(* Title: ZF/AC/AC16_WO4.thy
Author: Krzysztof Grabczewski
The proof of AC16(n, k) ==> WO4(n-k)
Tidied (using locales) by LCP
*)
theory AC16_WO4
imports AC16_lemmas
begin
(* ********************************************************************** *)
(* The case of finite set *)
(* ********************************************************************** *)
lemma lemma1:
"[| Finite(A); 0 nat |]
==> \<exists>a f. Ord(a) & domain(f) = a &
(\<Union>b<a. f`b) = A & (\<forall>b<a. f`b \<lesssim> m)"
apply (unfold Finite_def)
apply (erule bexE)
apply (drule eqpoll_sym [THEN eqpoll_def [THEN def_imp_iff, THEN iffD1]])
apply (erule exE)
apply (rule_tac x = n in exI)
apply (rule_tac x = "\i \ n. {f`i}" in exI)
apply (simp add: ltD bij_def surj_def)
apply (fast intro!: ltI nat_into_Ord lam_funtype [THEN domain_of_fun]
singleton_eqpoll_1 [THEN eqpoll_imp_lepoll, THEN lepoll_trans]
nat_1_lepoll_iff [THEN iffD2]
elim!: apply_type ltE)
done
(* ********************************************************************** *)
(* The case of infinite set *)
(* ********************************************************************** *)
(* well_ord(x,r) ==> well_ord({{y,z}. y \<in> x}, Something(x,z)) **)
lemmas well_ord_paired = paired_bij [THEN bij_is_inj, THEN well_ord_rvimage]
lemma lepoll_trans1: "[| A \ B; ~ A \ C |] ==> ~ B \ C"
by (blast intro: lepoll_trans)
(* ********************************************************************** *)
(* There exists a well ordered set y such that ... *)
(* ********************************************************************** *)
lemmas lepoll_paired = paired_eqpoll [THEN eqpoll_sym, THEN eqpoll_imp_lepoll]
lemma lemma2: "\y R. well_ord(y,R) & x \ y = 0 & ~y \ z & ~Finite(y)"
apply (rule_tac x = "{{a,x}. a \ nat \ Hartog (z) }" in exI)
apply (rule well_ord_Un [OF Ord_nat [THEN well_ord_Memrel]
Ord_Hartog [THEN well_ord_Memrel], THEN exE])
apply (blast intro!: Ord_Hartog well_ord_Memrel well_ord_paired
lepoll_trans1 [OF _ not_Hartog_lepoll_self]
lepoll_trans [OF subset_imp_lepoll lepoll_paired]
elim!: nat_not_Finite [THEN notE]
elim: mem_asym
dest!: Un_upper1 [THEN subset_imp_lepoll, THEN lepoll_Finite]
lepoll_paired [THEN lepoll_Finite])
done
lemma infinite_Un: "~Finite(B) ==> ~Finite(A \ B)"
by (blast intro: subset_Finite)
(* ********************************************************************** *)
(* There is a v \<in> s(u) such that k \<lesssim> x \<inter> y (in our case succ(k)) *)
(* The idea of the proof is the following \<in> *)
(* Suppose not, i.e. every element of s(u) has exactly k-1 elements of y *)
(* Thence y is less than or equipollent to {v \<in> Pow(x). v \<approx> n#-k} *)
(* We have obtained this result in two steps \<in> *)
(* 1. y is less than or equipollent to {v \<in> s(u). a \<subseteq> v} *)
(* where a is certain k-2 element subset of y *)
(* 2. {v \<in> s(u). a \<subseteq> v} is less than or equipollent *)
(* to {v \<in> Pow(x). v \<approx> n-k} *)
