"
by simp
also have "\ = (of_nat (m div n) + of_nat (m mod n) / of_nat n) * of_nat n"
using False by (simp only: of_nat_add) (simp add: field_simps)
finally have "(of_nat m / of_nat n :: 'a) = \ / of_nat n"
by simp
then have "(of_nat m / of_nat n :: 'a) = of_nat (m div n) + of_nat (m mod n) / of_nat n"
using False by (simp only:) simp
then have "\of_nat m / of_nat n :: 'a\ = \of_nat (m div n) + of_nat (m mod n) / of_nat n :: 'a\"
by simp
then have "\of_nat m / of_nat n :: 'a\ = \of_nat (m mod n) / of_nat n + of_nat (m div n) :: 'a\"
by (simp add: ac_simps)
moreover have "(of_nat (m div n) :: 'a) = of_int (of_nat (m div n))"
by simp
ultimately have "\of_nat m / of_nat n :: 'a\ =
\<lfloor>of_nat (m mod n) / of_nat n :: 'a\<rfloor> + of_nat (m div n)"
by (simp only: floor_add_int)
with * show ?thesis
by simp
qed
lemma floor_divide_lower:
fixes q :: "'a::floor_ceiling"
shows "q > 0 \ of_int \p / q\ * q \ p"
using of_int_floor_le pos_le_divide_eq by blast
lemma floor_divide_upper:
fixes q :: "'a::floor_ceiling"
shows "q > 0 \ p < (of_int \p / q\ + 1) * q"
by (meson floor_eq_iff pos_divide_less_eq)
subsection \<open>Ceiling function\<close>
definition ceiling :: "'a::floor_ceiling \ int" ("\_\")
where "\x\ = - \- x\"
lemma ceiling_correct: "of_int \x\ - 1 < x \ x \ of_int \x\"
unfolding ceiling_def using floor_correct [of "- x"]
by (simp add: le_minus_iff)
lemma ceiling_unique: "of_int z - 1 < x \ x \ of_int z \ \x\ = z"
unfolding ceiling_def using floor_unique [of "- z" "- x"] by simp
lemma ceiling_eq_iff: "\x\ = a \ of_int a - 1 < x \ x \ of_int a"
using ceiling_correct ceiling_unique by auto
lemma le_of_int_ceiling [simp]: "x \ of_int \x\"
using ceiling_correct ..
lemma ceiling_le_iff: "\x\ \ z \ x \ of_int z"
unfolding ceiling_def using le_floor_iff [of "- z" "- x"] by auto
lemma less_ceiling_iff: "z < \x\ \ of_int z < x"
by (simp add: not_le [symmetric] ceiling_le_iff)
lemma ceiling_less_iff: "\x\ < z \ x \ of_int z - 1"
using ceiling_le_iff [of x "z - 1"] by simp
lemma le_ceiling_iff: "z \ \x\ \ of_int z - 1 < x"
by (simp add: not_less [symmetric] ceiling_less_iff)
lemma ceiling_mono: "x \ y \ \x\ \ \y\"
unfolding ceiling_def by (simp add: floor_mono)
lemma ceiling_less_cancel: "\x\ < \y\ \ x < y"
by (auto simp add: not_le [symmetric] ceiling_mono)
lemma ceiling_of_int [simp]: "\of_int z\ = z"
by (rule ceiling_unique) simp_all
lemma ceiling_of_nat [simp]: "\of_nat n\ = int n"
using ceiling_of_int [of "of_nat n"] by simp
lemma ceiling_add_le: "\x + y\ \ \x\ + \y\"
by (simp only: ceiling_le_iff of_int_add add_mono le_of_int_ceiling)
lemma mult_ceiling_le:
assumes "0 \ a" and "0 \ b"
shows "\a * b\ \ \a\ * \b\"
by (metis assms ceiling_le_iff ceiling_mono le_of_int_ceiling mult_mono of_int_mult)
lemma mult_ceiling_le_Ints:
assumes "0 \ a" "a \ Ints"
shows "(of_int \a * b\ :: 'a :: linordered_idom) \ of_int(\a\ * \b\)"
by (metis Ints_cases assms ceiling_le_iff ceiling_of_int le_of_int_ceiling mult_left_mono of_int_le_iff of_int_mult)
lemma finite_int_segment:
fixes a :: "'a::floor_ceiling"
shows "finite {x \ \. a \ x \ x \ b}"
proof -
have "finite {ceiling a..floor b}"
by simp
moreover have "{x \ \. a \ x \ x \ b} = of_int ` {ceiling a..floor b}"
by (auto simp: le_floor_iff ceiling_le_iff elim!: Ints_cases)
ultimately show ?thesis
by simp
qed
corollary finite_abs_int_segment:
fixes a :: "'a::floor_ceiling"