(* ********************************************************************** *)
(*Proof simplified by LCP*)
lemma succ_not_lepoll_lemma:
"[| ~(\x \ A. f`x=y); f \ inj(A, B); y \ B |]
==> (\<lambda>a \<in> succ(A). if(a=A, y, f`a)) \<in> inj(succ(A), B)"
apply (rule_tac d = "%z. if (z=y, A, converse (f) `z) " in lam_injective)
apply (force simp add: inj_is_fun [THEN apply_type])
(*this preliminary simplification prevents looping somehow*)
apply (simp (no_asm_simp))
apply force
done
lemma succ_not_lepoll_imp_eqpoll: "[| ~A \ B; A \ B |] ==> succ(A) \ B"
apply (unfold lepoll_def eqpoll_def bij_def surj_def)
apply (fast elim!: succ_not_lepoll_lemma inj_is_fun)
done
(* ********************************************************************** *)
(* There is a k-2 element subset of y *)
(* ********************************************************************** *)
lemmas ordertype_eqpoll =
ordermap_bij [THEN exI [THEN eqpoll_def [THEN def_imp_iff, THEN iffD2]]]
lemma cons_cons_subset:
"[| a \ y; b \ y-a; u \ x |] ==> cons(b, cons(u, a)) \ Pow(x \ y)"
by fast
lemma cons_cons_eqpoll:
"[| a \ k; a \ y; b \ y-a; u \ x; x \ y = 0 |]
==> cons(b, cons(u, a)) \<approx> succ(succ(k))"
by (fast intro!: cons_eqpoll_succ)
lemma set_eq_cons:
"[| succ(k) \ A; k \ B; B \ A; a \ A-B; k \ nat |] ==> A = cons(a, B)"
apply (rule equalityI)
prefer 2 apply fast
apply (rule Diff_eq_0_iff [THEN iffD1])
apply (rule equals0I)
apply (drule eqpoll_sym [THEN eqpoll_imp_lepoll])
apply (drule eqpoll_sym [THEN cons_eqpoll_succ], fast)
apply (drule cons_eqpoll_succ, fast)
apply (fast elim!: lepoll_trans [THEN lepoll_trans, THEN succ_lepoll_natE,
OF eqpoll_sym [THEN eqpoll_imp_lepoll] subset_imp_lepoll])
done
lemma cons_eqE: "[| cons(x,a) = cons(y,a); x \ a |] ==> x = y "
by (fast elim!: equalityE)
lemma eq_imp_Int_eq: "A = B ==> A \ C = B \ C"
by blast
(* ********************************************************************** *)
(* some arithmetic *)
(* ********************************************************************** *)
lemma eqpoll_sum_imp_Diff_lepoll_lemma [rule_format]:
"[| k \ nat; m \ nat |]
==> \<forall>A B. A \<approx> k #+ m & k \<lesssim> B & B \<subseteq> A \<longrightarrow> A-B \<lesssim> m"
apply (induct_tac "k")
apply (simp add: add_0)
apply (blast intro: eqpoll_imp_lepoll lepoll_trans
Diff_subset [THEN subset_imp_lepoll])
apply (intro allI impI)
apply (rule succ_lepoll_imp_not_empty [THEN not_emptyE], fast)
apply (erule_tac x = "A - {xa}" in allE)
apply (erule_tac x = "B - {xa}" in allE)
apply (erule impE)
apply (simp add: add_succ)
apply (fast intro!: Diff_sing_eqpoll lepoll_Diff_sing)
apply (subgoal_tac "A - {xa} - (B - {xa}) = A - B", simp)
apply blast
done
lemma eqpoll_sum_imp_Diff_lepoll:
"[| A \ succ(k #+ m); B \ A; succ(k) \ B; k \ nat; m \ nat |]
==> A-B \<lesssim> m"
apply (simp only: add_succ [symmetric])
apply (blast intro: eqpoll_sum_imp_Diff_lepoll_lemma)
done
(* ********************************************************************** *)
(* similar properties for \<approx> *)
(* ********************************************************************** *)
lemma eqpoll_sum_imp_Diff_eqpoll_lemma [rule_format]:
"[| k \ nat; m \ nat |]
==> \<forall>A B. A \<approx> k #+ m & k \<approx> B & B \<subseteq> A \<longrightarrow> A-B \<approx> m"
apply (induct_tac "k")
apply (force dest!: eqpoll_sym [THEN eqpoll_imp_lepoll, THEN lepoll_0_is_0])
apply (intro allI impI)
apply (rule succ_lepoll_imp_not_empty [THEN not_emptyE])
apply (fast elim!: eqpoll_imp_lepoll)
apply (erule_tac x = "A - {xa}" in allE)
apply (erule_tac x = "B - {xa}" in allE)
apply (erule impE)
apply (force intro: eqpoll_sym intro!: Diff_sing_eqpoll)
apply (subgoal_tac "A - {xa} - (B - {xa}) = A - B", simp)
apply blast
done
lemma eqpoll_sum_imp_Diff_eqpoll:
"[| A \ succ(k #+ m); B \ A; succ(k) \ B; k \ nat; m \ nat |]
==> A-B \<approx> m"
apply (simp only: add_succ [symmetric])
apply (blast intro: eqpoll_sum_imp_Diff_eqpoll_lemma)
done
(* ********************************************************************** *)
(* LL can be well ordered *)
(* ********************************************************************** *)
lemma subsets_lepoll_0_eq_unit: "{x \ Pow(X). x \ 0} = {0}"
by (fast dest!: lepoll_0_is_0 intro!: lepoll_refl)
lemma subsets_lepoll_succ:
"n \ nat ==> {z \ Pow(y). z \ succ(n)} =
{z \<in> Pow(y). z \<lesssim> n} \<union> {z \<in> Pow(y). z \<approx> succ(n)}"
by (blast intro: leI le_imp_lepoll nat_into_Ord
lepoll_trans eqpoll_imp_lepoll
dest!: lepoll_succ_disj)
lemma Int_empty:
"n \ nat ==> {z \ Pow(y). z \ n} \ {z \ Pow(y). z \ succ(n)} = 0"
by (blast intro: eqpoll_sym [THEN eqpoll_imp_lepoll, THEN lepoll_trans]
succ_lepoll_natE)
locale AC16 =
fixes x and y and k and l and m and t_n and R and MM and LL and GG and s
defines k_def: "k == succ(l)"
and MM_def: "MM == {v \ t_n. succ(k) \ v \ y}"
and LL_def: "LL == {v \ y. v \ MM}"
and GG_def: "GG == \v \ LL. (THE w. w \ MM & v \ w) - v"
and s_def: "s(u) == {v \ t_n. u \ v & k \ v \ y}"
assumes all_ex: "\z \ {z \ Pow(x \ y) . z \ succ(k)}.
\<exists>! w. w \<in> t_n & z \<subseteq> w "
and disjoint[iff]: "x \ y = 0"
and "includes": "t_n \ {v \ Pow(x \ y). v \ succ(k #+ m)}"
and WO_R[iff]: "well_ord(y,R)"
and lnat[iff]: "l \ nat"
and mnat[iff]: "m \ nat"
and mpos[iff]: "0
and Infinite[iff]: "~ Finite(y)"
and noLepoll: "~ y \ {v \ Pow(x). v \ m}"
begin
lemma knat [iff]: "k \ nat"
by (simp add: k_def)
(* ********************************************************************** *)
(* 1. y is less than or equipollent to {v \<in> s(u). a \<subseteq> v} *)
(* where a is certain k-2 element subset of y *)
(* ********************************************************************** *)
lemma Diff_Finite_eqpoll: "[| l \ a; a \ y |] ==> y - a \ y"
apply (insert WO_R Infinite lnat)
apply (rule eqpoll_trans)
apply (rule Diff_lesspoll_eqpoll_Card)