shows "finite {k \ \. \k\ \ a}"
using finite_int_segment [of "-a" a] by (auto simp add: abs_le_iff conj_commute minus_le_iff)
subsubsection \<open>Ceiling with numerals.\<close>
lemma ceiling_zero [simp]: "\0\ = 0"
using ceiling_of_int [of 0] by simp
lemma ceiling_one [simp]: "\1\ = 1"
using ceiling_of_int [of 1] by simp
lemma ceiling_numeral [simp]: "\numeral v\ = numeral v"
using ceiling_of_int [of "numeral v"] by simp
lemma ceiling_neg_numeral [simp]: "\- numeral v\ = - numeral v"
using ceiling_of_int [of "- numeral v"] by simp
lemma ceiling_le_zero [simp]: "\x\ \ 0 \ x \ 0"
by (simp add: ceiling_le_iff)
lemma ceiling_le_one [simp]: "\x\ \ 1 \ x \ 1"
by (simp add: ceiling_le_iff)
lemma ceiling_le_numeral [simp]: "\x\ \ numeral v \ x \ numeral v"
by (simp add: ceiling_le_iff)
lemma ceiling_le_neg_numeral [simp]: "\x\ \ - numeral v \ x \ - numeral v"
by (simp add: ceiling_le_iff)
lemma ceiling_less_zero [simp]: "\x\ < 0 \ x \ -1"
by (simp add: ceiling_less_iff)
lemma ceiling_less_one [simp]: "\x\ < 1 \ x \ 0"
by (simp add: ceiling_less_iff)
lemma ceiling_less_numeral [simp]: "\x\ < numeral v \ x \ numeral v - 1"
by (simp add: ceiling_less_iff)
lemma ceiling_less_neg_numeral [simp]: "\x\ < - numeral v \ x \ - numeral v - 1"
by (simp add: ceiling_less_iff)
lemma zero_le_ceiling [simp]: "0 \ \x\ \ -1 < x"
by (simp add: le_ceiling_iff)
lemma one_le_ceiling [simp]: "1 \ \x\ \ 0 < x"
by (simp add: le_ceiling_iff)
lemma numeral_le_ceiling [simp]: "numeral v \ \x\ \ numeral v - 1 < x"
by (simp add: le_ceiling_iff)
lemma neg_numeral_le_ceiling [simp]: "- numeral v \ \x\ \ - numeral v - 1 < x"
by (simp add: le_ceiling_iff)
lemma zero_less_ceiling [simp]: "0 < \x\ \ 0 < x"
by (simp add: less_ceiling_iff)
lemma one_less_ceiling [simp]: "1 < \x\ \ 1 < x"
by (simp add: less_ceiling_iff)
lemma numeral_less_ceiling [simp]: "numeral v < \x\ \ numeral v < x"
by (simp add: less_ceiling_iff)
lemma neg_numeral_less_ceiling [simp]: "- numeral v < \x\ \ - numeral v < x"
by (simp add: less_ceiling_iff)
lemma ceiling_altdef: "\x\ = (if x = of_int \x\ then \x\ else \x\ + 1)"
by (intro ceiling_unique; simp, linarith?)
lemma floor_le_ceiling [simp]: "\x\ \ \x\"
by (simp add: ceiling_altdef)
subsubsection \<open>Addition and subtraction of integers.\<close>
lemma ceiling_add_of_int [simp]: "\x + of_int z\ = \x\ + z"
using ceiling_correct [of x] by (simp add: ceiling_def)
lemma ceiling_add_numeral [simp]: "\x + numeral v\ = \x\ + numeral v"
using ceiling_add_of_int [of x "numeral v"] by simp
lemma ceiling_add_one [simp]: "\x + 1\ = \x\ + 1"
using ceiling_add_of_int [of x 1] by simp
lemma ceiling_diff_of_int [simp]: "\x - of_int z\ = \x\ - z"
using ceiling_add_of_int [of x "- z"] by (simp add: algebra_simps)
lemma ceiling_diff_numeral [simp]: "\x - numeral v\ = \x\ - numeral v"
using ceiling_diff_of_int [of x "numeral v"] by simp
lemma ceiling_diff_one [simp]: "\x - 1\ = \x\ - 1"
using ceiling_diff_of_int [of x 1] by simp
lemma ceiling_split[arith_split]: "P \t\ \ (\i. of_int i - 1 < t \ t \ of_int i \ P i)"
by (auto simp add: ceiling_unique ceiling_correct)
lemma ceiling_diff_floor_le_1: "\x\ - \x\ \ 1"
proof -
have "of_int \x\ - 1 < x"
using ceiling_correct[of x] by simp
also have "x < of_int \x\ + 1"
using floor_correct[of x] by simp_all
finally have "of_int (\x\ - \x\) < (of_int 2::'a)"
by simp
then show ?thesis
unfolding of_int_less_iff by simp
qed