apply (erule well_ord_cardinal_eqpoll [THEN eqpoll_sym])
apply (blast intro: lesspoll_trans1
intro!: Card_cardinal
Card_cardinal [THEN Card_is_Ord, THEN nat_le_infinite_Ord,
THEN le_imp_lepoll]
dest: well_ord_cardinal_eqpoll
eqpoll_sym eqpoll_imp_lepoll
n_lesspoll_nat [THEN lesspoll_trans2]
well_ord_cardinal_eqpoll [THEN eqpoll_sym,
THEN eqpoll_imp_lepoll, THEN lepoll_infinite])+
done
lemma s_subset: "s(u) \ t_n"
by (unfold s_def, blast)
lemma sI:
"[| w \ t_n; cons(b,cons(u,a)) \ w; a \ y; b \ y-a; l \ a |]
==> w \<in> s(u)"
apply (unfold s_def succ_def k_def)
apply (blast intro!: eqpoll_imp_lepoll [THEN cons_lepoll_cong]
intro: subset_imp_lepoll lepoll_trans)
done
lemma in_s_imp_u_in: "v \ s(u) ==> u \ v"
by (unfold s_def, blast)
lemma ex1_superset_a:
"[| l \ a; a \ y; b \ y - a; u \ x |]
==> \<exists>! c. c \<in> s(u) & a \<subseteq> c & b \<in> c"
apply (rule all_ex [simplified k_def, THEN ballE])
apply (erule ex1E)
apply (rule_tac a = w in ex1I, blast intro: sI)
apply (blast dest: s_subset [THEN subsetD] in_s_imp_u_in)
apply (blast del: PowI
intro!: cons_cons_subset eqpoll_sym [THEN cons_cons_eqpoll])
done
lemma the_eq_cons:
"[| \v \ s(u). succ(l) \ v \ y;
l \<approx> a; a \<subseteq> y; b \<in> y - a; u \<in> x |]
==> (THE c. c \<in> s(u) & a \<subseteq> c & b \<in> c) \<inter> y = cons(b, a)"
apply (frule ex1_superset_a [THEN theI], assumption+)
apply (rule set_eq_cons)
apply (fast+)
done
lemma y_lepoll_subset_s:
"[| \v \ s(u). succ(l) \ v \ y;
l \<approx> a; a \<subseteq> y; u \<in> x |]
==> y \<lesssim> {v \<in> s(u). a \<subseteq> v}"
apply (rule Diff_Finite_eqpoll [THEN eqpoll_sym, THEN eqpoll_imp_lepoll,
THEN lepoll_trans], fast+)
apply (rule_tac f3 = "\b \ y-a. THE c. c \ s (u) & a \ c & b \ c"
in exI [THEN lepoll_def [THEN def_imp_iff, THEN iffD2]])
apply (simp add: inj_def)
apply (rule conjI)
apply (rule lam_type)
apply (frule ex1_superset_a [THEN theI], fast+, clarify)
apply (rule cons_eqE [of _ a])
apply (drule_tac A = "THE c. P (c)" and C = y for P in eq_imp_Int_eq)
apply (simp_all add: the_eq_cons)
done
(* ********************************************************************** *)
(* back to the second part *)
(* ********************************************************************** *)
(*relies on the disjointness of x, y*)
lemma x_imp_not_y [dest]: "a \ x ==> a \ y"
by (blast dest: disjoint [THEN equalityD1, THEN subsetD, OF IntI])
lemma w_Int_eq_w_Diff:
"w \ x \ y ==> w \ (x - {u}) = w - cons(u, w \ y)"
by blast
lemma w_Int_eqpoll_m:
"[| w \ {v \ s(u). a \ v};
l \<approx> a; u \<in> x;
\<forall>v \<in> s(u). succ(l) \<approx> v \<inter> y |]
==> w \<inter> (x - {u}) \<approx> m"
apply (erule CollectE)
apply (subst w_Int_eq_w_Diff)
apply (fast dest!: s_subset [THEN subsetD]
"includes" [simplified k_def, THEN subsetD])
apply (blast dest: s_subset [THEN subsetD]
"includes" [simplified k_def, THEN subsetD]
dest: eqpoll_sym [THEN cons_eqpoll_succ, THEN eqpoll_sym]
in_s_imp_u_in
intro!: eqpoll_sum_imp_Diff_eqpoll)
done
(* ********************************************************************** *)
(* 2. {v \<in> s(u). a \<subseteq> v} is less than or equipollent *)
(* to {v \<in> Pow(x). v \<approx> n-k} *)
(* ********************************************************************** *)
lemma eqpoll_m_not_empty: "a \ m ==> a \ 0"
apply (insert mpos)
apply (fast elim!: zero_lt_natE dest!: eqpoll_succ_imp_not_empty)
done
lemma cons_cons_in:
"[| z \ xa \ (x - {u}); l \ a; a \ y; u \ x |]
==> \<exists>! w. w \<in> t_n & cons(z, cons(u, a)) \<subseteq> w"
apply (rule all_ex [THEN bspec])
apply (unfold k_def)
apply (fast intro!: cons_eqpoll_succ elim: eqpoll_sym)
done
lemma subset_s_lepoll_w:
"[| \v \ s(u). succ(l) \ v \ y; a \ y; l \ a; u \ x |]
==> {v \<in> s(u). a \<subseteq> v} \<lesssim> {v \<in> Pow(x). v \<approx> m}"
apply (rule_tac f3 = "\w \ {v \ s (u) . a \ v}. w \ (x - {u})"
in exI [THEN lepoll_def [THEN def_imp_iff, THEN iffD2]])
apply (simp add: inj_def)
apply (intro conjI lam_type CollectI)
apply fast
apply (blast intro: w_Int_eqpoll_m)
apply (intro ballI impI)
(** LEVEL 8 **)
apply (rule w_Int_eqpoll_m [THEN eqpoll_m_not_empty, THEN not_emptyE])
apply (blast, assumption+)
apply (drule equalityD1 [THEN subsetD], assumption)
apply (frule cons_cons_in, assumption+)
apply (blast dest: ex1_two_eq intro: s_subset [THEN subsetD] in_s_imp_u_in)+
done
(* ********************************************************************** *)
(* well_ord_subsets_lepoll_n *)
(* ********************************************************************** *)
lemma well_ord_subsets_eqpoll_n:
"n \ nat ==> \S. well_ord({z \ Pow(y) . z \ succ(n)}, S)"
apply (rule WO_R [THEN well_ord_infinite_subsets_eqpoll_X,
THEN eqpoll_def [THEN def_imp_iff, THEN iffD1], THEN exE])
apply (fast intro: bij_is_inj [THEN well_ord_rvimage])+
done
lemma well_ord_subsets_lepoll_n:
"n \ nat ==> \R. well_ord({z \ Pow(y). z \ n}, R)"
apply (induct_tac "n")
apply (force intro!: well_ord_unit simp add: subsets_lepoll_0_eq_unit)
apply (erule exE)
apply (rule well_ord_subsets_eqpoll_n [THEN exE], assumption)
apply (simp add: subsets_lepoll_succ)
apply (drule well_ord_radd, assumption)
apply (erule Int_empty [THEN disj_Un_eqpoll_sum,
THEN eqpoll_def [THEN def_imp_iff, THEN iffD1], THEN exE])
apply (fast elim!: bij_is_inj [THEN well_ord_rvimage])
done
lemma LL_subset: "LL \ {z \ Pow(y). z \ succ(k #+ m)}"
apply (unfold LL_def MM_def)
apply (insert "includes")
apply (blast intro: subset_imp_lepoll eqpoll_imp_lepoll lepoll_trans)
done
lemma well_ord_LL: "\S. well_ord(LL,S)"
apply (rule well_ord_subsets_lepoll_n [THEN exE, of "succ(k#+m)"])
apply simp
apply (blast intro: well_ord_subset [OF _ LL_subset])
done
(* ********************************************************************** *)
(* every element of LL is a contained in exactly one element of MM *)