lemma nat_approx_posE:
fixes e:: "'a::{archimedean_field,floor_ceiling}"
assumes "0 < e"
obtains n :: nat where "1 / of_nat(Suc n) < e"
proof
have "(1::'a) / of_nat (Suc (nat \1/e\)) < 1 / of_int (\1/e\)"
proof (rule divide_strict_left_mono)
show "(of_int \1 / e\::'a) < of_nat (Suc (nat \1 / e\))"
using assms by (simp add: field_simps)
show "(0::'a) < of_nat (Suc (nat \1 / e\)) * of_int \1 / e\"
using assms by (auto simp: zero_less_mult_iff pos_add_strict)
qed auto
also have "1 / of_int (\1/e\) \ 1 / (1/e)"
by (rule divide_left_mono) (auto simp: \<open>0 < e\<close> ceiling_correct)
also have "\ = e" by simp
finally show "1 / of_nat (Suc (nat \1 / e\)) < e"
by metis
qed
lemma ceiling_divide_upper:
fixes q :: "'a::floor_ceiling"
shows "q > 0 \ p \ of_int (ceiling (p / q)) * q"
by (meson divide_le_eq le_of_int_ceiling)
lemma ceiling_divide_lower:
fixes q :: "'a::floor_ceiling"
shows "q > 0 \ (of_int \p / q\ - 1) * q < p"
by (meson ceiling_eq_iff pos_less_divide_eq)
subsection \<open>Negation\<close>
lemma floor_minus: "\- x\ = - \x\"
unfolding ceiling_def by simp
lemma ceiling_minus: "\- x\ = - \x\"
unfolding ceiling_def by simp
subsection \<open>Natural numbers\<close>
lemma of_nat_floor: "r\0 \ of_nat (nat \r\) \ r"
by simp
lemma of_nat_ceiling: "of_nat (nat \r\) \ r"
by (cases "r\0") auto
subsection \<open>Frac Function\<close>
definition frac :: "'a \ 'a::floor_ceiling"
where "frac x \ x - of_int \x\"
lemma frac_lt_1: "frac x < 1"
by (simp add: frac_def) linarith
lemma frac_eq_0_iff [simp]: "frac x = 0 \ x \ \"
by (simp add: frac_def) (metis Ints_cases Ints_of_int floor_of_int )
lemma frac_ge_0 [simp]: "frac x \ 0"
unfolding frac_def by linarith
lemma frac_gt_0_iff [simp]: "frac x > 0 \ x \ \"
by (metis frac_eq_0_iff frac_ge_0 le_less less_irrefl)
lemma frac_of_int [simp]: "frac (of_int z) = 0"
by (simp add: frac_def)
lemma frac_frac [simp]: "frac (frac x) = frac x"
by (simp add: frac_def)
lemma floor_add: "\x + y\ = (if frac x + frac y < 1 then \x\ + \y\ else (\x\ + \y\) + 1)"
proof -
have "x + y < 1 + (of_int \x\ + of_int \y\) \ \x + y\ = \x\ + \y\"
by (metis add.commute floor_unique le_floor_add le_floor_iff of_int_add)
moreover
have "\ x + y < 1 + (of_int \x\ + of_int \y\) \ \x + y\ = 1 + (\x\ + \y\)"
apply (simp add: floor_eq_iff)
apply (auto simp add: algebra_simps)
apply linarith
done
ultimately show ?thesis by (auto simp add: frac_def algebra_simps)
qed
lemma floor_add2[simp]: "x \ \ \ y \ \ \ \x + y\ = \x\ + \y\"
by (metis add.commute add.left_neutral frac_lt_1 floor_add frac_eq_0_iff)
lemma frac_add:
"frac (x + y) = (if frac x + frac y < 1 then frac x + frac y else (frac x + frac y) - 1)"
by (simp add: frac_def floor_add)
lemma frac_unique_iff: "frac x = a \ x - a \ \ \ 0 \ a \ a < 1"
for x :: "'a::floor_ceiling"
apply (auto simp: Ints_def frac_def algebra_simps floor_unique)
apply linarith+
done
lemma frac_eq: "frac x = x \ 0 \ x \ x < 1"
by (simp add: frac_unique_iff)
lemma frac_neg: "frac (- x) = (if x \ \ then 0 else 1 - frac x)"
for x :: "'a::floor_ceiling"
apply (auto simp add: frac_unique_iff)
apply (simp add: frac_def)
apply (meson frac_lt_1 less_iff_diff_less_0 not_le not_less_iff_gr_or_eq)
done
lemma frac_in_Ints_iff [simp]: "frac x \ \ \ x \ \"
proof safe
assume "frac x \ \"
hence "of_int \x\ + frac x \ \" by auto
also have "of_int \x\ + frac x = x" by (simp add: frac_def)
finally show "x \ \" .