(* ********************************************************************** *)
lemma unique_superset_in_MM:
"v \ LL ==> \! w. w \ MM & v \ w"
apply (unfold MM_def LL_def, safe, fast)
apply (rule lepoll_imp_eqpoll_subset [THEN exE], assumption)
apply (rule_tac x = x in all_ex [THEN ballE])
apply (blast intro: eqpoll_sym)+
done
(* ********************************************************************** *)
(* The function GG satisfies the conditions of WO4 *)
(* ********************************************************************** *)
(* ********************************************************************** *)
(* The union of appropriate values is the whole x *)
(* ********************************************************************** *)
lemma Int_in_LL: "w \ MM ==> w \ y \ LL"
by (unfold LL_def, fast)
lemma in_LL_eq_Int:
"v \ LL ==> v = (THE x. x \ MM & v \ x) \ y"
apply (unfold LL_def, clarify)
apply (subst unique_superset_in_MM [THEN the_equality2])
apply (auto simp add: Int_in_LL)
done
lemma unique_superset1: "a \ LL \ (THE x. x \ MM \ a \ x) \ MM"
by (erule unique_superset_in_MM [THEN theI, THEN conjunct1])
lemma the_in_MM_subset:
"v \ LL ==> (THE x. x \ MM & v \ x) \ x \ y"
apply (drule unique_superset1)
apply (unfold MM_def)
apply (fast dest!: unique_superset1 "includes" [THEN subsetD])
done
lemma GG_subset: "v \ LL ==> GG ` v \ x"
apply (unfold GG_def)
apply (frule the_in_MM_subset)
apply (frule in_LL_eq_Int)
apply (force elim: equalityE)
done
lemma nat_lepoll_ordertype: "nat \ ordertype(y, R)"
apply (rule nat_le_infinite_Ord [THEN le_imp_lepoll])
apply (rule Ord_ordertype [OF WO_R])
apply (rule ordertype_eqpoll [THEN eqpoll_imp_lepoll, THEN lepoll_infinite])
apply (rule WO_R)
apply (rule Infinite)
done
lemma ex_subset_eqpoll_n: "n \ nat ==> \z. z \ y & n \ z"
apply (erule nat_lepoll_imp_ex_eqpoll_n)
apply (rule lepoll_trans [OF nat_lepoll_ordertype])
apply (rule ordertype_eqpoll [THEN eqpoll_sym, THEN eqpoll_imp_lepoll])
apply (rule WO_R)
done
lemma exists_proper_in_s: "u \ x ==> \v \ s(u). succ(k) \ v \ y"
apply (rule ccontr)
apply (subgoal_tac "\v \ s (u) . k \ v \ y")
prefer 2 apply (simp add: s_def, blast intro: succ_not_lepoll_imp_eqpoll)
apply (unfold k_def)
apply (insert all_ex "includes" lnat)
apply (rule ex_subset_eqpoll_n [THEN exE], assumption)
apply (rule noLepoll [THEN notE])
apply (blast intro: lepoll_trans [OF y_lepoll_subset_s subset_s_lepoll_w])
done
lemma exists_in_MM: "u \ x ==> \w \ MM. u \ w"
apply (erule exists_proper_in_s [THEN bexE])
apply (unfold MM_def s_def, fast)
done
lemma exists_in_LL: "u \ x ==> \w \ LL. u \ GG`w"
apply (rule exists_in_MM [THEN bexE], assumption)
apply (rule bexI)
apply (erule_tac [2] Int_in_LL)
apply (unfold GG_def)
apply (simp add: Int_in_LL)
apply (subst unique_superset_in_MM [THEN the_equality2])
apply (fast elim!: Int_in_LL)+
done
lemma OUN_eq_x: "well_ord(LL,S) ==>
(\<Union>b<ordertype(LL,S). GG ` (converse(ordermap(LL,S)) ` b)) = x"
apply (rule equalityI)
apply (rule subsetI)
apply (erule OUN_E)
apply (rule GG_subset [THEN subsetD])
prefer 2 apply assumption
apply (blast intro: ltD ordermap_bij [THEN bij_converse_bij, THEN bij_is_fun,
THEN apply_type])
apply (rule subsetI)
apply (erule exists_in_LL [THEN bexE])
apply (force intro: ltI [OF _ Ord_ordertype]
ordermap_type [THEN apply_type]
simp add: ordermap_bij [THEN bij_is_inj, THEN left_inverse])
done
(* ********************************************************************** *)
(* Every element of the family is less than or equipollent to n-k (m) *)
(* ********************************************************************** *)
lemma in_MM_eqpoll_n: "w \ MM ==> w \ succ(k #+ m)"
apply (unfold MM_def)
apply (fast dest: "includes" [THEN subsetD])
done
lemma in_LL_eqpoll_n: "w \ LL ==> succ(k) \ w"
by (unfold LL_def MM_def, fast)
lemma in_LL: "w \ LL ==> w \ (THE x. x \ MM \ w \ x)"
by (erule subset_trans [OF in_LL_eq_Int [THEN equalityD1] Int_lower1])
lemma all_in_lepoll_m:
"well_ord(LL,S) ==>
\<forall>b<ordertype(LL,S). GG ` (converse(ordermap(LL,S)) ` b) \<lesssim> m"
apply (unfold GG_def)
apply (rule oallI)
apply (simp add: ltD ordermap_bij [THEN bij_converse_bij, THEN bij_is_fun, THEN apply_type])
apply (insert "includes")
apply (rule eqpoll_sum_imp_Diff_lepoll)
apply (blast del: subsetI
dest!: ltD
intro!: eqpoll_sum_imp_Diff_lepoll in_LL_eqpoll_n
intro: in_LL unique_superset1 [THEN in_MM_eqpoll_n]
ordermap_bij [THEN bij_converse_bij, THEN bij_is_fun,
THEN apply_type])+
done
lemma "conclusion":
"\a f. Ord(a) & domain(f) = a & (\bb m)"
apply (rule well_ord_LL [THEN exE])
apply (rename_tac S)
apply (rule_tac x = "ordertype (LL,S)" in exI)
apply (rule_tac x = "\b \ ordertype(LL,S).
GG ` (converse (ordermap (LL,S)) ` b)" in exI)
apply (simp add: ltD)
apply (blast intro: lam_funtype [THEN domain_of_fun]
Ord_ordertype OUN_eq_x all_in_lepoll_m [THEN ospec])
done
end
(* ********************************************************************** *)
(* The main theorem AC16(n, k) ==> WO4(n-k) *)
(* ********************************************************************** *)
theorem AC16_WO4:
"[| AC_Equiv.AC16(k #+ m, k); 0 < k; 0 < m; k \ nat; m \ nat |] ==> WO4(m)"
apply (unfold AC_Equiv.AC16_def WO4_def)
apply (rule allI)
apply (case_tac "Finite (A)")
apply (rule lemma1, assumption+)
apply (cut_tac lemma2)
apply (elim exE conjE)
apply (erule_tac x = "A \ y" in allE)
apply (frule infinite_Un, drule mp, assumption)
apply (erule zero_lt_natE, assumption, clarify)
apply (blast intro: AC16.conclusion [OF AC16.intro])
done
end
¤ Dauer der Verarbeitung: 0.19 Sekunden
(vorverarbeitet)
¤
|
Haftungshinweis
Die Informationen auf dieser Webseite wurden
nach bestem Wissen sorgfältig zusammengestellt. Es wird jedoch weder Vollständigkeit, noch Richtigkeit,
noch Qualität der bereit gestellten Informationen zugesichert.
Bemerkung:
Die farbliche Syntaxdarstellung ist noch experimentell.
|