qed (auto simp: frac_def)
lemma frac_1_eq: "frac (x+1) = frac x"
by (simp add: frac_def)
subsection \<open>Rounding to the nearest integer\<close>
definition round :: "'a::floor_ceiling \ int"
where "round x = \x + 1/2\"
lemma of_int_round_ge: "of_int (round x) \ x - 1/2"
and of_int_round_le: "of_int (round x) \ x + 1/2"
and of_int_round_abs_le: "\of_int (round x) - x\ \ 1/2"
and of_int_round_gt: "of_int (round x) > x - 1/2"
proof -
from floor_correct[of "x + 1/2"] have "x + 1/2 < of_int (round x) + 1"
by (simp add: round_def)
from add_strict_right_mono[OF this, of "-1"] show A: "of_int (round x) > x - 1/2"
by simp
then show "of_int (round x) \ x - 1/2"
by simp
from floor_correct[of "x + 1/2"] show "of_int (round x) \ x + 1/2"
by (simp add: round_def)
with A show "\of_int (round x) - x\ \ 1/2"
by linarith
qed
lemma round_of_int [simp]: "round (of_int n) = n"
unfolding round_def by (subst floor_eq_iff) force
lemma round_0 [simp]: "round 0 = 0"
using round_of_int[of 0] by simp
lemma round_1 [simp]: "round 1 = 1"
using round_of_int[of 1] by simp
lemma round_numeral [simp]: "round (numeral n) = numeral n"
using round_of_int[of "numeral n"] by simp
lemma round_neg_numeral [simp]: "round (-numeral n) = -numeral n"
using round_of_int[of "-numeral n"] by simp
lemma round_of_nat [simp]: "round (of_nat n) = of_nat n"
using round_of_int[of "int n"] by simp
lemma round_mono: "x \ y \ round x \ round y"
unfolding round_def by (intro floor_mono) simp
lemma round_unique: "of_int y > x - 1/2 \ of_int y \ x + 1/2 \ round x = y"
unfolding round_def
proof (rule floor_unique)
assume "x - 1 / 2 < of_int y"
from add_strict_left_mono[OF this, of 1] show "x + 1 / 2 < of_int y + 1"
by simp
qed
lemma round_unique': "\x - of_int n\ < 1/2 \ round x = n"
by (subst (asm) abs_less_iff, rule round_unique) (simp_all add: field_simps)
lemma round_altdef: "round x = (if frac x \ 1/2 then \x\ else \x\)"
by (cases "frac x \ 1/2")
(rule round_unique, ((simp add: frac_def field_simps ceiling_altdef; linarith)+)[2])+
lemma floor_le_round: "\x\ \ round x"
unfolding round_def by (intro floor_mono) simp
lemma ceiling_ge_round: "\x\ \ round x"
unfolding round_altdef by simp
lemma round_diff_minimal: "\z - of_int (round z)\ \ \z - of_int m\"
for z :: "'a::floor_ceiling"
proof (cases "of_int m \ z")
case True
then have "\z - of_int (round z)\ \ \of_int \z\ - z\"
unfolding round_altdef by (simp add: field_simps ceiling_altdef frac_def) linarith
also have "of_int \z\ - z \ 0"
by linarith
with True have "\of_int \z\ - z\ \ \z - of_int m\"
by (simp add: ceiling_le_iff)
finally show ?thesis .
next
case False
then have "\z - of_int (round z)\ \ \of_int \z\ - z\"
unfolding round_altdef by (simp add: field_simps ceiling_altdef frac_def) linarith
also have "z - of_int \z\ \ 0"
by linarith
with False have "\of_int \z\ - z\ \ \z - of_int m\"
by (simp add: le_floor_iff)
finally show ?thesis .
qed
end
¤ Dauer der Verarbeitung: 0.114 Sekunden
(vorverarbeitet)
¤
|
Haftungshinweis
Die Informationen auf dieser Webseite wurden
nach bestem Wissen sorgfältig zusammengestellt. Es wird jedoch weder Vollständigkeit, noch Richtigkeit,
noch Qualität der bereit gestellten Informationen zugesichert.
Bemerkung:
Die farbliche Syntaxdarstellung ist noch experimentell.
|
|
|
|
|
|
